|
|
SEATTLE
WASHINGTON |
|
|
45
| 24
Final
14 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| NFC Wild Card Playoffs |
|
|  | |
| 107 | SEATTLE | -2.5 | -3 | | 108 | WASHINGTON | 45 | 46 |
|
|
|  | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| All Games | 11-5 | +6 | 11-5 | 8-8 | 25.7 | 13.7 | 350.6 | (6) | 1.1 | 15.3 | 8.4 | 305.7 | (5.3) | 1.9 | | Road Games | 3-5 | -3 | 4-4 | 4-4 | 21.1 | 10.9 | 342.5 | (5.8) | 1.5 | 18.7 | 9.2 | 322.9 | (5.6) | 1.4 | | Last 3 Games | 3-0 | +3 | 2-1 | 2-1 | 37.3 | 20.7 | 391.3 | (7.1) | 0.3 | 14.3 | 10.0 | 325.7 | (5.4) | 2.0 | | Grass Games | 2-2 | -0.1 | 3-1 | 2-2 | 16.5 | 7.2 | 333.0 | (5.7) | 1.2 | 16.5 | 5.0 | 324.0 | (6) | 1.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
| Offense (All Games) | 25.7 | 13.7 | 19.4 | 31:51 | 33-161 | (4.8) | 16-25 | 64.0% | 189 | (7.5) | 59-351 | (6) | (13.6) | | Opponents Defensive Avg. | 21.7 | 10.8 | 19.5 | 31:32 | 28-117 | (4.2) | 21-34 | 60.3% | 221 | (6.4) | 62-337 | (5.4) | (15.5) | | Offense Road Games | 21.1 | 10.9 | 18.9 | 30:60 | 30-150 | (5) | 18-29 | 63.8% | 192 | (6.7) | 59-342 | (5.8) | (16.2) | | Defense (All Games) | 15.3 | 8.4 | 18.4 | 28:37 | 23-103 | (4.5) | 20-35 | 58.0% | 203 | (5.7) | 58-306 | (5.3) | (20) | | Opponents Offensive Avg. | 22 | 10.6 | 19.6 | 30:23 | 27-118 | (4.3) | 21-34 | 60.6% | 222 | (6.5) | 62-340 | (5.5) | (15.4) | | Defense Road Games | 18.7 | 9.2 | 19.5 | 29:56 | 25-112 | (4.5) | 19-33 | 59.3% | 211 | (6.4) | 58-323 | (5.6) | (17.2) |
|
|
|
|
|
| Stats For (All Games) | 0.6 | 0.5 | 1.1 | 0.8 | 12-5 | 40.2% | 1-1 | 61.1% | 2-49 | (27.1) | 3-22 | (8.5) | 7-56 | | Opponents Avg. Stats Against | 0.9 | 0.6 | 1.6 | 1.8 | 14-5 | 36.9% | 1-1 | 52.5% | 3-62 | (23.3) | 20-2 | (9.1) | 6-51 | | Stats For (Road Games) | 1.0 | 0.5 | 1.5 | -0.1 | 13-5 | 40.6% | 1-0 | 50.0% | 2-63 | (31.6) | 3-22 | (7.6) | 6-48 | | Stats Against (All Games) | 1.1 | 0.8 | 1.9 | | 12-5 | 38.4% | 1-0 | 30.0% | 3-72 | (22.9) | 2-16 | (8.7) | 6-56 | | Opponents Avg. Stats For | 0.9 | 0.7 | 1.6 | | 13-5 | 36.9% | 1-0 | 50.8% | 3-61 | (23.4) | 22-2 | (9.7) | 6-54 | | Stats Against (Road Games) | 0.9 | 0.5 | 1.4 | | 12-5 | 42.1% | 0-0 | 25.0% | 2-48 | (21.4) | 1-18 | (13.1) | 5-43 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| All Games | 10-6 | +5.2 | 11-5 | 9-7 | 27.2 | 13.6 | 383.3 | (6.4) | 0.9 | 24.2 | 12.1 | 377.7 | (6) | 1.9 | | Home Games | 5-3 | +1.3 | 5-3 | 3-5 | 25.7 | 10.6 | 363.4 | (6.3) | 0.7 | 22.1 | 12.2 | 369.0 | (5.8) | 1.9 | | Last 3 Games | 3-0 | +3.5 | 3-0 | 2-1 | 31.0 | 10.0 | 368.0 | (6) | 0.7 | 19.7 | 10.3 | 332.7 | (5.6) | 2.3 | | Grass Games | 8-4 | +4 | 8-4 | 6-6 | 25.6 | 11.2 | 364.9 | (6.2) | 0.7 | 22.2 | 12.3 | 365.2 | (5.9) | 1.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
| Offense (All Games) | 27.2 | 13.6 | 21.3 | 31:11 | 32-170 | (5.3) | 18-28 | 65.9% | 214 | (7.7) | 60-383 | (6.4) | (14.1) | | Opponents Defensive Avg. | 23.2 | 11.6 | 20.2 | 31:39 | 28-118 | (4.3) | 22-34 | 62.7% | 238 | (6.9) | 62-356 | (5.7) | (15.4) | | Offense Home Games | 25.7 | 10.6 | 21.0 | 30:16 | 33-187 | (5.7) | 16-25 | 64.2% | 176 | (7) | 58-363 | (6.3) | (14.1) | | Defense (All Games) | 24.2 | 12.1 | 21.2 | 29:01 | 23-96 | (4.2) | 25-40 | 61.8% | 282 | (7.1) | 62-378 | (6) | (15.6) | | Opponents Offensive Avg. | 23 | 11.2 | 19.9 | 30:50 | 26-109 | (4.3) | 22-36 | 61.2% | 244 | (6.8) | 62-354 | (5.7) | (15.4) | | Defense Home Games | 22.1 | 12.2 | 21.2 | 30:09 | 27-110 | (4.1) | 22-36 | 61.3% | 259 | (7.1) | 63-369 | (5.8) | (16.7) |
|
|
|
|
|
