WNBA ATLANTA Matchup 20140725

You are viewing a condensed version of this FoxSheet. Login as a FoxSheets Subscriber to view the full sheet.
Not a member? Subscribe today and start taking advantage of our premium information, including the Game Estimator™, the Super Situations ™, the Power Trends ™, and many more features.

WNBA : Money Line Matchup

Friday 7/25/2014

Line

$ Line

OU Line

Score

CHICAGO

ATLANTA

-9

+325

-450

160

79
Final
75

CHICAGO (9 - 14) at ATLANTA (15 - 7)

Friday, 7/25/2014 7:35 PM

Board		Money Line
653	CHICAGO	+300
654	ATLANTA	-400

	Current Money Line FoxSheets
	ATS FoxSheet
	First Half FoxSheet
	Money Line FoxSheet
	Teaser Line FoxSheet

BETTING TRENDS

One of the growing resources utilized by sports handicappers is the public betting information offered by a variety of sources. Leading the way in this is Sportsbook.com, who offers the data at its website in real-time.

(Money)	(0%)	OVER	(0%)
(Money)	(0%)	UNDER	(0%)

STATFOX SUPER SITUATIONS™

StatFox Super Situations favoring ATLANTA against the money line

There are 27 situations with a total rating of 63 stars.

- Home teams vs. the money line (ATLANTA) - in a game involving two average defensive teams (40.5-43.5%), in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game) after 15+ games.
(240-97 since 1997.) (71.2%, +83.1 units. Rating = 3*)

- Home teams vs. the money line (ATLANTA) - in a game involving two average defensive teams (40.5-43.5%) after 15+ games, in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game).
(240-97 since 1997.) (71.2%, +83.1 units. Rating = 3*)

- Home teams vs. the money line (ATLANTA) - in a game involving two average defensive teams (40.5-43.5%) after 15+ games, in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game) after 15+ games.
(240-97 since 1997.) (71.2%, +83.1 units. Rating = 3*)

- Road teams vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - in a game involving two average defensive teams (40.5-43.5%), in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game) after 15+ games.
(240-97 since 1997.) (71.2%, +83.1 units. Rating = 3*)

- Road teams vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - in a game involving two average defensive teams (40.5-43.5%) after 15+ games, in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game).
(240-97 since 1997.) (71.2%, +83.1 units. Rating = 3*)

- Road teams vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - in a game involving two average defensive teams (40.5-43.5%) after 15+ games, in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game) after 15+ games.
(240-97 since 1997.) (71.2%, +83.1 units. Rating = 3*)

- Home favorites vs. the money line (ATLANTA) - in a game involving two average defensive teams (40.5-43.5%), in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game).
(254-84 since 1997.) (75.1%, +81.3 units. Rating = 2*)

- Road teams vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - in a game involving two average defensive teams (40.5-43.5%), in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game).
(280-118 since 1997.) (70.4%, +81.2 units. Rating = 2*)

- Home teams vs. the money line (ATLANTA) - in a game involving two average defensive teams (40.5-43.5%), in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game).
(280-118 since 1997.) (70.4%, +81.2 units. Rating = 2*)

- Road underdogs vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - in a game involving two average defensive teams (40.5-43.5%), in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game).
(249-80 since 1997.) (75.7%, +80.8 units. Rating = 2*)

- Road underdogs vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - in a game involving two average defensive teams (40.5-43.5%), in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game) after 15+ games.
(213-68 since 1997.) (75.8%, +78.5 units. Rating = 3*)

- Road underdogs vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - in a game involving two average defensive teams (40.5-43.5%) after 15+ games, in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game).
(213-68 since 1997.) (75.8%, +78.5 units. Rating = 3*)

- Road underdogs vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - in a game involving two average defensive teams (40.5-43.5%) after 15+ games, in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game) after 15+ games.
(213-68 since 1997.) (75.8%, +78.5 units. Rating = 3*)

- Home favorites vs. the money line (ATLANTA) - in a game involving two average defensive teams (40.5-43.5%), in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game) after 15+ games.
(217-72 since 1997.) (75.1%, +78.1 units. Rating = 3*)

- Home favorites vs. the money line (ATLANTA) - in a game involving two average defensive teams (40.5-43.5%) after 15+ games, in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game).
(217-72 since 1997.) (75.1%, +78.1 units. Rating = 3*)

- Home favorites vs. the money line (ATLANTA) - in a game involving two average defensive teams (40.5-43.5%) after 15+ games, in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game) after 15+ games.
(217-72 since 1997.) (75.1%, +78.1 units. Rating = 3*)

- Road teams vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - after 2 or more consecutive unders, poor team - outscored by their opponents by 3+ points/game.
(163-30 since 1997.) (84.5%, +71.9 units. Rating = 3*)

- Any team vs the money line (CHICAGO) - vs. division opponents, off a close win by 3 points or less over a division rival.
(152-118 since 1997.) (56.3%, +50.8 units. Rating = 2*)

- Any team vs the money line (CHICAGO) - off an upset win as an underdog, a bad team, winning 25% to 40% of their games after 15 or more games.
(104-48 since 1997.) (68.4%, +40.2 units. Rating = 2*)

- Home teams vs. the money line (ATLANTA) - after allowing 70 points or more in 3 straight games against opponent after a game where both teams scored 60 points or less.
(66-22 since 1997.) (75%, +35.5 units. Rating = 3*)

- Any team vs the money line (CHICAGO) - off a win against a division rival, a bad team, winning 25% to 40% of their games after 15 or more games.
(33-13 over the last 5 seasons.) (71.7%, +16.7 units. Rating = 1*)

- Home teams vs. the money line (ATLANTA) - after allowing 70 points or more in 4 straight games against opponent after a game where both teams scored 60 points or less.
(45-14 since 1997.) (76.3%, +29 units. Rating = 3*)

- Any team vs the money line (CHICAGO) - off an upset win over a division rival as an underdog, a bad team, winning 25% to 40% of their games after 15 or more games.
(21-7 over the last 5 seasons.) (75%, +12.4 units. Rating = 0*)

- Home teams vs. the money line (ATLANTA) - after allowing 70 points or more in 5 straight games against opponent after a game where both teams scored 60 points or less.
(28-7 since 1997.) (80%, +21.5 units. Rating = 3*)

- Road underdogs vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - off a close win by 3 points or less over a division rival, with a losing record after 15 or more games.
(26-5 since 1997.) (83.9%, +17.5 units. Rating = 0*)

- Road teams vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - in a game involving two horrible defensive teams (>=76 PPG), after a close win by 3 points or less.
(22-7 since 1997.) (75.9%, +17.4 units. Rating = 2*)

- Road teams vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - off a close win by 3 points or less over a division rival, with a losing record after 15 or more games.
(27-8 since 1997.) (77.1%, +15.9 units. Rating = 0*)

StatFox Super Situations favoring CHICAGO against the money line

There are 53 situations with a total rating of 144 stars.

