| | WNBA : Money Line Matchup |
| |
WASHINGTON ATLANTA |
|
| 156.5 | 75 Final 86 |
|
|
| | |
|
| | | |
603 | WASHINGTON | +400 | 604 | ATLANTA | -600 |
|
|
| | |
|
| | | One of the growing resources utilized by sports handicappers is the public betting information offered by a variety of sources. Leading the way in this is Sportsbook.com, who offers the data at its website in real-time. |
|
| | |
|
- Underdogs vs the money line (WASHINGTON) - revenging a loss versus opponent by 10 points or more against opponent off a home win against a division rival. (43-7 over the last 5 seasons.) (86%, +33.2 units. Rating = 4*) | - Any team vs the money line (WASHINGTON) - after going over the total by more than 24 points in their previous game, a marginal losing team (40% to 49%) playing a winning team. (28-9 since 1997.) (75.7%, +19 units. Rating = 2*) | - Any team vs the money line (ATLANTA) - off a home win against a division rival, with a winning record on the season playing a losing team. (62-19 over the last 5 seasons.) (76.5%, +33.8 units. Rating = 3*) |
|
| | |
|
WASHINGTON | 68 | | 26-64 | 39.9% | 4-12 | 30.6% | 13-18 | 75.7% | 41 | 10 | 18 | ATLANTA | 81 | | 32-69 | 46.1% | 3-12 | 27.2% | 15-19 | 77.6% | 44 | 11 | 13 |
| The number of simulations in which each team won the game straight up are listed below. If one time held a significant advantage against the money line, the edge is indicated. | In 1000 simulated games, ATLANTA won the game straight up 833 times, while WASHINGTON won 146 times. No Edge. |
|
|
| Potential StatFox Money Line Power Trends to watch out for:
| |
ATLANTA is 13-21 against the money line (-19.7 Units) when they make 22% to 28% of their three point attempts in a game since 1997. The average score was ATLANTA 78.4, OPPONENT 80.3 | ATLANTA is 27-27 against the money line (-23.6 Units) in home games in games where they force 13 to 18 turnovers since 1997. The average score was ATLANTA 80.0, OPPONENT 77.1 | ATLANTA is 12-17 against the money line (-19.1 Units) when they score 78 to 82 points in a game since 1997. The average score was ATLANTA 80.4, OPPONENT 81.4 |
|
WASHINGTON is 2-16 against the money line (-13.9 Units) in up-tempo games where they attempt 84 or more shots over the last 2 seasons. The average score was WASHINGTON 72.8, OPPONENT 82.7 | WASHINGTON is 59-91 against the money line (-44.2 Units) when they make 40% to 44% of their shots in a game since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 70.3, OPPONENT 72.9 | WASHINGTON is 28-83 against the money line (-61.6 Units) when their opponents make 45% to 48% of their shots in a game since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 70.9, OPPONENT 77.2 | WASHINGTON is 48-89 against the money line (-49.0 Units) when they attempt 17 to 22 free throws in a game since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 70.2, OPPONENT 74.6 | WASHINGTON is 3-23 against the money line (-19.6 Units) in games attempting around the same number of free throws as opponents over the last 3 seasons. The average score was WASHINGTON 69.4, OPPONENT 78.4 | WASHINGTON is 7-32 against the money line (-23.4 Units) when they grab 8 to 12 offensive rebounds in a game over the last 3 seasons. The average score was WASHINGTON 72.4, OPPONENT 80.6 | WASHINGTON is 17-73 against the money line (-56.1 Units) when they allow 78 to 82 points in a game since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 72.1, OPPONENT 79.7 | WASHINGTON is 31-164 against the money line (-134.2 Units) when they allow 78 or more points in a game since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 75.3, OPPONENT 85.2 | WASHINGTON is 112-170 against the money line (-56.5 Units) in games where they force 13 to 18 turnovers since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 