| | | |
CHARLOTTE NEW YORK |
|
| 211.5 | 103 Final 102 |
|
|
| | |
|
| | | |
533 | CHARLOTTE | 211.5 | 212 | 534 | NEW YORK | -4 | -3.5 |
|
|
| | |
|
| | | |
|
|
All Games | 5-7 | +3 | 7-5 | 6-6 | 107.0 | 56.7 | 45.0% | 50.5 | 113.1 | 58.8 | 49.3% | 52.4 | Road Games | 2-3 | +3.2 | 4-1 | 3-2 | 102.8 | 57.0 | 44.7% | 48.6 | 108.6 | 58.8 | 49.2% | 50.2 | Last 5 Games | 1-4 | -1.8 | 2-3 | 2-3 | 105.8 | 55.4 | 43.7% | 49.6 | 112.4 | 57.6 | 50.6% | 52.2 |
|
| |
|
|
Team Stats (All Games) | 107.0 | 56.7 | 39-87 | 45.0% | 13-34 | 36.8% | 16-22 | 71.5% | 50 | 10 | 24 | 19 | 7 | 16 | 4 | vs opponents surrendering | 111.5 | 55.8 | 40-88 | 45.9% | 12-33 | 35.9% | 19-25 | 76.2% | 54 | 10 | 24 | 22 | 8 | 16 | 5 | Team Stats (Road Games) | 102.8 | 57.0 | 38-85 | 44.7% | 12-34 | 35.1% | 15-19 | 76.0% | 49 | 11 | 23 | 19 | 7 | 16 | 2 | Stats Against (All Games) | 113.1 | 58.8 | 44-88 | 49.3% | 12-33 | 36.2% | 14-17 | 78.5% | 52 | 10 | 27 | 22 | 9 | 17 | 6 | vs opponents averaging | 110.9 | 55.4 | 41-90 | 45.5% | 11-33 | 34.5% | 18-23 | 76.9% | 54 | 10 | 25 | 23 | 8 | 15 | 5 | Stats Against (Road Games) | 108.6 | 58.8 | 43-87 | 49.2% | 11-33 | 33.7% | 12-15 | 80.3% | 50 | 9 | 26 | 21 | 9 | 17 | 6 |
|
|
| |
|
|
All Games | 3-9 | -1.8 | 6-6 | 3-9 | 100.0 | 49.8 | 42.0% | 57.2 | 109.7 | 55.1 | 46.1% | 52.7 | Home Games | 2-3 | +0.2 | 2-3 | 0-5 | 97.0 | 45.6 | 40.4% | 63.4 | 108.0 | 53.2 | 44.5% | 50.8 | Last 5 Games | 2-3 | +3.1 | 2-3 | 2-3 | 100.6 | 53.6 | 42.3% | 57.0 | 111.0 | 57.6 | 46.6% | 51.6 |
|
| |
|
|
Team Stats (All Games) | 100.0 | 49.8 | 36-86 | 42.0% | 11-30 | 36.1% | 17-25 | 65.7% | 57 | 13 | 20 | 24 | 8 | 16 | 4 | vs opponents surrendering | 109.9 | 54.1 | 41-89 | 45.9% | 11-32 | 34.9% | 17-23 | 75.5% | 55 | 10 | 23 | 22 | 7 | 15 | 5 | Team Stats (Home Games) | 97.0 | 45.6 | 35-86 | 40.4% | 9-30 | 31.1% | 18-27 | 68.4% | 63 | 16 | 18 | 24 | 6 | 18 | 5 | Stats Against (All Games) | 109.7 | 55.1 | 38-83 | 46.1% | 12-34 | 35.1% | 21-27 | 77.5% | 53 | 9 | 23 | 21 | 8 | 15 | 4 | vs opponents averaging | 110.1 | 55 | 40-89 | 44.7% | 12-34 | 34.9% | 18-24 | 76.6% | 54 | 10 | 23 | 21 | 8 | 14 | 5 | Stats Against (Home Games) | 108.0 | 53.2 | 38-86 | 44.5% | 11-36 | 30.7% | 21-27 | 75.2% | 51 | 10 | 22 | 22 | 10 | 12 | 5 |
|
| Average power rating of opponents played: CHARLOTTE 96.5, NEW YORK 93.1 |
| | |
|
|
10/23/2019 | CHICAGO | 126-125 | W | 3.5 | W | 217 | O | 45-88 | 51.1% | 48 | 19 | 49-105 | 46.7% | 58 | 10 | 10/25/2019 | MINNESOTA | 99-121 | L | 5 | L | 225.5 | U | 37-84 | 44.0% | 52 | 19 | 43-91 | 47.3% | 64 | 15 | 10/27/2019 | @ LA LAKERS | 101-120 | L | 13.5 | L | 216 | O | 35-91 | 38.5% | 52 | 14 | 49-93 | 52.7% | 53 | 13 | 10/28/2019 | @ LA CLIPPERS | 96-111 | L | 15.5 | W | 227 | U | 36-83 | 43.4% | 46 | 21 | 40-83 | 48.2% | 50 | 21 | 10/30/2019 | @ SACRAMENTO | 118-111 | W | 7 | W | 223 | O | 46-84 | 54.8% | 49 | 20 | 44-96 | 45.8% | 48 | 15 | 11/2/2019 | @ GOLDEN STATE | 93-87 | W | -5.5 | W | 221 | U | 36-85 | 42.4% | 56 | 12 | 34-77 | 44.2% | 46 | 18 | 11/5/2019 | INDIANA | 122-120 | W | 2.5 | W | 213 | O | 42-88 | 47.7% | 55 | 13 | 