| | | |
DETROIT MILWAUKEE |
|
| 197 | 103 Final 87 |
|
|
| | |
|
| | | |
815 | DETROIT | 195.5 | 197 | 816 | MILWAUKEE | -6 | -5 |
|
|
| | |
|
| | | |
|
|
All Games | 13-23 | -11 | 16-20 | 17-18 | 95.0 | 48.8 | 44.3% | 53.0 | 96.6 | 47.6 | 43.9% | 50.5 | Road Games | 3-14 | -9.2 | 8-9 | 9-7 | 92.9 | 46.5 | 41.5% | 54.4 | 100.1 | 50.2 | 44.5% | 52.9 | Last 5 Games | 4-1 | +1.4 | 2-3 | 3-2 | 98.8 | 56.4 | 49.5% | 52.4 | 96.4 | 48.0 | 44.7% | 43.6 | Division Games | 3-2 | +1 | 2-3 | 2-3 | 94.0 | 50.6 | 45.2% | 48.4 | 93.2 | 45.6 | 44.4% | 51.6 |
|
| |
|
|
Team Stats (All Games) | 95.0 | 48.8 | 36-81 | 44.3% | 6-17 | 37.4% | 17-24 | 71.7% | 53 | 13 | 20 | 20 | 6 | 14 | 6 | vs opponents surrendering | 98 | 49.3 | 37-82 | 44.8% | 7-20 | 35.9% | 17-23 | 75.6% | 51 | 11 | 22 | 20 | 8 | 14 | 5 | Team Stats (Road Games) | 92.9 | 46.5 | 35-83 | 41.5% | 6-17 | 35.9% | 18-24 | 73.9% | 54 | 14 | 20 | 20 | 6 | 15 | 5 | Stats Against (All Games) | 96.6 | 47.6 | 36-82 | 43.9% | 7-21 | 33.0% | 17-23 | 75.9% | 50 | 12 | 21 | 21 | 8 | 12 | 6 | vs opponents averaging | 97.5 | 48.9 | 37-83 | 44.6% | 7-20 | 35.5% | 17-22 | 75.5% | 51 | 11 | 22 | 20 | 8 | 14 | 5 | Stats Against (Road Games) | 100.1 | 50.2 | 38-84 | 44.5% | 8-22 | 35.2% | 17-23 | 75.3% | 53 | 12 | 22 | 21 | 8 | 12 | 6 |
|
|
| |
|
|
All Games | 18-16 | +2.8 | 17-16 | 16-18 | 96.5 | 49.4 | 43.3% | 52.0 | 97.2 | 48.4 | 44.3% | 53.4 | Home Games | 10-8 | -0.8 | 7-10 | 10-8 | 98.3 | 50.1 | 43.3% | 52.6 | 98.4 | 48.9 | 45.0% | 53.3 | Last 5 Games | 2-3 | -0.1 | 2-3 | 4-1 | 100.6 | 51.4 | 44.9% | 53.6 | 104.4 | 56.2 | 46.1% | 54.0 | Division Games | 6-4 | +0.6 | 6-4 | 3-7 | 93.1 | 48.3 | 43.5% | 49.8 | 93.2 | 48.6 | 42.2% | 57.3 |
|
| |
|
|
Team Stats (All Games) | 96.5 | 49.4 | 37-86 | 43.3% | 6-18 | 34.4% | 16-21 | 74.8% | 52 | 13 | 22 | 19 | 9 | 14 | 8 | vs opponents surrendering | 96.1 | 48.2 | 36-81 | 44.6% | 7-20 | 35.7% | 17-22 | 75.2% | 50 | 11 | 21 | 20 | 8 | 14 | 6 | Team Stats (Home Games) | 98.3 | 50.1 | 38-87 | 43.3% | 6-17 | 35.9% | 17-22 | 75.2% | 53 | 14 | 23 | 19 | 8 | 13 | 8 | Stats Against (All Games) | 97.2 | 48.4 | 37-83 | 44.3% | 6-17 | 33.4% | 18-23 | 77.6% | 53 | 13 | 22 | 20 | 8 | 16 | 4 | vs opponents averaging | 96 | 48.2 | 36-82 | 44.4% | 7-19 | 35.6% | 17-22 | 76.0% | 51 | 11 | 21 | 20 | 8 | 14 | 5 | Stats Against (Home Games) | 98.4 | 48.9 | 37-82 | 45.0% | 6-18 | 33.2% | 19-25 | 76.0% | 53 | 12 | 22 | 21 | 7 | 15 | 4 |
|
| Average power rating of opponents played: DETROIT 95.9, MILWAUKEE 95.6 |
| | |
|
|
