| | | |
TAMPA BAY ANAHEIM |
|
| 5 | 1 Final 2 |
|
|
| | |
|
|
| | |
67 | TAMPA BAY | +155 | 68 | ANAHEIM | -175 |
|
|
| |
|
| | | | | |
|
|
All Games | 21-24-0 | -8.1 | 21-24 | -8.1 | 22-18 | 2.8 | 29.9 | 3.0 | 30.4 | Team Stats (Road Games) | 9-14-0 | -5.5 | 9-14 | -5.5 | 10-11 | 2.6 | 29.4 | 2.9 | 31.2 | Last 5 Games | 2-3-0 | -0.8 | 2-3 | -0.8 | 3-2 | 2.2 | 29.2 | 3.2 | 34.6 |
|
| |
|
|
Team Stats (All Games) | 45 | 125 | 29 | 47 | 46 | 3 | 6 | 1345 | 9.3% | 164 | 38 | 23.2% | 218 | Team Stats (Road Games) | 23 | 59 | 18 | 19 | 22 | 0 | 1 | 677 | 8.7% | 77 | 16 | 20.8% | 102 | Team Stats (Last 5 Games) | 5 | 11 | 4 | 5 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 146 | 7.5% | 16 | 3 | 18.7% | 22 | Stats Against (All Games) | | 133 | 36 | 49 | 44 | 4 | 8 | 1367 | 9.7% | 152 | 30 | 19.7% | 213 | Stats Against (Road Games) | | 67 | 13 | 27 | 25 | 2 | 4 | 718 | 9.3% | 80 | 17 | 21.2% | 108 | Stats Against (Last 5 Games) | | 16 | 2 | 7 | 7 | 0 | 1 | 173 | 9.2% | 16 | 2 | 12.5% | 23 |
|
| |
|
|
BEN BISHOP (All Games) | 24 | 23 | 670 | 610 | 91.0% | 1 | 12-11 | -2.1 | 12-11-0 | -2 | 10-9 | BEN BISHOP (Road Games) | 14 | 13 | 410 | 377 | 92.0% | 1 | 6-7 | -1 | 6-7-0 | -1 | 5-6 | BEN BISHOP(vs. Non-Conference) | 8 | 7 | 182 | 161 | 88.5% | 0 | 2-5 | -5.3 | 2-5-0 | -5 | 2-5 | BEN BISHOP (Last 4 Games) | 4 | 4 | 94 | 89 | 94.7% | 0 | 3-1 | +2.2 | 3-1-0 | +2 | 1-2 | KRISTERS GUDLEVSKIS (All Games) | 1 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 100.0% | 0 | 0-0 | 0 | 0-0-0 | 0 | 0-0 | KRISTERS GUDLEVSKIS (Road Games) | 1 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 100.0% | 0 | 0-0 | 0 | 0-0-0 | 0 | 0-0 | KRISTERS GUDLEVSKIS(vs. Non-Conference) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0-0 | 0 | 0-0-0 | 0 | 0-0 | KRISTERS GUDLEVSKIS (Last 4 Games) | 1 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 100.0% | 0 | 0-0 | 0 | 0-0-0 | 0 | 0-0 | ANDREI VASILEVSKIY (All Games) | 24 | 22 | 688 | 623 | 90.6% | 0 | 9-13 | -6 | 9-13-0 | -4 | 12-9 | ANDREI VASILEVSKIY (Road Games) | 10 | 10 | 302 | 272 | 90.1% | 0 | 3-7 | -4.4 | 3-7-0 | -4 | 5-5 | ANDREI VASILEVSKIY(vs. Non-Conference) | 6 | 5 | 123 | 103 | 83.7% | 0 | 1-4 | -3.9 | 1-4-0 | -3 | 5-0 | ANDREI VASILEVSKIY (Last 4 Games) | 4 | 4 | 132 | 115 | 87.1% | 0 | 0-4 | -4.3 | 0-4-0 | -4 | 3-1 |
|
|
| |
|
|