70.4, OPPONENT 73.8 | WASHINGTON is 38-94 against the money line (-58.2 Units) when they commit 3 to 6 more turnovers than their opponents since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 69.9, OPPONENT 76.3 | WASHINGTON is 53-92 against the money line (-38.7 Units) when they have the around same number of rebounds as their opponents in a game since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 70.1, OPPONENT 74.1 | WASHINGTON is 32-74 against the money line (-48.1 Units) when they score 66 to 71 points in a game since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 68.6, OPPONENT 74.1 | ATLANTA is 7-1 against the money line (+8.3 Units) when they make 45% to 48% of their shots in a game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was ATLANTA 78.1, OPPONENT 70.9 | ATLANTA is 7-1 against the money line (+6.0 Units) when their opponents make 29% to 35% of their 3 pointers in a game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was ATLANTA 86.0, OPPONENT 75.4 | ATLANTA is 12-4 against the money line (+9.7 Units) in games attempting around the same number of free throws as opponents over the last 2 seasons. The average score was ATLANTA 79.9, OPPONENT 74.6 | ATLANTA is 9-2 against the money line (+9.4 Units) when they make 77% to 82% of their free throws in a game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was ATLANTA 80.5, OPPONENT 73.0 | ATLANTA is 10-1 against the money line (+9.5 Units) when they allow 66 to 71 points in a game over the last 3 seasons. The average score was ATLANTA 77.5, OPPONENT 68.4 | ATLANTA is 11-3 against the money line (+8.5 Units) when they commit 3 to 6 fewer turnovers than their opponents over the last 2 seasons. The average score was ATLANTA 80.8, OPPONENT 70.3 |
|
| | |
|
ATLANTA is 8-11 against the money line (-11.6 Units) versus good offensive teams - scoring 77+ points/game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was ATLANTA 77.1, OPPONENT 79.4 - (Rating = 0*) |
|
|
WASHINGTON is 80-163 against the money line (-56.1 Units) when playing against a team with a winning record since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 69.6, OPPONENT 75.3 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 7-34 against the money line (-22.5 Units) when playing against a top-level team (Win Pct. > 75%) since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 69.2, OPPONENT 78.8 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 5-24 against the money line (-17.0 Units) versus up-tempo teams averaging 62 or more shots/game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was WASHINGTON 70.5, OPPONENT 80.3 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 4-18 against the money line (-13.0 Units) versus horrible foul drawing teams - attempting <=21 free throws/game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was WASHINGTON 70.2, OPPONENT 79.2 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 5-26 against the money line (-19.0 Units) versus poor foul drawing teams - attempting <=24 free throws/game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was WASHINGTON 70.1, OPPONENT 80.0 - (Rating = 2*) | WASHINGTON is 20-52 against the money line (-33.1 Units) versus good pressure defensive teams - forcing >=17 turnovers/game since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 69.4, OPPONENT 75.0 - (Rating = 2*) | WASHINGTON is 24-58 against the money line (-29.2 Units) versus teams who are called for 18 or less fouls/game since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 68.1, OPPONENT 74.5 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 2-13 against the money line (-11.2 Units) versus teams who average 42 or more rebounds/game on the season over the last 2 seasons. The average score was WASHINGTON 70.2, OPPONENT 