51-94 | 54.3% | 49 | 18 | 11/7/2019 | BOSTON | 87-108 | L | 7 | L | 215 | U | 33-86 | 38.4% | 59 | 20 | 40-93 | 43.0% | 58 | 12 | 11/9/2019 | NEW ORLEANS | 110-115 | L | 2 | L | 232.5 | U | 36-88 | 40.9% | 54 | 21 | 40-75 | 53.3% | 50 | 26 | 11/10/2019 | @ PHILADELPHIA | 106-114 | L | 14 | W | 213.5 | O | 38-84 | 45.2% | 40 | 13 | 46-84 | 54.8% | 54 | 20 | 11/13/2019 | MEMPHIS | 117-119 | L | -2.5 | L | 222 | O | 43-88 | 48.9% | 44 | 15 | 48-90 | 53.3% | 50 | 22 | 11/15/2019 | DETROIT | 109-106 | W | 4 | W | 220 | U | 43-96 | 44.8% | 51 | 10 | 40-81 | 49.4% | 49 | 19 | 11/16/2019 | @ NEW YORK | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 11/18/2019 | @ TORONTO | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 11/20/2019 | @ BROOKLYN | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 11/22/2019 | @ WASHINGTON | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 11/23/2019 | CHICAGO | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 11/25/2019 | @ MIAMI | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 11/27/2019 | DETROIT | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 11/29/2019 | @ DETROIT | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 11/30/2019 | @ MILWAUKEE | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 12/2/2019 | PHOENIX | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
| |
|
|
10/23/2019 | @ SAN ANTONIO | 111-120 | L | 10.5 | W | 214.5 | O | 44-94 | 46.8% | 46 | 14 | 42-83 | 50.6% | 57 | 21 | 10/25/2019 | @ BROOKLYN | 109-113 | L | 8 | W | 229 | U | 38-81 | 46.9% | 51 | 26 | 37-78 | 47.4% | 56 | 26 | 10/26/2019 | BOSTON | 95-118 | L | 5 | L | 219 | U | 31-80 | 38.7% | 65 | 25 | 42-93 | 45.2% | 53 | 12 | 10/28/2019 | CHICAGO | 105-98 | W | 2 | W | 224.5 | U | 38-91 | 41.8% | 74 | 17 | 36-85 | 42.4% | 44 | 9 | 10/30/2019 | @ ORLANDO | 83-95 | L | 9.5 | L | 209.5 | U | 31-82 | 37.8% | 55 | 11 | 37-88 | 42.0% | 56 | 7 | 11/1/2019 | @ BOSTON | 102-104 | L | 9 | W | 212 | U | 37-93 | 39.8% | 58 | 13 | 33-74 | 44.6% | 48 | 14 | 11/3/2019 | SACRAMENTO | 92-113 | L | 1.5 | L | 213 | U | 32-80 | 40.0% | 52 | 13 | 41-85 | 48.2% | 60 | 13 | 11/6/2019 | @ DETROIT | 102-122 | L | 3.5 | L | 205.5 | O | 39-80 | 48.7% | 40 | 13 | 44-79 | 55.7% | 49 | 16 | 11/8/2019 | @ DALLAS | 106-102 | W | 10.5 | W | 215 | U | 37-89 | 41.6% | 67 | 12 | 37-90 | 41.1% | 54 | 13 | 11/10/2019 | CLEVELAND | 87-108 | L | -2.5 | L | 213 | U | 31-86 | 36.0% | 64 | 21 | 36-82 | 43.9% | 49 | 14 | 11/12/2019 | @ CHICAGO | 102-120 | L | 6.5 | L | 211.5 | O | 36-88 | 40.9% | 52 | 18 | 41-81 | 50.6% | 58 | 19 | 11/14/2019 | DALLAS | 106-103 | W | 7.5 | W | 214.5 | U | 42-94 | 44.7% | 62 | 15 | 36-84 | 42.9% | 48 | 11 | 11/16/2019 | CHARLOTTE | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 11/18/2019 | CLEVELAND | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 11/20/2019 | @ PHILADELPHIA | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 11/23/2019 | SAN ANTONIO | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 11/24/2019 | BROOKLYN | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 11/27/2019 | @ TORONTO | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 11/29/2019 | PHILADELPHIA | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 12/1/2019 | BOSTON | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 12/2/2019 | @ MILWAUKEE | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
