|
|
MILWAUKEE INDIANA |
|
| 187.5 | 80 Final 95 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| | |
501 | MILWAUKEE | +155 | 502 | INDIANA | -175 |
|
|
| | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All Games | 16-15 | +0.8 | 15-15 | 14-17 | 96.4 | 49.4 | 43.3% | 52.0 | 97.3 | 47.8 | 44.5% | 52.7 | Road Games | 7-7 | +2.6 | 9-5 | 5-9 | 94.8 | 48.5 | 43.6% | 51.3 | 95.9 | 47.0 | 43.7% | 52.4 | Last 5 Games | 2-3 | -0.6 | 3-2 | 3-2 | 103.4 | 53.2 | 45.6% | 50.4 | 101.2 | 51.4 | 47.1% | 50.4 | Division Games | 5-3 | -0.4 | 5-3 | 2-6 | 93.4 | 48.2 | 43.9% | 49.2 | 92.6 | 47.1 | 42.2% | 56.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
Team Stats (All Games) | 96.4 | 49.4 | 37-86 | 43.3% | 6-18 | 33.6% | 16-22 | 74.7% | 52 | 13 | 22 | 19 | 9 | 14 | 7 | vs opponents surrendering | 96.6 | 48.4 | 36-81 | 44.8% | 7-20 | 35.8% | 17-22 | 75.1% | 51 | 11 | 21 | 20 | 8 | 14 | 6 | Team Stats (Road Games) | 94.8 | 48.5 | 37-84 | 43.6% | 6-18 | 32.1% | 15-21 | 74.3% | 51 | 11 | 21 | 19 | 9 | 16 | 7 | Stats Against (All Games) | 97.3 | 47.8 | 37-82 | 44.5% | 6-17 | 34.5% | 18-23 | 78.1% | 53 | 12 | 22 | 20 | 8 | 16 | 4 | vs opponents averaging | 96.2 | 48.3 | 36-81 | 44.4% | 7-19 | 35.8% | 17-22 | 75.9% | 51 | 11 | 21 | 20 | 8 | 14 | 5 | Stats Against (Road Games) | 95.9 | 47.0 | 36-83 | 43.7% | 6-17 | 35.0% | 17-21 | 81.5% | 52 | 12 | 22 | 18 | 9 | 16 | 4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
All Games | 19-14 | +2.1 | 17-16 | 14-19 | 91.2 | 44.6 | 42.2% | 54.6 | 90.1 | 45.5 | 41.5% | 51.2 | Home Games | 11-3 | +4.2 | 8-6 | 6-8 | 95.6 | 48.0 | 42.5% | 56.6 | 88.6 | 45.6 | 40.9% | 50.4 | Last 5 Games | 3-2 | +1 | 1-4 | 1-4 | 89.8 | 45.2 | 40.1% | 51.4 | 91.6 | 45.2 | 45.2% | 51.4 | Division Games | 4-2 | +2.6 | 4-2 | 2-4 | 90.2 | 42.5 | 41.9% | 58.3 | 86.7 | 47.2 | 39.3% | 50.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
Team Stats (All Games) | 91.2 | 44.6 | 34-80 | 42.2% | 6-19 | 34.5% | 17-23 | 73.4% | 55 | 12 | 20 | 19 | 6 | 15 | 7 | vs opponents surrendering | 97.9 | 49.1 | 37-82 | 44.8% | 7-20 | 35.7% | 17-23 | 75.4% | 51 | 11 | 22 | 20 | 8 | 14 | 5 | Team Stats (Home Games) | 95.6 | 48.0 | 35-81 | 42.5% | 8-19 | 41.4% | 18-25 | 74.0% | 57 | 13 | 21 | 19 | 7 | 14 | 8 | Stats Against (All Games) | 90.1 | 45.5 | 34-83 | 41.5% | 5-17 | 31.3% | 16-21 | 77.0% | 51 | 11 | 19 | 22 | 7 | 13 | 5 | vs opponents averaging | 96.7 | 48.5 | 37-83 | 44.2% | 7-20 | 35.6% | 17-22 | 75.6% | 51 | 11 | 22 | 20 | 8 | 14 | 5 | Stats Against (Home Games) | 88.6 | 45.6 | 34-83 | 40.9% | 5-16 | 29.0% | 16-20 | 78.8% | 50 | 11 | 19 | 23 | 7 | 12 | 5 |
|
|
Average power rating of opponents played: MILWAUKEE 95.3, INDIANA 95.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