- Home teams vs. the money line (ATLANTA) - poor defensive team - allowing 73+ points/game on the season, in May, June, or July games.
(471-509 since 1997.) (48.1%, +103.7 units. Rating = 2*)

- Home teams vs. the money line (ATLANTA) - poor defensive team - allowing 73+ points/game on the season, in July games.
(269-273 since 1997.) (49.6%, +99.2 units. Rating = 2*)

- Home teams vs. the money line (ATLANTA) - terrible defensive team - allowing 77+ points/game on the season, after a combined score of 155 points or more.
(140-117 over the last 5 seasons.) (54.5%, +59.1 units. Rating = 2*)

- Home teams vs. the money line (ATLANTA) - poor defensive team - allowing 73+ points/game on the season, after a combined score of 165 points or more.
(231-239 since 1997.) (49.1%, +79.7 units. Rating = 2*)

- Road teams vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - excellent free throw shooting team - making >=80% of their free throws.
(248-228 since 1997.) (52.1%, +78 units. Rating = 2*)

- Home teams vs. the money line (ATLANTA) - terrible defensive team - allowing 77+ points/game on the season, after allowing 80 points or more.
(138-106 over the last 5 seasons.) (56.6%, +54.5 units. Rating = 2*)

- Home teams vs. the money line (ATLANTA) - terrible defensive team - allowing 77+ points/game on the season, after a combined score of 165 points or more.
(91-70 over the last 5 seasons.) (56.5%, +48.7 units. Rating = 3*)

- Home teams vs. the money line (ATLANTA) - terrible defensive team - allowing 77+ points/game on the season, in July games.
(143-126 since 1997.) (53.2%, +61.1 units. Rating = 2*)

- Road teams vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - good free throw shooting team - making >=76% of their free throws, in July games.
(84-67 over the last 5 seasons.) (55.6%, +61.9 units. Rating = 4*)

- Road teams vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - excellent free throw shooting team - making >=80% of their free throws, in July games.
(76-56 since 1997.) (57.6%, +51.4 units. Rating = 3*)

- Road teams vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - poor defensive team - allowing 73+ points/game on the season against opponent after a combined score of 165 points or more.
(105-100 over the last 5 seasons.) (51.2%, +47.9 units. Rating = 2*)

- Home teams vs. the money line (ATLANTA) - poor defensive team - allowing 73+ points/game on the season, after allowing 90 points or more.
(68-47 over the last 5 seasons.) (59.1%, +39.7 units. Rating = 3*)

- Home teams vs. the money line (ATLANTA) - well rested team - playing 5 or less games in 14 days, in July games.
(91-94 over the last 5 seasons.) (49.2%, +48.7 units. Rating = 2*)

- Any team vs the money line (CHICAGO) - excellent FT shooting team (>=80%) against an average FT shooting team (71-76%) after 15+ games.
(51-23 over the last 5 seasons.) (68.9%, +30.7 units. Rating = 3*)

- Road teams vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - good ball handling team - committing <=14 turnovers/game, in May, June, or July games.
(90-77 over the last 5 seasons.) (53.9%, +40.8 units. Rating = 2*)

- Home teams vs. the money line (ATLANTA) - in a game involving 2 up-tempo teams (>=62 shots/game), average ball handling team (14.5-17.5 TO's) against a good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO's).
(79-53 over the last 5 seasons.) (59.8%, +42.3 units. Rating = 3*)

- Road teams vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - good ball handling team - committing <=14 turnovers/game, in July games.
(53-39 over the last 5 seasons.) (57.6%, +35.7 units. Rating = 3*)

- Any team vs the money line (CHICAGO) - excellent free throw shooting team (>=80%) against an average free throw shooting team (71-76%), after 2 straight games making 80% of their free throws or better.
(75-34 since 1997.) (68.8%, +35.7 units. Rating = 3*)

- Home teams vs. the money line (ATLANTA) - after allowing 90 points or more.
(81-55 over the last 5 seasons.) (59.6%, +48 units. Rating = 3*)

- Home teams vs. the money line (ATLANTA) - in a game involving two horrible defensive teams (>=76 PPG) after 15+ games, after a combined score of 155 points or more.
(45-39 over the last 5 seasons.) (53.6%, +29.1 units. Rating = 2*)

- Any team vs the money line (CHICAGO) - excellent free throw shooting team (>=80%) against an average free throw shooting team (71-76%), good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO's) against an average pressure defensive team (14.5-17.5 TO's).
(33-13 over the last 5 seasons.) (71.7%, +28.4 units. Rating = 4*)

- Road teams vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - excellent free throw shooting team (>=80%) against an average free throw shooting team (71-76%), good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO's) against an average pressure defensive team (14.5-17.5 TO's).
(41-22 since 1997.) (65.1%, +32.1 units. Rating = 3*)

- Home teams vs. the money line (ATLANTA) - good offensive team - scoring 73+ points/game on the season, after allowing 90 points or more.
(61-44 over the last 5 seasons.) (58.1%, +39.8 units. Rating = 3*)

- Any team vs the money line (ATLANTA) - in a game involving 2 up-tempo teams (>=62 shots/game), average ball handling team (14.5-17.5 TO's) against a good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO's).
(171-90 over the last 5 seasons.) (65.5%, +71.5 units. Rating = 3*)

- Any team vs the money line (CHICAGO) - excellent free throw shooting team (>=80%) against an average free throw shooting team (71-76%), in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game) after 15+ games.
(50-17 since 1997.) (74.6%, +30.4 units. Rating = 3*)

- Any team vs the money line (CHICAGO) - excellent FT shooting team (>=80%) against an average FT shooting team (71-76%) after 15+ games, in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game).
(50-17 since 1997.) (74.6%, +30.4 units. Rating = 3*)

- Any team vs the money line (CHICAGO) - excellent FT shooting team (>=80%) against an average FT shooting team (71-76%) after 15+ games, in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game) after 15+ games.
(50-17 since 1997.) (74.6%, +30.4 units. Rating = 3*)