All Games | 24-22-0 | -2.1 | 24-22 | -2.1 | 15-18 | 2.7 | 29.1 | 2.5 | 29.4 | Team Stats (Home Games) | 14-8-0 | +2.4 | 14-8 | +2.4 | 8-9 | 2.9 | 31.2 | 2.1 | 30.0 | Last 5 Games | 3-2-0 | 0 | 3-2 | 0 | 0-4 | 2.2 | 28.0 | 1.0 | 31.0 |
|
| |
|
|
Team Stats (All Games) | 46 | 123 | 37 | 45 | 38 | 3 | 5 | 1337 | 9.2% | 146 | 31 | 21.2% | 199 | Team Stats (Home Games) | 22 | 64 | 21 | 21 | 19 | 3 | 2 | 687 | 9.3% | 69 | 16 | 23.2% | 109 | Team Stats (Last 5 Games) | 5 | 11 | 4 | 2 | 5 | 0 | 2 | 140 | 7.9% | 13 | 1 | 7.7% | 16 | Stats Against (All Games) | | 116 | 31 | 48 | 28 | 9 | 2 | 1352 | 8.6% | 162 | 28 | 17.3% | 201 | Stats Against (Home Games) | | 47 | 16 | 20 | 8 | 3 | 1 | 660 | 7.1% | 72 | 12 | 16.7% | 79 | Stats Against (Last 5 Games) | | 5 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 155 | 3.2% | 16 | 1 | 6.2% | 7 |
|
| |
|
|
JONATHAN BERNIER (All Games) | 17 | 13 | 375 | 339 | 90.4% | 0 | 7-6 | +0.6 | 7-6-0 | 0 | 6-4 | JONATHAN BERNIER (Home Games) | 6 | 4 | 115 | 108 | 93.9% | 0 | 3-1 | +1.4 | 3-1-0 | +1 | 1-2 | JONATHAN BERNIER(vs. Non-Conference) | 9 | 7 | 229 | 208 | 90.8% | 0 | 3-4 | -1.9 | 3-4-0 | -2 | 5-1 | JONATHAN BERNIER (Last 4 Games) | 4 | 3 | 82 | 73 | 89.0% | 0 | 1-2 | -1.2 | 1-2-0 | -1 | 2-1 | YANN DANIS (All Games) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0-0 | 0 | 0-0-0 | 0 | 0-0 | YANN DANIS (Home Games) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0-0 | 0 | 0-0-0 | 0 | 0-0 | YANN DANIS(vs. Non-Conference) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0-0 | 0 | 0-0-0 | 0 | 0-0 | JOHN GIBSON (All Games) | 35 | 33 | 971 | 893 | 92.0% | 2 | 17-16 | -2.7 | 17-16-0 | -2 | 9-14 | JOHN GIBSON (Home Games) | 18 | 18 | 540 | 501 | 92.8% | 2 | 11-7 | +1 | 11-7-0 | +1 | 7-7 | JOHN GIBSON(vs. Non-Conference) | 14 | 13 | 401 | 366 | 91.3% | 1 | 7-6 | -0.4 | 7-6-0 | 0 | 4-7 | JOHN GIBSON (Last 4 Games) | 4 | 4 | 129 | 124 | 96.1% | 1 | 2-2 | -1 | 2-2-0 | -1 | 0-3 | DUSTIN TOKARSKI (All Games) | 1 | 0 | 5 | 5 | 100.0% | 0 | 0-0 | 0 | 0-0-0 | 0 | 0-0 | DUSTIN TOKARSKI (Home Games) | 1 | 0 | 5 | 5 | 100.0% | 0 | 0-0 | 0 | 0-0-0 | 0 | 0-0 | DUSTIN TOKARSKI(vs. Non-Conference) | 1 | 0 | 5 | 5 | 100.0% | 0 | 0-0 | 0 | 0-0-0 | 0 | 0-0 |
|
| Average power rating of opponents played: TAMPA BAY 3.14, ANAHEIM 3.06 |
| | |
|
