|
|
MINNESOTA
TENNESSEE |
|
|
37.5
| 17
Final
24 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|  | |
| 119 | MINNESOTA | 38 | 38.5 | | 120 | TENNESSEE | -2.5 | -1.5 |
|
|
|  | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| All Games | 4-0 | +4.3 | 4-0 | 2-2 | 22.0 | 14.0 | 295.7 | (4.8) | 1.7 | 11.2 | 8.7 | 248.0 | (4.3) | 1.5 | | Road Games | 2-0 | +2.3 | 2-0 | 1-1 | 21.0 | 10.0 | 267.5 | (4.7) | 1.0 | 8.5 | 8.5 | 192.5 | (3.7) | 1.5 | | Last 3 Games | 3-0 | +3.3 | 3-0 | 2-1 | 24.7 | 16.3 | 312.7 | (4.9) | 2.0 | 14.0 | 10.7 | 267.0 | (4.6) | 1.3 | | Grass Games | 1-0 | +1 | 1-0 | 0-1 | 14.0 | 7.0 | 245.0 | (4.5) | 1.0 | 3.0 | 3.0 | 191.0 | (3.4) | 2.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
| Offense (All Games) | 22.0 | 14.0 | 18.5 | 32:28 | 30-90 | (3) | 23-31 | 75.6% | 205 | (6.7) | 61-296 | (4.8) | (13.4) | | Opponents Defensive Avg. | 21.9 | 12.4 | 17.3 | 31:50 | 29-97 | (3.4) | 21-30 | 68.8% | 183 | (6.1) | 59-281 | (4.8) | (12.8) | | Offense Road Games | 21.0 | 10.0 | 17.0 | 34:22 | 30-85 | (2.8) | 21-26 | 81.1% | 182 | (6.9) | 57-267 | (4.7) | (12.7) | | Defense (All Games) | 11.2 | 8.7 | 13.5 | 27:32 | 26-90 | (3.5) | 16-31 | 51.6% | 158 | (5) | 57-248 | (4.3) | (22) | | Opponents Offensive Avg. | 14.9 | 10.2 | 16.8 | 29:10 | 25-83 | (3.3) | 20-35 | 56.6% | 192 | (5.6) | 60-275 | (4.6) | (18.5) | | Defense Road Games | 8.5 | 8.5 | 11.0 | 25:38 | 23-76 | (3.3) | 14-28 | 49.1% | 116 | (4.1) | 51-192 | (3.7) | (22.6) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| All Games | 1-2 | -1 | 1-2 | 3-0 | 20.3 | 14.3 | 329.3 | (6.3) | 1.3 | 26.3 | 13.7 | 386.0 | (6.8) | 1.0 | | Home Games | 1-0 | +1 | 1-0 | 1-0 | 27.0 | 20.0 | 379.0 | (6.8) | 0.0 | 14.0 | 0.0 | 403.0 | (7.2) | 1.0 | | Last 3 Games | 1-2 | -1 | 1-2 | 3-0 | 20.3 | 14.3 | 329.3 | (6.3) | 1.3 | 26.3 | 13.7 | 386.0 | (6.8) | 1.0 | | Grass Games | 1-1 | 0 | 1-1 | 2-0 | 18.5 | 15.0 | 308.5 | (6) | 0.5 | 24.0 | 8.5 | 417.5 | (7.5) | 1.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
| Offense (All Games) | 20.3 | 14.3 | 18.0 | 30:17 | 26-98 | (3.7) | 18-26 | 69.6% | 231 | (8.8) | 53-329 | (6.3) | (16.2) | | Opponents Defensive Avg. | 19.8 | 12 | 17.3 | 30:45 | 27-85 | (3.2) | 20-31 | 65.1% | 223 | (7.1) | 58-308 | (5.3) | (15.6) | | Offense Home Games | 27.0 | 20.0 | 18.0 | 32:08 | 29-112 | (3.9) | 20-27 | 74.1% | 267 | (9.9) | 56-379 | (6.8) | (14) | | Defense (All Games) | 26.3 | 13.7 | 21.3 | 28:26 | 24-99 | (4.1) | 23-33 | 70.4% | 287 | (8.8) | 57-386 | (6.8) | (14.7) | | Opponents Offensive Avg. | 19.4 | 10.6 | 19.3 | 30:49 | 25-86 | (3.4) | 22-32 | 67.1% | 227 | (7) | 58-313 | (5.4) | (16.1) | | Defense Home Games | 14.0 | 0.0 | 15.0 | 27:52 | 24-113 | (4.7) | 17-32 | 53.1% | 290 | (9.1) | 56-403 | (7.2) | (28.8) |
|
|
| Average power rating of opponents played: MINNESOTA 14.2, TENNESSEE 16 |
|
|
|
|
|