- Road teams vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - good offensive team - scoring 73+ points/game on the season against opponent after allowing 90 points or more.
(59-37 over the last 5 seasons.) (61.5%, +35.9 units. Rating = 3*)

- Any team vs the money line (CHICAGO) - excellent free throw shooting team (>=80%) against an average free throw shooting team (71-76%), in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game).
(66-28 since 1997.) (70.2%, +28.8 units. Rating = 2*)

- Home teams vs. the money line (ATLANTA) - after going over the total by more than 18 points in their previous game against opponent after going under the total by 30 or more points total in their last five games.
(24-18 since 1997.) (57.1%, +27.8 units. Rating = 3*)

- Any team vs the money line (CHICAGO) - excellent FT shooting team (>=80%) against an average FT shooting team (71-76%) after 15+ games, good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO's) against an average pressure defensive team (14.5-17.5 TO's).
(26-6 over the last 5 seasons.) (81.2%, +28 units. Rating = 5*)

- Any team vs the money line (CHICAGO) - excellent FT shooting team (>=80%) against an average FT shooting team (71-76%) after 15+ games, good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO) vs. an average pressure defense (14.5-17.5 TO) after 15+ games.
(26-6 over the last 5 seasons.) (81.2%, +28 units. Rating = 5*)

- Any team vs the money line (CHICAGO) - excellent free throw shooting team (>=80%) against an average free throw shooting team (71-76%), good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO) vs. an average pressure defense (14.5-17.5 TO) after 15+ games.
(26-6 over the last 5 seasons.) (81.2%, +28 units. Rating = 5*)

- Road teams vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - excellent FT shooting team (>=80%) against an average FT shooting team (71-76%) after 15+ games, good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO's) against an average pressure defensive team (14.5-17.5 TO's).
(31-13 since 1997.) (70.5%, +26.9 units. Rating = 3*)

- Road teams vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - excellent FT shooting team (>=80%) against an average FT shooting team (71-76%) after 15+ games, good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO) vs. an average pressure defense (14.5-17.5 TO) after 15+ games.
(31-13 since 1997.) (70.5%, +26.9 units. Rating = 3*)

- Road teams vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - excellent free throw shooting team (>=80%) against an average free throw shooting team (71-76%), good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO) vs. an average pressure defense (14.5-17.5 TO) after 15+ games.
(31-13 since 1997.) (70.5%, +26.9 units. Rating = 3*)

- Road teams vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - poor defensive team - allowing 73+ points/game on the season against opponent after allowing 90 points or more.
(64-42 over the last 5 seasons.) (60.4%, +42.8 units. Rating = 3*)

- Road teams vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - excellent FT shooting team (>=80%) against an average FT shooting team (71-76%) after 15+ games.
(26-12 over the last 5 seasons.) (68.4%, +23.6 units. Rating = 3*)

- Home teams vs. the money line (ATLANTA) - in a game involving two explosive offensive teams (>=76 PPG) after 15+ games, after allowing 90 points or more.
(23-12 over the last 5 seasons.) (65.7%, +19.6 units. Rating = 2*)

- Home favorites of -165 to -500 vs. the money line (ATLANTA) - after allowing 90 points or more.
(36-32 over the last 5 seasons.) (52.9%, +39.7 units. Rating = 3*)

- Road teams vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - excellent FT shooting team (>=80%) against an average FT shooting team (71-76%) after 15+ games, in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game).
(26-11 since 1997.) (70.3%, +20.2 units. Rating = 2*)

- Road teams vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - excellent FT shooting team (>=80%) against an average FT shooting team (71-76%) after 15+ games, in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game) after 15+ games.
(26-11 since 1997.) (70.3%, +20.2 units. Rating = 2*)

- Road teams vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - excellent free throw shooting team (>=80%) against an average free throw shooting team (71-76%), in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game) after 15+ games.
(26-11 since 1997.) (70.3%, +20.2 units. Rating = 2*)

- Home teams vs. the money line (ATLANTA) - in a game involving 2 up-tempo teams (>=62 shots/game), average ball handling team (14.5-17.5 TO) vs. a good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO) after 15+ games.
(54-37 over the last 5 seasons.) (59.3%, +26.8 units. Rating = 2*)

- Home teams vs. the money line (ATLANTA) - in a game involving 2 up-tempo teams (>=62 shots/game) after 15+ games, average ball handling team (14.5-17.5 TO's) against a good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO's).
(54-37 over the last 5 seasons.) (59.3%, +26.8 units. Rating = 2*)

- Home teams vs. the money line (ATLANTA) - in a game involving 2 up-tempo teams (>=62 shots/game) after 15+ games, average ball handling team (14.5-17.5 TO) vs. a good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO) after 15+ games.
(54-37 over the last 5 seasons.) (59.3%, +26.8 units. Rating = 2*)

- Road teams vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - excellent free throw shooting team (>=80%) against an average free throw shooting team (71-76%), in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game).
(32-19 since 1997.) (62.7%, +16.5 units. Rating = 1*)

- Home favorites vs. the money line (ATLANTA) - after allowing 90 points or more.
(48-45 over the last 5 seasons.) (51.6%, +40.4 units. Rating = 3*)

- Road teams vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - off a win against a division rival, in July games.
(40-20 over the last 5 seasons.) (66.7%, +29 units. Rating = 3*)

- Any team vs the money line (ATLANTA) - in a game involving 2 up-tempo teams (>=62 shots/game), average ball handling team (14.5-17.5 TO) vs. a good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO) after 15+ games.
(115-61 over the last 5 seasons.) (65.3%, +48 units. Rating = 3*)

- Any team vs the money line (ATLANTA) - in a game involving 2 up-tempo teams (>=62 shots/game) after 15+ games, average ball handling team (14.5-17.5 TO's) against a good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO's).
(115-61 over the last 5 seasons.) (65.3%, +48 units. Rating = 3*)

- Any team vs the money line (ATLANTA) - in a game involving 2 up-tempo teams (>=62 shots/game) after 15+ games, average ball handling team (14.5-17.5 TO) vs. a good ball handling team (<=14.5 TO) after 15+ games.
(115-61 over the last 5 seasons.) (65.3%, +48 units. Rating = 3*)

- Road teams vs. the money line (CHICAGO) - off a home win against a division rival, in July games.
(24-12 over the last 5 seasons.) (66.7%, +17.4 units. Rating = 1*)

STATFOX GAME ESTIMATOR™

	Projection		Shooting		3pt Shots		Free Throws		Rebounding
Teams	Score	Edge	FGM-A	Pct.	FGM-A	Pct.	FTM-A	Pct.	Tot.	OFF	TO
CHICAGO	74		28-67	42.1%	4-11	33.5%	14-17	80.2%	43	10	16
ATLANTA	81		30-71	42.7%	5-15	29.6%	15-22	71.0%	47	13	14

The number of simulations in which each team won the game straight up are listed below. If one time held a significant advantage against the money line, the edge is indicated.