| Stats For (All Games) | 0.5 | 0.4 | 0.9 | 1.1 | 12-4 | 35.8% | 1-1 | 70.6% | 2-56 | (23.5) | 2-22 | (9.7) | 7-62 | | Opponents Avg. Stats Against | 0.8 | 0.6 | 1.5 | 1.9 | 13-5 | 39.1% | 1-0 | 48.1% | 3-66 | (23.2) | 22-2 | (10) | 6-53 | | Stats For (Home Games) | 0.4 | 0.4 | 0.7 | 1.1 | 11-4 | 34.8% | 1-0 | 57.1% | 2-59 | (26.3) | 2-25 | (10.5) | 7-59 | | Stats Against (All Games) | 1.3 | 0.6 | 1.9 | | 13-6 | 44.2% | 1-0 | 57.1% | 3-79 | (23) | 2-20 | (8.3) | 6-51 | | Opponents Avg. Stats For | 1 | 0.6 | 1.6 | | 13-5 | 38.9% | 1-0 | 52.9% | 3-69 | (23.7) | 20-2 | (9.7) | 6-52 | | Stats Against (Home Games) | 1.2 | 0.6 | 1.9 | | 14-7 | 47.8% | 0-0 | 33.3% | 3-81 | (23.2) | 2-22 | (8.9) | 6-48 |
|
|
| Average power rating of opponents played: SEATTLE 21.1, WASHINGTON 20.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
| 11/11/2012 | NY JETS | 28-7 | W | -5.5 | W | 38.5 | U | 43-174 | 13-20-189 | 2 | 22-84 | 12-25-101 | 3 | | 11/25/2012 | @ MIAMI | 21-24 | L | -3 | L | 37.5 | O | 27-96 | 21-27-216 | 0 | 28-189 | 18-26-246 | 1 | | 12/2/2012 | @ CHICAGO | 23-17 | W | 3 | W | 36.5 | O | 32-176 | 23-37-283 | 1 | 32-132 | 17-26-226 | 0 | | 12/9/2012 | ARIZONA | 58-0 | W | -10 | W | 36 | O | 42-284 | 12-22-209 | 1 | 16-43 | 19-39-111 | 8 | | 12/16/2012 | *BUFFALO | 50-17 | W | -4 | W | 44.5 | O | 32-270 | 14-23-196 | 0 | 21-118 | 24-43-215 | 3 | | 12/23/2012 | SAN FRANCISCO | 42-13 | W | -3 | W | 40.5 | O | 39-176 | 15-22-170 | 1 | 19-82 | 19-36-231 | 2 | | 12/30/2012 | ST LOUIS | 20-13 | W | -10.5 | L | 42 | U | 30-153 | 15-19-209 | 0 | 19-79 | 25-42-252 | 1 | | 1/6/2013 | @ WASHINGTON | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 11/18/2012 | PHILADELPHIA | 31-6 | W | -3 | W | 45.5 | U | 34-169 | 14-15-192 | 0 | 21-80 | 21-46-177 | 3 | | 11/22/2012 | @ DALLAS | 38-31 | W | 3 | W | 47 | O | 30-142 | 20-28-295 | 1 | 11-35 | 37-62-423 | 3 | | 12/3/2012 | NY GIANTS | 17-16 | W | 3 | W | 50 | U | 31-207 | 13-21-163 | 1 | 29-117 | 20-33-273 | 0 | | 12/9/2012 | BALTIMORE | 31-28 | W | -2 | W | 48 | O | 35-172 | 17-28-248 | 1 | 35-186 | 16-21-173 | 2 | | 12/16/2012 | @ CLEVELAND | 38-21 | W | 4 | W | 40.5 | O | 35-122 | 26-37-308 | 1 | 15-58 | 21-35-233 | 2 | | 12/23/2012 | @ PHILADELPHIA | 27-20 | W | -4.5 | W | 46 | O | 28-128 | 16-24-185 | 1 | 22-90 | 32-48-321 | 2 | | 12/30/2012 | DALLAS | 28-18 | W | -3 | W | 50 | U | 42-274 | 9-18-87 | 0 | 22-100 | 20-37-196 | 3 | | 1/6/2013 | SEATTLE | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
|
 | SEATTLE: The Seahawks are well-versed in zone blocking after a year under current offensive line coach Tom Cable, one of the best zone-blocking coaches in the game. They play a lot of two-tight end and three-receiver sets and do a lot of inside zone runs with Marshawn Lynch, who will continue to get a mammoth workload. Change-of-pace back Leon Washington will occasionally spell Lynch on passing downs, taking about a third of the reps, and rookie Robert Turbin is expected to be used on only a handful of snaps as long as Lynch is able to remain healthy. Seattle is run-heavy near the goal line: Lynch will again have a huge role in the red zone, as Seattle was one of four teams to run it more than 60 percent of the time in goal-to-go situations. The Seahawks run a West Coast offense similar to the one QB Matt Flynn played in at Green Bay. Seattle uses a lot of three-WR sets, and offensive coordinator Darrell Bevell was able to open things up for slot receiver Doug Baldwin. Split end Sidney Rice is more of a perimeter threat in this offense, and Golden Tate has a chance for an increased number of targets at flanker. Tight end Zach Miller ended up being a bit redundant with