| | WNBA : Money Line Matchup |
| |
WASHINGTON ATLANTA |
|
| 143.5 | 72 Final 80 |
|
|
| | |
|
Eastern Conference Semifinals - Best of 3 - Game 3 - Series tied 1-1 | | | | |
667 | WASHINGTON | +210 | 668 | ATLANTA | -270 |
|
|
| | |
|
| | | One of the growing resources utilized by sports handicappers is the public betting information offered by a variety of sources. Leading the way in this is Sportsbook.com, who offers the data at its website in real-time. |
|
| | |
|
- Underdogs vs the money line (WASHINGTON) - vs. division opponents, after 3 consecutive division games. (523-211 since 1997.) (71.3%, +90.6 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (WASHINGTON) - in a game involving two average defensive teams (40.5-43.5%), in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game) after 15+ games. (237-95 since 1997.) (71.4%, +84.4 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (WASHINGTON) - in a game involving two average defensive teams (40.5-43.5%) after 15+ games, in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game). (237-95 since 1997.) (71.4%, +84.4 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (WASHINGTON) - in a game involving two average defensive teams (40.5-43.5%) after 15+ games, in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game) after 15+ games. (237-95 since 1997.) (71.4%, +84.4 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (ATLANTA) - in a game involving two average defensive teams (40.5-43.5%), in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game) after 15+ games. (237-95 since 1997.) (71.4%, +84.4 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (ATLANTA) - in a game involving two average defensive teams (40.5-43.5%) after 15+ games, in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game). (237-95 since 1997.) (71.4%, +84.4 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (ATLANTA) - in a game involving two average defensive teams (40.5-43.5%) after 15+ games, in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game) after 15+ games. (237-95 since 1997.) (71.4%, +84.4 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (ATLANTA) - in a game involving two average defensive teams (40.5-43.5%), in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game). (275-115 since 1997.) (70.5%, +81.5 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (WASHINGTON) - in a game involving two average defensive teams (40.5-43.5%), in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game). (275-115 since 1997.) (70.5%, +81.5 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (ATLANTA) - after 1 or more consecutive unders against opponent after 2 or more consecutive unders. (105-46 over the last 5 seasons.) (69.5%, +45.5 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home favorites vs. the money line (ATLANTA) - in a game involving two average defensive teams (40.5-43.5%), in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game). (249-83 since 1997.) (75%, +79.7 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road underdogs vs. the money line (WASHINGTON) - in a game involving two average defensive teams (40.5-43.5%), in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game). (244-79 since 1997.) (75.5%, +79.1 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road underdogs vs. the money line (WASHINGTON) - in a game involving two average defensive teams (40.5-43.5%), in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game) after 15+ games. (210-67 since 1997.) (75.8%, +78.8 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road underdogs vs. the money line (WASHINGTON) - in a game involving two average defensive teams (40.5-43.5%) after 15+ games, in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game). (210-67 since 1997.) (75.8%, +78.8 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road underdogs vs. the money line (WASHINGTON) - in a game involving two average defensive teams (40.5-43.5%) after 15+ games, in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game) after 15+ games. (210-67 since 1997.) (75.8%, +78.8 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home favorites vs. the money line (ATLANTA) - in a game involving two average defensive teams (40.5-43.5%), in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game) after 15+ games. (214-71 since 1997.) (75.1%, +78.4 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home favorites vs. the money line (ATLANTA) - in a game involving two average defensive teams (40.5-43.5%) after 15+ games, in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game). (214-71 since 1997.) (75.1%, +78.4 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home favorites vs. the money line (ATLANTA) - in a game involving two average defensive teams (40.5-43.5%) after 15+ games, in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game) after 15+ games. (214-71 since 1997.) (75.1%, +78.4 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home favorites vs. the money line (ATLANTA) - after 1 or more consecutive unders against opponent after 2 or more consecutive unders. (89-27 over the last 5 seasons.) (76.7%, +33.2 units. Rating = 1*) | - Favorites vs. the money line (ATLANTA) - after 1 or more consecutive unders against opponent after 2 or more consecutive unders. (392-168 since 1997.) (70%, +71 units. Rating = 1*) | - Favorites vs. the money line (ATLANTA) - in a game involving two average defensive teams (40.5-43.5%), in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game). (276-105 since 1997.) (72.4%, +70.2 units. Rating = 2*) | - Underdogs vs the money line (WASHINGTON) - in a game involving two average defensive teams (40.5-43.5%), in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game). (276-105 since 1997.) (72.4%, +70.2 units. Rating = 2*) | - Underdogs vs the money line (WASHINGTON) - in a game involving two average defensive teams (40.5-43.5%), in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game) after 