| | WNBA : Money Line Matchup |
| |
WASHINGTON ATLANTA |
|
| 152.5 | 67 Final 73 |
|
|
| | |
|
| | | |
651 | WASHINGTON | +135 | 652 | ATLANTA | -155 |
|
|
| | |
|
| | | | One of the growing resources utilized by sports handicappers is the public betting information offered by a variety of sources. Leading the way in this is Sportsbook.com, who offers the data at its website in real-time. |
|
| | |
|
- Underdogs vs the money line (WASHINGTON) - after failing to cover 2 of their last 3 against the spread, with a winning record on the season. (315-127 since 1997.) (71.3%, +87.4 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home favorites vs. the money line (ATLANTA) - off a loss against a division rival, in August or September games. (260-94 since 1997.) (73.4%, +75.4 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (ATLANTA) - after having lost 2 of their last 3 games, with a winning percentage of between 40-49% after 15 or more games. (244-199 since 1997.) (55.1%, +64.8 units. Rating = 2*) | - Favorites vs. the money line (ATLANTA) - after having lost 2 of their last 3 games, with a winning percentage of between 40-49% after 15 or more games. (149-49 since 1997.) (75.3%, +57.7 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home favorites vs. the money line (ATLANTA) - after having lost 2 of their last 3 games, with a winning percentage of between 40-49% after 15 or more games. (134-42 since 1997.) (76.1%, +53.8 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (ATLANTA) - with a losing record after 15 or more games, on Sunday games. (125-72 since 1997.) (63.5%, +46.5 units. Rating = 2*) | - Favorites vs. the money line (ATLANTA) - in a game involving two average shooting teams (40.5-43.5%), average ball handling team (14.5-17.5 TO) vs. a poor pressure defense (<=14.5 TO) after 15+ games. (83-25 since 1997.) (76.9%, +39.6 units. Rating = 2*) | - Favorites vs. the money line (ATLANTA) - in a game involving two average shooting teams (40.5-43.5%) after 15+ games, average ball handling team (14.5-17.5 TO's) against a poor pressure defensive team (<=14.5 TO's). (83-25 since 1997.) (76.9%, +39.6 units. Rating = 2*) | - Favorites vs. the money line (ATLANTA) - in a game involving two average shooting teams (40.5-43.5%) after 15+ games, average ball handling team (14.5-17.5 TO) vs. a poor pressure defense (<=14.5 TO) after 15+ games. (83-25 since 1997.) (76.9%, +39.6 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (ATLANTA) - average shooting team (40.5-43.5%) against an average defensive team (40.5-43.5%), in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game). (107-62 since 1997.) (63.3%, +36.6 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (ATLANTA) - an excellent offensive team (>=76 PPG) against an average defensive team (65-72 PPG), after scoring 70 points or more in 5 straight games. (85-54 since 1997.) (61.2%, +31.8 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (ATLANTA) - a bad team, winning 25% to 40% of their games after 15 or more games, on Sunday games. (56-28 since 1997.) (66.7%, +31.6 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (WASHINGTON) - after having lost 3 of their last 4 games, tired team - playing their 3rd game in 5 days. (42-17 since 1997.) (71.2%, +23.4 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (WASHINGTON) - after allowing 90 points or more against opponent after scoring 75 points or more in 3 straight games. (40-15 over the last 5 seasons.) (72.7%, +26.9 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (WASHINGTON) - good free throw shooting team - making >=76% of their free throws, in August or September games. (39-16 over the last 5 seasons.) (70.9%, +22.9 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (WASHINGTON) - in a game involving two average shooting teams (40.5-43.5%) after 15+ games, after 2 straight games - allowing a shooting pct. of 50% or higher. (23-8 since 1997.) (74.2%, +16.9 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (WASHINGTON) - after a loss by 6 points or less against opponent after scoring 75 points or more in 3 straight games. (50-29 over the last 5 seasons.) (63.3%, +12.8 units. Rating = 0*) | - Any team vs the money line (ATLANTA) - after scoring 75 points or more in 3 straight games against opponent after a combined score of 175 points or more. (34-15 over the last 5 seasons.) (69.4%, +23.1 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (WASHINGTON) - after allowing 80 points or more against opponent after scoring 75 points or more in 3 straight games. (108-61 over the last 5 seasons.) (63.9%, +21.6 units. Rating = 0*) | - Any team vs the money line (WASHINGTON) - after allowing 90 points or more against opponent after 3 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more. (30-13 over the last 5 seasons.) (69.8%, +21.4 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (WASHINGTON) - off a road cover where the team lost straight up as an underdog, playing with 2 days rest. (25-10 over the last 5 seasons.) (71.4%, +19.1 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (ATLANTA) - after scoring 75 points or more in 3 straight games against opponent after a combined score of 165 points or more. (68-41 over the last 5 seasons.) (62.4%, +22.3 units. Rating = 1*) | - Any team vs the money line (ATLANTA) - an explosive offensive team (>=76 PPG) against a good offensive team (72-76 PPG), after allowing 40 points or more in the first half in 2 straight games. (32-14 over the last 5 seasons.) (69.6%, +16.5 units. Rating = 1*) | - Any team vs the money line (WASHINGTON) - after allowing 80 points or more against opponent after 3 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more. (78-45 over the last 5 seasons.) (63.4%, +29.8 units. Rating = 2*) |
|
|
- Home teams vs. the money line (ATLANTA) - terrible defensive team - allowing 77+ points/game on the season, after a combined score of 155 points or more. (278-267 since 1997.) (51%, +85.6 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (ATLANTA) - terrible defensive team - allowing 77+ points/game on the season, after allowing 80 points or more. (118-101 over the last 5 seasons.) (53.9%, +41.1 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (ATLANTA) - poor team - outscored by their opponents by 3+ points/game, after a combined score of 155 points or more. (181-117 since 1997.) (60.7%, +47.2 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (WASHINGTON) - after allowing 70 points or more in 2 straight games against opponent after a combined score of 155 points or more in 2 straight games. (57-51 over the last 5 seasons.) (52.8%, +31.4 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (ATLANTA) - after allowing 75 points or more against opponent after scoring 90 points or more. (116-90 since 1997.) (56.3%, +44 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (WASHINGTON) - after scoring 90 points or more against opponent after a combined score of 155 points or more. (98-81 since 1997.) (54.7%, +43.2 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (ATLANTA) - in a game involving 2 up-tempo teams (>=62 shots/game), average ball handling team (14.5-17.5 TO's) against a