11/26/2012 | @ CHICAGO | 93-92 | W | 4 | W | 192 | U | 39-85 | 45.9% | 51 | 12 | 35-80 | 43.7% | 49 | 15 | 11/28/2012 | NEW YORK | 88-102 | L | 2.5 | L | 202.5 | U | 33-72 | 45.8% | 42 | 17 | 35-73 | 47.9% | 43 | 14 | 11/30/2012 | @ MINNESOTA | 85-95 | L | 1.5 | L | 194.5 | U | 34-93 | 36.6% | 57 | 11 | 34-87 | 39.1% | 67 | 15 | 12/1/2012 | BOSTON | 91-88 | W | -3 | T | 196 | U | 36-79 | 45.6% | 49 | 14 | 34-82 | 41.5% | 50 | 16 | 12/3/2012 | @ NEW ORLEANS | 81-102 | L | -4 | L | 188.5 | U | 29-76 | 38.2% | 48 | 16 | 43-82 | 52.4% | 46 | 8 | 12/5/2012 | @ SAN ANTONIO | 99-110 | L | 9 | L | 202.5 | O | 35-84 | 41.7% | 45 | 11 | 40-85 | 47.1% | 58 | 17 | 12/7/2012 | CHARLOTTE | 108-93 | W | -7.5 | W | 197.5 | O | 38-94 | 40.4% | 66 | 10 | 36-81 | 44.4% | 55 | 11 | 12/9/2012 | @ BROOKLYN | 97-88 | W | 6 | W | 194 | U | 33-71 | 46.5% | 40 | 18 | 32-79 | 40.5% | 57 | 20 | 12/12/2012 | SACRAMENTO | 98-85 | W | -7.5 | W | 198 | U | 39-96 | 40.6% | 68 | 9 | 32-86 | 37.2% | 56 | 17 | 12/14/2012 | @ CLEVELAND | 90-86 | W | -3 | W | 196 | U | 33-83 | 39.8% | 55 | 17 | 32-81 | 39.5% | 53 | 24 | 12/15/2012 | LA CLIPPERS | 85-111 | L | 5 | L | 195 | O | 30-83 | 36.1% | 50 | 13 | 44-82 | 53.7% | 54 | 11 | 12/18/2012 | INDIANA | 98-93 | W | -2.5 | W | 185 | O | 37-86 | 43.0% | 52 | 15 | 32-80 | 40.0% | 60 | 20 | 12/19/2012 | @ MEMPHIS | 80-90 | L | 9 | L | 187.5 | U | 30-85 | 35.3% | 55 | 16 | 36-88 | 40.9% | 60 | 16 | 12/21/2012 | @ BOSTON | 99-94 | W | 5 | W | 191 | O | 36-83 | 43.4% | 72 | 21 | 36-94 | 38.3% | 50 | 14 | 12/22/2012 | CLEVELAND | 82-94 | L | -8 | L | 197 | U | 31-79 | 39.2% | 50 | 14 | 38-88 | 43.2% | 58 | 12 | 12/26/2012 | BROOKLYN | 108-93 | W | -5 | W | 187 | O | 40-84 | 47.6% | 52 | 18 | 34-88 | 38.6% | 50 | 15 | 12/29/2012 | MIAMI | 104-85 | W | 4 | W | 199.5 | U | 40-98 | 40.8% | 51 | 5 | 33-76 | 43.4% | 60 | 20 | 12/30/2012 | @ DETROIT | 94-96 | L | 2.5 | W | 191 | U | 36-77 | 46.8% | 37 | 12 | 39-82 | 47.6% | 55 | 16 | 1/2/2013 | SAN ANTONIO | 110-117 | L | 5.5 | L | 204 | O | 43-88 | 48.9% | 53 | 16 | 46-89 | 51.7% | 47 | 8 | 1/4/2013 | HOUSTON | 101-115 | L | 0 | L | 214 | O | 39-87 | 44.8% | 59 | 25 | 45-83 | 54.2% | 40 | 19 | 1/5/2013 | @ INDIANA | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1/8/2013 | PHOENIX | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1/9/2013 | @ CHICAGO | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1/11/2013 | DETROIT | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1/13/2013 | @ TORONTO | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1/15/2013 | @ LA LAKERS | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1/17/2013 | @ PHOENIX | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1/19/2013 | @ PORTLAND | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