| | | CHARLOTTE: LAST SEASON: 39-43, missed playoffs.
COACH: James Borrego (second season).
PROJECTED STARTING FIVE: G Terry Rozier (9.0 ppg), G Dwyane Bacon (7.3 ppg), F PJ Washington (rookie), F Miles Bridges (7.5 ppg), C Cody Zeller (10.1 ppg).
KEY LOSSES: PG Kemba Walker, SG Jeremy Lamb.
KEY ADDITIONS: Rozier, Washington.
PLAYERS TO WATCH: All eyes will be on Rozier. He replaces Walker, a three-time All-Star and the franchise's career scoring leader. Walker averaged 25.6 points last season, so the Hornets will need to find production from players like Bridges and Bacon. Rozier is expected to put up better assist numbers than Walker but doesn't figure to come close to matching his scoring output. One big question for the Hornets will be who they turn to in late-game situations to make big shots. Walker and Lamb have handled that role in recent years, but both are gone. Borrego says it will be something the team must figure out moving forward.
OUTLOOK: Make no doubt about it, the Hornets are in complete rebuilding mode and most view them as a sure lottery team next season. This season isn't about wins and losses, but rather getting young players as many quality minutes as possible. That means Bridges, Bacon, Washington and Malik Monk will see plenty of playing time while aging veterans Nic Batum and Marvin Williams are likely relegated to reserve roles. Charlotte lacks NBA experience, but its youthful roster will provide plenty of energy and enthusiasm and could give some opponents problems. This team may not be very talented, but it will compete. | | NEW YORK: LAST SEASON: 17-65, missed playoffs.
COACH: David Fizdale (second season, fourth NBA season).
PROJECTED STARTING FIVE: G Dennis Smith Jr. (13.6 ppg), G RJ Barrett (rookie), F Marcus Morris (13.9 ppg), F Julius Randle (21.1 ppg). C Mitchell Robinson (7.3 ppg).
KEY LOSSES: F Noah Vonleh, F Mario Hezonja, G Emmanuel Mudiay, C DeAndre Jordan
KEY ADDITIONS: G Barrett, F Randle, F Morris, F Bobby Portis, F Taj Gibson, G Elfrid Payton, G Wayne Ellington, G/F Reggie Bullock.
PLAYER TO WATCH: Barrett. The Knicks shared the best odds of getting the No. 1 pick and Zion Williamson after having the worst record in the league. They ended up third and took his Duke teammate and fellow All-American, who tied for the ACC scoring lead, with their highest selection since grabbing Hall of Famer Patrick Ewing first overall in 1985. There aren't a lot of scorers on the roster, so the Knicks will need Barrett to play well quickly.
OUTLOOK: The Knicks couldn't land any of the top talent in free agency after missing the playoffs for a sixth straight year, but believe they signed enough veteran toughness to exceed their relatively low expectations. |
| error '80070070'/includes/foxsheetfunctions.asp, line 397 |
|
|