good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO's). (72-50 over the last 5 seasons.) (59%, +34.8 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (WASHINGTON) - revenging a same season loss versus opponent against opponent off a cover where the team lost the game straight up as an underdog. (26-9 over the last 5 seasons.) (74.3%, +25.7 units. Rating = 4*) | - Any team vs the money line (ATLANTA) - after going over the total by 30 or more points total in their last five games, a bad team, winning 25% to 40% of their games after 15 or more games. (96-44 since 1997.) (68.6%, +36.8 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (ATLANTA) - after a road game where both teams score 75 or more points, with a winning percentage of between 40-49% after 15 or more games. (85-47 since 1997.) (64.4%, +36.3 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (ATLANTA) - after allowing 75 points or more in 2 straight games against opponent after scoring 90 points or more. (65-46 since 1997.) (58.6%, +34.8 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (ATLANTA) - after allowing 75 points or more in 2 straight games against opponent after a combined score of 155 points or more. (100-74 over the last 5 seasons.) (57.5%, +44.9 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (ATLANTA) - after beating the spread by 30 or more points total in their last five games, a bad team, winning 25% to 40% of their games on the season. (53-20 since 1997.) (72.6%, +33 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (ATLANTA) - after beating the spread by 30 or more points total in their last five games, a bad team, winning 25% to 40% of their games after 15 or more games. (43-15 since 1997.) (74.1%, +32.9 units. Rating = 4*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (ATLANTA) - after allowing 80 points or more against opponent after scoring 90 points or more. (42-23 over the last 5 seasons.) (64.6%, +22.5 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (WASHINGTON) - after scoring 90 points or more against opponent after a combined score of 155 points or more in 2 straight games. (54-40 since 1997.) (57.4%, +32.4 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (ATLANTA) - poor defensive team - allowing 73+ points/game on the season, after 2 straight losses by 6 points or less. (76-48 since 1997.) (61.3%, +30 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (ATLANTA) - poor team - outscored by their opponents by 3+ points/game, after a game where both teams scored 75 points or more. (132-92 since 1997.) (58.9%, +29.9 units. Rating = 1*) | - Any team vs the money line (ATLANTA) - in a game involving 2 up-tempo teams (>=62 shots/game), average ball handling team (14.5-17.5 TO's) against a good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO's). (163-88 over the last 5 seasons.) (64.9%, +62 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (WASHINGTON) - average defensive team (65-72 PPG) against a horrible defensive team (>=76 PPG), after allowing 75 points or more. (74-34 since 1997.) (68.5%, +29.1 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (ATLANTA) - after 2 straight losses by 6 points or less. (35-17 over the last 5 seasons.) (67.3%, +24.3 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (WASHINGTON) - average defensive team (65-72 PPG) against a horrible defensive team (>=76 PPG), after allowing 70 points or more in 2 straight games. (61-28 since 1997.) (68.5%, +28 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (ATLANTA) - after a game where both teams scored 75 points or more against opponent after a combined score of 155 points or more. (94-87 over the last 5 seasons.) (51.9%, +27.6 units. Rating = 1*) | - Road teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (WASHINGTON) - after allowing 70 points or more in 2 straight games against opponent after 2 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more. (24-8 over the last 5 seasons.) (75%, +17.1 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (ATLANTA) - after going over the total by 30 or more points total in their last five games, a bad team, winning 25% to 40% of their games after 15 or more games. (45-24 since 1997.) (65.2%, +23.1 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (ATLANTA) - after allowing 80 points or more against opponent after a combined score of 155 points or more. (115-98 over the last 5 seasons.) (54%, +36.5 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (WASHINGTON) - after allowing 70 points or more in 2 straight games against opponent after a game where both teams scored 75 points or more. (26-12 over the last 5 seasons.) (68.4%, +14.4 units. Rating = 1*) | - Any team vs the money line (WASHINGTON) - revenging a loss versus opponent against opponent off a cover where the team lost the game straight up as an underdog. (34-15 over the last 5 seasons.) (69.4%, +20 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (ATLANTA) - good offensive team - scoring 73+ points/game on the season, after 2 straight losses by 6 points or less. (24-13 over the last 5 seasons.) (64.9%, +18.5 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (ATLANTA) - in a game involving 2 up-tempo teams (>=62 shots/game), average ball handling team (14.5-17.5 TO) vs. a good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO) after 15+ games. (111-58 over the last 5 seasons.) (65.7%, +45.8 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (ATLANTA) - in a game involving 2 up-tempo teams (>=62 shots/game) after 15+ games, average ball handling team (14.5-17.5 TO's) against a good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO's). (111-58 over the last 5 seasons.) (65.7%, +45.8 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (ATLANTA) - in a game involving 2 up-tempo teams (>=62 shots/game) after 15+ games, average ball handling team (14.5-17.5 TO) vs. a good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO) after 15+ games. (111-58 over the last 5 seasons.) (65.7%, +45.8 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (ATLANTA) - after having covered 5 or 6 of their last 7 against the spread, with a losing record after 15 or more games. (52-20 over the last 5 seasons.) (72.2%, +30 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (ATLANTA) - after allowing 75 points or more in 3 straight games against opponent after a combined score of 155 points or more. (59-39 over the last 5 seasons.) (60.2%, +32.8 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams with a money line of +135 to -155 (ATLANTA) - after a game where both teams scored 75 points or more against opponent after a combined score of 155 points or more. (29-16 over the last 5 seasons.) (64.4%, +12.8 units. Rating = 0*) | - Any team vs the money line (WASHINGTON) - good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO's) against an average pressure defensive team (14.5-17.5 TO's). (225-177 over the last 5 seasons.) (56%, +44.9 units. Rating = 1*) | - Any team vs the money line (WASHINGTON) - in a game involving 2 up-tempo teams (>=62 shots/game), good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO's) against an average pressure defensive team (14.5-17.5 TO's). (210-156 over the last 5 seasons.) (57.4%, +46.9 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (WASHINGTON) - after being beaten by the spread by 18 or more points total in their last three games, winning between 51% and 60% of their games on the season. (31-14 over the last 5 seasons.) (68.9%, +24.1 units. Rating = 3*) |
