| | NBA : Teaser Line Matchup |
| |
CHICAGO WASHINGTON |
|
| 183.5 | 89 Final 98 |
|
|
| | |
|
Eastern Conference - Round 1 - Best of 7 - Game 4 - WAS Leads 2-1 | | | | |
753 | CHICAGO | +6 | Over 179.5 | 754 | WASHINGTON | +2 | Under 187.5 |
|
|
| | |
|
| | | |
|
|
All Games | 49-36 | +4.4 | 42-42 | 36-48 | 93.8 | 46.9 | 43.3% | 52.8 | 92.1 | 45.8 | 43.2% | 49.2 | Road Games | 22-20 | +2.2 | 21-20 | 20-21 | 93.0 | 46.1 | 43.3% | 51.9 | 94.1 | 46.4 | 44.3% | 48.3 | Last 5 Games | 2-3 | -2.9 | 2-3 | 4-1 | 97.2 | 49.4 | 44.4% | 50.8 | 97.2 | 48.4 | 45.6% | 51.6 | Playoff Games | 1-2 | -2.9 | 1-2 | 3-0 | 97.3 | 50.3 | 44.2% | 52.7 | 100.0 | 51.7 | 46.2% | 51.3 |
|
| |
|
|
Team Stats (All Games) | 93.8 | 46.9 | 35-80 | 43.3% | 6-18 | 34.9% | 18-23 | 77.7% | 53 | 11 | 23 | 19 | 7 | 14 | 5 | vs opponents surrendering | 101 | 50.6 | 38-83 | 45.5% | 8-22 | 36.1% | 18-24 | 75.7% | 51 | 11 | 22 | 21 | 8 | 14 | 5 | Team Stats (Road Games) | 93.0 | 46.1 | 34-79 | 43.3% | 7-18 | 35.8% | 18-24 | 77.3% | 52 | 11 | 21 | 19 | 7 | 15 | 5 | Stats Against (All Games) | 92.1 | 45.8 | 35-81 | 43.2% | 7-19 | 35.3% | 15-21 | 74.9% | 49 | 11 | 20 | 21 | 8 | 14 | 6 | vs opponents averaging | 100.5 | 50.3 | 38-83 | 45.3% | 8-22 | 35.9% | 18-23 | 75.2% | 51 | 11 | 22 | 21 | 8 | 14 | 5 | Stats Against (Road Games) | 94.1 | 46.4 | 36-82 | 44.3% | 7-19 | 35.5% | 15-19 | 76.1% | 48 | 11 | 21 | 21 | 8 | 14 | 5 |
|
|
| |
|
|
All Games | 46-39 | -8.9 | 44-39 | 45-40 | 100.6 | 51.1 | 45.9% | 50.2 | 99.3 | 50.4 | 45.7% | 50.6 | Home Games | 22-20 | -20.8 | 16-24 | 19-23 | 100.3 | 51.3 | 46.3% | 49.3 | 98.3 | 50.2 | 45.8% | 49.6 | Last 5 Games | 4-1 | +4.1 | 4-1 | 5-0 | 106.4 | 58.6 | 51.0% | 50.4 | 97.4 | 51.0 | 44.8% | 47.8 | Playoff Games | 2-1 | +2.1 | 2-1 | 3-0 | 100.0 | 51.7 | 46.2% | 51.3 | 97.3 | 50.3 | 44.2% | 52.7 |
|
| |
|
|
Team Stats (All Games) | 100.6 | 51.1 | 39-84 | 45.9% | 8-21 | 38.0% | 15-21 | 72.8% | 50 | 11 | 23 | 21 | 8 | 14 | 5 | vs opponents surrendering | 100.6 | 50.4 | 38-83 | 45.4% | 8-22 | 36.1% | 18-23 | 75.6% | 51 | 11 | 22 | 21 | 8 | 14 | 5 | Team Stats (Home Games) | 100.3 | 51.3 | 39-83 | 46.3% | 7-20 | 36.2% | 16-21 | 75.1% | 49 | 10 | 23 | 20 | 8 | 14 | 5 | Stats Against (All Games) | 99.3 | 50.4 | 37-81 | 45.7% | 7-21 | 34.8% | 18-23 | 76.3% | 51 | 10 | 22 | 20 | 8 | 15 | 4 | vs opponents averaging | 100 | 50 | 37-83 | 45.1% | 8-21 | 35.6% | 18-24 | 75.6% | 51 | 11 | 22 | 21 | 8 | 14 | 5 | Stats Against (Home Games) | 98.3 | 50.2 | 37-81 | 45.8% | 8-22 | 35.2% | 17-22 | 76.7% | 50 | 9 | 22 | 20 | 8 | 15 | 4 |
|
| Average power rating of opponents played: CHICAGO 95.2, WASHINGTON 95.1 |
| | |
|
|