11/27/2012 | @ LA LAKERS | 79-77 | W | 8.5 | W | 196 | U | 29-79 | 36.7% | 62 | 17 | 24-76 | 31.6% | 70 | 19 | 11/30/2012 | @ SACRAMENTO | 97-92 | W | -1.5 | W | 187 | O | 37-85 | 43.5% | 49 | 9 | 32-75 | 42.7% | 50 | 12 | 12/1/2012 | @ GOLDEN STATE | 92-103 | L | 5 | L | 188.5 | O | 34-74 | 45.9% | 42 | 16 | 38-80 | 47.5% | 45 | 17 | 12/4/2012 | @ CHICAGO | 80-76 | W | 4 | W | 180.5 | U | 29-80 | 36.2% | 54 | 12 | 28-73 | 38.4% | 53 | 19 | 12/5/2012 | PORTLAND | 99-92 | W | -4 | W | 186 | O | 36-80 | 45.0% | 51 | 13 | 34-79 | 43.0% | 43 | 10 | 12/7/2012 | DENVER | 89-92 | L | -2 | L | 194.5 | U | 34-76 | 44.7% | 55 | 18 | 38-86 | 44.2% | 49 | 8 | 12/9/2012 | @ OKLAHOMA CITY | 93-104 | L | 10.5 | L | 195 | O | 38-82 | 46.3% | 38 | 7 | 37-76 | 48.7% | 52 | 9 | 12/12/2012 | CLEVELAND | 96-81 | W | -7.5 | W | 189 | U | 34-83 | 41.0% | 63 | 13 | 27-81 | 33.3% | 52 | 12 | 12/14/2012 | PHILADELPHIA | 95-85 | W | -6.5 | W | 179 | O | 35-77 | 45.5% | 60 | 16 | 35-81 | 43.2% | 42 | 12 | 12/15/2012 | @ DETROIT | 88-77 | W | -2 | W | 183 | U | 35-72 | 48.6% | 51 | 13 | 32-83 | 38.6% | 47 | 10 | 12/18/2012 | @ MILWAUKEE | 93-98 | L | 2.5 | L | 185 | O | 32-80 | 40.0% | 60 | 20 | 37-86 | 43.0% | 52 | 15 | 12/19/2012 | UTAH | 104-84 | W | -3.5 | W | 185.5 | O | 41-80 | 51.2% | 45 | 15 | 32-86 | 37.2% | 60 | 15 | 12/21/2012 | @ CLEVELAND | 99-89 | W | -4.5 | W | 187 | O | 39-80 | 48.7% | 57 | 17 | 32-80 | 40.0% | 47 | 16 | 12/22/2012 | @ NEW ORLEANS | 81-75 | W | -3.5 | W | 178.5 | U | 33-77 | 42.9% | 54 | 14 | 33-82 | 40.2% | 48 | 12 | 12/28/2012 | PHOENIX | 97-91 | W | -8 | L | 188.5 | U | 34-77 | 44.2% | 54 | 15 | 38-82 | 46.3% | 44 | 11 | 12/29/2012 | @ ATLANTA | 100-109 | L | 2.5 | L | 182 | O | 38-80 | 47.5% | 40 | 10 | 44-80 | 55.0% | 44 | 16 | 12/31/2012 | MEMPHIS | 88-83 | W | 1.5 | W | 177 | U | 28-70 | 40.0% | 47 | 18 | 31-82 | 37.8% | 56 | 16 | 1/2/2013 | WASHINGTON | 89-81 | W | -10.5 | L | 181.5 | U | 29-77 | 37.7% | 54 | 16 | 35-83 | 42.2% | 49 | 19 | 1/4/2013 | @ BOSTON | 75-94 | L | 3 | L | 181.5 | U | 27-85 | 31.8% | 62 | 18 | 40-89 | 44.9% | 64 | 14 | 1/5/2013 | MILWAUKEE | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1/8/2013 | MIAMI | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1/10/2013 | NEW YORK | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1/12/2013 | CHARLOTTE | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1/13/2013 | @ BROOKLYN | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1/15/2013 | @ CHARLOTTE | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1/16/2013 | @ ORLANDO | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1/18/2013 | HOUSTON | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1/21/2013 | @ MEMPHIS | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
|
| MILWAUKEE: GUARDS: BRANDON JENNINGS benefitted from the arrival of Monta Ellis last year. He has the offense and system to thrive, and now needs to prove he can be efficient enough to be a star . . . MONTA ELLIS played second fiddle to Jennings last year, and really struggled to shoot the ball. The Bucks now play the kind of tempo he likes, but he'll have to adjust to playing off the ball more often . . . BENO UDRIH won't see a ton of action off the bench considering Jennings and Ellis play so many minutes. If a starter gets hurt, he could step in and hit a lot of threes . . . Second-rounder DORON LAMB has some upside as a