|
| | |
|
WASHINGTON | 76 | | 27-63 | 42.9% | 6-17 | 36.1% | 16-20 | 79.2% | 40 | 9 | 14 | ATLANTA | 77 | | 28-68 | 41.7% | 5-15 | 31.3% | 15-20 | 77.8% | 45 | 13 | 14 |
| The number of simulations in which each team won the game straight up are listed below. If one time held a significant advantage against the money line, the edge is indicated. | In 1000 simulated games, ATLANTA won the game straight up 497 times, while WASHINGTON won 474 times. Edge against the money line=WASHINGTON |
|
|
| Potential StatFox Money Line Power Trends to watch out for:
| |
WASHINGTON is 7-3 against the money line (+8.5 Units) when they make 36% to 42% of their three point attempts in a game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was WASHINGTON 76.4, OPPONENT 73.3 | WASHINGTON is 16-9 against the money line (+11.0 Units) when they attempt 17 to 22 free throws in a game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was WASHINGTON 76.0, OPPONENT 70.9 | WASHINGTON is 16-8 against the money line (+11.8 Units) when they make 77% to 82% of their free throws in a game over the last 3 seasons. The average score was WASHINGTON 74.0, OPPONENT 70.0 | ATLANTA is 8-16 against the money line (-18.9 Units) in up-tempo games where they attempt 84 or more shots this season. The average score was ATLANTA 77.5, OPPONENT 81.4 | ATLANTA is 4-9 against the money line (-10.5 Units) when they make 40% to 44% of their shots in a game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was ATLANTA 77.6, OPPONENT 81.6 | ATLANTA is 2-7 against the money line (-16.0 Units) when they attempt 17 to 22 free throws in a game this season. The average score was ATLANTA 76.4, OPPONENT 81.8 | ATLANTA is 3-6 against the money line (-12.7 Units) when they grab 13 or more offensive rebounds in a game this season. The average score was ATLANTA 76.6, OPPONENT 79.1 | ATLANTA is 56-65 against the money line (-30.8 Units) when they commit around the same number of turnovers as opponents since 1997. The average score was ATLANTA 79.3, OPPONENT 80.4 | ATLANTA is 22-23 against the money line (-14.6 Units) where both teams score 71 or more points in a game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was ATLANTA 83.7, OPPONENT 83.6 | ATLANTA is 7-13 against the money line (-20.1 Units) when they score 72 to 77 points in a game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was ATLANTA 74.8, OPPONENT 78.7 |
|
WASHINGTON is 72-105 against the money line (-43.4 Units) when they make 40% to 44% of their shots in a game since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 71.1, OPPONENT 73.2 | WASHINGTON is 6-11 against the money line (-10.6 Units) when their opponents make 40% to 44% of their shots in a game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was WASHINGTON 74.1, OPPONENT 75.1 | WASHINGTON is 124-195 against the money line (-73.2 Units) when they grab 8 to 12 offensive rebounds in a game since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 70.7, OPPONENT 74.1 | WASHINGTON is 8-16 against the money line (-11.9 Units) when they allow 72 to 77 points in a game over the last 3 seasons. The average score was WASHINGTON 70.8, OPPONENT 74.3 | WASHINGTON is 134-192 against the money line (-59.8 Units) in games where they force 13 to 18 turnovers since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 70.7, OPPONENT 73.4 | WASHINGTON is 33-98 against the money line (-75.3 Units) when they grab 4 to 9 fewer rebounds than their opponents in a game since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 68.7, OPPONENT 74.8 | WASHINGTON is 2-7 against the money line (-9.8 Units) in games where they commit 13 to 18 turnovers this season. The average score was WASHINGTON 66.3, OPPONENT 70.0 |
|
| | |
|
ATLANTA is 32-27 against the money line (-25.7 Units) in home games versus good 3 point shooting teams - making >=33% of their attempts after 15+ games since 1997. The average score was ATLANTA 82.4, OPPONENT 79.3 - (Rating = 0*) | ATLANTA is 14-20 against the money line (-15.2 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was ATLANTA 81.6, OPPONENT 82.3 - (Rating = 1*) | ATLANTA is 24-27 against the money line (-16.4 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was ATLANTA 80.9, OPPONENT 80.5 - (Rating = 0*) | ATLANTA is 9-18 against the money line (-13.1 Units) vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was ATLANTA 81.6, OPPONENT 84.1 - (Rating = 1*) | ATLANTA is 29-37 against the money line (-19.3 Units) vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts over the last 3 seasons. The average score was ATLANTA 78.0, OPPONENT 79.4 - (Rating = 0*) | ATLANTA is 9-19 against the money line (-21.2 Units) versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was ATLANTA 80.2, OPPONENT 82.6 - (Rating = 4*) | ATLANTA is 19-24 against the money line (-19.8 Units) versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was ATLANTA 79.4, OPPONENT 79.5 - (Rating = 2*) | ATLANTA is 14-21 against the money line (-15.5 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was ATLANTA 81.3, OPPONENT 82.7 - (Rating = 1*) | ATLANTA is 25-28 against the money line (-15.7 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was ATLANTA 80.7, OPPONENT 80.5 - (Rating = 0*) | ATLANTA is 7-18 against the money line (-20.4 Units) versus poor pressure defensive teams - forcing <=14 turnovers/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was ATLANTA 80.8, OPPONENT 83.5 - (Rating = 4*) | ATLANTA is 4-12 against the money line (-9.9 Units) versus poor pressure defensive teams - forcing <=14 turnovers/game this season. The average score was ATLANTA 78.1, OPPONENT 83.1 - (Rating = 2*) | ATLANTA is 13-19 against the money line (-15.2 Units) versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was ATLANTA 81.4, OPPONENT 82.0 - (Rating = 1*) | ATLANTA is 19-23 against the money line (-15.0 Units) versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was ATLANTA 81.4, OPPONENT 81.0 - (Rating = 0*) | ATLANTA is 4-8 against the money line (-10.0 Units) versus teams who average 7 or less steals/game on the season after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was ATLANTA 80.8, OPPONENT 83.7 - (Rating = 1*) | ATLANTA is 14-16 against the money line (-14.9 Units) versus teams who average 7 or less steals/game on the season over the last 3 seasons. The average score was ATLANTA 78.8, OPPONENT 77.9 - (Rating = 0*) | ATLANTA is 19-27 against the money line (-14.9 Units) versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game after 15+ games over the last 3 seasons. The average score was ATLANTA 79.7, OPPONENT 81.9 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
|
