NBA UTAH Matchup 20160205

You are viewing a condensed version of this FoxSheet. Login as a FoxSheets Subscriber to view the full sheet.
Not a member? Subscribe today and start taking advantage of our premium information, including the Game Estimator™, the Super Situations ™, the Power Trends ™, and many more features.

NBA : ATS Matchup

Friday 2/5/2016

Line

$ Line

OU Line

Score

MILWAUKEE

UTAH

-7

+220

-300

188

81
Final
84

MILWAUKEE (20 - 31) at UTAH (23 - 25)

Friday, 2/5/2016 9:00 PM

Board		Open	Latest
865	MILWAUKEE	190	189.5
866	UTAH	-6.5	-7.5

	Current ATS FoxSheets
	ATS FoxSheet
	First Half FoxSheet
	Money Line FoxSheet
	Teaser Line FoxSheet

ADVANCED TEAM STATS

MILWAUKEE - Current Season Performance
	Straight Up		Against Spread		Team				Opponent
	W-L	Units	W-L	O-U	Score	Half	FG Pct	Reb.	Score	Half	FG Pct	Reb.
All Games	20-31	-3.1	25-26	29-21	98.2	49.8	46.1%	49.1	103.3	52.2	45.2%	51.7
Road Games	7-23	-10.8	13-17	15-14	96.1	48.5	46.2%	48.3	104.6	53.5	46.0%	50.4
Last 5 Games	1-4	-3.2	1-4	3-2	98.4	49.4	45.6%	48.4	105.6	54.0	45.9%	50.8

MILWAUKEE Team Statistics
			Shooting		3pt Shooting		Free Throws		Rebounding
	PPG	Half	FGM-A	Pct	FGM-A	PCT	FTM-A	Pct	Tot	Off	Ast	PF	Stl	TO	Bk
Team Stats (All Games)	98.2	49.8	38-82	46.1%	5-16	34.8%	17-23	76.0%	49	11	23	22	8	15	6
vs opponents surrendering	101.4	50.5	38-84	44.8%	8-24	35.1%	17-23	75.5%	52	10	22	20	8	14	5
Team Stats (Road Games)	96.1	48.5	37-80	46.2%	5-16	33.3%	17-22	76.2%	48	10	22	22	7	15	5
Stats Against (All Games)	103.3	52.2	37-83	45.2%	9-26	36.5%	19-25	76.4%	52	12	24	19	8	14	6
vs opponents averaging	101.7	50.7	38-84	44.9%	8-24	35.3%	18-23	75.5%	52	10	22	20	8	14	5
Stats Against (Road Games)	104.6	53.5	38-82	46.0%	10-25	37.9%	19-25	76.6%	50	11	24	18	8	13	5

UTAH - Current Season Performance
	Straight Up		Against Spread		Team				Opponent
	W-L	Units	W-L	O-U	Score	Half	FG Pct	Reb.	Score	Half	FG Pct	Reb.
All Games	23-25	-3.1	25-21	20-27	97.6	47.2	44.4%	51.1	96.4	46.7	44.7%	48.8
Home Games	16-10	+1.6	15-9	10-15	98.7	50.1	44.9%	52.2	93.9	47.2	43.3%	48.7
Last 5 Games	4-1	+2.4	3-2	2-3	97.4	44.4	46.1%	52.2	87.0	46.2	42.1%	49.2

UTAH Team Statistics
			Shooting		3pt Shooting		Free Throws		Rebounding
	PPG	Half	FGM-A	Pct	FGM-A	PCT	FTM-A	Pct	Tot	Off	Ast	PF	Stl	TO	Bk
Team Stats (All Games)	97.6	47.2	36-81	44.4%	8-23	35.9%	18-23	75.4%	51	11	18	21	8	14	5
vs opponents surrendering	101.8	50.8	38-85	44.9%	8-24	35.1%	18-23	75.5%	52	10	22	20	8	14	5
Team Stats (Home Games)	98.7	50.1	35-79	44.9%	9-25	35.7%	19-25	75.2%	52	10	17	20	8	14	5
Stats Against (All Games)	96.4	46.7	35-79	44.7%	8-21	36.4%	18-24	75.8%	49	10	19	20	8	14	5
vs opponents averaging	102	50.8	38-84	45.0%	8-24	35.2%	18-24	75.3%	53	11	22	20	8	14	5
Stats Against (Home Games)	93.9	47.2	34-79	43.3%	8-22	36.3%	17-23	73.4%	49	10	17	21	8	14	4