15+ games. (234-90 since 1997.) (72.2%, +66.3 units. Rating = 2*) | - Underdogs vs the money line (WASHINGTON) - in a game involving two average defensive teams (40.5-43.5%) after 15+ games, in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game). (234-90 since 1997.) (72.2%, +66.3 units. Rating = 2*) | - Underdogs vs the money line (WASHINGTON) - in a game involving two average defensive teams (40.5-43.5%) after 15+ games, in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game) after 15+ games. (234-90 since 1997.) (72.2%, +66.3 units. Rating = 2*) | - Favorites vs. the money line (ATLANTA) - in a game involving two average defensive teams (40.5-43.5%), in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game) after 15+ games. (234-90 since 1997.) (72.2%, +66.3 units. Rating = 2*) | - Favorites vs. the money line (ATLANTA) - in a game involving two average defensive teams (40.5-43.5%) after 15+ games, in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game). (234-90 since 1997.) (72.2%, +66.3 units. Rating = 2*) | - Favorites vs. the money line (ATLANTA) - in a game involving two average defensive teams (40.5-43.5%) after 15+ games, in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game) after 15+ games. (234-90 since 1997.) (72.2%, +66.3 units. Rating = 2*) | - Favorites vs. the money line (ATLANTA) - after 1 or more consecutive unders against opponent after 3 or more consecutive unders. (219-79 since 1997.) (73.5%, +62.2 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (WASHINGTON) - off a home loss by 10 points or more. (215-84 since 1997.) (71.9%, +59.7 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home favorites vs. the money line (ATLANTA) - after 1 or more consecutive unders against opponent after 3 or more consecutive unders. (182-60 since 1997.) (75.2%, +59.1 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home favorites of -165 to -500 vs. the money line (ATLANTA) - in a game involving two average defensive teams (40.5-43.5%), in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game). (180-53 since 1997.) (77.3%, +58.8 units. Rating = 2*) | - Road underdogs of +145 to +350 vs. the money line (WASHINGTON) - in a game involving two average defensive teams (40.5-43.5%), in a game involving two average rebounding teams (+/-3 reb/game). (180-53 since 1997.) (77.3%, +58.8 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (ATLANTA) - after 1 or more consecutive unders against opponent after 3 or more consecutive unders. (199-92 since 1997.) (68.4%, +57.4 units. Rating = 2*) | - Underdogs vs the money line (WASHINGTON) - after going under the total by 42 or more points total in their last five games. (242-86 since 1997.) (73.8%, +50.2 units. Rating = 1*) | - Road underdogs of +145 to +350 vs. the money line (WASHINGTON) - after scoring 55 points or less. (122-31 since 1997.) (79.7%, +49.7 units. Rating = 2*) | - Underdogs vs the money line (WASHINGTON) - off a home loss by 10 points or more against opponent off a road win. (97-23 since 1997.) (80.8%, +46.7 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (ATLANTA) - good offensive team - scoring 73+ points/game on the season against opponent after a combined score of 115 points or less. (75-33 since 1997.) (69.4%, +43.8 units. Rating = 4*) | - Any team vs the money line (WASHINGTON) - off a home loss by 10 points or more against opponent off a road win. (112-48 since 1997.) (70%, +43.1 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (WASHINGTON) - off an embarrassing home loss scoring less than 54 points. (81-36 since 1997.) (69.2%, +41.8 units. Rating = 3*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (WASHINGTON) - vs. division opponents, off a home loss by 10 points or more. (155-61 since 1997.) (71.8%, +40.6 units. Rating = 1*) | - Underdogs vs the money line (WASHINGTON) - revenging a same season loss versus opponent, off a home loss by 10 points or more. (126-41 since 1997.) (75.4%, +37.4 units. Rating = 1*) | - Underdogs vs the money line (WASHINGTON) - after going under the total by 42 or more points total in their last five games, vs. division opponents. (166-54 since 1997.) (75.5%, +36.8 units. Rating = 1*) | - Any team vs the money line (WASHINGTON) - poor defensive team - allowing 73+ points/game on the season, after scoring 55 points or less. (67-26 since 1997.) (72%, +33.5 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (ATLANTA) - good offensive team - scoring 73+ points/game on the season against opponent after a combined score of 115 points or less. (43-8 since 1997.) (84.3%, +32.1 units. Rating = 4*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (WASHINGTON) - revenging a same season loss versus opponent, off a home loss by 10 points or more. (95-28 since 1997.) (77.2%, +30.8 units. Rating = 1*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (WASHINGTON) - off a home loss by 10 points or more, in August or September games. (77-27 since 1997.) (74%, +29.6 units. Rating = 1*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (ATLANTA) - after being beaten by the spread by 30 or more points total in their last five games, vs. division opponents. (55-29 over the last 5 seasons.) (65.5%, +22.1 units. Rating = 1*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (WASHINGTON) - off an upset loss to a division rival as a favorite, in August or September games. (33-15 over the last 5 seasons.) (68.8%, +20 units. Rating = 2*) | - Underdogs vs the money line (WASHINGTON) - off a loss by 10 points or more to a division rival, with a winning percentage of between 45-55% after 15 or more games. (75-23 since 1997.) (76.5%, +24.6 units. Rating = 0*) | - Any team vs the money line (WASHINGTON) - off a home loss, on Monday nights. (43-23 since 1997.) (65.2%, +22.5 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (WASHINGTON) - revenging a home loss versus opponent, off an embarrassing home loss scoring less than 54 points. (29-6 since 1997.) (82.9%, +21.8 units. Rating = 3*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (ATLANTA) - poor defensive team - allowing 73+ points/game on the season against opponent after a combined score of 115 points or less. (30-8 since 1997.) (78.9%, +20.8 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (WASHINGTON) - poor defensive team - allowing 73+ points/game on the season, after scoring 50 points or less. (24-5 since 1997.) (82.8%, +19.1 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (WASHINGTON) - poor defensive team - allowing 73+ points/game on the season, after a combined score of 115 points or less. (27-12 since 1997.) (69.2%, +18.9 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (ATLANTA) - off a road win against a division rival, on Monday nights. (30-13 since 1997.) (69.8%, +18 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (ATLANTA) - vs. division opponents, off a road win by 10 points or more. (50-16 over the last 5 seasons.) (75.8%, +22.4 units. Rating = 1*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (WASHINGTON) - after being beaten by the spread by more than 18 points in their previous game. (43-19 over the last 5 seasons.) (69.4%, +22.3 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (ATLANTA) - off an upset win by 10 points or more as a road underdog. (42-15 over the last 5 seasons.) (73.7%, +18.6 units. Rating = 0*) | - Road teams vs. the money line (WASHINGTON) - off a upset loss as a favorite, tired team - playing their 3rd game in 5 days. (26-11 over the last 5 seasons.) (70.3%, +17.4 units. Rating = 2*) | - Home teams vs. the money line (ATLANTA) - vs. division opponents, off an upset win by 10 points or more as a road underdog. (28-11 over the last 5 seasons.) (71.8%, +10 units. Rating = 0*) | - Any team vs the money line (ATLANTA) - vs. division opponents, off an upset win by 10 points or more as a road underdog. (34-19 over the last 5 seasons.) (64.2%, +10.5 units. Rating = 0*) |
|
|
- Any team vs the money line (WASHINGTON) - good offensive team - scoring 73+ points/game on the season against opponent after a combined score of 115 points or less. (75-33 since 1997.) (69.4%, +43.8 units. Rating = 4*) | - Any team vs the money line (WASHINGTON) - revenging a straight up loss versus opponent as a favorite, off a loss against a division rival. (72-43 over the last 5 seasons.) (62.6%, +39 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (WASHINGTON) - after 5 or more consecutive unders, good offensive team - scoring 73+ points/game on the season. (63-31 since 1997.) (67%, +32.8 units. Rating = 3*) | - Any team vs the money line (ATLANTA) - in a game involving two average teams (+/- 3 PPG differential.), after a win by 10 points or more. (46-29 over the last 5 seasons.) (61.3%, +20.5 units. Rating = 1*) | - Any team vs the money line (ATLANTA) - poor defensive team - allowing 73+ points/game on the season, after a combined score of 115 points or less. (27-12 since 1997.) (69.2%, +18.9 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (ATLANTA) - after being beaten by the spread by 30 or more points total in their last three games, with a winning percentage of between 45-55% on the season. (51-32 since 1997.) (61.4%, +17.6 units. Rating = 1*) | - Any team vs the money line (ATLANTA) - after being beaten by the spread by 24 or more points total in their last three games, with a winning percentage of between 45-55% after 15 or more games. (60-42 since 1997.) (58.8%, +14.7 units. Rating = 0*) | - Any team vs the money line (ATLANTA) - after being beaten by the spread by 30 or more points total in their last three games, with a winning percentage of between 45-55% after 15 or more games. (41-26 since 1997.) (61.2%, +14.1 units. Rating = 0*) | - Any team vs the money line (ATLANTA) - in a game involving two poor defensive teams (72-76 PPG) after 15+ games, after a blowout win by 15 points or more. (25-19 since 1997.) (56.8%, +10.2 units. Rating = 0*) | - Any team vs the money line (ATLANTA) - off a road win, with a winning percentage of between 45-55% on the season. (51-30 over the last 5 seasons.) (63%, +32.9 units. Rating = 3*) |
|
| | |
|
WASHINGTON | 72 | | 26-66 | 39.4% | 5-15 | 32.4% | 15-19 | 77.8% | 46 | 11 | 15 | ATLANTA | 72 | | 28-70 | 39.8% | 3-13 | 24.3% | 13-18 | 74.7% | 46 | 12 | 13 |
| The number of simulations in which each team won the game straight up are listed below. If one time held a significant advantage against the money line, the edge is indicated. | In 1000 simulated games, ATLANTA won the game straight up 491 times, while WASHINGTON won 474 times. Edge against the money line=WASHINGTON |
|
|
| Potential StatFox Money Line Power Trends to watch out for:
| |
WASHINGTON is 11-7 against the money line (+11.1 Units) in games where they commit 13 to 18 turnovers this season. The average score was WASHINGTON 73.9, OPPONENT 72.3 | ATLANTA is 15-17 against the money line (-15.7 Units) in up-tempo games where they attempt 84 or more shots this season. The average score was ATLANTA 75.8, OPPONENT 75.8 | ATLANTA is 11-13 against the money line (-17.4 Units) when they make 40% to 44% of their shots in a game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was ATLANTA 78.7, OPPONENT 77.7 | ATLANTA is 7-9 against the money line (-13.9 Units) when they make 22% to 28% of their three point attempts in a game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was ATLANTA 75.8, OPPONENT 76.4 | ATLANTA is 19-18 against the money line (-17.6 Units) in games where they force 13 to 18 turnovers over the last 2 seasons. The average score was ATLANTA 76.5, OPPONENT 75.0 | ATLANTA is 15-20 against the money line (-21.3 Units) where both teams score 71 or more points in a game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was ATLANTA 83.3, OPPONENT 83.3 |
|