82.9 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 32-89 against the money line (-47.5 Units) versus good teams - outscoring their opponents by 3+ points/game since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 69.5, OPPONENT 76.5 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 3-20 against the money line (-16.2 Units) versus explosive offensive teams - scoring 73+ points/game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was WASHINGTON 70.5, OPPONENT 81.9 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 6-34 against the money line (-23.4 Units) versus good offensive teams - scoring 77+ points/game over the last 3 seasons. The average score was WASHINGTON 70.3, OPPONENT 80.6 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 28-69 against the money line (-40.2 Units) versus teams who average 9 or more steals/game on the season since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 69.3, OPPONENT 75.6 - (Rating = 2*) | ATLANTA is 9-2 against the money line (+8.6 Units) when playing against a marginal losing team (Win Pct. 40% to 49%) over the last 3 seasons. The average score was ATLANTA 77.6, OPPONENT 72.9 - (Rating = 2*) |
|
| | |
|
ATLANTA is 49-42 against the money line (-28.8 Units) in a home game where where the total is greater than or equal to 150 since 1997. The average score was ATLANTA 82.0, OPPONENT 79.5 - (Rating = 0*) | ATLANTA is 10-12 against the money line (-16.9 Units) in home games when playing with 2 days rest since 1997. The average score was ATLANTA 79.6, OPPONENT 80.6 - (Rating = 1*) | ATLANTA is 6-8 against the money line (-11.8 Units) after covering 2 of their last 3 against the spread over the last 2 seasons. The average score was ATLANTA 79.1, OPPONENT 82.6 - (Rating = 0*) | ATLANTA is 1-6 against the money line (-13.5 Units) after a game being outrebounded by opponent by 15 or more since 1997. The average score was ATLANTA 75.5, OPPONENT 81.8 - (Rating = 5*) |
|
|
WASHINGTON is 15-59 against the money line (-32.3 Units) in all games over the last 3 seasons. The average score was WASHINGTON 70.7, OPPONENT 78.8 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 94-239 against the money line (-73.8 Units) as an underdog since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 68.5, OPPONENT 75.5 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 140-215 against the money line (-68.2 Units) in May, June, or July games since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 70.7, OPPONENT 73.5 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 9-37 against the money line (-22.6 Units) vs. division opponents over the last 3 seasons. The average score was WASHINGTON 68.8, OPPONENT 77.1 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 2-15 against the money line (-12.8 Units) after a non-conference game over the last 2 seasons. The average score was WASHINGTON 70.5, OPPONENT 78.4 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 4-36 against the money line (-27.5 Units) when playing only their 2nd game in 5 days over the last 3 seasons. The average score was WASHINGTON 71.0, OPPONENT 81.7 - (Rating = 2*) | WASHINGTON is 1-9 against the money line (-8.8 Units) after 2 straight games attempting 70 or more shots since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 71.5, OPPONENT 81.4 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 6-25 against the money line (-16.5 Units) after 3 straight games - allowing a shooting pct. of 42% or higher over the last 3 seasons. The average score was WASHINGTON 70.8, OPPONENT 79.5 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 15-49 against the money line (-32.6 Units) after 4 straight games - allowing a shooting pct. of 42% or higher since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 68.1, OPPONENT 75.4 - (Rating = 2*) | WASHINGTON is 6-28 against the money line (-20.0 Units) after one or more consecutive overs over the last 3 seasons. The average score was WASHINGTON 69.6, OPPONENT 77.6 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 8-34 against the money line (-20.7 Units) after having lost 4 or 5 of their last 6 games over the last 3 seasons. The average score was WASHINGTON 69.5, OPPONENT 77.8 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 6-30 against the money line (-21.1 Units) after having lost 4 of their last 5 games over the last 3 seasons. The average score was WASHINGTON 68.4, OPPONENT 77.8 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 48-71 against the money line (-30.0 Units) after covering 4 or 5 of their last 6 against the spread since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 71.1, OPPONENT 73.5 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 20-47 against the money line (-35.8 Units) after covering 5 or 6 of their last 7 against the spread since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 69.2, OPPONENT 73.4 - (Rating = 3*) | WASHINGTON is 37-89 against the money line (-36.4 Units) revenging a home loss versus opponent since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 69.3, OPPONENT 75.9 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 7-30 against the money line (-19.0 Units) revenging a same season loss versus opponent over the last 3 seasons. The average score was WASHINGTON 69.9, OPPONENT 78.3 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 9-37 against the money line (-23.0 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 2 straight games over the last 3 seasons. The average score was WASHINGTON 69.7, OPPONENT 78.2 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 4-32 against the money line (-27.3 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 3 straight games over the last 3 seasons. The average score was WASHINGTON 70.4, OPPONENT 79.5 - (Rating = 4*) | WASHINGTON is 4-27 against the money line (-21.8 Units) after allowing 70 points or more in 4 straight games over the last 3 seasons. The average score was WASHINGTON 68.9, OPPONENT 78.6 - (Rating = 2*) | WASHINGTON is 5-23 against the money line (-16.0 Units) after allowing 75 points or more over the last 2 seasons. The average score was WASHINGTON 69.5, OPPONENT 78.2 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 6-28 against the money line (-19.3 Units) after allowing 75 points or more in 2 straight games over the last 3 seasons. The average score was WASHINGTON 70.3, OPPONENT 79.1 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 2-22 against the money line (-20.1 Units) after allowing 75 points or more in 3 straight games over the last 3 seasons. The average score was WASHINGTON 70.3, OPPONENT 79.7 - (Rating = 3*) | WASHINGTON is 7-31 against the money line (-24.6 Units) after allowing 75 points or more in 4 straight games since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 68.6, OPPONENT 77.3 - (Rating = 3*) | WASHINGTON is 5-26 against the money line (-20.0 Units) after allowing 80 points or more over the last 3 seasons. The average score was WASHINGTON 70.4, OPPONENT 78.3 - (Rating = 2*) | WASHINGTON is 1-9 against the money line (-9.2 Units) after allowing 90 points or more over the last 3 seasons. The average score was WASHINGTON 69.1, OPPONENT 80.0 - (Rating = 2*) | WASHINGTON is 1-14 against the money line (-14.4 Units) after allowing 40 points or more in the first half in 2 straight games over the last 3 seasons. The average score was WASHINGTON 67.5, OPPONENT 82.3 - (Rating = 5*) | WASHINGTON is 2-16 against the money line (-16.0 Units) after a game where both teams scored 75 points or more over the last 3 seasons. The average score was WASHINGTON 