WASHINGTON is 120-144 against the money line (-57.5 Units) when playing against a team with a losing record since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 71.0, OPPONENT 71.8 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 64-83 against the money line (-42.4 Units) when playing against a team with a losing record after 15+ games after 15+ games since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 70.6, OPPONENT 72.1 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 37-65 against the money line (-32.9 Units) when playing against a marginal losing team (Win Pct. 40% to 49%) since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 69.1, OPPONENT 72.2 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 24-49 against the money line (-32.0 Units) when playing against a marginal losing team (Win Pct. 40% to 49%) after 15+ games since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 68.8, OPPONENT 72.3 - (Rating = 2*) | WASHINGTON is 121-200 against the money line (-84.8 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game after 15+ games since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 69.5, OPPONENT 73.4 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 188-287 against the money line (-98.8 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 70.2, OPPONENT 73.3 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 26-43 against the money line (-24.9 Units) versus foul prone teams - called for 21 or more fouls/game after 15+ games since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 69.4, OPPONENT 74.6 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 70-109 against the money line (-50.2 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game after 15+ games since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 72.9, OPPONENT 76.4 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 3-9 against the money line (-7.9 Units) in road games versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game this season. The average score was WASHINGTON 71.3, OPPONENT 75.5 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 64-111 against the money line (-42.2 Units) versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game after 15+ games since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 72.8, OPPONENT 77.2 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
| | |
|
WASHINGTON is 10-4 against the money line (+6.0 Units) revenging a loss versus opponent this season. The average score was WASHINGTON 76.9, OPPONENT 68.2 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 19-16 against the money line (+11.5 Units) double revenge - 2 straight losses vs. opponent over the last 3 seasons. The average score was WASHINGTON 74.8, OPPONENT 74.4 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 6-1 against the money line (+8.5 Units) in road games after a combined score of 165 points or more over the last 2 seasons. The average score was WASHINGTON 79.1, OPPONENT 72.6 - (Rating = 2*) | ATLANTA is 12-17 against the money line (-12.9 Units) in all games this season. The average score was ATLANTA 78.1, OPPONENT 81.3 - (Rating = 1*) | ATLANTA is 5-7 against the money line (-15.2 Units) as a favorite this season. The average score was ATLANTA 75.4, OPPONENT 77.7 - (Rating = 3*) | ATLANTA is 15-10 against the money line (-18.6 Units) as a home favorite over the last 2 seasons. The average score was ATLANTA 79.5, OPPONENT 74.9 - (Rating = 0*) | ATLANTA is 83-63 against the money line (-44.5 Units) in home games since 1997. The average score was ATLANTA 81.1, OPPONENT 77.9 - (Rating = 1*) | ATLANTA is 83-63 against the money line (-44.5 Units) in a home game where where the total is greater than or equal to 140 since 1997. The average score was ATLANTA 81.1, OPPONENT 77.9 - (Rating = 1*) | ATLANTA is 4-6 against the money line (-11.3 Units) in a home game where where the total is greater than or equal to 150 this season. The average score was ATLANTA 77.7, OPPONENT 77.9 - (Rating = 1*) | ATLANTA is 18-27 against the money line (-22.1 Units) in August or September games over the last 3 seasons. The average score was ATLANTA 77.6, OPPONENT 78.4 - (Rating = 2*) | ATLANTA is 9-11 against the money line (-17.7 Units) on Sunday games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was ATLANTA 76.7, OPPONENT 78.7 - (Rating = 2*) | ATLANTA is 8-11 against the money line (-10.8 Units) vs. division opponents this season. The average score was ATLANTA 78.9, OPPONENT 81.6 - (Rating = 1*) | ATLANTA is 11-15 against the money line (-14.3 Units) after a game where a team made 80% of their free throws or better over the last 2 seasons. The average score was ATLANTA 81.6, OPPONENT 81.1 - (Rating = 1*) | ATLANTA is 24-26 against the money line (-17.4 Units) after 1 or more consecutive unders over the last 3 seasons. The average score was ATLANTA 77.1, OPPONENT 78.2 - (Rating = 0*) | ATLANTA is 14-19 against the money line (-14.1 Units) after covering 4 or 5 of their last 6 against the spread over the last 3 seasons. The average score was ATLANTA 76.0, OPPONENT 80.5 - (Rating = 0*) | ATLANTA is 16-17 against the money line (-17.2 Units) off a loss against a division rival over the last 3 seasons. The average score was ATLANTA 80.9, OPPONENT 80.5 - (Rating = 0*) | ATLANTA is 3-7 against the money line (-10.2 Units) off a cover where the team lost the game straight up as an underdog over the last 3 seasons. The average score was ATLANTA 74.3, OPPONENT 86.0 - (Rating = 0*) | ATLANTA is 18-17 against the money line (-19.3 Units) in home games off a road loss against a division rival since 1997. The average score was ATLANTA 80.6, OPPONENT 78.7 - (Rating = 0*) | ATLANTA is 2-6 against the money line (-10.2 Units) off a road cover where the team lost straight up as an underdog over the last 3 seasons. The average score was ATLANTA 72.0, OPPONENT 84.6 - (Rating = 1*) | ATLANTA is 8-12 against the money line (-18.8 Units) off a road loss over the last 2 seasons. The average score was ATLANTA 82.0, OPPONENT 84.3 - (Rating = 3*) | ATLANTA is 19-25 against the money line (-19.0 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 2 straight games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was ATLANTA 79.6, OPPONENT 80.5 - (Rating = 1*) | ATLANTA is 14-22 against the money line (-21.4 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 3 straight games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was ATLANTA 80.1, OPPONENT 82.1 - (Rating = 3*) | ATLANTA is 22-24 against the money line (-21.3 Units) after allowing 75 points or more over the last 2 seasons. The average score was ATLANTA 80.2, OPPONENT 80.1 - (Rating = 1*) | ATLANTA is 14-19 against the money line (-16.9 Units) after allowing 75 points or more in 2 straight games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was ATLANTA 78.8, OPPONENT 79.4 - (Rating = 1*) | ATLANTA is 10-13 against the money line (-15.4 Units) after allowing 75 points or more in 3 straight games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was ATLANTA 77.8, OPPONENT 78.6 - (Rating = 1*) | ATLANTA is 22-25 against the money line (-22.0 Units) after allowing 80 points or more over the last 3 seasons. The average score was ATLANTA 79.1, OPPONENT 79.0 - (Rating = 1*) | ATLANTA is 39-46 against the money line (-25.7 Units) after allowing 80 points or more in 2 straight games since 1997. The average score was ATLANTA 80.8, OPPONENT 80.5 - (Rating = 0*) | ATLANTA is 