| | | |
SACRAMENTO CLEVELAND |
|
| 200 | 97 Final 94 |
|
|
| | |
|
| | | |
701 | SACRAMENTO | 198 | 198 | 702 | CLEVELAND | -4 | -3 |
|
|
| | |
|
| | | |
|
|
All Games | 11-20 | -6.2 | 14-16 | 18-12 | 96.8 | 47.0 | 43.8% | 49.2 | 101.8 | 50.7 | 45.7% | 52.5 | Road Games | 1-13 | -10.8 | 6-8 | 7-6 | 91.7 | 43.6 | 40.9% | 48.9 | 102.4 | 53.5 | 45.5% | 57.2 | Last 5 Games | 3-2 | +1.7 | 4-1 | 5-0 | 104.0 | 53.2 | 47.3% | 44.6 | 101.8 | 52.2 | 47.4% | 52.0 |
|
| |
|
|
Team Stats (All Games) | 96.8 | 47.0 | 36-83 | 43.8% | 7-19 | 36.3% | 17-22 | 77.1% | 49 | 12 | 20 | 21 | 8 | 14 | 5 | vs opponents surrendering | 97 | 48.5 | 37-82 | 44.4% | 7-20 | 35.0% | 17-22 | 75.6% | 51 | 11 | 21 | 20 | 8 | 14 | 5 | Team Stats (Road Games) | 91.7 | 43.6 | 35-85 | 40.9% | 7-20 | 35.9% | 15-19 | 79.0% | 49 | 12 | 19 | 22 | 8 | 14 | 5 | Stats Against (All Games) | 101.8 | 50.7 | 38-82 | 45.7% | 7-21 | 35.2% | 19-25 | 78.4% | 53 | 13 | 23 | 19 | 7 | 14 | 7 | vs opponents averaging | 98.1 | 49.3 | 37-82 | 44.8% | 7-20 | 35.4% | 17-23 | 75.0% | 52 | 12 | 22 | 20 | 8 | 14 | 5 | Stats Against (Road Games) | 102.4 | 53.5 | 39-85 | 45.5% | 6-20 | 32.5% | 19-24 | 76.8% | 57 | 15 | 23 | 18 | 8 | 14 | 8 |
|
|
| |
|
|
All Games | 7-25 | -10.4 | 14-18 | 17-15 | 93.9 | 47.8 | 41.6% | 52.2 | 99.4 | 49.2 | 47.3% | 50.0 | Home Games | 3-10 | -7 | 3-10 | 6-7 | 93.2 | 46.2 | 41.4% | 54.0 | 99.3 | 46.3 | 46.3% | 50.8 | Last 5 Games | 2-3 | +0.8 | 3-2 | 3-2 | 92.8 | 48.6 | 41.9% | 48.4 | 94.0 | 48.0 | 45.9% | 53.0 |
|
| |
|
|
Team Stats (All Games) | 93.9 | 47.8 | 35-84 | 41.6% | 8-22 | 35.6% | 16-22 | 73.1% | 52 | 13 | 19 | 22 | 8 | 15 | 3 | vs opponents surrendering | 96.2 | 48.3 | 36-82 | 44.3% | 7-19 | 35.3% | 17-22 | 75.8% | 51 | 11 | 21 | 20 | 8 | 14 | 5 | Team Stats (Home Games) | 93.2 | 46.2 | 35-85 | 41.4% | 8-21 | 36.6% | 15-21 | 71.7% | 54 | 13 | 21 | 21 | 7 | 15 | 5 | Stats Against (All Games) | 99.4 | 49.2 | 37-78 | 47.3% | 7-20 | 36.2% | 19-25 | 75.2% | 50 | 10 | 23 | 20 | 8 | 15 | 7 | vs opponents averaging | 96.2 | 48.6 | 36-82 | 44.3% | 7-20 | 35.3% | 16-22 | 75.2% | 51 | 11 | 22 | 20 | 8 | 14 | 5 | Stats Against (Home Games) | 99.3 | 46.3 | 37-79 | 46.3% | 7-20 | 36.9% | 19-25 | 73.9% | 51 | 11 | 23 | 20 | 9 | 15 | 7 |
|
| Average power rating of opponents played: SACRAMENTO 95.3, CLEVELAND 96.2 |
| | |
|
|
11/23/2012 | @ UTAH | 102-104 | L | 9 | W | 194.5 | O | 40-80 | 50.0% | 47 | 13 | 36-83 | 43.4% | 48 | 11 | 11/24/2012 | UTAH | 108-97 | W | 1 | W | 196.5 | O | 40-74 | 54.1% | 47 | 14 | 32-79 | 40.5% | 52 | 17 | 11/27/2012 | MINNESOTA | 89-97 | L | -1 | L | 195.5 | U | 37-84 | 44.0% | 44 | 13 | 38-83 | 45.8% | 56 | 17 | 11/30/2012 | INDIANA | 92-97 | L | 1.5 | L | 187 | O | 32-75 | 42.7% | 50 | 12 | 37-85 | 43.5% | 49 | 9 | 12/1/2012 | @ LA CLIPPERS | 81-116 | L | 12.5 | L | 197 | P | 29-76 | 38.2% | 49 | 17 | 47-86 | 54.7% | 47 | 5 | 12/5/2012 | TORONTO | 107-100 | W | -2.5 | W | 198 | O | 38-82 | 46.3% | 61 | 15 | 35-86 | 40.7% | 47 | 11 | 12/7/2012 | ORLANDO | 91-82 | W | -3 | W | 194 | U | 32-79 | 40.5% | 59 | 18 | 30-80 | 37.5% | 46 | 16 | 