12/3/2012 | CLEVELAND | 89-79 | W | -5 | W | 191.5 | U | 36-84 | 42.9% | 58 | 11 | 32-95 | 33.7% | 64 | 11 | 12/5/2012 | GOLDEN STATE | 97-104 | L | -1 | L | 192.5 | O | 35-79 | 44.3% | 60 | 17 | 34-75 | 45.3% | 42 | 10 | 12/7/2012 | CHICAGO | 104-108 | L | 2 | L | 181 | O | 36-70 | 51.4% | 36 | 8 | 43-82 | 52.4% | 48 | 8 | 12/8/2012 | @ CLEVELAND | 104-97 | W | -1 | W | 187 | O | 35-75 | 46.7% | 46 | 9 | 39-91 | 42.9% | 58 | 14 | 12/10/2012 | @ PHILADELPHIA | 97-104 | L | 5.5 | L | 186.5 | O | 32-81 | 39.5% | 47 | 13 | 44-82 | 53.7% | 56 | 11 | 12/11/2012 | DENVER | 94-101 | L | 4.5 | L | 203.5 | U | 34-81 | 42.0% | 63 | 16 | 37-80 | 46.2% | 50 | 9 | 12/14/2012 | @ BROOKLYN | 105-107 | L | 8 | W | 190 | O | 40-99 | 40.4% | 68 | 11 | 42-93 | 45.2% | 51 | 11 | 12/15/2012 | INDIANA | 77-88 | L | 2 | L | 183 | U | 32-83 | 38.6% | 47 | 10 | 35-72 | 48.6% | 51 | 13 | 12/17/2012 | LA CLIPPERS | 76-88 | L | 6.5 | L | 192.5 | U | 29-71 | 40.8% | 44 | 15 | 35-78 | 44.9% | 53 | 11 | 12/19/2012 | @ TORONTO | 91-97 | L | 2.5 | L | 186 | O | 35-84 | 41.7% | 64 | 10 | 35-72 | 48.6% | 39 | 6 | 12/21/2012 | WASHINGTON | 100-68 | W | -6.5 | W | 185 | U | 38-90 | 42.2% | 68 | 12 | 28-85 | 32.9% | 51 | 12 | 12/22/2012 | @ WASHINGTON | 96-87 | W | -1 | W | 183 | P | 36-88 | 40.9% | 64 | 17 | 29-77 | 37.7% | 47 | 11 | 12/26/2012 | @ ATLANTA | 119-126 | L | 8 | W | 187 | O | 48-109 | 44.0% | 71 | 17 | 46-98 | 46.9% | 56 | 10 | 12/28/2012 | MIAMI | 109-99 | W | 6 | W | 189 | O | 43-74 | 58.1% | 43 | 14 | 39-77 | 50.6% | 36 | 14 | 12/30/2012 | MILWAUKEE | 96-94 | W | -2.5 | L | 191 | U | 39-82 | 47.6% | 55 | 16 | 36-77 | 46.8% | 37 | 12 | 1/1/2013 | SACRAMENTO | 103-97 | W | -7 | L | 195.5 | O | 39-75 | 52.0% | 52 | 17 | 36-86 | 41.9% | 44 | 13 | 1/4/2013 | ATLANTA | 85-84 | W | 1.5 | W | 190.5 | U | 35-85 | 41.2% | 64 | 13 | 31-75 | 41.3% | 47 | 17 | 1/6/2013 | CHARLOTTE | 101-108 | L | -8 | L | 193.5 | O | 40-80 | 50.0% | 48 | 22 | 40-92 | 43.5% | 54 | 11 | 1/11/2013 | @ MILWAUKEE | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1/12/2013 | UTAH | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1/17/2013 | NEW YORK | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1/20/2013 | BOSTON | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1/22/2013 | ORLANDO | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1/23/2013 | @ CHICAGO | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1/25/2013 | @ MIAMI | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1/27/2013 | @ ORLANDO | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
| |
|
|
12/3/2012 | @ NEW ORLEANS | 81-102 | L | -4 | L | 188.5 | U | 29-76 | 38.2% | 48 | 16 | 43-82 | 52.4% | 46 | 8 | 12/5/2012 | @ SAN ANTONIO | 99-110 | L | 9 | L | 202.5 | O | 35-84 | 41.7% | 45 | 11 | 40-85 | 47.1% | 58 | 17 | 12/7/2012 | CHARLOTTE | 108-93 | W | -7.5 | W | 197.5 | O | 38-94 | 40.4% | 66 | 10 | 36-81 | 44.4% | 55 | 11 | 12/9/2012 | @ BROOKLYN | 97-88 | W | 6 | W | 194 | U | 33-71 | 46.5% | 40 | 18 | 32-79 | 40.5% | 57 | 20 | 12/12/2012 | SACRAMENTO | 98-85 | W | -7.5 | W | 198 | U | 39-96 | 40.6% | 68 | 9 | 32-86 | 37.2% | 56 | 17 | 12/14/2012 | @ CLEVELAND | 90-86 | W | -3 | W | 196 | U | 33-83 | 39.8% | 55 | 17 | 32-81 | 39.5% | 53 | 24 | 12/15/2012 | LA CLIPPERS | 85-111 | L | 5 | L | 195 | O | 30-83 | 36.1% | 50 | 13 | 44-82 | 53.7% | 