|
|
OAKLAND
SEATTLE |
|
|
37.5
| 21
Final
31 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|  | |
| 131 | OAKLAND | +9.5 | Over 32 | | 132 | SEATTLE | +2.5 | Under 44 |
|
|
|  | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| All Games | 1-2 | -1.2 | 1-2 | 1-2 | 17.7 | 11.0 | 324.7 | (4.9) | 1.7 | 17.7 | 6.3 | 283.3 | (4.5) | 1.3 | | Road Games | 0-1 | -1 | 0-1 | 0-1 | 12.0 | 9.0 | 289.0 | (4.7) | 2.0 | 20.0 | 13.0 | 260.0 | (3.8) | 2.0 | | Last 3 Games | 1-2 | -1.2 | 1-2 | 1-2 | 17.7 | 11.0 | 324.7 | (4.9) | 1.7 | 17.7 | 6.3 | 283.3 | (4.5) | 1.3 | | Turf Games | 0-1 | -1 | 0-1 | 0-1 | 12.0 | 9.0 | 289.0 | (4.7) | 2.0 | 20.0 | 13.0 | 260.0 | (3.8) | 2.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
| Offense (All Games) | 17.7 | 11.0 | 20.3 | 30:14 | 28-86 | (3.1) | 24-38 | 62.3% | 238 | (6.3) | 66-325 | (4.9) | (18.4) | | Opponents Defensive Avg. | 20.2 | 12.1 | 18.5 | 29:00 | 27-85 | (3.2) | 21-35 | 60.5% | 216 | (6.2) | 62-301 | (4.9) | (14.9) | | Offense Road Games | 12.0 | 9.0 | 15.0 | 29:48 | 32-120 | (3.7) | 17-30 | 56.7% | 169 | (5.6) | 62-289 | (4.7) | (24.1) | | Defense (All Games) | 17.7 | 6.3 | 19.7 | 29:46 | 26-82 | (3.2) | 23-38 | 60.5% | 201 | (5.3) | 64-283 | (4.5) | (16) | | Opponents Offensive Avg. | 18.3 | 8.2 | 17.9 | 31:60 | 27-88 | (3.2) | 21-33 | 62.2% | 217 | (6.6) | 60-304 | (5) | (16.6) | | Defense Road Games | 20.0 | 13.0 | 22.0 | 30:12 | 32-87 | (2.7) | 23-37 | 62.2% | 173 | (4.7) | 69-260 | (3.8) | (13) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| All Games | 1-2 | -1.8 | 1-2 | 1-2 | 16.3 | 10.0 | 210.0 | (3.9) | 0.7 | 17.0 | 10.7 | 326.7 | (5.1) | 1.0 | | Home Games | 0-1 | -1.8 | 0-1 | 1-0 | 20.0 | 10.0 | 181.0 | (3.5) | 2.0 | 22.0 | 19.0 | 356.0 | (5.7) | 1.0 | | Last 3 Games | 1-2 | -1.8 | 1-2 | 1-2 | 16.3 | 10.0 | 210.0 | (3.9) | 0.7 | 17.0 | 10.7 | 326.7 | (5.1) | 1.0 | | Turf Games | 0-1 | -1.8 | 0-1 | 1-0 | 20.0 | 10.0 | 181.0 | (3.5) | 2.0 | 22.0 | 19.0 | 356.0 | (5.7) | 1.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
| Offense (All Games) | 16.3 | 10.0 | 12.7 | 26:21 | 26-95 | (3.7) | 15-28 | 52.9% | 115 | (4.1) | 54-210 | (3.9) | (12.9) | | Opponents Defensive Avg. | 14 | 7.7 | 15.4 | 28:18 | 25-93 | (3.7) | 17-31 | 54.5% | 154 | (5) | 56-247 | (4.4) | (17.7) | | Offense Home Games | 20.0 | 10.0 | 13.0 | 26:15 | 24-89 | (3.7) | 13-27 | 48.1% | 92 | (3.4) | 51-181 | (3.5) | (9) | | Defense (All Games) | 17.0 | 10.7 | 19.3 | 33:39 | 31-116 | (3.7) | 21-33 | 64.0% | 211 | (6.3) | 64-327 | (5.1) | (19.2) | | Opponents Offensive Avg. | 21.2 | 11.6 | 20.7 | 31:16 | 28-113 | (4) | 22-35 | 65.0% | 213 | (6.2) | 63-326 | (5.2) | (15.4) | | Defense Home Games | 22.0 | 19.0 | 20.0 | 33:45 | 32-113 | (3.5) | 22-31 | 71.0% | 243 | (7.8) | 63-356 | (5.7) | (16.2) |
|
|
| Average power rating of opponents played: OAKLAND 18, SEATTLE 20.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