12/8/2012 | @ PORTLAND | 99-80 | W | 7 | W | 197 | U | 36-86 | 41.9% | 55 | 10 | 29-75 | 38.7% | 49 | 18 | 12/10/2012 | @ DALLAS | 96-119 | L | 6.5 | L | 200.5 | O | 37-84 | 44.0% | 51 | 19 | 48-87 | 55.2% | 46 | 8 | 12/12/2012 | @ MILWAUKEE | 85-98 | L | 7.5 | L | 198 | U | 32-86 | 37.2% | 56 | 17 | 39-96 | 40.6% | 68 | 9 | 12/14/2012 | @ OKLAHOMA CITY | 103-113 | L | 13 | W | 203 | O | 34-75 | 45.3% | 34 | 14 | 41-83 | 49.4% | 52 | 18 | 12/16/2012 | DENVER | 97-122 | L | 4.5 | L | 204.5 | O | 31-91 | 34.1% | 50 | 9 | 46-85 | 54.1% | 61 | 11 | 12/17/2012 | @ PHOENIX | 90-101 | L | 7 | L | 197 | U | 34-83 | 41.0% | 58 | 16 | 41-85 | 48.2% | 44 | 7 | 12/19/2012 | GOLDEN STATE | 131-127 | W | 3.5 | W | 201 | O | 43-86 | 50.0% | 51 | 9 | 46-92 | 50.0% | 49 | 12 | 12/21/2012 | @ LA CLIPPERS | 85-97 | L | 13 | W | 202 | U | 33-79 | 41.8% | 42 | 16 | 37-87 | 42.5% | 67 | 19 | 12/23/2012 | PORTLAND | 108-96 | W | 0 | W | 195 | O | 45-81 | 55.6% | 42 | 14 | 37-85 | 43.5% | 46 | 17 | 12/26/2012 | @ PORTLAND | 91-109 | L | 7.5 | L | 198.5 | O | 35-86 | 40.7% | 40 | 10 | 44-87 | 50.6% | 63 | 17 | 12/28/2012 | NEW YORK | 106-105 | W | 3 | W | 198.5 | O | 39-86 | 45.3% | 45 | 11 | 41-83 | 49.4% | 56 | 17 | 12/30/2012 | BOSTON | 118-96 | W | 3 | W | 193.5 | O | 44-82 | 53.7% | 52 | 13 | 36-86 | 41.9% | 43 | 12 | 1/1/2013 | @ DETROIT | 97-103 | L | 7 | W | 195.5 | O | 36-86 | 41.9% | 44 | 13 | 39-75 | 52.0% | 52 | 17 | 1/2/2013 | @ CLEVELAND | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1/4/2013 | @ TORONTO | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1/5/2013 | @ BROOKLYN | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1/7/2013 | MEMPHIS | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1/10/2013 | DALLAS | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1/12/2013 | MIAMI | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1/14/2013 | CLEVELAND | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1/16/2013 | WASHINGTON | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1/18/2013 | @ MEMPHIS | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
| |
|
|
11/23/2012 | @ ORLANDO | 104-108 | L | 4.5 | W | 185 | O | 37-87 | 42.5% | 55 | 13 | 40-80 | 50.0% | 46 | 18 | 11/24/2012 | @ MIAMI | 108-110 | L | 15 | W | 197.5 | O | 35-79 | 44.3% | 43 | 10 | 36-69 | 52.2% | 51 | 18 | 11/26/2012 | @ MEMPHIS | 78-84 | L | 12 | W | 193 | U | 31-76 | 40.8% | 49 | 16 | 33-71 | 46.5% | 41 | 14 | 11/27/2012 | PHOENIX | 78-91 | L | 3 | L | 200 | U | 30-84 | 35.7% | 61 | 18 | 37-79 | 46.8% | 48 | 15 | 11/30/2012 | @ ATLANTA | 113-111 | W | 8.5 | W | 189.5 | O | 41-85 | 48.2% | 56 | 18 | 38-78 | 48.7% | 38 | 12 | 12/1/2012 | PORTLAND | 117-118 | L | -1.5 | L | 192.5 | O | 43-99 | 43.4% | 63 | 16 | 46-94 | 48.9% | 49 | 14 | 12/3/2012 | @ DETROIT | 79-89 | L | 5 | L | 191.5 | U | 32-95 | 33.7% | 64 | 11 | 36-84 | 42.9% | 58 | 11 | 12/5/2012 | CHICAGO | 85-95 | L | 3 | L | 183 | U | 31-85 | 36.5% | 51 | 10 | 34-72 | 47.2% | 52 | 15 | 12/7/2012 | @ MINNESOTA | 73-91 | L | 8.5 | L | 191 | U | 30-87 | 34.5% | 49 | 18 | 30-70 | 42.9% | 59 | 