In 1000 simulated games, ATLANTA won the game straight up 664 times, while CHICAGO won 314 times.
Edge against the money line=CHICAGO

Potential StatFox Money Line Power Trends to watch out for:

Potential StatFox Power Trends based on estimated statistics favoring CHICAGO to win against the money line

CHICAGO is 13-4 against the money line (+8.8 Units) when their opponents make 40% to 44% of their shots in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 83.6, OPPONENT 75.6

ATLANTA is 43-40 against the money line (-24.4 Units) in up-tempo games where they attempt 84 or more shots over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was ATLANTA 78.8, OPPONENT 77.4

ATLANTA is 14-16 against the money line (-18.6 Units) when they make 40% to 44% of their shots in a game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was ATLANTA 78.8, OPPONENT 77.7

ATLANTA is 7-8 against the money line (-13.4 Units) when their opponents make 29% to 35% of their 3 pointers in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was ATLANTA 77.8, OPPONENT 77.7

ATLANTA is 27-27 against the money line (-22.2 Units) where both teams score 71 or more points in a game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was ATLANTA 83.3, OPPONENT 82.6

ATLANTA is 17-21 against the money line (-23.4 Units) when they score 78 to 82 points in a game since 1997.
The average score was ATLANTA 80.4, OPPONENT 81.1

Potential StatFox Power Trends based on estimated statistics favoring ATLANTA to win against the money line

CHICAGO is 5-12 against the money line (-9.1 Units) in up-tempo games where they attempt 84 or more shots this season.
The average score was CHICAGO 78.3, OPPONENT 82.5

CHICAGO is 35-50 against the money line (-26.8 Units) when they make 40% to 44% of their shots in a game since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 74.7, OPPONENT 76.3

CHICAGO is 7-15 against the money line (-10.8 Units) when they attempt 4 to 9 less free throws than opponents in a game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 74.4, OPPONENT 76.3

CHICAGO is 19-35 against the money line (-23.4 Units) when they make 77% to 82% of their free throws in a game since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 76.3, OPPONENT 78.2

CHICAGO is 7-20 against the money line (-16.3 Units) when they allow 78 to 82 points in a game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 76.6, OPPONENT 80.4

CHICAGO is 3-11 against the money line (-9.0 Units) when they allow 78 or more points in a game this season.
The average score was CHICAGO 79.6, OPPONENT 87.1

CHICAGO is 20-25 against the money line (-16.7 Units) where both teams score 71 or more points in a game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 83.2, OPPONENT 82.3

CHICAGO is 5-9 against the money line (-10.7 Units) when they score 72 to 77 points in a game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 74.3, OPPONENT 75.9

ATLANTA is 7-1 against the money line (+6.0 Units) when they attempt 17 to 22 free throws in a game this season.
The average score was ATLANTA 88.3, OPPONENT 79.6

ATLANTA is 13-2 against the money line (+10.4 Units) when they score 78 or more points in a game this season.
The average score was ATLANTA 86.8, OPPONENT 77.9

STATFOX MATCHUP POWER TRENDS™

StatFox Matchup Power Trends against similar type opponents favoring CHICAGO to win against the money line

There are 13 trends with a total rating of 19 stars.

CHICAGO is 18-8 against the money line (+8.8 Units) versus teams who average 42 or more rebounds/game on the season over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 81.3, OPPONENT 75.3 - (Rating = 0*)

CHICAGO is 11-4 against the money line (+9.0 Units) versus teams who average 45 or more rebounds/game on the season over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 80.2, OPPONENT 72.4 - (Rating = 1*)

ATLANTA is 15-20 against the money line (-19.9 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was ATLANTA 76.0, OPPONENT 77.0 - (Rating = 2*)

ATLANTA is 1-6 against the money line (-6.8 Units) vs. excellent free throw shooting teams - making >=80% of their shots after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was ATLANTA 78.1, OPPONENT 83.6 - (Rating = 0*)

ATLANTA is 15-19 against the money line (-16.6 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was ATLANTA 76.2, OPPONENT 77.0 - (Rating = 1*)

ATLANTA is 9-17 against the money line (-20.6 Units) versus poor pressure defensive teams - forcing <=14 turnovers/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was ATLANTA 75.2, OPPONENT 77.3 - (Rating = 4*)

ATLANTA is 18-20 against the money line (-16.4 Units) versus poor pressure defensive teams - forcing <=14 turnovers/game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was ATLANTA 77.0, OPPONENT 76.3 - (Rating = 1*)

ATLANTA is 9-15 against the money line (-17.6 Units) versus teams who average 42 or more rebounds/game on the season after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was ATLANTA 74.2, OPPONENT 74.7 - (Rating = 3*)

ATLANTA is 16-17 against the money line (-13.6 Units) versus teams who average 42 or more rebounds/game on the season over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was ATLANTA 76.4, OPPONENT 75.1 - (Rating = 0*)

ATLANTA is 12-16 against the money line (-19.7 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was ATLANTA 77.0, OPPONENT 76.6 - (Rating = 2*)

ATLANTA is 4-7 against the money line (-11.0 Units) versus poor defensive teams - allowing 77+ points/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was ATLANTA 78.6, OPPONENT 82.4 - (Rating = 1*)

ATLANTA is 8-15 against the money line (-16.7 Units) versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was ATLANTA 75.0, OPPONENT 78.3 - (Rating = 3*)

ATLANTA is 27-30 against the money line (-21.2 Units) versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was ATLANTA 77.6, OPPONENT 77.7 - (Rating = 1*)

StatFox Matchup Power Trends against similar type opponents favoring ATLANTA to win against the money line

There are 10 trends with a total rating of 16 stars.