54 | 11 | 12/18/2012 | INDIANA | 98-93 | W | -2.5 | W | 185 | O | 37-86 | 43.0% | 52 | 15 | 32-80 | 40.0% | 60 | 20 | 12/19/2012 | @ MEMPHIS | 80-90 | L | 9 | L | 187.5 | U | 30-85 | 35.3% | 55 | 16 | 36-88 | 40.9% | 60 | 16 | 12/21/2012 | @ BOSTON | 99-94 | W | 5 | W | 191 | O | 36-83 | 43.4% | 72 | 21 | 36-94 | 38.3% | 50 | 14 | 12/22/2012 | CLEVELAND | 82-94 | L | -8 | L | 197 | U | 31-79 | 39.2% | 50 | 14 | 38-88 | 43.2% | 58 | 12 | 12/26/2012 | BROOKLYN | 108-93 | W | -5 | W | 187 | O | 40-84 | 47.6% | 52 | 18 | 34-88 | 38.6% | 50 | 15 | 12/29/2012 | MIAMI | 104-85 | W | 4 | W | 199.5 | U | 40-98 | 40.8% | 51 | 5 | 33-76 | 43.4% | 60 | 20 | 12/30/2012 | @ DETROIT | 94-96 | L | 2.5 | W | 191 | U | 36-77 | 46.8% | 37 | 12 | 39-82 | 47.6% | 55 | 16 | 1/2/2013 | SAN ANTONIO | 110-117 | L | 5.5 | L | 204 | O | 43-88 | 48.9% | 53 | 16 | 46-89 | 51.7% | 47 | 8 | 1/4/2013 | HOUSTON | 101-115 | L | 0 | L | 214 | O | 39-87 | 44.8% | 59 | 25 | 45-83 | 54.2% | 40 | 19 | 1/5/2013 | @ INDIANA | 80-95 | L | 4.5 | L | 187.5 | U | 31-82 | 37.8% | 49 | 13 | 40-92 | 43.5% | 67 | 12 | 1/8/2013 | PHOENIX | 108-99 | W | -6 | W | 200.5 | O | 42-91 | 46.2% | 52 | 11 | 37-90 | 41.1% | 59 | 16 | 1/9/2013 | @ CHICAGO | 104-96 | W | 6 | W | 190 | O | 39-84 | 46.4% | 55 | 16 | 39-95 | 41.1% | 57 | 15 | 1/11/2013 | DETROIT | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1/13/2013 | @ TORONTO | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1/15/2013 | @ LA LAKERS | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1/17/2013 | @ PHOENIX | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1/19/2013 | @ PORTLAND | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1/22/2013 | PHILADELPHIA | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1/25/2013 | @ CLEVELAND | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1/26/2013 | GOLDEN STATE | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
| | | DETROIT: GUARDS: RODNEY STUCKEY was hampered by nagging injuries a year ago. If he's healthy, he's the best offensive weapon they have . . . BRANDON KNIGHT is more of a combo guard running the point. He can shoot, but doesn't bring much else to the table . . . With Ben Gordon gone, WILL BYNUM has a chance to regain a significant role . . . The Pistons' two second-round picks have a chance to carve out big roles. KIM ENGLISH has a skill set similar to Gordon's, capable of heating up and scoring in bunches . . . KHRIS MIDDLETON is more of a spot-up, catch-and-shoot threat only . . . Former No. 6 overall pick JONNY FLYNN agreed to a non-guaranteed contract in October, as he is no guarantee to even make this sorry roster. FORWARDS: TAYSHAUN PRINCE is still hanging on as the Pistons' best all-around player . . . JASON MAXIELL should be able to reclaim his starting spot early. He rebounds and takes up space . . . JONAS JEREBKO showed flashes but looked rusty in his first year back from an Achilles injury . . . 