3/19/2014 | @ PHILADELPHIA | 102-94 | W | -13.5 | L | 194.5 | O | 36-83 | 43.4% | 60 | 15 | 37-81 | 45.7% | 46 | 11 | 3/21/2014 | @ INDIANA | 79-91 | L | 6.5 | L | 179.5 | U | 28-77 | 36.4% | 43 | 13 | 34-79 | 43.0% | 61 | 16 | 3/22/2014 | PHILADELPHIA | 91-81 | W | -16 | L | 193 | U | 31-70 | 44.3% | 52 | 15 | 30-87 | 34.5% | 53 | 10 | 3/24/2014 | INDIANA | 89-77 | W | -1.5 | W | 176 | U | 35-84 | 41.7% | 52 | 10 | 27-73 | 37.0% | 46 | 15 | 3/28/2014 | PORTLAND | 74-91 | L | -4.5 | L | 186.5 | U | 33-84 | 39.3% | 51 | 12 | 35-80 | 43.7% | 52 | 9 | 3/30/2014 | @ BOSTON | 107-102 | W | -4.5 | W | 180.5 | O | 37-70 | 52.9% | 43 | 15 | 40-87 | 46.0% | 47 | 15 | 3/31/2014 | BOSTON | 94-80 | W | -9.5 | W | 184.5 | U | 38-80 | 47.5% | 48 | 13 | 31-77 | 40.3% | 45 | 16 | 4/2/2014 | @ ATLANTA | 105-92 | W | -2 | W | 183.5 | O | 40-78 | 51.3% | 40 | 13 | 32-72 | 44.4% | 46 | 16 | 4/4/2014 | MILWAUKEE | 102-90 | W | -11.5 | W | 184.5 | O | 31-84 | 36.9% | 59 | 11 | 31-68 | 45.6% | 49 | 20 | 4/5/2014 | @ WASHINGTON | 96-78 | W | 2 | W | 183.5 | U | 35-79 | 44.3% | 57 | 10 | 34-86 | 39.5% | 48 | 11 | 4/9/2014 | @ MINNESOTA | 102-87 | W | -3 | W | 192.5 | U | 41-82 | 50.0% | 47 | 13 | 34-80 | 42.5% | 44 | 12 | 4/11/2014 | DETROIT | 106-98 | W | -10 | L | 192.5 | O | 40-81 | 49.4% | 47 | 11 | 40-86 | 46.5% | 52 | 11 | 4/13/2014 | @ NEW YORK | 89-100 | L | -3 | L | 185 | O | 29-74 | 39.2% | 56 | 16 | 37-81 | 45.7% | 44 | 9 | 4/14/2014 | ORLANDO | 108-95 | W | -10.5 | W | 182 | O | 39-77 | 50.6% | 43 | 8 | 36-72 | 50.0% | 41 | 16 | 4/16/2014 | @ CHARLOTTE | 86-91 | L | 1.5 | L | 180.5 | U | 34-86 | 39.5% | 53 | 11 | 34-85 | 40.0% | 63 | 9 | 4/20/2014 | WASHINGTON | 93-102 | L | -4.5 | L | 177.5 | O | 34-81 | 42.0% | 46 | 8 | 36-74 | 48.6% | 54 | 10 | 4/22/2014 | WASHINGTON | 99-101 | L | -5 | L | 180 | O | 38-88 | 43.2% | 57 | 12 | 38-80 | 47.5% | 53 | 12 | 4/25/2014 | @ WASHINGTON | 100-97 | W | 2.5 | W | 180.5 | O | 34-71 | 47.9% | 55 | 16 | 37-86 | 43.0% | 47 | 11 | 4/27/2014 | @ WASHINGTON | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 4/29/2014 | WASHINGTON | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
| |
|
|
3/18/2014 | @ SACRAMENTO | 111-117 | L | -1.5 | L | 201 | O | 40-91 | 44.0% | 52 | 15 | 40-87 | 46.0% | 65 | 20 | 3/20/2014 | @ PORTLAND | 103-116 | L | 5.5 | L | 205.5 | O | 38-90 | 42.2% | 49 | 11 | 41-81 | 50.6% | 50 | 9 | 3/21/2014 | @ LA LAKERS | 117-107 | W | -5 | W | 218.5 | O | 42-87 | 48.3% | 54 | 19 | 43-91 | 47.3% | 54 | 21 | 3/23/2014 | @ DENVER | 102-105 | L | 0 | L | 213.5 | U | 41-85 | 48.2% | 57 | 24 | 40-91 | 44.0% | 45 | 15 | 3/26/2014 | PHOENIX | 93-99 | L | 1.5 | L | 209.5 | U | 37-81 | 45.7% | 47 | 14 | 37-75 | 49.3% | 44 | 19 | 3/28/2014 | INDIANA | 91-78 | W | 1.5 | W | 186.5 | U | 34-87 | 39.1% | 51 | 8 | 28-79 | 35.4% | 59 | 17 | 3/29/2014 | ATLANTA | 101-97 | W | -6 | L | 198.5 | U | 39-79 | 49.4% | 50 | 13 | 34-80 | 42.5% | 52 | 12 | 3/31/2014 | @ CHARLOTTE | 94-100 | L | 3 | L | 194.5 | U | 38-79 | 48.1% | 41 | 14 | 34-78 | 43.6% | 53 | 10 | 4/2/2014 | BOSTON | 118-92 | W | -8 | W | 200 | O | 45-72 | 62.5% | 47 | 21 | 32-81 | 39.5% | 37 | 14 | 4/4/2014 | @ NEW YORK | 90-89 | W | 5.5 | W | 195.5 | U | 38-78 | 48.7% | 49 | 15 | 34-76 | 44.7% | 40 | 16 | 4/5/2014 | CHICAGO | 78-96 | L | -2 | L | 183.5 | U | 34-86 | 39.5% | 48 | 11 | 35-79 | 44.3% | 57 | 10 | 4/9/2014 | CHARLOTTE | 88-94 | L | -5.5 | L | 190 | U | 37-82 | 45.1% | 53 | 12 | 35-92 | 38.0% | 58 | 12 | 4/11/2014 | @ ORLANDO | 96-86 | W | -7 | W | 194 | U | 35-82 | 42.7% | 57 | 12 | 32-77 | 41.6% | 50 | 16 | 4/12/2014 | MILWAUKEE | 104-91 | W | -11 | W | 204 | U | 40-84 | 47.6% | 44 | 9 | 32-68 | 47.1% | 51 | 20 | 4/14/2014 | MIAMI | 114-93 | W | -5.5 | W | 190 | O | 46-78 | 59.0% | 49 | 17 | 36-80 | 45.0% | 36 | 12 | 4/16/2014 | @ BOSTON | 118-102 | W | -8 | W | 198 | O | 50-88 | 56.8% | 49 | 12 | 39-84 | 46.4% | 45 | 13 | 4/20/2014 | @ CHICAGO | 102-93 | W | 4.5 | W | 177.5 | O | 36-74 | 48.6% | 54 | 10 | 34-81 | 42.0% | 46 | 8 | 4/22/2014 | @ CHICAGO | 101-99 | W | 5 | W | 180 | O | 38-80 | 47.5% | 53 | 12 | 38-88 | 43.2% | 57 | 12 | 4/25/2014 | CHICAGO | 97-100 | L | -2.5 | L | 180.5 | O | 37-86 | 43.0% | 47 | 11 | 34-71 | 47.9% | 55 | 16 | 4/27/2014 | CHICAGO | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 4/29/2014 | @ CHICAGO | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
| | | CHICAGO: GUARDS: After playing it very safe and sitting out all of last spring, DERRICK ROSE should pretty much be his old self. Of course, he'll have to knock some rust off early in the year . . . JIMMY BUTLER was an iron man during last year's playoffs, and his role will only grow this season. His defense and energy, as well as ability to get to the line, could make Luol Deng expendable . . . MIKE DUNLEAVY is in line for the sixth man role, primarily as a long-range threat . . . With Rose's return, KIRK HINRICH slides back to the bench. His playing time will be especially limited with Dunleavy taking up minutes at the two . . . MARQUIS TEAGUE will continue to be used only in garbage time unless Hinrich ends up getting hurt or traded. FORWARDS: LUOL DENG is back on the trading block, as the Bulls learned life isn't so bad without him now that Jimmy Butler has emerged. His offensive role could be slightly reduced . . . CARLOS BOOZER will likely be amnestied next summer, so for all intents and purposes this is a contract year. He's likely to still be a disaster defensively, which means he's a part-time player under defensive-minded head coach Tom Thibodeau . . . TAJ GIBSON will finish games and likely take over Boozer's