Baldwin in the middle of the field, which is why his numbers were down. Miller's contributions are not expected to increase now that he'll be splitting reps with Kellen Winslow. Although their 2011 leading tackler LB David Hawthorne is now in New Orleans, the Seahawks should remain an above-average defense. They finished fourth in the NFL with 22 interceptions (Brandon Browner had six) and made huge improvements in both yards allowed and scoring defense in 2011. One of the reasons was the play of DL Chris Clemons, who after floundering for several different teams has found a home in Seattle with back-to-back 11-sack seasons'there's little reason to believe the explosive DE won't reach double figures again in 2012. Safety Kam Chancellor is an elite in-the-box run-stuffer who even plays some linebacker on passing downs. He's also good enough in coverage that he's not a liability when opponents decide to pass the ball. Chancellor forms one of the NFL's best young safety tandems with Earl Thomas, who draws comparisons to Troy Polamalu due to his athleticism and exceptional instincts. | | WASHINGTON: The Redskins had to go away from the running game because they fell behind early and often last year, but their preference is to rely on their vaunted zone-blocking scheme. They generally settle on one feature back at the beginning of each game, but there's no guarantee who it will be week-to-week. Roy Helu enters the year as the heavy favorite for carries, followed by Tim Hightower and Evan Royster. All three are capable of playing three downs. Royster might be an option in the red zone later in the year, but at this point Helu and Hightower are the backs who have goal line experience. Robert Griffin III is an excellent fit in the passing game of head coach Mike and offensive coordinator Kyle Shanahan. They want their quarterbacks to move around and throw on the run, and Griffin can do exactly that. Washington has shuffled its receiving corps. Santana Moss has a chance to be the No. 1 receiver by design, and he will move to the slot when they go three-wide. Pierre Garcon will stretch the field (Griffin threw a lot of deep balls at Baylor) with Leonard Hankerson a deep threat on the opposite side. Josh Morgan is likely the odd man out, especially since the Redskins will play a lot of two-TE sets. Because TE Fred Davis runs more WR routes, Helu could end up being Griffin's safety valve. The Shanahans love to put their quarterback on the move near the goal line too, and Griffin will have the option of a short pass or trying to punch it in himself. This will be a new-look defense with safeties LaRon Landry and O.J. Atogwe replaced by free agents Madieu Williams and Tanard Jackson. Cedric Griffin also improves the DB unit. Ryan Kerrigan and Brian Orakpo are skilled pass rushers, but the Redskins face a tough schedule this season. Meanwhile, any thoughts last year that London Fletcher may be slowing down were erased by a big finish, in which he racked up 86 total tackles over the last seven games. Fletcher's heir apparent, perhaps as early as 2013, appears to be Perry Riley, who was great last season after earning a starting spot (63 total tackles over eight starts). One of two significant returnees to the secondary is DeJon Gomes, who proved to be a capable tackler with 28 total tackles in his five starts. He has the ability to play strong safety as well as nickel corner. Cornerback DeAngelo Hall, meanwhile, is so overaggressive that opposing quarterbacks can't resist throwing at him. |
|
|
Game Notes: |
|
| Last Updated: 4/24/2024 10:17:19 AM EST. |
|
|