12/22/2016 | ST LOUIS | 5-2 | W | 0, -115 | W | 5 ov | O | 12/23/2016 | at WASHINGTON | 0-4 | L | 0, +190 | L | 5 ov | U | 12/28/2016 | MONTREAL | 4-3 | W | 0, -110 | W | 5 ov | O | 12/29/2016 | TORONTO | 2-3 | L | 0, -130 | L | 5.5 ov | U | 12/31/2016 | CAROLINA | 3-1 | W | 0, -160 | W | 5.5 ev | U | 1/3/2017 | WINNIPEG | 4-6 | L | 0, -145 | L | 5.5 un | O | 1/5/2017 | NASHVILLE | 1-6 | L | 0, -130 | L | 5.5 un | O | 1/7/2017 | at PHILADELPHIA | 2-4 | L | 0, +100 | L | 5.5 un | O | 1/8/2017 | at PITTSBURGH | 2-6 | L | 0, +240 | L | 6 un | O | 1/12/2017 | BUFFALO | 4-2 | W | 0, -170 | W | 5.5 un | O | 1/13/2017 | COLUMBUS | 1-3 | L | 0, +110 | L | 5.5 un | U | 1/16/2017 | at LOS ANGELES | 2-1 | W | 0, +120 | W | 5 ov | U | 1/17/2017 | at ANAHEIM | | 1/19/2017 | at SAN JOSE | | 1/21/2017 | at ARIZONA | | 1/24/2017 | at CHICAGO | | 1/26/2017 | at FLORIDA | |
|
|
| |
|
12/22/2016 | at OTTAWA | 1-2 | L | 0, -125 | L | 5.5 un | U | 12/27/2016 | SAN JOSE | 2-3 | L | 0, -105 | L | 5 ov | P | 12/29/2016 | at CALGARY | 3-1 | W | 0, -110 | W | 5.5 un | U | 12/30/2016 | at VANCOUVER | 2-3 | L | 0, -120 | L | 5 ov | P | 1/1/2017 | PHILADELPHIA | 4-3 | W | 0, -145 | W | 5.5 un | O | 1/4/2017 | DETROIT | 2-0 | W | 0, -150 | W | 5.5 un | U | 1/6/2017 | ARIZONA | 3-2 | W | 0, -215 | W | 5.5 un | U | 1/8/2017 | MINNESOTA | 1-2 | L | 0, -135 | L | 5 ov | U | 1/10/2017 | DALLAS | 2-0 | W | 0, -155 | W | 5.5 un | U | 1/12/2017 | at COLORADO | 4-1 | W | 0, -175 | W | 5 ov | P | 1/14/2017 | at ARIZONA | 3-0 | W | 0, -170 | W | 5 ov | U | 1/15/2017 | ST LOUIS | 1-2 | L | 0, -165 | L | 5.5 un | U | 1/17/2017 | TAMPA BAY | | 1/19/2017 | COLORADO | | 1/21/2017 | at MINNESOTA | | 1/23/2017 | at WINNIPEG | | 1/25/2017 | EDMONTON | |
|
| | | TAMPA BAY: LAST SEASON: 49-24-9, 107 points. Second in Central Division. Lost to San Jose Sharks in Western Conference finals.
COACH: Ken Hitchcock, sixth season with Blues (224-103-36) , 20th season overall (757-453-88-106).
ADDED: F David Perron, G Carter Hutton.
LOST: C David Backes, F Troy Brouwer, G Brian Elliott, F Steve Ott.
PLAYER TO WATCH: Jake Allen. The Blues made the 26-year-old goalie their go-to guy in net after trading Brian Elliott to Calgary for a second-round draft pick. Allen went 26-15-3 with a 2.35 goals-against average, .920 save percentage and six shutouts in 47 games last season while splitting time with Elliott.