WASHINGTON is 13-40 against the money line (-23.3 Units) in up-tempo games where they attempt 84 or more shots over the last 3 seasons. The average score was WASHINGTON 73.7, OPPONENT 79.3 | WASHINGTON is 52-93 against the money line (-50.4 Units) when they attempt 17 to 22 free throws in a game since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 70.5, OPPONENT 74.6 | WASHINGTON is 5-15 against the money line (-10.7 Units) in games attempting around the same number of free throws as opponents over the last 2 seasons. The average score was WASHINGTON 74.0, OPPONENT 78.8 | WASHINGTON is 10-24 against the money line (-13.4 Units) when they grab 8 to 12 offensive rebounds in a game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was WASHINGTON 72.2, OPPONENT 78.1 | WASHINGTON is 2-13 against the money line (-12.2 Units) when they allow 72 to 77 points in a game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was WASHINGTON 68.2, OPPONENT 75.5 | WASHINGTON is 5-21 against the money line (-14.8 Units) when they have the around same number of rebounds as their opponents in a game over the last 3 seasons. The average score was WASHINGTON 72.0, OPPONENT 79.7 |
|
| | |
|
ATLANTA is 13-16 against the money line (-15.3 Units) versus good 3 point shooting teams - making >=33% of their attempts after 15+ games over the last 2 seasons. The average score was ATLANTA 74.8, OPPONENT 77.3 - (Rating = 1*) | ATLANTA is 8-14 against the money line (-18.2 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game after 15+ games this season. The average score was ATLANTA 74.3, OPPONENT 75.9 - (Rating = 4*) | ATLANTA is 13-16 against the money line (-15.2 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game this season. The average score was ATLANTA 75.9, OPPONENT 75.7 - (Rating = 2*) | ATLANTA is 5-10 against the money line (-11.2 Units) vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts after 15+ games this season. The average score was ATLANTA 72.7, OPPONENT 76.0 - (Rating = 2*) | ATLANTA is 7-12 against the money line (-12.0 Units) vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts this season. The average score was ATLANTA 73.7, OPPONENT 76.6 - (Rating = 2*) | ATLANTA is 8-9 against the money line (-11.4 Units) versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game after 15+ games this season. The average score was ATLANTA 75.4, OPPONENT 74.7 - (Rating = 0*) | ATLANTA is 8-14 against the money line (-18.2 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game after 15+ games this season. The average score was ATLANTA 74.3, OPPONENT 75.9 - (Rating = 4*) | ATLANTA is 13-17 against the money line (-16.9 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game this season. The average score was ATLANTA 75.5, OPPONENT 75.6 - (Rating = 2*) | ATLANTA is 6-12 against the money line (-17.4 Units) versus poor pressure defensive teams - forcing <=14 turnovers/game after 15+ games this season. The average score was ATLANTA 73.6, OPPONENT 74.3 - (Rating = 4*) | ATLANTA is 9-14 against the money line (-17.2 Units) versus poor pressure defensive teams - forcing <=14 turnovers/game this season. The average score was ATLANTA 74.5, OPPONENT 75.3 - (Rating = 3*) | ATLANTA is 6-11 against the money line (-15.4 Units) versus teams who average 42 or more rebounds/game on the season after 15+ games this season. The average score was ATLANTA 73.9, OPPONENT 73.0 - (Rating = 3*) | ATLANTA is 9-12 against the money line (-13.4 Units) versus teams who average 42 or more rebounds/game on the season this season. The average score was ATLANTA 75.3, OPPONENT 74.3 - (Rating = 2*) | ATLANTA is 7-13 against the money line (-18.2 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game after 15+ games this season. The average score was ATLANTA 74.0, OPPONENT 75.5 - (Rating = 4*) | ATLANTA is 12-16 against the money line (-16.9 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game this season. The average score was ATLANTA 75.4, OPPONENT 75.3 - (Rating = 2*) | ATLANTA is 4-9 against the money line (-11.2 Units) versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game after 15+ games this season. The average score was ATLANTA 71.9, OPPONENT 75.4 - (Rating = 2*) | ATLANTA is 7-11 against the money line (-10.2 Units) versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game this season. The average score was ATLANTA 74.8, OPPONENT 75.9 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
|
WASHINGTON is 14-39 against the money line (-20.1 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game after 15+ games over the last 3 seasons. The average score was WASHINGTON 69.9, OPPONENT 76.6 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 18-37 against the money line (-16.4 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was WASHINGTON 71.7, OPPONENT 76.6 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 80-136 against the money line (-63.9 Units) versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game after 15+ games since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 68.2, OPPONENT 72.4 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 123-185 against the money line (-64.7 Units) versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 69.0, OPPONENT 72.3 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 13-38 against the money line (-20.9 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game after 15+ games over the last 3 seasons. The average score was WASHINGTON 69.3, OPPONENT 76.4 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 18-39 against the money line (-18.4 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was WASHINGTON 71.4, OPPONENT 76.6 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 10-23 against the money line (-13.0 Units) versus teams who average 42 or more rebounds/game on the season over the last 2 seasons. The average score was WASHINGTON 72.4, OPPONENT 78.3 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 13-39 against the money line (-22.1 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game after 15+ games over the last 3 seasons. The average score was WASHINGTON 69.9, OPPONENT 76.8 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 