| 8/14/2015 | ST LOUIS | 18-3 | W | -1.5 | W | 35.5 | U | 30-102 | 23-30-215 | 2 | 21-86 | 24-37-199 | 0 | | 8/22/2015 | @ MINNESOTA | 12-20 | L | 4.5 | L | 38.5 | U | 32-120 | 17-30-169 | 2 | 32-87 | 23-37-173 | 2 | | 8/30/2015 | ARIZONA | 23-30 | L | -1.5 | L | 39 | O | 21-37 | 31-54-331 | 1 | 24-73 | 22-40-232 | 2 | | 9/3/2015 | @ SEATTLE | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 8/14/2015 | DENVER | 20-22 | L | -4.5 | L | 37 | O | 24-89 | 13-27-92 | 2 | 32-113 | 22-31-243 | 1 | | 8/21/2015 | @ KANSAS CITY | 13-14 | L | 3 | W | 40 | U | 25-78 | 18-29-149 | 0 | 29-98 | 19-30-140 | 1 | | 8/29/2015 | @ SAN DIEGO | 16-15 | W | -3 | L | 41.5 | U | 28-117 | 14-29-105 | 0 | 32-136 | 23-39-250 | 1 | | 9/3/2015 | OAKLAND | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
|
 | OAKLAND: The Raiders are going old-school with their offensive staff, with new coordinator Bill Musgrave and offensive line coach Mike Tice stepping in to tutor a young offense. Tice has overseen a variety of schemes over the years, but Oakland is probably going to go heavy with gap blocking this year. Latavius Murray will get a chance to run away with the feature back job; he earned rave reviews running in practices in recent years before breaking out late last season. Musgrave won't be making any drastic changes to the passing game. Like last year, this is going to be rooted in a West Coast system. Amari Cooper will be used on a variety of routes, but especially the screen game and anything that puts him in catch-and-run situations. Michael Crabtree will run more underneath possession routes. Andre Holmes is a situational deep threat. The Raiders swapped out MLB Nick Roach and S Tyvon Branch for MLB Curtis Lofton and S Nate Allen this offseason, but there's no guarantee that such moves will qualify as upgrades. The biggest positive was the signing of DT Dan Williams, who is a true run-plugger at nose tackle. | | SEATTLE: It will be more of the same from the Seattle running game, which has been one of the NFL's best during the Pete Carroll era. It's a zone-blocking scheme, coached expertly first by Alex Gibbs and now by Tom Cable. Rumors of Marshawn Lynch's demise were apparently exaggerated, as he was as tough as ever in 2014, slashing for yards between the tackles. He gets some help from the threat of Russell Wilson running when they use read-option plays. Bevell has been a maestro with a passing game that severely lacked talent. He's been creative with his ability to get Russell Wilson moving out of the pocket, and he uses a series of crossing patterns, wheel routes and natural picks to free up receivers who aren't very good. Now he has a major weapon in Jimmy Graham, who figures to become the focal point of the passing game. He should be used similarly to how he was in New Orleans, as a downfield matchup nightmare. The Seahawks allowed the fewest yards and points in the league for a second straight season, and there is little reason to believe that they won't do it again. Defensive coordinator Dan Quinn is gone, but CB Byron Maxwell is this unit's only significant loss. |
|
|
|
|
| Last Updated: 5/18/2024 7:48:22 AM EST. |
|
|