69.3, OPPONENT 75.9 - (Rating = 5*) | WASHINGTON is 2-17 against the money line (-17.0 Units) after scoring 75 points or more over the last 3 seasons. The average score was WASHINGTON 69.2, OPPONENT 75.8 - (Rating = 5*) | WASHINGTON is 2-11 against the money line (-10.6 Units) after scoring 80 points or more over the last 3 seasons. The average score was WASHINGTON 71.8, OPPONENT 77.6 - (Rating = 2*) | WASHINGTON is 10-21 against the money line (-21.7 Units) after scoring 45 points or more in the first half last game since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 73.4, OPPONENT 75.5 - (Rating = 3*) | WASHINGTON is 5-22 against the money line (-16.0 Units) after a combined score of 155 points or more over the last 3 seasons. The average score was WASHINGTON 69.9, OPPONENT 76.5 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 3-14 against the money line (-12.3 Units) after a combined score of 165 points or more over the last 3 seasons. The average score was WASHINGTON 70.2, OPPONENT 77.2 - (Rating = 2*) | WASHINGTON is 113-215 against the money line (-87.5 Units) after playing a game as an underdog since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 69.8, OPPONENT 74.2 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 67-141 against the money line (-61.7 Units) after playing 2 consecutive games as an underdog since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 69.1, OPPONENT 74.6 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 42-94 against the money line (-40.6 Units) after playing 3 consecutive games as an underdog since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 69.3, OPPONENT 76.2 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 26-69 against the money line (-36.9 Units) after playing 4 consecutive games as an underdog since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 68.7, OPPONENT 77.3 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 24-75 against the money line (-48.1 Units) after playing a game as a home underdog since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 67.8, OPPONENT 75.3 - (Rating = 2*) | WASHINGTON is 8-27 against the money line (-17.1 Units) after playing a home game over the last 3 seasons. The average score was WASHINGTON 68.6, OPPONENT 77.2 - (Rating = 0*) | WASHINGTON is 102-176 against the money line (-66.0 Units) after a game where they failed to cover the spread since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 69.4, OPPONENT 73.8 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 12-45 against the money line (-25.7 Units) after 1 or more consecutive losses over the last 3 seasons. The average score was WASHINGTON 70.0, OPPONENT 78.0 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 8-35 against the money line (-21.8 Units) after 2 or more consecutive losses over the last 3 seasons. The average score was WASHINGTON 70.4, OPPONENT 78.6 - (Rating = 1*) | WASHINGTON is 32-85 against the money line (-50.4 Units) after 3 or more consecutive losses since 1997. The average score was WASHINGTON 67.9, OPPONENT 74.3 - (Rating = 2*) | WASHINGTON is 1-9 against the money line (-8.6 Units) after 3 straight games forcing opponent to commit 14 or less turnovers over the last 2 seasons. The average score was WASHINGTON 76.4, OPPONENT 82.9 - (Rating = 0*) | ATLANTA is 11-2 against the money line (+10.5 Units) on Friday over the last 2 seasons. The average score was ATLANTA 82.0, OPPONENT 72.8 - (Rating = 3*) | ATLANTA is 25-12 against the money line (+10.8 Units) after 2 consecutive division games over the last 3 seasons. The average score was ATLANTA 78.0, OPPONENT 74.4 - (Rating = 0*) | ATLANTA is 13-3 against the money line (+11.0 Units) when playing 3 or less games in 10 days over the last 2 seasons. The average score was ATLANTA 80.5, OPPONENT 73.8 - (Rating = 3*) | ATLANTA is 10-3 against the money line (+8.9 Units) after 2 straight games giving up 11 or more offensive rebounds over the last 3 seasons. The average score was ATLANTA 78.1, OPPONENT 69.6 - (Rating = 1*) | ATLANTA is 8-1 against the money line (+7.0 Units) in home games after 2 or more consecutive wins over the last 3 seasons. The average score was ATLANTA 80.6, OPPONENT 73.3 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