4-10 against the money line (-11.4 Units) after allowing 40 points or more in the first half in 2 straight games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was ATLANTA 80.7, OPPONENT 83.2 - (Rating = 2*) | ATLANTA is 6-13 against the money line (-13.0 Units) after a loss by 6 points or less over the last 3 seasons. The average score was ATLANTA 78.1, OPPONENT 83.5 - (Rating = 1*) | ATLANTA is 3-9 against the money line (-7.3 Units) after 2 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more this season. The average score was ATLANTA 75.8, OPPONENT 81.2 - (Rating = 1*) | ATLANTA is 5-11 against the money line (-14.5 Units) after 3 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more over the last 2 seasons. The average score was ATLANTA 79.1, OPPONENT 81.9 - (Rating = 3*) | ATLANTA is 20-24 against the money line (-19.6 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 2 straight games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was ATLANTA 78.7, OPPONENT 78.9 - (Rating = 1*) | ATLANTA is 22-26 against the money line (-22.2 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 3 straight games over the last 3 seasons. The average score was ATLANTA 78.8, OPPONENT 78.2 - (Rating = 1*) | ATLANTA is 17-21 against the money line (-18.1 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 4 straight games over the last 3 seasons. The average score was ATLANTA 79.1, OPPONENT 79.1 - (Rating = 1*) | ATLANTA is 13-17 against the money line (-15.6 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 5 straight games over the last 3 seasons. The average score was ATLANTA 79.1, OPPONENT 80.2 - (Rating = 1*) | ATLANTA is 11-16 against the money line (-18.2 Units) after scoring 75 points or more in 2 straight games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was ATLANTA 78.7, OPPONENT 79.2 - (Rating = 2*) | ATLANTA is 19-19 against the money line (-16.0 Units) after a combined score of 155 points or more over the last 2 seasons. The average score was ATLANTA 79.3, OPPONENT 78.4 - (Rating = 0*) | ATLANTA is 6-13 against the money line (-15.2 Units) after a combined score of 155 points or more in 2 straight games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was ATLANTA 76.0, OPPONENT 78.3 - (Rating = 3*) | ATLANTA is 9-15 against the money line (-14.4 Units) after playing a game as an underdog over the last 2 seasons. The average score was ATLANTA 79.6, OPPONENT 81.6 - (Rating = 2*) | ATLANTA is 5-11 against the money line (-13.3 Units) after playing a game as a road underdog over the last 2 seasons. The average score was ATLANTA 79.5, OPPONENT 83.8 - (Rating = 2*) | ATLANTA is 5-9 against the money line (-11.5 Units) after playing a road game this season. The average score was ATLANTA 79.9, OPPONENT 83.4 - (Rating = 2*) | ATLANTA is 15-19 against the money line (-17.8 Units) after a game where they covered the spread over the last 2 seasons. The average score was ATLANTA 77.8, OPPONENT 78.9 - (Rating = 1*) | ATLANTA is 15-17 against the money line (-16.1 Units) after 1 or more consecutive losses over the last 2 seasons. The average score was ATLANTA 81.3, OPPONENT 82.7 - (Rating = 1*) | ATLANTA is 12-18 against the money line (-17.3 Units) after 2 or more consecutive losses over the last 3 seasons. The average score was ATLANTA 76.8, OPPONENT 80.2 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
|
WASHINGTON is 3-14 against the money line (-17.0 Units) after a game with 24 or more assists since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 69.6, OPPONENT 78.6 - (Rating = 4*) | WASHINGTON is 244-367 against the money line (-113.4 Units) in all games since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 70.6, OPPONENT 73.6 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 75-127 against the money line (-46.2 Units) in August or September games since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 69.3, OPPONENT 73.8 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 9-41 against the money line (-29.2 Units) in road games on Sunday games since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 67.5, OPPONENT 76.1 - (Rating = 2*) | WASHINGTON is 48-81 against the money line (-33.8 Units) when playing with 2 days rest since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 70.4, OPPONENT 74.4 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 155-237 against the money line (-91.6 Units) vs. division opponents since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 69.3, OPPONENT 72.3 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 110-170 against the money line (-58.7 Units) when playing 5 or less games in 14 days since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 71.6, OPPONENT 74.2 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 71-120 against the money line (-54.0 Units) when playing their 3rd game in 5 days since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 69.9, OPPONENT 73.6 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 7-25 against the money line (-19.7 Units) after a game where they were called for 10+ more fouls than opponent since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 69.9, OPPONENT 76.7 - (Rating = 2*) | WASHINGTON is 89-136 against the money line (-48.6 Units) after failing to cover 2 of their last 3 against the spread since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 70.5, OPPONENT 73.7 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 53-110 against the money line (-62.1 Units) after having lost 3 of their last 4 games since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 70.1, OPPONENT 75.9 - (Rating = 2*) | WASHINGTON is 41-88 against the money line (-45.9 Units) after having lost 4 of their last 5 games since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 69.4, OPPONENT 75.5 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 73-124 against the money line (-45.4 Units) off a road loss since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 70.9, OPPONENT 74.4 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 27-47 against the money line (-27.6 Units) after a road game where both teams score 75 or more points since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 73.6, OPPONENT 75.9 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 87-159 against the money line (-70.7 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 2 straight games since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 71.2, OPPONENT 75.5 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 100-177 against the money line (-72.9 Units) after allowing 75 points or more since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 71.2, OPPONENT 75.3 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 58-110 against the money line (-45.9 Units) after allowing 80 points or more since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 71.5, OPPONENT 75.8 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 15-25 against the money line (-17.9 Units) after scoring 45 points or more in the first half last game since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 74.0, OPPONENT 74.6 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 133-235 against the money