OUTLOOK: The Blues lost veteran forwards David Backes and Troy Brouwer in free agency but return plenty of firepower offensively, led by Vladimir Tarasenko, Alexander Steen and Paul Stastny. St. Louis still has one of the deepest groups of defenseman in the NHL with Alex Pietrangelo, now the team's captain, Jay Bouwmeester, Kevin Shattenkirk and youngster Colton Parayko. | | ANAHEIM: LAST SEASON: 46-25-11, 103 points. Won Pacific Division. Lost to Nashville in first round.
COACH: Randy Carlyle (eighth season, 11th NHL season)
ADDED: C Antoine Vermette, RW Jared Boll, LW Mason Raymond, G Jonathan Bernier.
LOST: Coach Bruce Boudreau, G Frederik Andersen, LW David Perron, RW Chris Stewart, LW Jamie McGinn.
PLAYER TO WATCH: G John Gibson. After sharing the crease with Andersen or sitting in the minors for the past three years, the 23-year-old American is an unquestioned No. 1 NHL netminder for the first time. He has capably handled a heavy workload before, but the Ducks need him to match the unflappable (and much more expensive) Andersen's steady play over an entire season.
OUTLOOK: The four-time defending Pacific Division champions are trying to go backward to go forward. GM Bob Murray jettisoned the successful Boudreau and re-hired old friend Carlyle, who insists the game hasn't passed him by after getting fired in Anaheim and Toronto over the past half-decade. He'll attempt to coax new mental toughness out of essentially the same roster built around Ryan Getzlaf and Corey Perry. The Ducks should be a Cup contender again, but that window could be getting smaller. |
| | Ducks aim to maintain stingy defense vs. Lightning
ANAHEIM, Calif. -- The Anaheim Ducks seek to continue their defensive resurgence when they face the desperate Tampa Bay Lightning on Tuesday night at the Honda Center. The Lightning began a six-game road trip that will cover 13 days with a 2-1 win Monday against the Los Angeles Kings -- and without two of their top players, Steven Stamkos and Ryan Callahan. Callahan, who has not played since Jan. 7, is having problems with his surgically repaired right hip and will miss another four weeks, the club announced Sunday. Stamkos remains out after tearing the lateral meniscus in his right knee in November against the Detroit Red Wings. The possible absence of All-Star defenseman Victor Hedman could make matters worse. Hedman, who leads NHL defensemen with 31 assists, was scratched Monday due to illness. Lightning coach Jon Cooper said after Monday's win that he did not know if Hedman would play in Anaheim. The 13-day excursion provides a daunting challenge for a team that compiled a 3-7-2 record in his past 12 road games and a 3-8-1 mark against the Western Conference. The Lightning will play the first five road games against Western opponents -- including the Ducks, San Jose Sharks and Chicago Blackhawks. As a result, the trip could become the season's turning point for a squad that observers considered a contender for the Stanley Cup. "These games will have a huge impact on our season," Lightning assistant coach Rick Bowness told the Tampa Bay Times before the trip began. "So we've got to make sure we come out of this with our heads above water." The Ducks, however, maintain a sense of confidence despite their most recent result, a 2-1 overtime loss to the St. Louis Blues on Sunday night. "If you look at the week and take what's transpired, we've been pretty consistent," Anaheim coach Randy Carlyle said about a stretch in which his team won five of seven games while allowing just seven goals. "We've had a great little run. We're still getting points and that's the most important thing, to keep our heads above water." The Ducks' defense extends beyond goalie John Gibson, who earned two shutouts among those five victories and compiled a 1.32 goals-against average for the month before Sunday night's loss. "We've been putting more practice into it and everybody's starting to kind of get on the same page," defenseman Josh Manson told the Orange County Register. "We've got to work as a five-man unit in the D-zone. If one guy's not on the same page as everybody else, it'll result in another team capitalizing." But by limiting opposing teams' offensive opportunities, the Ducks have earned 18 points in their past 12 games since Dec. 22 and moved into first place in the Pacific Division. "If we keep doing what we're doing and keep working as a five-man unit, you start breaking the puck out better and it leads to offense," Manson told the Register. "It's so many little things that lead to other things." |
| Last Updated: 5/2/2024 6:49:48 PM EST. |
|
|
| |
|