| | |
|
|
All Games | 4-5 | +5.7 | 6-3 | 5-4 | 78.6 | 37.9 | 43.4% | 42.6 | 81.2 | 40.9 | 43.2% | 43.1 | Road Games | 2-3 | +1.2 | 4-1 | 3-2 | 79.6 | 38.2 | 43.3% | 43.6 | 83.4 | 43.8 | 44.4% | 40.8 | Last 5 Games | 1-4 | -3 | 3-2 | 3-2 | 79.6 | 39.2 | 43.7% | 42.2 | 85.2 | 43.4 | 47.0% | 37.6 | Division Games | 2-1 | +2.1 | 2-1 | 0-3 | 64.3 | 28.7 | 38.6% | 42.3 | 65.0 | 33.3 | 36.7% | 46.7 |
|
| |
|
|
Team Stats (All Games) | 78.6 | 37.9 | 29-67 | 43.4% | 4-10 | 39.6% | 17-22 | 76.6% | 43 | 8 | 17 | 19 | 8 | 14 | 4 | vs opponents surrendering | 78.1 | 39.5 | 29-68 | 43.1% | 5-14 | 34.8% | 15-19 | 76.8% | 43 | 10 | 16 | 18 | 7 | 13 | 4 | Team Stats (Road Games) | 79.6 | 38.2 | 29-67 | 43.3% | 4-11 | 39.6% | 17-23 | 75.0% | 44 | 8 | 17 | 19 | 8 | 14 | 4 | Stats Against (All Games) | 81.2 | 40.9 | 30-69 | 43.2% | 5-14 | 34.9% | 17-21 | 81.3% | 43 | 10 | 19 | 19 | 8 | 13 | 6 | vs opponents averaging | 79.1 | 39.8 | 29-68 | 43.5% | 5-16 | 32.9% | 15-19 | 79.2% | 42 | 10 | 17 | 18 | 8 | 13 | 4 | Stats Against (Road Games) | 83.4 | 43.8 | 30-68 | 44.4% | 5-13 | 37.3% | 18-20 | 87.1% | 41 | 8 | 18 | 19 | 7 | 12 | 6 |
|
|
| |
|
|
All Games | 8-1 | +6.2 | 6-2 | 4-5 | 78.8 | 42.2 | 43.8% | 43.0 | 69.2 | 36.8 | 39.0% | 44.1 | Home Games | 5-0 | +5 | 4-0 | 2-3 | 81.0 | 43.4 | 45.7% | 43.0 | 66.0 | 37.8 | 36.5% | 43.0 | Last 5 Games | 4-1 | +1.5 | 2-2 | 2-3 | 75.4 | 40.6 | 42.1% | 40.0 | 69.2 | 36.2 | 39.0% | 48.6 | Division Games | 6-1 | +4.2 | 5-2 | 3-4 | 77.6 | 42.0 | 42.7% | 42.4 | 69.0 | 36.0 | 39.8% | 45.6 |
|
| |
|
|
Team Stats (All Games) | 78.8 | 42.2 | 30-68 | 43.8% | 4-12 | 30.0% | 16-20 | 76.9% | 43 | 10 | 17 | 15 | 13 | 14 | 6 | vs opponents surrendering | 77.1 | 38.3 | 29-68 | 42.7% | 5-15 | 33.2% | 14-19 | 76.7% | 43 | 10 | 16 | 17 | 9 | 13 | 5 | Team Stats (Home Games) | 81.0 | 43.4 | 31-67 | 45.7% | 4-12 | 33.9% | 16-22 | 72.2% | 43 | 9 | 19 | 16 | 14 | 13 | 6 | Stats Against (All Games) | 69.2 | 36.8 | 26-68 | 39.0% | 4-12 | 29.4% | 13-16 | 81.2% | 44 | 12 | 14 | 18 | 8 | 18 | 3 | vs opponents averaging | 73.9 | 36.9 | 28-67 | 41.3% | 5-14 | 35.4% | 13-17 | 76.5% | 43 | 10 | 15 | 18 | 7 | 15 | 4 | Stats Against (Home Games) | 66.0 | 37.8 | 24-65 | 36.5% | 4-12 | 29.0% | 15-18 | 85.4% | 43 | 12 | 12 | 19 | 8 | 20 | 3 |
|
| Average power rating of opponents played: WASHINGTON 70.2, ATLANTA 70.8 |
| | |
|
|
5/27/2013 | @ TULSA | 95-90 | W | +210 | 31-67 | 46.3% | 50 | 14 | 32-74 | 43.2% | 44 | 15 | 6/2/2013 | ATLANTA | 63-73 | L | +175 | 27-69 | 39.1% | 41 | 21 | 27-69 | 39.1% | 48 | 18 | 6/7/2013 | @ CONNECTICUT | 66-62 | W | +210 | 24-63 | 38.1% | 42 | 11 | 27-76 | 35.5% | 53 | 11 | 6/8/2013 | MINNESOTA | 85-80 | W | +550 | 30-61 | 49.2% | 39 | 14 | 30-78 | 38.5% | 55 | 13 | 6/16/2013 | INDIANA | 64-60 | W | -120 | 22-57 | 38.6% | 44 | 16 | 22-62 | 35.5% | 39 | 10 | 6/18/2013 | @ SEATTLE | 86-96 | L | +145 | 31-63 | 49.2% | 36 | 15 | 32-65 | 49.2% | 34 | 12 | 6/21/2013 | @ PHOENIX | 82-90 | L | +325 | 29-72 | 40.3% | 42 | 10 | 32-62 | 51.6% | 36 | 12 | 6/23/2013 | @ LOS ANGELES | 69-79 | L | +650 | 30-70 | 42.9% | 48 | 19 | 29-65 | 44.6% | 37 | 11 | 6/27/2013 | PHOENIX | 97-101 | L | +145 | 36-77 | 46.8% | 41 | 9 | 36-67 | 53.7% | 42 | 14 | 6/28/2013 | @ ATLANTA | | | | | | | | | | | | 6/30/2013 | TULSA | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/6/2013 | SEATTLE | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/10/2013 | @ CHICAGO | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/12/2013 | @ SAN ANTONIO | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