22-55 against the money line (-27.5 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game over the last 3 seasons. The average score was WASHINGTON 71.6, OPPONENT 77.1 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 8-34 against the money line (-20.8 Units) versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game after 15+ games over the last 3 seasons. The average score was WASHINGTON 68.8, OPPONENT 78.6 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 15-50 against the money line (-27.5 Units) versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game over the last 3 seasons. The average score was WASHINGTON 71.3, OPPONENT 78.8 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 18-47 against the money line (-27.1 Units) versus teams who average 9 or more steals/game on the season after 15+ games since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 67.9, OPPONENT 75.4 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 32-74 against the money line (-39.1 Units) versus teams who average 9 or more steals/game on the season since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 69.1, OPPONENT 75.1 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
| | |
|
WASHINGTON is 12-10 against the money line (+8.2 Units) after a division game this season. The average score was WASHINGTON 72.7, OPPONENT 72.1 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 11-10 against the money line (+8.5 Units) after 1 or more consecutive unders this season. The average score was WASHINGTON 73.8, OPPONENT 73.3 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 7-4 against the money line (+10.4 Units) after 2 or more consecutive unders this season. The average score was WASHINGTON 72.2, OPPONENT 70.4 - (Rating = 2*) | ATLANTA is 18-18 against the money line (-13.7 Units) in all games this season. The average score was ATLANTA 75.9, OPPONENT 74.4 - (Rating = 1*) | ATLANTA is 14-12 against the money line (-13.2 Units) as a favorite this season. The average score was ATLANTA 75.7, OPPONENT 72.9 - (Rating = 0*) | ATLANTA is 10-10 against the money line (-20.0 Units) as a home favorite of -270 to -450 since 1997. The average score was ATLANTA 83.0, OPPONENT 81.0 - (Rating = 1*) | ATLANTA is 7-13 against the money line (-17.1 Units) in August or September games this season. The average score was ATLANTA 74.9, OPPONENT 75.8 - (Rating = 4*) | ATLANTA is 19-33 against the money line (-30.4 Units) when playing their 3rd game in 5 days since 1997. The average score was ATLANTA 78.5, OPPONENT 80.4 - (Rating = 3*) | ATLANTA is 4-7 against the money line (-8.6 Units) after failing to cover 2 of their last 3 against the spread this season. The average score was ATLANTA 72.7, OPPONENT 76.1 - (Rating = 0*) | ATLANTA is 2-6 against the money line (-8.3 Units) after having lost 2 of their last 3 games this season. The average score was ATLANTA 78.0, OPPONENT 79.6 - (Rating = 1*) | ATLANTA is 2-7 against the money line (-10.4 Units) after having lost 3 of their last 4 games this season. The average score was ATLANTA 74.9, OPPONENT 83.1 - (Rating = 3*) | ATLANTA is 3-6 against the money line (-8.5 Units) after playing a game as an underdog this season. The average score was ATLANTA 73.6, OPPONENT 80.8 - (Rating = 0*) | ATLANTA is 7-10 against the money line (-11.9 Units) after playing a road game this season. The average score was ATLANTA 72.2, OPPONENT 73.6 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
|
WASHINGTON is 10-27 against the money line (-17.4 Units) after a game with 8 or less assists since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 68.3, OPPONENT 75.9 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 28-72 against the money line (-31.7 Units) in all games over the last 3 seasons. The average score was WASHINGTON 71.4, OPPONENT 77.1 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 101-248 against the money line (-71.2 Units) as an underdog since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 68.8, OPPONENT 75.6 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 22-67 against the money line (-32.5 Units) in road games in August or September games since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 67.8, OPPONENT 76.8 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 18-49 against the money line (-25.4 Units) vs. division opponents over the last 3 seasons. The average score was WASHINGTON 70.0, OPPONENT 76.0 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 82-137 against the money line (-59.6 Units) after 2 consecutive division games since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 69.7, OPPONENT 73.4 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 8-23 against the money line (-14.4 Units) after 3 consecutive division games over the last 3 seasons. The average score was WASHINGTON 68.8, OPPONENT 76.4 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 65-110 against the money line (-49.3 Units) when playing their 3rd game in 5 days since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 69.5, OPPONENT 73.3 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 4-21 against the money line (-16.0 Units) in road games after a game where a team made 55% of their free throws or worse since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 65.5, OPPONENT 74.2 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 31-52 against the money line (-26.6 Units) after 2 straight games giving up 11 or more offensive rebounds since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 70.4, OPPONENT 75.1 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 16-39 against the money line (-27.5 Units) after 3 or more consecutive unders since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 66.4, OPPONENT 72.3 - (Rating = 2*) | WASHINGTON is 8-18 against the money line (-14.7 Units) after 4 or more consecutive unders since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 66.0, OPPONENT 70.8 