CHICAGO is 33-38 against the money line (-20.5 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 76.9, OPPONENT 77.0 - (Rating = 0*)

CHICAGO is 5-13 against the money line (-9.2 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game this season.
The average score was CHICAGO 76.6, OPPONENT 82.8 - (Rating = 1*)

CHICAGO is 47-65 against the money line (-31.4 Units) versus poor defensive teams - allowing 77+ points/game since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 76.8, OPPONENT 78.2 - (Rating = 1*)

CHICAGO is 65-118 against the money line (-52.9 Units) versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 74.8, OPPONENT 78.1 - (Rating = 1*)

CHICAGO is 36-84 against the money line (-37.0 Units) versus good offensive teams - scoring 77+ points/game since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 75.5, OPPONENT 80.0 - (Rating = 0*)

CHICAGO is 3-12 against the money line (-15.2 Units) versus teams who average 9 or more steals/game on the season after 15+ games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 70.9, OPPONENT 76.9 - (Rating = 4*)

CHICAGO is 9-19 against the money line (-16.4 Units) versus teams who average 9 or more steals/game on the season over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 75.4, OPPONENT 80.2 - (Rating = 2*)

ATLANTA is 9-1 against the money line (+8.0 Units) vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts this season.
The average score was ATLANTA 86.9, OPPONENT 76.7 - (Rating = 3*)

ATLANTA is 7-1 against the money line (+6.0 Units) vs. excellent free throw shooting teams - making >=80% of their shots this season.
The average score was ATLANTA 86.9, OPPONENT 76.8 - (Rating = 1*)

ATLANTA is 12-2 against the money line (+9.8 Units) in home games versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was ATLANTA 82.9, OPPONENT 72.1 - (Rating = 3*)

STATFOX SITUATIONAL POWER TRENDS™

StatFox Situational Power Trends favoring CHICAGO to win against the money line

There are 17 trends with a total rating of 35 stars.

CHICAGO is 7-2 against the money line (+7.1 Units) revenging 2 straight losses where opponent scored 75 or more points over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 72.3, OPPONENT 71.1 - (Rating = 0*)

ATLANTA is 13-18 against the money line (-18.4 Units) after a non-conference game over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was ATLANTA 76.0, OPPONENT 77.3 - (Rating = 1*)

ATLANTA is 8-11 against the money line (-11.6 Units) after failing to cover 2 of their last 3 against the spread over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was ATLANTA 77.2, OPPONENT 78.7 - (Rating = 0*)

ATLANTA is 1-7 against the money line (-7.6 Units) in home games after 2 straight games where opponent grabbed 50 or more rebounds since 1997.
The average score was ATLANTA 77.5, OPPONENT 84.3 - (Rating = 0*)

ATLANTA is 4-14 against the money line (-13.0 Units) off a cover where the team lost the game straight up as an underdog since 1997.
The average score was ATLANTA 78.7, OPPONENT 85.0 - (Rating = 2*)

ATLANTA is 4-12 against the money line (-11.0 Units) off a road cover where the team lost straight up as an underdog since 1997.
The average score was ATLANTA 79.5, OPPONENT 86.2 - (Rating = 1*)

ATLANTA is 6-13 against the money line (-17.5 Units) off a road loss over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was ATLANTA 75.4, OPPONENT 80.3 - (Rating = 4*)

ATLANTA is 1-6 against the money line (-11.7 Units) off 2 or more consecutive road losses over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was ATLANTA 70.4, OPPONENT 82.0 - (Rating = 4*)

ATLANTA is 57-73 against the money line (-38.9 Units) after allowing 80 points or more since 1997.
The average score was ATLANTA 80.9, OPPONENT 81.0 - (Rating = 1*)

ATLANTA is 4-8 against the money line (-12.9 Units) after allowing 45 points or more in the first half last game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was ATLANTA 78.3, OPPONENT 80.3 - (Rating = 2*)

ATLANTA is 2-7 against the money line (-7.8 Units) after a loss by 6 points or less over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was ATLANTA 78.8, OPPONENT 85.0 - (Rating = 0*)

ATLANTA is 5-10 against the money line (-13.5 Units) after playing a game as an underdog over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was ATLANTA 74.3, OPPONENT 79.9 - (Rating = 2*)

ATLANTA is 3-9 against the money line (-14.1 Units) after playing a game as a road underdog over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was ATLANTA 72.1, OPPONENT 82.1 - (Rating = 4*)

ATLANTA is 13-17 against the money line (-17.8 Units) after playing a road game over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was ATLANTA 75.0, OPPONENT 77.4 - (Rating = 2*)

ATLANTA is 3-9 against the money line (-18.0 Units) after playing 2 consecutive road games over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was ATLANTA 71.2, OPPONENT 78.8 - (Rating = 6*)

ATLANTA is 9-17 against the money line (-22.4 Units) after 1 or more consecutive losses over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was ATLANTA 75.8, OPPONENT 78.8 - (Rating = 4*)

ATLANTA is 5-10 against the money line (-13.5 Units) after 2 or more consecutive losses over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was ATLANTA 75.5, OPPONENT 78.1 - (Rating = 2*)

StatFox Situational Power Trends favoring ATLANTA to win against the money line

There are 19 trends with a total rating of 17 stars.

CHICAGO is 120-168 against the money line (-52.5 Units) in all games since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 74.6, OPPONENT 76.5 - (Rating = 0*)

CHICAGO is 32-53 against the money line (-25.2 Units) in July games since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 73.2, OPPONENT 75.4 - (Rating = 0*)

CHICAGO is 17-18 against the money line (-18.8 Units) when playing 3 or less games in 10 days over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 75.9, OPPONENT 76.1 - (Rating = 1*)

CHICAGO is 4-10 against the money line (-8.3 Units) when playing 5 or less games in 14 days this season.
The average score was CHICAGO 76.3, OPPONENT 82.8 - (Rating = 1*)

CHICAGO is 1-6 against the money line (-6.0 Units) after having lost 2 of their last 3 games this season.
The average score was CHICAGO 76.1, OPPONENT 85.6 - (Rating = 0*)

CHICAGO is 6-13 against the money line (-12.4 Units) after having lost 3 of their last 4 games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 75.5, OPPONENT 76.9 - (Rating = 1*)

CHICAGO is 7-17 against the money line (-12.2 Units) after having lost 4 or 5 of their last 6 games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 76.0, OPPONENT 79.1 - (Rating = 1*)

CHICAGO is 4-12 against the money line (-9.4 Units) after having lost 4 of their last 5 games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 76.7, OPPONENT 80.9 - (Rating = 0*)

CHICAGO is 6-15 against the money line (-10.7 Units) after having lost 5 or 6 of their last 7 games over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 76.4, OPPONENT 80.1 - (Rating = 0*)

CHICAGO is 10-15 against the money line (-13.6 Units) revenging a loss versus opponent over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 74.7, OPPONENT 76.4 - (Rating = 1*)