line (-86.7 Units) after playing a game as an underdog since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 70.5, OPPONENT 74.2 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 77-150 against the money line (-60.6 Units) after playing 2 consecutive games as an underdog since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 70.1, OPPONENT 74.5 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 114-179 against the money line (-69.2 Units) after playing a road game since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 71.2, OPPONENT 73.8 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 130-221 against the money line (-71.0 Units) after 1 or more consecutive losses since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 70.1, OPPONENT 74.2 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 74-133 against the money line (-52.5 Units) after 2 or more consecutive losses since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 69.5, OPPONENT 73.9 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 36-86 against the money line (-45.3 Units) after 3 or more consecutive losses since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 68.4, OPPONENT 74.2 - (Rating = 1*) | ATLANTA is 15-3 against the money line (+11.6 Units) in home games after 3 consecutive division games over the last 3 seasons. The average score was ATLANTA 80.4, OPPONENT 71.4 - (Rating = 2*) | ATLANTA is 9-2 against the money line (+7.3 Units) in home games after covering 2 of their last 3 against the spread over the last 2 seasons. The average score was ATLANTA 82.3, OPPONENT 72.3 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
| | |
|
|
All Games | 16-14 | -0.2 | 15-15 | 11-19 | 73.5 | 38.7 | 41.9% | 39.7 | 71.6 | 36.5 | 41.1% | 42.5 | Road Games | 6-9 | -1.6 | 8-7 | 4-11 | 72.1 | 39.2 | 42.1% | 38.5 | 72.9 | 37.7 | 41.7% | 43.2 | Last 5 Games | 1-4 | -4.2 | 2-3 | 1-4 | 67.6 | 38.8 | 38.5% | 35.6 | 72.8 | 36.2 | 45.7% | 40.2 | Division Games | 8-10 | -6.4 | 8-10 | 7-11 | 71.8 | 37.4 | 41.0% | 41.0 | 72.0 | 36.5 | 40.9% | 43.6 |
|
| |
|
|
Team Stats (All Games) | 73.5 | 38.7 | 27-64 | 41.9% | 6-17 | 34.3% | 14-18 | 79.3% | 40 | 8 | 18 | 18 | 6 | 11 | 5 | vs opponents surrendering | 75.9 | 38.3 | 28-65 | 42.8% | 5-15 | 33.1% | 15-19 | 79.3% | 41 | 9 | 16 | 19 | 7 | 13 | 4 | Team Stats (Road Games) | 72.1 | 39.2 | 27-64 | 42.1% | 6-18 | 33.5% | 12-16 | 79.1% | 38 | 8 | 18 | 19 | 6 | 12 | 5 | Stats Against (All Games) | 71.6 | 36.5 | 27-66 | 41.1% | 4-13 | 31.1% | 13-16 | 82.4% | 42 | 10 | 15 | 19 | 6 | 13 | 4 | vs opponents averaging | 76.3 | 38.3 | 28-66 | 42.8% | 5-14 | 32.9% | 15-19 | 79.6% | 42 | 9 | 16 | 19 | 7 | 13 | 4 | Stats Against (Road Games) | 72.9 | 37.7 | 27-66 | 41.7% | 3-12 | 29.7% | 15-18 | 82.8% | 43 | 11 | 16 | 17 | 7 | 12 | 4 |
|
|
| |
|
|
All Games | 12-18 | -12.8 | 17-13 | 17-13 | 78.1 | 38.4 | 41.5% | 43.4 | 81.3 | 40.2 | 43.8% | 41.3 | Home Games | 7-7 | -9.5 | 8-6 | 6-8 | 76.4 | 37.1 | 40.1% | 47.2 | 75.8 | 37.5 | 41.2% | 41.4 | Last 5 Games | 3-2 | +2.4 | 4-1 | 3-2 | 86.8 | 43.2 | 46.2% | 42.2 | 82.2 | 39.8 | 43.1% | 40.6 | Division Games | 8-11 | -10.8 | 11-8 | 11-8 | 78.9 | 38.4 | 42.5% | 43.3 | 81.6 | 40.3 | 43.8% | 40.4 |
|
| |
|
|
Team Stats (All Games) | 78.1 | 38.4 | 28-68 | 41.5% | 5-15 | 32.0% | 17-21 | 78.6% | 43 | 11 | 16 | 23 | 9 | 15 | 4 | vs opponents surrendering | 74.9 | 38 | 28-65 | 42.4% | 5-15 | 33.2% | 15-18 | 79.7% | 41 | 9 | 16 | 18 | 7 | 13 | 4 | Team Stats (Home Games) | 76.4 | 37.1 | 28-69 | 40.1% | 4-14 | 27.7% | 17-22 | 76.1% | 47 | 12 | 17 | 23 | 9 | 14 | 4 | Stats Against (All Games) | 81.3 | 40.2 | 28-64 | 43.8% | 5-16 | 33.6% | 20-25 | 81.7% | 41 | 9 | 17 | 20 | 8 | 15 | 5 | vs opponents averaging | 75.7 | 38.2 | 28-66 | 42.7% | 5-15 | 33.0% | 15-19 | 79.0% | 42 | 9 | 16 | 18 | 7 | 13 | 4 | Stats Against (Home Games) | 75.8 | 37.5 | 26-63 | 41.2% | 6-18 | 31.9% | 18-23 | 79.1% | 41 | 9 | 17 | 22 | 8 | 15 | 5 |
|
| Average power rating of opponents played: WASHINGTON 70.3, ATLANTA 70.2 |
| | |
|
|
7/29/2015 | SEATTLE | 87-74 | W | -450 | 33-70 | 47.1% | 42 | 5 | 30-73 | 41.1% | 41 | 7 | 7/31/2015 | @ SAN ANTONIO | 88-53 | W | -120 | 36-63 | 57.1% | 47 | 14 | 22-63 | 34.9% | 30 | 12 | 8/2/2015 | @ CHICAGO | 68-71 | L | +180 | 25-70 | 35.7% | 41 | 5 | 27-69 | 39.1% | 50 | 6 | 8/5/2015 | SAN ANTONIO | 66-63 | W | -600 | 21-56 | 37.5% | 46 | 12 | 26-67 | 38.8% | 35 | 9 | 8/7/2015 | @ CONNECTICUT | 72-86 | L | -125 | 25-60 | 41.7% | 34 | 11 | 35-65 | 53.8% | 40 | 9 | 8/9/2015 | CONNECTICUT | 84-73 | W | -300 | 25-51 | 49.0% | 40 | 11 | 22-64 | 34.4% | 38 | 8 | 8/11/2015 | INDIANA | 62-73 | L | -165 | 25-57 | 43.9% | 33 | 14 | 30-70 | 42.9% | 44 | 10 | 8/16/2015 | MINNESOTA | 77-69 | W | +155 | 27-67 | 40.3% | 42 | 8 | 28-73 | 38.4% | 48 | 8 | 8/19/2015 | @ MINNESOTA | 79-61 | W | +350 | 29-65 | 44.6% | 43 | 10 | 21-61 | 34.4% | 41 | 14 | 8/21/2015 | @ CHICAGO | 85-87 | L | +180 | 37-73 | 50.7% | 34 | 12 | 37-79 | 46.8% | 49 | 15 | 8/23/2015 | CHICAGO | 64-66 | L | -140 | 22-66 | 33.3% | 47 | 16 | 24-62 | 38.7% | 46 | 15 | 8/28/2015 | PHOENIX | 71-63 | W | -200 | 25-60 | 41.7% | 35 | 11 | 26-65 | 40.0% | 45 | 19 | 8/30/2015 | @ SEATTLE | 59-69 | L | -175 | 24-66 | 36.4% | 33 | 16 | 18-43 | 41.9% | 37 | 17 | 9/2/2015 | @ PHOENIX | 53-73 | L | +155 | 19-61 | 31.1% | 36 | 12 | 31-56 | 55.4% | 35 | 14 | 9/3/2015 | @ LOS ANGELES | 91-93 | L | +210 | 35-72 | 48.6% | 27 | 6 | 27-50 | 54.0% | 38 | 13 | 9/6/2015 | @ ATLANTA | | | | | | | | | | | | 9/8/2015 | INDIANA | | | | | | | | | | | | 9/11/2015 | @ NEW YORK | | | | | | | | | | | | 9/13/2015 | ATLANTA | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
| |
|
|
7/29/2015 | @ SAN ANTONIO | 85-102 | L | +145 | 29-66 | 43.9% | 37 | 13 | 35-65 | 53.8% | 45 | 17 | 7/31/2015 | @ MINNESOTA | 70-86 | L | | 27-64 | 42.2% | 40 | 19 | 33-77 | 42.9% | 49 | 15 | 8/2/2015 | PHOENIX | 68-71 | L | +200 | 26-71 | 36.6% | 40 | 12 | 21-57 | 36.8% | 47 | 14 | 8/7/2015 | @ INDIANA | 77-106 | L | +300 | 24-61 | 39.3% | 41 | 26 | 31-68 | 45.6% | 41 | 10 | 8/9/2015 | @ TULSA | 98-90 | W | +220 | 34-67 | 50.7% | 44 | 12 | 26-64 | 40.6% | 41 | 9 | 8/14/2015 | MINNESOTA | 82-84 | L | +280 | 30-78 | 38.5% | 41 | 6 | 31-67 | 46.3% | 48 | 14 | 8/16/2015 | CONNECTICUT | 90-77 | W | -165 | 27-59 | 45.8% | 47 | 12 | 27-68 | 39.7% | 33 | 14 | 8/21/2015 | @ NEW YORK | 67-78 | L | +350 | 24-67 | 35.8% | 41 | 13 | 30-64 | 46.9% | 43 | 16 | 8/23/2015 | @ CONNECTICUT | 102-92 | W | -140 | 40-67 | 59.7% | 34 | 15 | 34-70 | 48.6% | 35 | 12 | 8/25/2015 | CONNECTICUT | 71-57 | W | -330 | 26-66 | 39.4% | 49 | 9 | 19-63 | 30.2% | 40 | 12 | 8/28/2015 | @ INDIANA | 90-84 | W | +250 | 28-63 | 44.4% | 39 | 14 | 27-59 | 45.8% | 35 | 18 | 8/29/2015 | CHICAGO | 96-98 | L | -105 | 33-74 | 44.6% | 45 | 6 | 37-70 | 52.9% | 45 | 10 | 9/1/2015 | @ NEW YORK | 75-80 | L | +325 | 30-70 | 42.9% | 44 | 15 | 26-70 | 37.1% | 48 | 14 | 9/6/2015 | WASHINGTON | | | | | | | | | | | | 9/9/2015 | LOS ANGELES | | | | | | | | | | | | 9/11/2015 | INDIANA | | | | | | | | | | | | 9/13/2015 | @ WASHINGTON | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
| | |
ATLANTA is 22-14 (+1.1 Units) against the money line versus WASHINGTON since 1997 |
| |