future sixth man, but figures to ride the bench this year once his torn elbow ligament heals. FORWARDS: ERSAN ILYASOVA should finally get some respect from Skiles after starring down the stretch last year . . . MIKE DUNLEAVY re-emerged as a legitimate three-point threat, though he doesn't do much else . . . DREW GOODEN's role should shrink with Ilyasova stepping up and Sam Dalembert coming in . . . LUC RICHARD MBAH a MOUTE is coming off knee surgery, but he's improving as a rebounder and can play both forward spots off the bench . . . Rookie JOHN HENSON is a defensive stud and does enough as a screener to get decent minutes early . . . TOBIAS HARRIS was a Summer League star, but he's too much of a 'tweener to thrive in the NBA . . . EKPE UDOH provides defense and rebounding off the bench . . . LARRY SANDERS has potential, but this frontcourt is too crowded for him to make an impact. CENTERS: SAM DALEMBERT fell in and out of favor in Houston, but he's exactly what the Bucksneed as a defensive presence in the paint. Milwaukee has numerous players who can man the five in spots (Ekpe Udoh, Drew Gooden), but Dalembert is by far their best defensive option and should see big minutes . . . JOEL PRZYBILLA signed on in August to provide back-end depth on the pine. | | INDIANA: GUARDS: The Pacers went 7-2 during the regular season and won a playoff series with GEORGE HILL in the starting five. He averaged 13.9 PPG and 5.3 APG in those regular season starts . . . PAUL GEORGE is a defensive stopper who is making strides on the offensive end. If he can find the touches, his scoring average will rise . . . D.J. AUGUSTIN has a skill set similar to Hill's. Maybe he'll push him for minutes later in the year, but more likely he'll shoot corner threes off the bench . . . GERALD GREEN is another athlete for their second unit . . . LANCE STEPHENSON has a chance for a bigger role, but he's been atrocious to this point of his career. FORWARDS: DANNY GRANGER's touches dropped last season, but his shot selection improved as last year went on. He'll continue to be a borderline All-Star . . . DAVID WEST's knee should be fully recovered from his torn ACL in late 2010-11. He was their best player in the postseason and should be a star this season with his ability to knock down shots . . . TYLER HANSBROUGH looks like he's settling in as a career second unit player. His lack of athleticism really limits his upside . . . JEFF PENDERGRAPH may or may not hold on to a roster spot in a 12th-man role. CENTERS: They're paying ROY HIBBERT like a franchise player, and he has the ability to control both ends of the court. The question is whether they'll now play him 30-plus minutes, or continue to use him as more of a part-time player . . . IAN MAHINMI should step in as a decent backup center . . . Rookie MILES PLUMLEE was a part-time player at Duke and is highly unlikely to contribute in his first season. |
|
|
|
|
Last Updated: 4/18/2024 8:48:08 AM EST. |
|
|