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 32-65 against the money line (-35.6 Units) after covering 3 of their last 4 against the spread since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 70.5, OPPONENT 74.4 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 32-51 against the money line (-24.9 Units) after having won 3 of their last 4 games since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 71.9, OPPONENT 73.3 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 3-9 against the money line (-7.8 Units) after covering 4 or 5 of their last 6 against the spread this season. The average score was WASHINGTON 72.0, OPPONENT 76.2 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 12-37 against the money line (-33.9 Units) after covering 4 of their last 5 against the spread since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 69.0, OPPONENT 75.2 - (Rating = 4*) | WASHINGTON is 1-9 against the money line (-9.7 Units) in road games after a game being outrebounded by opponent by 15 or more since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 66.2, OPPONENT 76.9 - (Rating = 2*) | WASHINGTON is 5-23 against the money line (-17.0 Units) revenging a home loss versus opponent over the last 3 seasons. The average score was WASHINGTON 70.8, OPPONENT 79.6 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 70-129 against the money line (-56.8 Units) off a loss against a division rival since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 69.3, OPPONENT 73.8 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 54-105 against the money line (-44.0 Units) after a loss by 10 points or more since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 70.0, OPPONENT 75.4 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 21-56 against the money line (-38.3 Units) after a blowout loss by 15 points or more since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 69.4, OPPONENT 76.6 - (Rating = 3*) | WASHINGTON is 13-32 against the money line (-23.9 Units) after scoring 55 points or less since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 66.8, OPPONENT 73.0 - (Rating = 2*) | WASHINGTON is 35-71 against the money line (-46.9 Units) after a game where both teams scored 60 points or less since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 67.6, OPPONENT 72.9 - (Rating = 2*) | WASHINGTON is 3-13 against the money line (-16.2 Units) after a combined score of 110 points or less since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 64.6, OPPONENT 71.6 - (Rating = 4*) | WASHINGTON is 7-24 against the money line (-23.3 Units) after a combined score of 115 points or less since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 64.6, OPPONENT 71.0 - (Rating = 4*) | WASHINGTON is 36-60 against the money line (-30.2 Units) after a combined score of 125 points or less since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 67.8, OPPONENT 71.0 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 102-181 against the money line (-71.2 Units) after a game where they failed to cover the spread since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 69.6, OPPONENT 74.1 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 17-52 against the money line (-26.6 Units) after 1 or more consecutive losses over the last 3 seasons. The average score was WASHINGTON 70.8, OPPONENT 77.8 - (Rating = 1*) | ATLANTA is 21-5 against the money line (+12.1 Units) in home games after 2 consecutive division games over the last 3 seasons. The average score was ATLANTA 79.0, OPPONENT 69.8 - (Rating = 0*) | ATLANTA is 15-8 against the money line (+10.7 Units) off an upset win over a division rival as an underdog since 1997. The average score was ATLANTA 83.5, OPPONENT 79.9 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
| | |
|
|
All Games | 18-18 | +6.2 | 20-16 | 14-21 | 74.5 | 36.4 | 41.0% | 44.1 | 74.5 | 36.6 | 40.7% | 43.7 | Road Games | 8-10 | +2 | 11-7 | 9-8 | 76.4 | 37.8 | 42.7% | 43.7 | 78.2 | 39.3 | 42.5% | 41.6 | Last 5 Games | 4-1 | +4.8 | 4-1 | 0-5 | 67.4 | 33.4 | 38.3% | 49.0 | 58.8 | 30.2 | 33.2% | 45.6 | Division Games | 11-13 | -0.7 | 12-12 | 8-15 | 71.5 | 33.9 | 39.7% | 43.4 | 72.5 | 35.4 | 39.8% | 45.5 |
|
| |
|
|
Team Stats (All Games) | 74.5 | 36.4 | 27-66 | 41.0% | 5-13 | 33.9% | 16-20 | 77.8% | 44 | 10 | 16 | 19 | 7 | 14 | 4 | vs opponents surrendering | 75.1 | 37.5 | 28-66 | 42.2% | 5-14 | 32.8% | 15-19 | 78.0% | 43 | 10 | 16 | 18 | 8 | 14 | 4 | Team Stats (Road Games) | 76.4 | 37.8 | 28-67 | 42.7% | 4-14 | 31.0% | 15-19 | 80.2% | 44 | 10 | 16 | 19 | 7 | 15 | 4 | Stats Against (All Games) | 74.5 | 36.6 | 28-68 | 40.7% | 5-15 | 31.1% | 15-19 | 78.0% | 44 | 11 | 18 | 18 | 7 | 13 | 4 | vs opponents averaging | 75 | 37.5 | 28-67 | 41.8% | 4-14 | 31.7% | 15-19 | 77.6% | 43 | 10 | 16 | 18 | 8 | 13 | 4 | Stats Against (Road Games) | 78.2 | 39.3 | 29-69 | 42.5% | 5-14 | 33.7% | 15-19 | 79.5% | 42 | 10 | 18 | 17 | 8 | 12 | 4 |
|
|
| |
|
|
All Games | 18-18 | -13.7 | 17-18 | 17-19 | 75.9 | 39.6 | 41.7% | 44.4 | 74.4 | 37.6 | 41.7% | 44.1 | Home Games | 13-5 | +0.5 | 11-6 | 9-9 | 79.8 | 40.1 | 43.0% | 44.1 | 71.1 | 35.1 | 39.4% | 44.9 | Last 5 Games | 1-4 | -7.5 | 2-3 | 3-2 | 69.2 | 35.8 | 36.9% | 47.6 | 75.6 | 37.6 | 42.2% | 46.0 | Division Games | 13-11 | -8.4 | 12-12 | 11-13 | 75.2 | 38.6 | 41.7% | 44.8 | 71.8 | 35.4 | 40.1% | 45.0 |
|
| |
|
|
Team Stats (All Games) | 75.9 | 39.6 | 29-70 | 41.7% | 3-13 | 27.2% | 14-19 | 74.5% | 44 | 11 | 16 | 18 | 10 | 14 | 4 | vs opponents surrendering | 75.2 | 37.3 | 28-67 | 42.1% | 5-14 | 32.5% | 15-19 | 78.0% | 43 | 10 | 16 | 18 | 8 | 13 | 4 | Team Stats (Home Games) | 79.8 | 40.1 | 30-69 | 43.0% | 4-12 | 30.6% | 17-22 | 76.6% | 44 | 10 | 18 | 17 | 11 | 14 | 5 | Stats Against (All Games) | 74.4 | 37.6 | 28-66 | 41.7% | 4-12 | 31.7% | 15-20 | 77.8% | 44 | 10 | 16 | 17 | 8 | 16 | 4 | vs opponents averaging | 74.5 | 36.7 | 28-66 | 41.7% | 5-14 | 32.8% | 15-19 | 78.0% | 43 | 10 | 16 | 18 | 7 | 13 | 4 | Stats Against (Home Games) | 71.1 | 35.1 | 26-67 | 39.4% | 4-13 | 29.4% | 15-19 | 78.1% | 45 | 11 | 16 | 19 | 8 | 18 | 4 |