ATLANTA is 10-4 (+3.1 Units) against the money line versus WASHINGTON over the last 3 seasons |
|
|
|
| |
ATLANTA is 12-6 (-1.1 Units) against the money line versus WASHINGTON since 1997 |
| |
ATLANTA is 6-2 (+0.8 Units) against the money line versus WASHINGTON over the last 3 seasons |
|
|
|
| |
|
6/26/2015 | WASHINGTON | 69 | -3.5 | Under | 36 | 26-57 | 45.6% | 6-17 | 35.3% | 11-14 | 78.6% | 34 | 5 | 17 | | ATLANTA | 72 | 146 | SU ATS | 31 | 30-70 | 42.9% | 3-7 | 42.9% | 9-14 | 64.3% | 45 | 15 | 17 | 6/12/2015 | ATLANTA | 64 | 146.5 | SU ATS | 25 | 24-62 | 38.7% | 7-18 | 38.9% | 9-10 | 90.0% | 39 | 8 | 16 | | WASHINGTON | 61 | -6.5 | Under | 36 | 23-63 | 36.5% | 5-16 | 31.2% | 10-12 | 83.3% | 42 | 11 | 15 | 7/27/2014 | ATLANTA | 67 | -3 | Under | 38 | 28-75 | 37.3% | 2-14 | 14.3% | 9-10 | 90.0% | 42 | 14 | 15 | | WASHINGTON | 77 | 157 | SU ATS | 39 | 27-59 | 45.8% | 7-15 | 46.7% | 16-22 | 72.7% | 44 | 7 | 15 | 7/5/2014 | WASHINGTON | 73 | 155 | Over | 40 | 29-65 | 44.6% | 3-12 | 25.0% | 12-17 | 70.6% | 44 | 8 | 15 | | ATLANTA | 86 | -8.5 | SU ATS | 40 | 35-76 | 46.1% | 5-22 | 22.7% | 11-21 | 52.4% | 48 | 10 | 8 | 6/18/2014 | WASHINGTON | 73 | 154 | Over | 39 | 31-72 | 43.1% | 8-17 | 47.1% | 3-4 | 75.0% | 38 | 11 | 14 | | ATLANTA | 83 | -7.5 | SU ATS | 34 | 31-69 | 44.9% | 1-7 | 14.3% | 20-23 | 87.0% | 45 | 12 | 10 | 6/15/2014 | ATLANTA | 75 | -4 | SU ATS | 40 | 26-68 | 38.2% | 3-15 | 20.0% | 20-31 | 64.5% | 52 | 17 | 17 | | WASHINGTON | 67 | 154.5 | Under | 32 | 26-62 | 41.9% | 7-20 | 35.0% | 8-13 | 61.5% | 42 | 4 | 19 |
|
| | |
|
Mike is 11-4 against the money line (+9.9 Units) in road games after a game with 24 or more assists in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Mike 75.9, OPPONENT 69.9 - (Rating = 1*) | Mike is 94-72 against the money line (+18.3 Units) after a non-conference game in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Mike 77.2, OPPONENT 74.6 - (Rating = 0*) | Mike is 47-30 against the money line (+24.9 Units) after 2 consecutive non-conference games in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Mike 76.9, OPPONENT 73.8 - (Rating = 2*) | Mike is 25-13 against the money line (+12.7 Units) after 3 consecutive non-conference games in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Mike 77.9, OPPONENT 74.0 - (Rating = 1*) | Mike is 47-31 against the money line (+15.6 Units) revenging a straight up loss versus opponent as a favorite in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Mike 75.1, OPPONENT 71.5 - (Rating = 0*) | Mike is 117-85 against the money line (+28.6 Units) revenging a loss versus opponent in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Mike 76.2, OPPONENT 73.5 - (Rating = 1*) | Mike is 19-16 against the money line (+11.5 Units) double revenge - 2 straight losses vs. opponent as the coach of WASHINGTON. The average score was WASHINGTON 74.8, OPPONENT 74.4 - (Rating = 1*) | Mike is 76-46 against the money line (+21.2 Units) revenging a road loss versus opponent in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Mike 77.0, OPPONENT 73.4 - (Rating = 0*) | Mike is 7-2 against the money line (+10.3 Units) in road games off a cover where the team lost the game straight up as an underdog in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Mike 81.4, OPPONENT 76.8 - (Rating = 2*) | Mike is 7-2 against the money line (+10.3 Units) in road games off a road cover where the team lost straight up as an underdog in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Mike 81.4, OPPONENT 76.8 - (Rating = 2*) | Mike is 43-28 against the money line (+16.3 Units) after scoring 45 points or more in the first half last game in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Mike 77.7, OPPONENT 73.2 - (Rating = 1*) | Mike is 102-78 against the money line (+28.0 Units) after playing a game as an underdog in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Mike 76.9, OPPONENT 74.4 - (Rating = 1*) | Mike is 16-13 against the money line (+10.1 Units) after playing 2 consecutive games as an underdog as the coach of WASHINGTON. The average score was WASHINGTON 77.5, OPPONENT 73.6 - (Rating = 0*) | Mike is 30-19 against the money line (+16.6 Units) after playing 2 consecutive games as a road underdog in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Mike 77.1, OPPONENT 73.1 - (Rating = 1*) | Mike is 106-84 against the money line (+20.9 Units) after 1 or more consecutive losses in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Mike 76.2, OPPONENT 74.1 - (Rating = 0*) | Mike is 19-11 against the money line (+11.8 Units) after 3 or more consecutive losses in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Mike 77.6, OPPONENT 73.9 - (Rating = 0*) | Mike is 4-0 against the money line (+7.7 Units) in road games after a game where they committed 8 or less turnovers as the coach of WASHINGTON. The average score was WASHINGTON 77.6, OPPONENT 62.4 - (Rating = 0*) | Michael is 32-34 against the money line (-27.6 Units) in all games as the coach of ATLANTA. The average score was ATLANTA 79.6, OPPONENT 79.9 - (Rating = 2*) | Michael is 22-19 against the money line (-28.6 Units) as a favorite as the coach of ATLANTA. The average score was ATLANTA 78.5, OPPONENT 77.1 - (Rating = 3*) | Michael is 15-10 against the money line (-18.6 Units) as a home favorite as the coach of ATLANTA. The average score was ATLANTA 79.5, OPPONENT 74.9 - (Rating = 0*) | Michael is 16-12 against the money line (-17.8 Units) in a home game where where the total is greater than or equal to 150 as the coach of ATLANTA. The average score was ATLANTA 81.5, OPPONENT 77.1 - (Rating = 0*) | Michael is 9-11 against the money line (-17.7 Units) on Sunday games as the coach of ATLANTA. The average score was ATLANTA 76.7, OPPONENT 78.7 - (Rating = 2*) | Michael is 20-24 against the money line (-28.6 Units) vs. division opponents as the coach of ATLANTA. The average score was ATLANTA 79.0, OPPONENT 79.2 - (Rating = 3*) | Michael is 11-15 against the money line (-14.3 Units) after a game where a team made 80% of their free throws or better as the coach of ATLANTA. The average score was ATLANTA 81.6, OPPONENT 81.1 - (Rating = 1*) | Michael is 8-12 against the money line (-18.8 Units) off a road loss as the coach of ATLANTA. The average score was ATLANTA 82.0, OPPONENT 84.3 - (Rating = 3*) | Michael is 19-25 against the money line (-19.0 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 2 straight games as the coach of ATLANTA. The average score was ATLANTA 79.6, OPPONENT 80.5 - (Rating = 1*) | Michael is 14-22 against the money line (-21.4 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 3 straight games as the coach of ATLANTA. The average score was ATLANTA 80.1, OPPONENT 82.1 - (Rating = 3*) | Michael is 22-24 against the money line (-21.3 Units) after allowing 75 points or more as the coach of ATLANTA. The average score was ATLANTA 80.2, OPPONENT 80.1 - (Rating = 1*) | Michael is 14-19 against the money line (-16.9 Units) after allowing 75 points or more in 2 straight games as the coach of ATLANTA. The average score was ATLANTA 78.8, OPPONENT 79.4 - (Rating = 1*) | Michael is 10-13 against the money line (-15.4 Units) after allowing 75 points or more in 3 straight games as the coach of ATLANTA. The average