| |
|
|
5/25/2013 | TULSA | 98-81 | W | -400 | 38-72 | 52.8% | 44 | 15 | 24-64 | 37.5% | 37 | 22 | 5/31/2013 | @ INDIANA | 86-77 | W | +175 | 34-68 | 50.0% | 42 | 13 | 28-66 | 42.4% | 36 | 13 | 6/2/2013 | @ WASHINGTON | 73-63 | W | -210 | 27-69 | 39.1% | 48 | 18 | 27-69 | 39.1% | 41 | 21 | 6/7/2013 | NEW YORK | 75-56 | W | -650 | 30-73 | 41.1% | 53 | 13 | 24-65 | 36.9% | 40 | 19 | 6/9/2013 | @ NEW YORK | 67-76 | L | -250 | 24-66 | 36.4% | 43 | 18 | 32-75 | 42.7% | 49 | 15 | 6/14/2013 | SEATTLE | 68-59 | W | -450 | 28-67 | 41.8% | 46 | 14 | 21-62 | 33.9% | 41 | 18 | 6/16/2013 | CHICAGO | 88-74 | W | -220 | 32-69 | 46.4% | 40 | 8 | 27-71 | 38.0% | 49 | 17 | 6/23/2013 | @ CONNECTICUT | 78-77 | W | -200 | 30-74 | 40.5% | 39 | 14 | 32-75 | 42.7% | 56 | 18 | 6/25/2013 | INDIANA | 76-60 | W | -1050 | 25-54 | 46.3% | 32 | 15 | 22-61 | 36.1% | 48 | 23 | 6/28/2013 | WASHINGTON | | | | | | | | | | | | 6/30/2013 | SAN ANTONIO | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/9/2013 | @ MINNESOTA | | | | | | | | | | | | 7/14/2013 | @ SEATTLE | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
| | |
ATLANTA is 13-10 (-1.1 Units) against the money line versus WASHINGTON since 1997 |
| |
ATLANTA is 8-2 (+2.5 Units) against the money line versus WASHINGTON over the last 3 seasons |
|
|
|
| |
WASHINGTON is 4-6 (+0.5 Units) against the money line versus ATLANTA since 1997 |
| |
ATLANTA is 3-1 (-0.3 Units) against the money line versus WASHINGTON over the last 3 seasons |
|
|
|
| |
|
6/2/2013 | ATLANTA | 73 | -5 | SU ATS | 39 | 27-69 | 39.1% | 3-13 | 23.1% | 16-20 | 80.0% | 48 | 16 | 18 | | WASHINGTON | 63 | 163 | Under | 26 | 27-69 | 39.1% | 0-5 | 0.0% | 9-10 | 90.0% | 41 | 12 | 21 | 9/14/2012 | ATLANTA | 82 | -9.5 | SU Over | 32 | 31-61 | 50.8% | 3-10 | 30.0% | 17-23 | 73.9% | 36 | 5 | 16 | | WASHINGTON | 74 | 150.5 | ATS | 42 | 26-69 | 37.7% | 3-16 | 18.7% | 19-24 | 79.2% | 48 | 16 | 18 | 9/9/2012 | WASHINGTON | 68 | 150.5 | Over | 27 | 23-63 | 36.5% | 7-14 | 50.0% | 15-23 | 65.2% | 40 | 14 | 19 | | ATLANTA | 93 | -10.5 | SU ATS | 48 | 40-69 | 58.0% | 5-14 | 35.7% | 8-10 | 80.0% | 39 | 6 | 15 | 8/30/2012 | WASHINGTON | 59 | 151 | Under | 33 | 22-59 | 37.3% | 1-8 | 12.5% | 14-16 | 87.5% | 37 | 8 | 20 | | ATLANTA | 82 | -10 | SU ATS | 31 | 30-71 | 42.3% | 1-9 | 11.1% | 21-29 | 72.4% | 51 | 16 | 15 | 8/24/2012 | ATLANTA | 81 | -5 | SU ATS | 49 | 30-59 | 50.8% | 5-10 | 50.0% | 16-22 | 72.7% | 39 | 8 | 17 | | WASHINGTON | 69 | 149.5 | Over | 33 | 24-62 | 38.7% | 7-17 | 41.2% | 14-17 | 82.4% | 37 | 7 | 18 |
|
| | |
|
Mike is 142-93 against the money line (+26.7 Units) in May, June, or July games in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Mike 76.9, OPPONENT 74.3 - (Rating = 0*) | Mike is 50-28 against the money line (+19.5 Units) on Friday in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Mike 77.5, OPPONENT 73.8 - (Rating = 1*) | Mike is 26-13 against the money line (+23.2 Units) when playing on back-to-back days in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Mike 78.6, OPPONENT 76.0 - (Rating = 3*) | Mike is 43-24 against the money line (+24.4 Units) after 2 consecutive non-conference games in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Mike 76.8, OPPONENT 73.5 - (Rating = 2*) | Mike is 24-11 against the money line (+13.7 Units) after 3 consecutive non-conference games in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Mike 77.9, OPPONENT 73.6 - (Rating = 1*) | Mike is 10-3 against the money line (+10.1 Units) after 4 straight games - allowing a shooting pct. of 42% or higher in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Mike 