|
| Average power rating of opponents played: WASHINGTON 72.2, ATLANTA 69.6 |
| | |
|
|
8/16/2013 | @ NEW YORK | 66-57 | W | +120 | 28-71 | 39.4% | 40 | 10 | 24-60 | 40.0% | 46 | 15 | 8/18/2013 | @ ATLANTA | 58-76 | L | +220 | 24-70 | 34.3% | 45 | 17 | 27-61 | 44.3% | 50 | 17 | 8/20/2013 | CHICAGO | 73-79 | L | +120 | 22-64 | 34.4% | 51 | 14 | 24-64 | 37.5% | 49 | 11 | 8/23/2013 | ATLANTA | 74-64 | W | +120 | 26-69 | 37.7% | 42 | 9 | 25-69 | 36.2% | 50 | 14 | 8/28/2013 | @ ATLANTA | 85-80 | W | +210 | 30-71 | 42.3% | 44 | 16 | 34-83 | 41.0% | 51 | 16 | 9/6/2013 | @ CONNECTICUT | 70-77 | L | -220 | 22-63 | 34.9% | 42 | 18 | 31-62 | 50.0% | 34 | 18 | 9/8/2013 | CHICAGO | 79-93 | L | +135 | 29-68 | 42.6% | 39 | 9 | 30-62 | 48.4% | 43 | 11 | 9/10/2013 | @ INDIANA | 69-67 | W | +200 | 26-63 | 41.3% | 46 | 15 | 28-73 | 38.4% | 41 | 9 | 9/13/2013 | CONNECTICUT | 82-56 | W | -550 | 28-64 | 43.7% | 49 | 16 | 19-54 | 35.2% | 36 | 14 | 9/15/2013 | NEW YORK | 70-52 | W | -360 | 25-71 | 35.2% | 50 | 8 | 22-70 | 31.4% | 50 | 13 | 9/19/2013 | @ ATLANTA | 71-56 | W | +220 | 32-72 | 44.4% | 58 | 13 | 20-75 | 26.7% | 41 | 9 | 9/21/2013 | ATLANTA | 45-63 | L | -140 | 14-56 | 25.0% | 42 | 11 | 25-71 | 35.2% | 60 | 13 | 9/23/2013 | @ ATLANTA | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
| |
|
|
8/14/2013 | @ CONNECTICUT | 86-88 | L | -165 | 35-75 | 46.7% | 48 | 10 | 33-70 | 47.1% | 38 | 13 | 8/16/2013 | CONNECTICUT | 88-57 | W | -450 | 31-61 | 50.8% | 38 | 17 | 22-69 | 31.9% | 47 | 21 | 8/18/2013 | WASHINGTON | 76-58 | W | -300 | 27-61 | 44.3% | 50 | 17 | 24-70 | 34.3% | 45 | 17 | 8/20/2013 | MINNESOTA | 88-75 | W | +120 | 31-65 | 47.7% | 40 | 13 | 29-70 | 41.4% | 43 | 19 | 8/23/2013 | @ WASHINGTON | 64-74 | L | -140 | 25-69 | 36.2% | 50 | 14 | 26-69 | 37.7% | 42 | 9 | 8/24/2013 | CHICAGO | 56-67 | L | -175 | 20-70 | 28.6% | 47 | 22 | 23-64 | 35.9% | 53 | 20 | 8/28/2013 | WASHINGTON | 80-85 | L | -270 | 34-83 | 41.0% | 51 | 16 | 30-71 | 42.3% | 44 | 16 | 8/31/2013 | @ CHICAGO | 68-85 | L | +220 | 29-68 | 42.6% | 40 | 17 | 31-70 | 44.3% | 46 | 8 | 9/2/2013 | LOS ANGELES | 92-82 | W | +135 | 34-65 | 52.3% | 34 | 12 | 28-62 | 45.2% | 41 | 15 | 9/4/2013 | INDIANA | 89-80 | W | -200 | 31-73 | 42.5% | 59 | 16 | 27-76 | 35.5% | 44 | 15 | 9/6/2013 | @ NEW YORK | 70-57 | W | -200 | 28-64 | 43.7% | 41 | 15 | 24-67 | 35.8% | 45 | 18 | 9/8/2013 | PHOENIX | 71-79 | L | -200 | 25-78 | 32.1% | 40 | 12 | 28-57 | 49.1% | 52 | 28 | 9/11/2013 | @ CONNECTICUT | 77-78 | L | -270 | 31-67 | 46.3% | 48 | 25 | 29-67 | 43.3% | 41 | 16 | 9/13/2013 | @ CHICAGO | 82-87 | L | +220 | 30-74 | 40.5% | 43 | 7 | 28-61 | 45.9% | 43 | 12 | 9/15/2013 | @ SAN ANTONIO | 68-97 | L | -200 | 25-68 | 36.8% | 46 | 14 | 38-78 | 48.7% | 46 | 6 | 9/19/2013 | WASHINGTON | 56-71 | L | -300 | 20-75 | 26.7% | 41 | 9 | 32-72 | 44.4% | 58 | 13 | 9/21/2013 | @ WASHINGTON | 63-45 | W | +120 | 25-71 | 35.2% | 60 | 13 | 14-56 | 25.0% | 42 | 11 | 9/23/2013 | WASHINGTON | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
| | |
WASHINGTON is 13-16 (+0.7 Units) against the money line versus ATLANTA since 1997 |
| |
ATLANTA is 11-5 (-1.4 Units) against the money line versus WASHINGTON over the last 3 seasons |
|
|
|
| |
WASHINGTON is 6-8 (+2.8 Units) against the money line versus ATLANTA since 1997 |
| |
WASHINGTON is 3-5 (+1.8 Units) against the money line versus ATLANTA over the last 3 seasons |
|
|
|
| |
|
9/21/2013 | ATLANTA | 63 | 148.5 | SU ATS | 36 | 25-71 | 35.2% | 2-11 | 18.2% | 11-14 | 78.6% | 60 | 18 | 13 | | WASHINGTON | 45 | -2.5 | Under | 21 | 14-56 | 25.0% | 4-16 | 25.0% | 13-24 | 54.2% | 42 | 6 | 11 | 9/19/2013 | WASHINGTON | 71 | 151.5 | SU ATS | 31 | 32-72 | 44.4% | 3-15 | 20.0% | 4-7 | 57.1% | 58 | 14 | 13 | | ATLANTA | 56 | -7 | Under | 24 | 20-75 | 26.7% | 4-16 | 25.0% | 12-13 | 92.3% | 41 | 12 | 9 | 8/28/2013 | WASHINGTON | 85 | 149.5 | SU ATS | 33 | 30-71 | 42.3% | 5-17 | 29.4% | 20-22 | 90.9% | 44 | 5 | 16 | | ATLANTA | 80 | -6.5 | Over | 33 | 34-83 | 41.0% | 2-14 | 14.3% | 10-13 | 76.9% | 51 | 8 | 16 | 8/23/2013 | ATLANTA | 64 | -2.5 | Under | 35 | 25-69 | 36.2% | 1-18 | 5.6% | 13-17 | 76.5% | 50 | 13 | 14 | | WASHINGTON | 74 | 154 | SU ATS | 37 | 26-69 | 37.7% | 4-10 | 40.0% | 18-19 | 94.7% | 42 | 9 | 9 | 8/18/2013 | WASHINGTON | 58 | 157 | Under | 37 | 24-70 | 34.3% | 5-16 | 31.2% | 5-10 | 50.0% | 45 | 11 | 17 | | ATLANTA | 76 | -7 | SU ATS | 38 | 27-61 | 44.3% | 4-13 | 30.8% | 18-28 | 64.3% | 50 | 9 | 17 | 6/28/2013 | WASHINGTON | 75 | 156.5 | Over | 28 | 31-69 | 44.9% | 1-9 | 11.1% | 12-15 | 80.0% | 36 | 7 | 15 | | ATLANTA | 86 | -9.5 | SU ATS | 39 | 34-67 | 50.7% | 8-18 | 44.4% | 10-18 | 55.6% | 46 | 12 | 16 | 6/2/2013 | ATLANTA | 73 | -5 | SU ATS | 39 | 27-69 | 39.1% | 3-13 | 23.1% | 16-20 | 80.0% | 48 | 16 | 18 | | WASHINGTON | 63 | 163 | Under | 26 | 27-69 | 39.1% | 0-5 | 0.0% | 9-10 | 90.0% | 41 | 12 | 21 | 9/14/2012 | ATLANTA | 82 | -9.5 | SU Over | 32 | 31-61 | 50.8% | 3-10 | 30.0% | 17-23 | 73.9% | 36 | 5 | 16 | | WASHINGTON | 74 | 150.5 | ATS | 42 | 26-69 | 37.7% | 3-16 | 18.7% | 19-24 | 79.2% | 48 | 16 | 18 | 9/9/2012 | WASHINGTON | 68 | 150.5 | Over | 27 | 23-63 | 36.5% | 7-14 | 50.0% | 15-23 | 65.2% | 40 | 14 | 19 | | ATLANTA | 93 | -10.5 | SU ATS | 48 | 40-69 | 58.0% | 5-14 | 35.7% | 8-10 | 80.0% | 39 | 6 | 15 | 8/30/2012 | WASHINGTON | 59 | 151 | Under | 33 | 22-59 | 37.3% | 1-8 | 12.5% | 14-16 | 87.5% | 37 | 8 | 20 | | ATLANTA | 82 | -10 | SU ATS | 31 | 30-71 | 42.3% | 1-9 | 11.1% | 21-29 | 72.4% | 51 | 16 | 15 | 8/24/2012 | ATLANTA | 81 | -5 | SU ATS | 49 | 30-59 | 50.8% | 5-10 | 50.0% | 16-22 | 72.7% | 39 | 8 | 17 | | WASHINGTON | 69 | 149.5 | Over | 33 | 24-62 | 38.7% | 7-17 | 41.2% | 14-17 | 82.4% | 37 | 7 | 18 |
|
| | |
|