CHICAGO is 9-14 against the money line (-11.9 Units) revenging a loss where opponent scored 75 or more points over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 74.5, OPPONENT 76.6 - (Rating = 1*)

CHICAGO is 26-44 against the money line (-22.8 Units) off a home win since 1997.
The average score was CHICAGO 73.3, OPPONENT 76.4 - (Rating = 0*)

CHICAGO is 13-20 against the money line (-17.7 Units) after playing a game as an underdog over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 75.7, OPPONENT 76.8 - (Rating = 1*)

CHICAGO is 1-8 against the money line (-13.6 Units) after playing a game as a home underdog over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was CHICAGO 75.8, OPPONENT 80.1 - (Rating = 5*)

CHICAGO is 2-9 against the money line (-8.0 Units) after playing a home game this season.
The average score was CHICAGO 76.5, OPPONENT 82.8 - (Rating = 2*)

ATLANTA is 10-2 against the money line (+8.4 Units) on Friday over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was ATLANTA 79.0, OPPONENT 69.3 - (Rating = 2*)

ATLANTA is 17-2 against the money line (+12.8 Units) in home games when playing 5 or less games in 14 days over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was ATLANTA 83.2, OPPONENT 70.7 - (Rating = 1*)

ATLANTA is 16-1 against the money line (+13.3 Units) in home games after scoring 75 points or more over the last 2 seasons.
The average score was ATLANTA 84.5, OPPONENT 71.2 - (Rating = 0*)

ATLANTA is 16-4 against the money line (+10.2 Units) in home games after scoring 80 points or more over the last 3 seasons.
The average score was ATLANTA 83.6, OPPONENT 71.7 - (Rating = 0*)

ADVANCED TEAM STATS

CHICAGO - Current Season Performance
	Straight Up		Against Spread		Team				Opponent
	W-L	Units	W-L	O-U	Score	Half	FG Pct	Reb.	Score	Half	FG Pct	Reb.
All Games	9-14	-5.5	10-13	11-12	76.9	39.4	43.1%	42.3	80.1	40.3	42.7%	44.5
Road Games	3-7	-2.1	4-6	3-7	72.3	40.4	41.3%	41.9	80.2	42.5	43.1%	45.8
Last 5 Games	1-4	-3.2	2-3	1-4	66.8	34.6	36.4%	44.6	72.8	35.4	38.8%	48.4
Division Games	8-7	+1	9-6	6-9	75.7	39.5	42.2%	42.7	77.2	38.9	40.7%	46.4

CHICAGO Team Statistics
			Shooting		3pt Shooting		Free Throws		Rebounding
	PPG	Half	FGM-A	Pct	FGM-A	PCT	FTM-A	Pct	Tot	Off	Ast	PF	Stl	TO	Bk
Team Stats (All Games)	76.9	39.4	29-67	43.1%	3-11	31.1%	15-19	80.3%	42	9	16	20	7	14	6
vs opponents surrendering	77.2	38	29-66	43.6%	5-14	33.3%	15-19	78.4%	41	9	17	19	8	14	4
Team Stats (Road Games)	72.3	40.4	27-66	41.3%	4-11	33.0%	14-18	77.5%	42	9	14	20	7	15	4
Stats Against (All Games)	80.1	40.3	30-69	42.7%	5-14	33.2%	16-21	76.0%	44	11	18	19	8	13	5
vs opponents averaging	77.5	38.4	29-66	43.8%	5-14	33.4%	15-19	77.0%	42	10	17	19	8	14	4
Stats Against (Road Games)	80.2	42.5	30-70	43.1%	5-15	30.7%	15-20	75.0%	46	12	19	18	8	13	4

ATLANTA - Current Season Performance
	Straight Up		Against Spread		Team				Opponent
	W-L	Units	W-L	O-U	Score	Half	FG Pct	Reb.	Score	Half	FG Pct	Reb.
All Games	15-7	-0.1	12-10	13-9	82.9	42.0	43.9%	46.6	77.8	39.0	42.2%	43.8
Home Games	10-2	+3.1	8-4	7-5	83.2	41.5	44.8%	48.5	74.1	37.4	40.5%	42.9
Last 5 Games	3-2	-0.2	3-2	3-2	88.0	44.8	43.4%	47.4	82.6	41.6	41.2%	50.2
Division Games	10-6	-4.5	8-8	9-7	81.1	41.4	42.8%	48.2	75.6	38.6	41.2%	44.1

ATLANTA Team Statistics
			Shooting		3pt Shooting		Free Throws		Rebounding
	PPG	Half	FGM-A	Pct	FGM-A	PCT	FTM-A	Pct	Tot	Off	Ast	PF	Stl	TO	Bk
Team Stats (All Games)	82.9	42.0	31-71	43.9%	5-15	30.4%	16-22	71.5%	47	12	20	19	10	15	5
vs opponents surrendering	77.5	38.2	29-66	43.7%	5-14	32.8%	15-20	78.0%	42	9	17	18	8	13	4
Team Stats (Home Games)	83.2	41.5	32-71	44.8%	4-13	27.7%	16-23	70.9%	48	12	21	19	9	15	5
Stats Against (All Games)	77.8	39.0	29-68	42.2%	5-15	37.2%	15-20	75.2%	44	10	19	21	9	17	3
vs opponents averaging	76.1	37.8	28-66	43.2%	5-14	33.8%	15-19	78.3%	41	9	16	19	8	14	4
Stats Against (Home Games)	74.1	37.4	27-68	40.5%	4-13	33.1%	15-20	73.4%	43	10	19	22	9	16	3