79.6, OPPONENT 72.0 - (Rating = 1*) | Mike is 94-60 against the money line (+30.2 Units) revenging a loss versus opponent in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Mike 76.7, OPPONENT 73.5 - (Rating = 1*) | Mike is 39-24 against the money line (+21.9 Units) revenging a loss versus opponent by 10 points or more in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Mike 77.1, OPPONENT 73.3 - (Rating = 2*) | Mike is 67-43 against the money line (+20.6 Units) revenging a same season loss versus opponent in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Mike 76.6, OPPONENT 73.0 - (Rating = 1*) | Mike is 35-19 against the money line (+15.0 Units) off a home loss in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Mike 77.1, OPPONENT 72.8 - (Rating = 1*) | Mike is 38-23 against the money line (+13.6 Units) after scoring 45 points or more in the first half last game in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Mike 78.1, OPPONENT 73.5 - (Rating = 0*) | Mike is 80-56 against the money line (+26.0 Units) after playing a game as an underdog in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Mike 77.5, OPPONENT 74.8 - (Rating = 1*) | Mike is 32-21 against the money line (+21.9 Units) after playing 2 consecutive games as an underdog in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Mike 77.0, OPPONENT 74.0 - (Rating = 2*) | Mike is 18-10 against the money line (+17.5 Units) after playing 3 consecutive games as an underdog in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Mike 79.3, OPPONENT 76.1 - (Rating = 2*) | Mike is 11-4 against the money line (+10.4 Units) after playing a game as a home underdog in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Mike 79.9, OPPONENT 75.2 - (Rating = 1*) | Mike is 86-62 against the money line (+18.9 Units) after 1 or more consecutive losses in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Mike 76.9, OPPONENT 74.2 - (Rating = 0*) | Mike is 20-13 against the money line (+13.0 Units) in road games after a game where a team made 45% of their 3 point shots or better in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Mike 79.1, OPPONENT 74.1 - (Rating = 0*) | Mike is 21-13 against the money line (+16.5 Units) versus very good teams - outscoring their opponents by 6+ points/game in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Mike 75.9, OPPONENT 72.8 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
|
Fred is 19-9 against the money line (+13.0 Units) vs. division opponents in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Fred 75.5, OPPONENT 73.5 - (Rating = 1*) | Fred is 7-1 against the money line (+6.8 Units) in home games after having won 4 or 5 of their last 6 games in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Fred 81.8, OPPONENT 74.4 - (Rating = 0*) | Fred is 9-3 against the money line (+9.0 Units) after scoring 75 points or more in 2 straight games in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Fred 76.7, OPPONENT 69.5 - (Rating = 1*) | Fred is 17-7 against the money line (+10.3 Units) after playing a game as favorite in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Fred 74.8, OPPONENT 72.0 - (Rating = 1*) | Fred is 10-3 against the money line (+9.3 Units) after playing 2 consecutive games as favorite in all games he has coached since 1997. The average score was Fred 72.4, OPPONENT 70.4 - (Rating = 1*) |
|
| | |
|
Since 1997, the home favorite won the game straight up 10 times, while the road underdog won straight up 1 times. No Edge. | Over the last 3 seasons, the home favorite won the game straight up 3 times, while the road underdog won straight up 0 times. No Edge. |
|
| | |
No significant injuries. | |
No significant injuries. |
|
|
| Last Updated: 4/25/2024 8:54:25 AM EST. |
|
|
| |
|