Average power rating of opponents played: MILWAUKEE 95.5, UTAH 95.3

SCHEDULE AND RESULTS

MILWAUKEE - Season Results
								Team Stats				Opp Stats
Date	Opponent	Score	SU	Line	ATS	Tot.	O/U	Shots	Pct	REB	TO	Shots	Pct	REB	TO
12/28/2015	@ DALLAS	93-103	L	5.5	L	202	U	38-79	48.1%	58	17	38-84	45.2%	40	4
12/29/2015	@ OKLAHOMA CITY	123-131	L	13.5	W	207	O	49-100	49.0%	58	14	43-86	50.0%	46	11
12/31/2015	@ INDIANA	120-116	W	6	W	200.5	O	45-77	58.4%	42	16	41-82	50.0%	47	19
1/2/2016	@ MINNESOTA	95-85	W	2	W	204	U	32-75	42.7%	53	13	33-84	39.3%	54	16
1/4/2016	SAN ANTONIO	98-123	L	9.5	L	192.5	O	37-77	48.1%	43	15	49-90	54.4%	51	13
1/5/2016	@ CHICAGO	106-117	L	8.5	L	200.5	O	46-102	45.1%	51	10	46-83	55.4%	48	15
1/8/2016	DALLAS	96-95	W	0	W	205	U	37-80	46.2%	55	15	35-84	41.7%	53	16
1/10/2016	@ NEW YORK	88-100	L	5.5	L	197.5	U	32-80	40.0%	52	11	39-84	46.4%	53	11
1/12/2016	CHICAGO	106-101	W	3	W	203	O	43-93	46.2%	51	5	35-85	41.2%	65	17
1/13/2016	@ WASHINGTON	101-106	L	5.5	W	207	P	38-72	52.8%	58	27	38-84	45.2%	38	16
1/15/2016	ATLANTA	108-101	W	4.5	W	206	O	40-96	41.7%	74	16	43-100	43.0%	51	17
1/16/2016	@ CHARLOTTE	105-92	W	5.5	W	196.5	O	39-72	54.2%	54	15	33-87	37.9%	42	5
1/19/2016	@ MIAMI	91-79	W	4	W	191.5	U	36-74	48.6%	45	17	27-74	36.5%	48	14
1/22/2016	@ HOUSTON	98-102	L	2	L	210.5	U	39-85	45.9%	56	15	38-94	40.4%	56	11
1/23/2016	@ NEW ORLEANS	99-116	L	6.5	L	202.5	O	39-74	52.7%	47	18	43-94	45.7%	46	8
1/26/2016	ORLANDO	107-100	W	-5	W	196.5	O	38-77	49.4%	52	12	33-80	41.2%	47	11
1/28/2016	@ MEMPHIS	83-103	L	5	L	193	U	29-79	36.7%	52	14	38-80	47.5%	46	11
1/29/2016	MIAMI	103-107	L	-1	L	194.5	O	38-80	47.5%	46	19	37-74	50.0%	42	17
2/1/2016	@ SACRAMENTO	104-111	L	1.5	L	214	O	42-84	50.0%	38	15	39-86	45.3%	62	16
2/2/2016	@ PORTLAND	95-107	L	7.5	L	206	U	38-86	44.2%	54	13	39-85	45.9%	57	15
2/5/2016	@ UTAH
2/9/2016	BOSTON
2/11/2016	WASHINGTON
2/19/2016	CHARLOTTE
2/20/2016	@ ATLANTA

UTAH - Season Results
								Team Stats				Opp Stats
Date	Opponent	Score	SU	Line	ATS	Tot.	O/U	Shots	Pct	REB	TO	Shots	Pct	REB	TO
12/28/2015	PHILADELPHIA	95-91	W	-8	L	195.5	U	28-84	33.3%	67	15	36-86	41.9%	48	18
12/30/2015	@ MINNESOTA	80-94	L	4	L	191.5	U	28-80	35.0%	53	19	36-77	46.8%	56	10
12/31/2015	PORTLAND	109-96	W	-3	W	188	O	43-86	50.0%	46	5	35-78	44.9%	47	10
1/2/2016	MEMPHIS	92-87	W	2	W	184	U	31-75	41.3%	59	16	33-81	40.7%	52	11
1/4/2016	HOUSTON	91-93	L	3.5	W	198	U	30-75	40.0%	50	15	33-68	48.5%	41	16
1/6/2016	@ SAN ANTONIO	98-123	L	13.5	L	183.5	O	37-79	46.8%	39	18	52-86	60.5%	41	13
1/7/2016	@ HOUSTON	94-103	L	6.5	L	196.5	O	38-78	48.7%	41	19	39-75	52.0%	49	16
1/9/2016	MIAMI	98-83	W	1.5	W	182	U	39-71	54.9%	47	16	34-82	41.5%	48	17
1/10/2016	@ LA LAKERS	86-74	W	-3	W	191	U	31-69	44.9%	57	14	29-89	32.6%	49	11
1/13/2016	@ PORTLAND	85-99	L	3.5	L	193	U	31-76	40.8%	46	14	39-88	44.3%	60	13
1/14/2016	SACRAMENTO	101-103	L	-2.5	L	200	O	35-83	42.2%	46	13	34-74	45.9%	63	15
1/16/2016	LA LAKERS	109-82	W	-8.5	W	191	P	41-83	49.4%	56	10	31-90	34.4%	55	14
1/18/2016	@ CHARLOTTE	119-124	L	3.5	L	185.5	O	44-104	42.3%	54	10	41-88	46.6%	61	16
1/20/2016	@ NEW YORK	111-118	L	2.5	L	187.5	O	37-86	43.0%	52	12	47-90	52.2%	47	9
1/22/2016	@ BROOKLYN	108-86	W	-5.5	W	188.5	O	43-75	57.3%	49	14	33-75	44.0%	31	11
1/25/2016	DETROIT	92-95	L	-3	L	192	U	34-85	40.0%	56	13	34-75	45.3%	56	10
1/27/2016	CHARLOTTE	102-73	W	-6.5	W	193.5	U	40-81	49.4%	52	10	25-68	36.8%	41	18
1/29/2016	MINNESOTA	103-90	W	-8.5	W	192	O	40-76	52.6%	44	13	35-75	46.7%	43	14
2/1/2016	CHICAGO	105-96	W	-5.5	W	190.5	O	38-85	44.7%	62	14	39-90	43.3%	54	14
2/3/2016	DENVER	85-81	W	-7.5	L	195	U	33-74	44.6%	47	14	26-70	37.1%	52	14
2/5/2016	MILWAUKEE
2/6/2016	@ PHOENIX
2/9/2016	@ DALLAS
2/10/2016	@ NEW ORLEANS
2/19/2016	BOSTON
2/21/2016	@ PORTLAND