Average power rating of opponents played: CHICAGO 69.7, ATLANTA 70.2

SCHEDULE AND RESULTS

CHICAGO - Season Results Against the Money Line
					Team Stats				Opp Stats
Date	Opponent	Score	SU	Money	Shots	Pct	REB	TO	Shots	Pct	REB	TO
6/18/2014	NEW YORK	105-100	W	-125	35-76	46.1%	44	10	36-75	48.0%	45	17
6/20/2014	INDIANA	75-83	L	-165	33-67	49.3%	36	14	27-65	41.5%	52	14
6/22/2014	TULSA	99-105	L	-140	39-77	50.6%	42	14	37-74	50.0%	43	17
6/25/2014	@ CONNECTICUT	69-79	L	+100	28-67	41.8%	33	12	28-73	38.4%	55	14
6/27/2014	@ NEW YORK	73-69	W	-120	26-55	47.3%	26	15	26-61	42.6%	47	16
7/1/2014	@ LOS ANGELES	90-83	W	+210	33-63	52.4%	45	21	32-71	45.1%	31	11
7/2/2014	@ PHOENIX	69-87	L	+350	29-75	38.7%	38	7	30-66	45.5%	51	13
7/5/2014	@ SEATTLE	73-80	L	+120	27-63	42.9%	46	10	28-55	50.9%	29	5
7/9/2014	WASHINGTON	65-72	L	-165	21-67	31.3%	50	15	23-63	36.5%	41	12
7/11/2014	PHOENIX	66-72	L	+180	27-66	40.9%	36	12	25-67	37.3%	54	17
7/13/2014	@ ATLANTA	79-81	L	+220	28-74	37.8%	55	21	29-82	35.4%	60	18
7/17/2014	@ INDIANA	64-82	L	+175	21-58	36.2%	44	21	35-74	47.3%	39	8
7/22/2014	INDIANA	60-57	W	+145	21-59	35.6%	38	11	21-57	36.8%	48	18
7/25/2014	@ ATLANTA
7/27/2014	@ TULSA
7/29/2014	@ SAN ANTONIO
7/31/2014	NEW YORK
8/3/2014	WASHINGTON
8/5/2014	@ CONNECTICUT
8/7/2014	@ MINNESOTA
8/10/2014	ATLANTA

ATLANTA - Season Results Against the Money Line
					Team Stats				Opp Stats
Date	Opponent	Score	SU	Money	Shots	Pct	REB	TO	Shots	Pct	REB	TO
6/15/2014	@ WASHINGTON	75-67	W	-175	26-68	38.2%	52	17	26-62	41.9%	42	19
6/18/2014	WASHINGTON	83-73	W	-330	31-69	44.9%	45	10	31-72	43.1%	38	14
6/20/2014	NEW YORK	85-64	W	-450	33-76	43.4%	50	10	26-66	39.4%	43	15
6/22/2014	@ NEW YORK	78-85	L	-200	27-74	36.5%	56	15	31-66	47.0%	40	16
6/26/2014	@ SAN ANTONIO	81-79	W	-155	32-71	45.1%	46	13	27-64	42.2%	37	16
6/29/2014	@ INDIANA	76-68	W	-155	31-63	49.2%	37	15	24-63	38.1%	43	18
7/1/2014	INDIANA	70-77	L	-330	25-68	36.8%	57	15	23-66	34.8%	44	11
7/5/2014	WASHINGTON	86-73	W	-400	35-76	46.1%	48	8	29-65	44.6%	44	15
7/8/2014	CONNECTICUT	83-71	W	-450	33-66	50.0%	52	20	29-74	39.2%	41	20
7/12/2014	@ INDIANA	93-74	W	-120	33-70	47.1%	43	9	23-61	37.7%	44	13
7/13/2014	CHICAGO	81-79	W	-300	29-82	35.4%	60	18	28-74	37.8%	55	21
7/16/2014	@ NEW YORK	75-77	L	-220	28-69	40.6%	37	14	31-76	40.8%	53	18
7/22/2014	@ MINNESOTA	108-112	L	+175	42-93	45.2%	45	14	42-86	48.8%	58	21
7/25/2014	CHICAGO
7/27/2014	@ WASHINGTON
7/29/2014	CONNECTICUT
7/31/2014	@ TULSA
8/3/2014	NEW YORK
8/5/2014	@ PHOENIX
8/7/2014	@ SEATTLE
8/8/2014	@ LOS ANGELES
8/10/2014	@ CHICAGO

HEAD-TO-HEAD HISTORY

All games in this series since 1997

CHICAGO is 16-12 (+8.3 Units) against the money line versus ATLANTA since 1997

Games over the last 3 seasons

CHICAGO is 6-6 (+0.5 Units) against the money line versus ATLANTA over the last 3 seasons

All games played at ATLANTA since 1997

CHICAGO is 8-7 (+6.9 Units) against the money line versus ATLANTA since 1997

Games played at ATLANTA over the last 3 seasons.

ATLANTA is 4-2 (+0.3 Units) against the money line versus CHICAGO over the last 3 seasons

						Shooting		3pt shots		Free Throws		Rebounds
Date	Teams	Score	Line	Result	Half	FGM-A	Pct	FGM-A	Pct	FTM-A	Pct	Tot.	OFF	TO
7/13/2014	CHICAGO	79	159	ATS	46	28-74	37.8%	1-4	25.0%	22-28	78.6%	55	13	21
	ATLANTA	81	-7	SU Over	42	29-82	35.4%	3-15	20.0%	20-30	66.7%	60	21	18
6/7/2014	CHICAGO	59	160	Under	31	22-65	33.8%	2-9	22.2%	13-18	72.2%	40	10	18
	ATLANTA	97	-6	SU ATS	56	35-78	44.9%	8-18	44.4%	19-27	70.4%	59	20	13
5/24/2014	ATLANTA	73	152.5	Over	39	28-66	42.4%	5-17	29.4%	12-15	80.0%	37	10	15
	CHICAGO	87	-2	SU ATS	41	30-64	46.9%	8-14	57.1%	19-22	86.4%	41	10	16
9/13/2013	ATLANTA	82	154	ATS	44	30-74	40.5%	6-12	50.0%	16-20	80.0%	43	12	7
	CHICAGO	87	-7	SU Over	45	28-61	45.9%	6-12	50.0%	25-30	83.3%	43	9	12
8/31/2013	ATLANTA	68	155	Under	39	29-68	42.6%	3-15	20.0%	7-10	70.0%	40	7	17
	CHICAGO	85	-7	SU ATS	40	31-70	44.3%	1-7	14.3%	22-27	81.5%	46	13	8
8/24/2013	CHICAGO	67	154	SU ATS	35	23-64	35.9%	2-7	28.6%	19-26	73.1%	53	12	20
	ATLANTA	56	-4	Under	26	20-70	28.6%	3-11	27.3%	13-15	86.7%	47	10	22
6/16/2013	CHICAGO	74	155	Over	47	27-71	38.0%	2-9	22.2%	18-19	94.7%	49	15	17
	ATLANTA	88	-5.5	SU ATS	51	32-69	46.4%	7-13	53.8%	17-24	70.8%	40	8	8

COACHING TRENDS

StatFox Coaching Situational Power Trends favoring ATLANTA to win against the money line

There are 37 trends with a total rating of 52 stars.