Mike is 7-4 against the money line (+10.4 Units) after 2 or more consecutive unders as the coach of WASHINGTON. The average score was WASHINGTON 72.2, OPPONENT 70.4 - (Rating = 1*) | Mike is 101-69 against the money line (+28.1 Units) revenging a loss versus opponent in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Mike 76.3, OPPONENT 73.6 - (Rating = 1*) | Mike is 42-29 against the money line (+21.0 Units) revenging a loss versus opponent by 10 points or more in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Mike 76.4, OPPONENT 73.6 - (Rating = 1*) | Mike is 73-50 against the money line (+20.5 Units) revenging a same season loss versus opponent in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Mike 76.0, OPPONENT 73.0 - (Rating = 0*) | Mike is 27-16 against the money line (+13.9 Units) off a loss by 10 points or more to a division rival in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Mike 74.9, OPPONENT 72.0 - (Rating = 1*) | Mike is 38-22 against the money line (+16.7 Units) off a home loss in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Mike 77.2, OPPONENT 73.4 - (Rating = 1*) | Mike is 19-10 against the money line (+10.2 Units) after a game where both teams scored 60 points or less in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Mike 74.4, OPPONENT 71.9 - (Rating = 0*) | Mike is 90-67 against the money line (+19.6 Units) after 1 or more consecutive losses in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Mike 76.8, OPPONENT 74.4 - (Rating = 0*) | Mike is 102-60 against the money line (+23.3 Units) versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game after 15+ games in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Mike 74.0, OPPONENT 70.1 - (Rating = 0*) | Fred is 10-14 against the money line (-15.1 Units) in August or September games as the coach of ATLANTA. The average score was ATLANTA 76.8, OPPONENT 75.6 - (Rating = 1*) | Fred is 2-6 against the money line (-8.3 Units) after having lost 2 of their last 3 games as the coach of ATLANTA. The average score was ATLANTA 78.0, OPPONENT 79.6 - (Rating = 0*) | Fred is 2-7 against the money line (-10.4 Units) after having lost 3 of their last 4 games as the coach of ATLANTA. The average score was ATLANTA 74.9, OPPONENT 83.1 - (Rating = 2*) | Fred is 10-15 against the money line (-17.2 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game after 15+ games as the coach of ATLANTA. The average score was ATLANTA 76.1, OPPONENT 76.4 - (Rating = 2*) | Fred is 15-17 against the money line (-14.2 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game as the coach of ATLANTA. The average score was ATLANTA 77.2, OPPONENT 76.0 - (Rating = 0*) | Fred is 5-10 against the money line (-11.2 Units) vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts after 15+ games as the coach of ATLANTA. The average score was ATLANTA 72.7, OPPONENT 76.0 - (Rating = 1*) | Fred is 7-12 against the money line (-12.0 Units) vs. good free throw shooting teams - making >=76% of their attempts as the coach of ATLANTA. The average score was ATLANTA 73.7, OPPONENT 76.6 - (Rating = 1*) | Fred is 11-15 against the money line (-16.2 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game after 15+ games as the coach of ATLANTA. The average score was ATLANTA 76.2, OPPONENT 75.8 - (Rating = 2*) | Fred is 16-18 against the money line (-14.9 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game as the coach of ATLANTA. The average score was ATLANTA 76.8, OPPONENT 75.5 - (Rating = 1*) | Fred is 7-12 against the money line (-16.4 Units) versus poor pressure defensive teams - forcing <=14 turnovers/game after 15+ games as the coach of ATLANTA. The average score was ATLANTA 73.8, OPPONENT 73.6 - (Rating = 3*) | Fred is 10-14 against the money line (-16.2 Units) versus poor pressure defensive teams - forcing <=14 turnovers/game as the coach of ATLANTA. The average score was ATLANTA 74.6, OPPONENT 74.7 - (Rating = 2*) | Fred is 6-12 against the money line (-16.4 Units) versus teams who average 42 or more rebounds/game on the season after 15+ games as the coach of ATLANTA. The average score was ATLANTA 75.0, OPPONENT 74.3 - (Rating = 3*) | Fred is 9-13 against the money line (-14.4 Units) versus teams who average 42 or more rebounds/game on the season as the coach of ATLANTA. The average score was ATLANTA 76.1, OPPONENT 75.4 - (Rating = 1*) | Fred is 9-14 against the money line (-17.2 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game after 15+ games as the coach of ATLANTA. The average score was ATLANTA 76.0, OPPONENT 76.0 - (Rating = 2*) | Fred is 14-17 against the money line (-15.9 Units) versus terrible defensive teams - allowing 73+ points/game as the coach of ATLANTA. The average score was ATLANTA 76.7, OPPONENT 75.7 - (Rating = 1*) | Fred is 4-10 against the money line (-12.2 Units) versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game after 15+ games as the coach of ATLANTA. The average score was ATLANTA 73.4, OPPONENT 76.9 - (Rating = 2*) | Fred is 7-12 against the money line (-11.2 Units) versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game as the coach of ATLANTA. The average score was ATLANTA 75.8, OPPONENT 77.1 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
|
Mike is 1-6 against the money line (-8.6 Units) in the 3rd game of a playoff series in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Mike 66.7, OPPONENT 74.4 - (Rating = 1*) | Mike is 1-6 against the money line (-8.6 Units) when tied in a playoff series in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Mike 66.7, OPPONENT 74.4 - (Rating = 1*) | Mike is 3-9 against the money line (-7.8 Units) after covering 4 or 5 of their last 6 against the spread as the coach of WASHINGTON. The average score was WASHINGTON 72.0, OPPONENT 76.2 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
| | |
|
Since 1997, the home favorite won the game straight up 173 times, while the road underdog won straight up 56 times. No Edge. | Over the last 3 seasons, the home favorite won the game straight up 24 times, while the road underdog won straight up 7 times. No Edge. |
|
| | |
No significant injuries. | |
No significant injuries. |
|
|
| Last Updated: 3/29/2024 7:51:29 AM EST. |
|
|
| |
|