21 | 12/8/2012 | DETROIT | 97-104 | L | 1 | L | 187 | O | 39-91 | 42.9% | 58 | 14 | 35-75 | 46.7% | 46 | 9 | 12/11/2012 | LA LAKERS | 100-94 | W | 6.5 | W | 206.5 | U | 37-84 | 44.0% | 54 | 12 | 31-75 | 41.3% | 63 | 18 | 12/12/2012 | @ INDIANA | 81-96 | L | 7.5 | L | 189 | U | 27-81 | 33.3% | 52 | 12 | 34-83 | 41.0% | 63 | 13 | 12/14/2012 | MILWAUKEE | 86-90 | L | 3 | L | 196 | U | 32-81 | 39.5% | 53 | 24 | 33-83 | 39.8% | 55 | 17 | 12/15/2012 | @ NEW YORK | 102-103 | L | 10 | W | 193.5 | O | 40-82 | 48.8% | 52 | 12 | 37-85 | 43.5% | 49 | 9 | 12/18/2012 | TORONTO | 99-113 | L | -5 | L | 189 | O | 36-70 | 51.4% | 42 | 15 | 39-75 | 52.0% | 42 | 14 | 12/19/2012 | @ BOSTON | 91-103 | L | 9 | L | 191 | O | 36-88 | 40.9% | 48 | 9 | 37-62 | 59.7% | 43 | 14 | 12/21/2012 | INDIANA | 89-99 | L | 4.5 | L | 187 | O | 32-80 | 40.0% | 47 | 16 | 39-80 | 48.7% | 57 | 17 | 12/22/2012 | @ MILWAUKEE | 94-82 | W | 8 | W | 197 | U | 38-88 | 43.2% | 58 | 12 | 31-79 | 39.2% | 50 | 14 | 12/26/2012 | @ WASHINGTON | 87-84 | W | 1 | W | 188.5 | U | 31-82 | 37.8% | 47 | 10 | 35-76 | 46.1% | 57 | 20 | 12/28/2012 | ATLANTA | 94-102 | L | 5.5 | L | 189.5 | O | 36-86 | 41.9% | 43 | 11 | 38-78 | 48.7% | 50 | 14 | 12/29/2012 | @ BROOKLYN | 100-103 | L | 8.5 | W | 190 | O | 38-82 | 46.3% | 47 | 18 | 35-75 | 46.7% | 51 | 12 | 1/2/2013 | SACRAMENTO | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1/4/2013 | @ CHARLOTTE | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1/5/2013 | HOUSTON | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1/7/2013 | @ CHICAGO | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1/9/2013 | ATLANTA | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1/11/2013 | @ DENVER | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1/13/2013 | @ LA LAKERS | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1/14/2013 | @ SACRAMENTO | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1/16/2013 | @ PORTLAND | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
| | | SACRAMENTO: GUARDS: MARCUS THORNTON is the only one guaranteed a consistent role on the perimeter . . . ISAIAH THOMAS was the story of the second half for the Kings. He can fill up the box score, but at 5-foot-9 (at best) he's too much of a defensive liability and not a point guard . . . AARON BROOKS is the most talented guard on this team. He's had attitude problems in the past, but he could, and should, lead this team . . . Now that he remained in Sacto, TYREKE EVANS will be playing off the ball at the three against his wishes . . . The Kings will keep on trying to unload JOHN SALMONS, who's not a useful NBA player . . . JIMMER FREDETTE should have a role off the bench, but his ball-handling is not where it has to be for an NBA point guard . . . FRANCISCO GARCIA's chance seems to have passed him by. FORWARDS: THOMAS ROBINSON should emerge as a starter early in his rookie year. He has his flaws on both ends of the floor, but he brings energy and doesn't need a lot of touches to get his points . . . Even if Robinson knocks him to the bench, JASON THOMPSON should play