score was ATLANTA 77.8, OPPONENT 78.6 - (Rating = 1*) | Michael is 4-10 against the money line (-11.4 Units) after allowing 40 points or more in the first half in 2 straight games as the coach of ATLANTA. The average score was ATLANTA 80.7, OPPONENT 83.2 - (Rating = 2*) | Michael is 9-19 against the money line (-23.6 Units) after 2 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more as the coach of ATLANTA. The average score was ATLANTA 77.5, OPPONENT 79.7 - (Rating = 5*) | Michael is 5-11 against the money line (-14.5 Units) after 3 straight games where both teams scored 70 points or more as the coach of ATLANTA. The average score was ATLANTA 79.1, OPPONENT 81.9 - (Rating = 3*) | Michael is 20-24 against the money line (-19.6 Units) after scoring 70 points or more in 2 straight games as the coach of ATLANTA. The average score was ATLANTA 78.7, OPPONENT 78.9 - (Rating = 1*) | Michael is 11-16 against the money line (-18.2 Units) after scoring 75 points or more in 2 straight games as the coach of ATLANTA. The average score was ATLANTA 78.7, OPPONENT 79.2 - (Rating = 2*) | Michael is 19-19 against the money line (-16.0 Units) after a combined score of 155 points or more as the coach of ATLANTA. The average score was ATLANTA 79.3, OPPONENT 78.4 - (Rating = 0*) | Michael is 6-13 against the money line (-15.2 Units) after a combined score of 155 points or more in 2 straight games as the coach of ATLANTA. The average score was ATLANTA 76.0, OPPONENT 78.3 - (Rating = 3*) | Michael is 9-15 against the money line (-14.4 Units) after playing a game as an underdog as the coach of ATLANTA. The average score was ATLANTA 79.6, OPPONENT 81.6 - (Rating = 2*) | Michael is 5-11 against the money line (-13.3 Units) after playing a game as a road underdog as the coach of ATLANTA. The average score was ATLANTA 79.5, OPPONENT 83.8 - (Rating = 2*) | Michael is 12-20 against the money line (-29.1 Units) after playing a road game as the coach of ATLANTA. The average score was ATLANTA 80.2, OPPONENT 82.6 - (Rating = 5*) | Michael is 15-19 against the money line (-17.8 Units) after a game where they covered the spread as the coach of ATLANTA. The average score was ATLANTA 77.8, OPPONENT 78.9 - (Rating = 1*) | Michael is 15-17 against the money line (-16.1 Units) after 1 or more consecutive losses as the coach of ATLANTA. The average score was ATLANTA 81.3, OPPONENT 82.7 - (Rating = 1*) | Michael is 14-20 against the money line (-15.2 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game after 15+ games as the coach of ATLANTA. The average score was ATLANTA 81.6, OPPONENT 82.3 - (Rating = 1*) | Michael is 24-27 against the money line (-16.4 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game as the coach of ATLANTA. The average score was ATLANTA 80.9, OPPONENT 80.5 - (Rating = 0*) | Michael is 9-18 against the money line (-13.1 Units) vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts after 15+ games as the coach of ATLANTA. The average score was ATLANTA 81.6, OPPONENT 84.1 - (Rating = 1*) | Michael is 9-19 against the money line (-21.2 Units) versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game after 15+ games as the coach of ATLANTA. The average score was ATLANTA 80.2, OPPONENT 82.6 - (Rating = 4*) | Michael is 19-24 against the money line (-19.8 Units) versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game as the coach of ATLANTA. The average score was ATLANTA 79.4, OPPONENT 79.5 - (Rating = 2*) | Michael is 14-21 against the money line (-15.5 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game after 15+ games as the coach of ATLANTA. The average score was ATLANTA 81.3, OPPONENT 82.7 - (Rating = 1*) | Michael is 25-28 against the money line (-15.7 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game as the coach of ATLANTA. The average score was ATLANTA 80.7, OPPONENT 80.5 - (Rating = 0*) | Michael is 7-18 against the money line (-20.4 Units) versus poor pressure defensive teams - forcing <=14 turnovers/game after 15+ games as the coach of ATLANTA. The average score was ATLANTA 80.8, OPPONENT 83.5 - (Rating = 4*) | Michael is 16-23 against the money line (-20.0 Units) versus poor pressure defensive teams - forcing <=14 turnovers/game as the coach of ATLANTA. The average score was ATLANTA 80.1, OPPONENT 80.3 - (Rating = 2*) | Michael is 13-19 against the money line (-15.2 Units) versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game after 15+ games as the coach of ATLANTA. The average score was ATLANTA 81.4, OPPONENT 82.0 - (Rating = 1*) | Michael is 19-23 against the money line (-15.0 Units) versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game as the coach of ATLANTA. The average score was ATLANTA 81.4, OPPONENT 81.0 - (Rating = 0*) | Michael is 4-8 against the money line (-10.0 Units) versus teams who average 7 or less steals/game on the season after 15+ games as the coach of ATLANTA. The average score was ATLANTA 80.8, OPPONENT 83.7 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
|
Mike is 2-8 against the money line (-7.5 Units) in road games after 2 straight games making 80% of their free throws or better as the coach of WASHINGTON. The average score was WASHINGTON 75.4, OPPONENT 80.5 - (Rating = 0*) | Michael is 158-79 against the money line (+36.8 Units) after a division game in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Michael 75.8, OPPONENT 72.0 - (Rating = 1*) | Michael is 111-56 against the money line (+32.5 Units) after 2 consecutive division games in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Michael 76.2, OPPONENT 72.2 - (Rating = 1*) | Michael is 85-41 against the money line (+28.1 Units) after 3 consecutive division games in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Michael 75.9, OPPONENT 71.6 - (Rating = 1*) | Michael is 107-47 against the money line (+44.8 Units) when playing 5 or less games in 14 days in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Michael 77.0, OPPONENT 73.0 - (Rating = 2*) | Michael is 9-2 against the money line (+7.3 Units) in home games after covering 2 of their last 3 against the spread as the coach of ATLANTA. The average score was ATLANTA 82.3, OPPONENT 72.3 - (Rating = 1*) | Michael is 11-5 against the money line (+9.4 Units) off 2 consecutive losses against division rivals in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Michael 80.4, OPPONENT 76.8 - (Rating = 0*) | Michael is 62-23 against the money line (+22.9 Units) in home games when playing against a team with a winning record in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Michael 77.6, OPPONENT 70.8 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
| | |
|
Since 1997, the home favorite won the game straight up 83 times, while the road underdog won straight up 44 times. No Edge. | Over the last 3 seasons, the home favorite won the game straight up 12 times, while the road underdog won straight up 5 times. No Edge. |
|
| | |
[G] 09/06/2015 - Kara Lawson is downgraded to expected to miss Sunday vs. Atlanta Dream ( Back ) | |
[F] 08/03/2015 - Cierra Burdick expected to miss 4-6 weeks ( Foot ) | [G] 06/06/2015 - Celine Dumerc out for season ( Suspension ) |
|
|
| Last Updated: 5/20/2024 1:10:55 PM EST. |
|
|
| |
|