| 8/9/2015 | *PITTSBURGH | 14-3 | W | -3 | W | 36.5 | U | 29-86 | 19-26-159 | 1 | 25-68 | 16-32-123 | 2 | | 8/15/2015 | TAMPA BAY | 26-16 | W | -3.5 | W | 36 | O | 29-104 | 27-33-284 | 3 | 26-89 | 20-39-229 | 1 | | 8/22/2015 | OAKLAND | 20-12 | W | -4.5 | W | 38.5 | U | 32-87 | 23-37-173 | 2 | 32-120 | 17-30-169 | 2 | | 8/29/2015 | @ DALLAS | 28-14 | W | 3 | W | 41.5 | O | 32-85 | 24-27-205 | 1 | 21-84 | 12-25-110 | 1 | | 9/3/2015 | @ TENNESSEE | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 8/14/2015 | @ ATLANTA | 24-31 | L | 2.5 | L | 37 | O | 28-85 | 23-27-286 | 3 | 32-69 | 21-28-254 | 1 | | 8/23/2015 | ST LOUIS | 27-14 | W | -3 | W | 39 | O | 29-112 | 20-27-267 | 0 | 24-113 | 17-32-290 | 1 | | 8/28/2015 | @ KANSAS CITY | 10-34 | L | 5.5 | L | 41 | O | 22-98 | 12-25-140 | 1 | 17-115 | 31-38-317 | 1 | | 9/3/2015 | MINNESOTA | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
|
 | MINNESOTA: Offensive coordinator Norv Turner planned on building this offense around the power running game and Adrian Peterson in Year 1. Those plans obviously fell through after Peterson's nearly season-long suspension. Now he'll use him heavily in a scheme that skews toward a lot of gap blocking and banging between the tackles. Turner's offense takes downfield shots off play-action. Charles Johnson emerged as Teddy Bridgewater's favorite target in the second half of last season, working deep on the perimeter. Mike Wallace gives them another field stretcher on the other side of the field, which would open things up for Kyle Rudolph. Although the Vikings were one of only eight teams with fewer than 20 takeaways in 2014, the team did show an ability to get to the quarterback, finishing tied for ninth in the NFL with 41 sacks. The Vikes have promising young talent in OLB Anthony Barr, CB Xavier Rhodes and rookie CB Trae Waynes. | | TENNESSEE: The Titans use a hybrid blocking scheme in the running game, and the maturation of some of their young blockers should lead to more success this season. Bishop Sankey overtook Shonn Greene last year and figures to be the lead in Tennessee's committee. Sankey thrives on inside zone runs, something that is becoming a staple of the Titans' offense. Head coach Ken Whisenhunt's offense is QB-friendly; a lot of pre-snap reads. Quarterback Marcus Mariota was named the starter and shouldn't have too difficult of a time adjusting. Kendall Wright will continue to operate as more of a slot receiver, using his quickness to shake open on shorter routes in the middle of the field. Rookie Dorial Green-Beckham should overtake Justin Hunter as the primary deep threat; both are raw. Harry Douglas gives them a complementary receiver who can win some one-on-one matchups, but it should be tight end Delanie Walker, used on a wide variety of routes, who is the default No. 2 receiver again. The Titans made a big move by hiring Dick LeBeau as defensive coordinator after he'd spent the past 11 seasons in the same position with the Steelers. He'll be tasked with turning around a defense that gave up more rushing yards last season than any team aside from the Browns. |
|
|
|
|
| Last Updated: 5/2/2024 1:22:19 AM EST. |
|
|