the five at times and see close to starter's minutes . . . JAMES JOHNSON should also play big minutes soon considering his ability to make positive contributions without a lot of touches . . . CHUCK HAYES should continue to play second-unit minutes as a glue guy . . . TRAVIS OUTLAW has regressed to the point that he's lucky to have a roster spot . . . TYLER HONEYCUTT has an intriguing skill set as a defensive-minded point forward, but he's likely ticketed for the D-League again. CENTERS: DeMARCUS COUSINS came on strong late last season. There's no doubt he has All-Star potential, but between his awful shot selection and occasional attitude problems, he just hasn't lived up to his potential. After Team USA passed on him this summer because of reported maturity problems, he might still not get it. | | CLEVELAND: GUARDS: KYRIE IRVING is the real deal, a heady playmaker and near-elite shooter. He should emerge as the NBA's next great point guard this season . . . Rookie DION WAITERS has a chance to step right into the starting lineup. He can get to the rim and generally makes good choices withthe ball. The only thing holding him back is defense after playing college ball in Syracuse's lazy zone . . . C.J. MILES will reportedly start at either the two or three spot, but he really needs to find the range on his shot again for him to stick in the starting lineup . . . Gunning combo guard DANIEL GIBSON is looking like he'll be their sixth man . . . The Cavs are still trying to figure out their second unit. JEREMY PARGO figures to be Irving's backup, but DONALD SLOAN is a better defender and could eventually pass him for this role, which doesn't mean many minutes unless Irving gets injured again. FORWARDS: TRISTAN THOMPSON is trying to add a perimeter shot to his repertoire. Don't count on him becoming David West, but he should improve offensively to go along with his rebounding and shot-blocking . . . ALONZO GEE returns as the starting small forward, excelling on the defensive end, but without a polished enough offensive game to earn 35 minutes per night . . . OMRI CASSPI was in and out of the rotation late in the year as he battled knee issues. It's getting close to make-or-break time for him . . . JON LEUER is a solid stretch four who has a real chance at a rotation spot . . . SAMARDO SAMUELS reportedly dropped some weight in his effort to find some minutes . . . LUKE WALTON is an unofficial member of the coaching staff . . . Undrafted rookie KEVIN JONES could make some noise with his work on the offensive boards . . . LUKE HARANGODY is more of a D-League talent. CENTERS: ANDERSON VAREJAO's wrist should be 100 percent, and Sideshow Anderson should be the same relentless, double-double threat he's always been . . . Rookie TYLER ZELLER is a 7-footer with some nice offensive skills -- he can knock down a jump shot in the half court, and run the floor. He'll struggle to defend in space, but made a living drawing charges at UNC, and should be able to play 20+ minutes as a rookie. |
| | |
| Last Updated: 4/19/2024 8:53:14 AM EST. |
|
|
| |
|