KEY GAME INFORMATION

MILWAUKEE: His new contract is a bit eye-opening, but between his shooting and his ability to cover ground on defense, Khris Middleton is exactly what the Bucks want on the wings . . . Michael Carter-Williams does a lot of things well, but it will be tough for head coach Jason Kidd to play him full-time starter's minutes while he's bricking so many jumpers . . . That's the reason why Milwaukee acquired Greivis Vasquez. He could end up in close to a 50/50 time split with Carter-Williams . . . O.J. Mayo will continue to serve as a high-scoring sixth man . . . Jerryd Bayless will lose minutes, but the Bucks can go three guards often with their scrambling defense . . . Rookie Rashad Vaughn is probably a year away from significant minutes . . . Tyler Ennis is buried as the third point guard. He has taken significant steps forward in each of his first two seasons, and Giannis Antetokounmpo still has plenty of room to grow. The Greek Freak is perfect for what the Bucks do defensively, with the ability to scramble and cover a ton of ground. Offensively, the next step is adding a three-point shot . . . Jabari Parker is the mystery man on this roster. He was not off to a great start early last season, then tore his ACL. He's skilled and a capable offensive player, but pairing him and Greg Monroe would give them two minus defenders in the frontcourt . . . Chris Copeland is one-dimensional, but his shooting comes in handy as a stretch 4 . . . Johnny O'Bryant will likely be on the outside looking in at the rotation of bigs. Greg Monroe is what he is: a skilled offensive player but a subpar athlete who is a liability on defense. The Bucks are banking that the active, scrambling defenders they'll surround him with can make up for that . . . When the Bucks go defense, rim protector and all around Inspector Gadget athlete John Henson can play the 4 or 5 . . . Miles Plumlee is a warm body with six fouls to give.

UTAH: Dante Exum tore his ACL over the summer and will not play this season . . . Alec Burks is expected to be 100% after missing most of last season with a shoulder injury. If the improved three-point shot he showed off last year is for real, he'll be a solid two-way player . . . Trey Burke is looking at a sixth man role. It's a better fit for him; he doesn't have the athleticism to keep up with top guards . . . Joe Ingles is back as a solid glue guy in a part-time role . . . Raul Neto can be a solid defender and just might be the favorite to start this season . . . Olivier Hanlan gives them another potential ball-handler off the bench. Utah's go-to scorer is Gordon Hayward. He can knock down open jumpers and showed improved play off the dribble last year . . . Derrick Favors has always been a solid two-way player, and he and Rudy Gobert clicked nicely down the stretch last season . . . Rodney Hood has the makings of a solid 3-and-D wing. He could play his way into big minutes with Hayward's ability to slide to shooting guard . . . Trevor Booker is a decent defender who moves around and sets screens on offense . . . Trey Lyles' ability to step away from the basket is a plus, though he might need a year to add muscle . . . Defensive-minded J.J. O'Brien replaces Jeremy Evans at the end of the bench. The Enes Kanter trade opened up big minutes for Rudy Gobert, and he was a monster in the second half of the season. His defense alone makes him a legitimate All-Star candidate, though opponents will surely go small early and often to try to take him off the court . . . Tibor Pleiss is a bit of a poor man's Kanter, solid and skilled offensively but a poor defender.

PREVIEW

Last Updated: 4/23/2024 3:33:21 PM EST.