Pokey is 60-65 against the money line (-21.8 Units) in all games as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 76.2, OPPONENT 75.8 - (Rating = 0*)

Pokey is 23-24 against the money line (-19.6 Units) when playing 3 or less games in 10 days as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 75.5, OPPONENT 75.1 - (Rating = 1*)

Pokey is 37-49 against the money line (-34.6 Units) when playing 5 or less games in 14 days as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 75.7, OPPONENT 76.3 - (Rating = 2*)

Pokey is 16-25 against the money line (-16.2 Units) after having lost 2 of their last 3 games as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 75.4, OPPONENT 76.8 - (Rating = 1*)

Pokey is 11-18 against the money line (-11.9 Units) after having lost 3 of their last 4 games as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 75.2, OPPONENT 75.3 - (Rating = 1*)

Pokey is 28-36 against the money line (-19.0 Units) revenging a loss versus opponent as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 75.7, OPPONENT 75.9 - (Rating = 1*)

Pokey is 23-32 against the money line (-18.4 Units) revenging a loss where opponent scored 75 or more points as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 75.8, OPPONENT 76.3 - (Rating = 1*)

Pokey is 13-21 against the money line (-14.4 Units) off a home win as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 75.4, OPPONENT 77.3 - (Rating = 1*)

Pokey is 22-28 against the money line (-16.4 Units) after playing a game as an underdog as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 75.9, OPPONENT 76.0 - (Rating = 1*)

Pokey is 2-10 against the money line (-13.8 Units) after playing a game as a home underdog as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 74.5, OPPONENT 78.4 - (Rating = 5*)

Pokey is 22-39 against the money line (-30.1 Units) after playing a home game as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 75.1, OPPONENT 77.0 - (Rating = 3*)

Pokey is 10-24 against the money line (-15.3 Units) versus good passing teams, averaging >=17 assists/game as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 76.1, OPPONENT 80.4 - (Rating = 1*)

Pokey is 24-34 against the money line (-15.7 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game after 15+ games as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 74.2, OPPONENT 74.7 - (Rating = 1*)

Pokey is 42-55 against the money line (-31.7 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 76.1, OPPONENT 76.6 - (Rating = 2*)

Pokey is 26-36 against the money line (-15.4 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game after 15+ games as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 74.0, OPPONENT 74.5 - (Rating = 0*)

Pokey is 44-57 against the money line (-31.8 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 75.9, OPPONENT 76.5 - (Rating = 2*)

Pokey is 43-50 against the money line (-20.2 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 76.5, OPPONENT 76.0 - (Rating = 1*)

Pokey is 20-29 against the money line (-21.8 Units) versus poor defensive teams - allowing 77+ points/game as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 75.5, OPPONENT 76.2 - (Rating = 2*)

Pokey is 26-45 against the money line (-25.2 Units) versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 76.3, OPPONENT 78.4 - (Rating = 2*)

Pokey is 16-39 against the money line (-23.3 Units) versus good offensive teams - scoring 77+ points/game as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 76.0, OPPONENT 80.1 - (Rating = 2*)

Pokey is 3-12 against the money line (-15.2 Units) versus teams who average 9 or more steals/game on the season after 15+ games as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 70.9, OPPONENT 76.9 - (Rating = 5*)

Pokey is 10-19 against the money line (-15.4 Units) versus teams who average 9 or more steals/game on the season as the coach of CHICAGO.
The average score was CHICAGO 75.5, OPPONENT 79.7 - (Rating = 2*)

Michael is 36-14 against the money line (+17.7 Units) after 2 straight games with 20 or more assists in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Michael 74.8, OPPONENT 71.8 - (Rating = 1*)

Michael is 214-108 against the money line (+41.3 Units) in all games in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Michael 75.4, OPPONENT 71.8 - (Rating = 1*)

Michael is 180-56 against the money line (+46.7 Units) as a favorite in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Michael 76.2, OPPONENT 70.3 - (Rating = 1*)

Michael is 43-18 against the money line (+18.8 Units) when playing with 2 days rest in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Michael 75.8, OPPONENT 71.9 - (Rating = 1*)

Michael is 143-74 against the money line (+29.1 Units) vs. division opponents in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Michael 75.1, OPPONENT 71.8 - (Rating = 0*)

Michael is 49-21 against the money line (+19.7 Units) when playing 3 or less games in 10 days in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Michael 77.0, OPPONENT 72.7 - (Rating = 1*)

Michael is 96-36 against the money line (+46.9 Units) when playing 5 or less games in 14 days in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Michael 76.3, OPPONENT 71.6 - (Rating = 3*)

Michael is 21-7 against the money line (+11.7 Units) in home games after having lost 2 of their last 3 games in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Michael 78.2, OPPONENT 71.4 - (Rating = 0*)

Michael is 23-3 against the money line (+15.8 Units) in home games after scoring 45 points or more in the first half last game in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Michael 77.3, OPPONENT 70.3 - (Rating = 0*)

Michael is 9-1 against the money line (+8.0 Units) vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts as the coach of ATLANTA.
The average score was ATLANTA 86.9, OPPONENT 76.7 - (Rating = 3*)

Michael is 7-1 against the money line (+6.0 Units) vs. excellent free throw shooting teams - making >=80% of their shots as the coach of ATLANTA.
The average score was ATLANTA 86.9, OPPONENT 76.8 - (Rating = 1*)

Michael is 113-61 against the money line (+29.4 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game after 15+ games in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Michael 74.5, OPPONENT 71.7 - (Rating = 1*)

Michael is 165-86 against the money line (+29.5 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Michael 75.0, OPPONENT 71.6 - (Rating = 0*)

Michael is 25-8 against the money line (+13.8 Units) versus poor teams - outscored by their opponents by 3+ points/game after 15+ games in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Michael 73.9, OPPONENT 69.8 - (Rating = 1*)

Michael is 48-20 against the money line (+20.0 Units) versus good ball handling teams - committing <=14 turnovers/game after 15+ games in all games he has coached since 1997.
The average score was Michael 74.8, OPPONENT 71.6 - (Rating = 1*)

STATFOX LINE TRACKER™

Here is a summary of past results against the money line in games where the line movement was similar to:

Opening Money Line: Home=-360 (Road=+280), Closing Money Line: Home=-400 (Road=+300)

Since 1997, the home favorite won the game straight up 102 times, while the road underdog won straight up 35 times. No Edge.

Over the last 3 seasons, the home favorite won the game straight up 17 times, while the road underdog won straight up 6 times. No Edge.

KEY PLAYER INJURIES

CHICAGO

No significant injuries.

ATLANTA

No significant injuries.

Last Updated: 5/2/2024 7:06:27 AM EST.