spot a year from now. He's a superior defender and, while he doesn't have Boozer's range, he's a capable finisher around the rim . . . Rookie TONY SNELL is a Thibodeau kind of player, a long-armed, athletic perimeter defender. He's unlikely to ever do much on offense though. CENTERS: JOAKIM NOAH may be consistently banged up, but he's capable of playing through the pain. Depending on the Bulls' playoff position, he might sit some games late in the year, but Thibodeau isn't shy about playing him 35 minutes per night . . . NAZR MOHAMMED is back as a designated screener on offense and hacker on defense.. | | WASHINGTON: GUARDS: Late last year, JOHN WALL finally started to fulfill his promising talent. He got wherever he wanted on the court, and the Wizards were very tough to guard with all the shooters surrounding him . . . BRADLEY BEAL and Wall should mesh beautifully. Beal is a potentially elite shooter, and he rebounds very well for a guard . . . ERIC MAYNOR is fully healthy again after tearing his ACL two seasons ago. He can play some alongside Wall, but mostly he'll be the league's best back-up point guard again . . . GLEN RICE JR. doesn't shoot it nearly as well as his father, but he's an athlete who could break into the rotation down the line . . . GARRETT TEMPLE is insurance in case Wall or Maynor goes down. FORWARDS: The Wizards need NENÊ’S low post offense. It seems inevitable that they'll have to cap his minutes . . . OTTO PORTER is likely to step into the starting lineup early on. They need his defense, as he can guard twos through fours . . . MARTELL WEBSTER will platoon with Porter, providing another outstanding shooter for Wall to feed . . . TREVOR ARIZA is playing out the string on an untradeable deal . . . TREVOR BOOKER has some use as a screener and low-post banger, but not much else . . . AL HARRINGTON may be inefficient, but he can score points in a hurry and is a decent defender'JAN VESELY is still trying to figure out the NBA, though it's too early to give up on his athleticism . . . CHRIS SINGLETON can defend, but he's no more than a garbage-time player due to his atrocious offense. CENTERS: EMEKA OKAFOR may be absurdly overpaid, but he's settled in as a passable starter who helps defensively and doesn't hurt on offense. He'll also miss the beginning of the season with a herniated disc . . . With Okafor's deal expiring at the end of the year, KEVIN SERAPHIN is auditioning to be Washington's center of the future. After showing promise two seasons ago, he was a disaster last season. |
| | Freelancers Benjamin Standig and Joey Kamide contributed to this report.
---
Follow Howard Fendrich on Twitter at http://twitter.com/HowardFendrich
|
| Last Updated: 4/20/2024 6:30:52 AM EST. |
|
|
| |
|