2011 2nd-rounder KYLE SINGLER has a good chance to step into the rotation after a solid year in Spain . . . COREY MAGGETTE was acquired in a Ben Gordon salary dump. He'll see limited minutes . . . AUSTIN DAYE regressed big-time last year. Unless he gets off to a hot start, he'll be on the outside looking in at the rotation . . . TERRENCE WILLIAMS is seeking a new lease on life, but could be too much of a head case to realize he's wasting his talent . . . The Pistons are counting down the days left on CHARLIE VILLANUEVA's contract (two years). CENTERS: GREG MONROE is a solid fit in Frank's system. He's not a great athlete, but he can score and move the ball on offense, as well as rebound . . . ANDRE DRUMMOND could one day be a perfect fit alongside Monroe. But for now, he'll watch and learn as a raw, boom-or-bust prospect . . . VIACHESLAV KRAVTSOV is an athletic big who will bring energy, but little offense in limited minutes. | | MILWAUKEE: GUARDS: BRANDON JENNINGS benefitted from the arrival of Monta Ellis last year. He has the offense and system to thrive, and now needs to prove he can be efficient enough to be a star . . . MONTA ELLIS played second fiddle to Jennings last year, and really struggled to shoot the ball. The Bucks now play the kind of tempo he likes, but he'll have to adjust to playing off the ball more often . . . BENO UDRIH won't see a ton of action off the bench considering Jennings and Ellis play so many minutes. If a starter gets hurt, he could step in and hit a lot of threes . . . Second-rounder DORON LAMB has some upside as a future sixth man, but figures to ride the bench this year once his torn elbow ligament heals. FORWARDS: ERSAN ILYASOVA should finally get some respect from Skiles after starring down the stretch last year . . . MIKE DUNLEAVY re-emerged as a legitimate three-point threat, though he doesn't do much else . . . DREW GOODEN's role should shrink with Ilyasova stepping up and Sam Dalembert coming in . . . LUC RICHARD MBAH a MOUTE is coming off knee surgery, but he's improving as a rebounder and can play both forward spots off the bench . . . Rookie JOHN HENSON is a defensive stud and does enough as a screener to get decent minutes early . . . TOBIAS HARRIS was a Summer League star, but he's too much of a 'tweener to thrive in the NBA . . . EKPE UDOH provides defense and rebounding off the bench . . . LARRY SANDERS has potential, but this frontcourt is too crowded for him to make an impact. CENTERS: SAM DALEMBERT fell in and out of favor in Houston, but he's exactly what the Bucksneed as a defensive presence in the paint. Milwaukee has numerous players who can man the five in spots (Ekpe Udoh, Drew Gooden), but Dalembert is by far their best defensive option and should see big minutes . . . JOEL PRZYBILLA signed on in August to provide back-end depth on the pine. |
| | |
| Last Updated: 3/28/2024 6:02:17 AM EST. |
|
|
| |
|