| | | |
PHOENIX First Half Results CHICAGO |
|
| 95.5 | 49 Final 42 |
|
|
| | |
|
| | | |
511 | PHOENIX | 95.5 | 512 | CHICAGO | -5 |
|
|
| | |
|
| | | |
|
|
All Games | 12-26 | -14.7 | 15-22 | 17-20 | 95.5 | 49.2 | 44.4% | 48.5 | 100.2 | 50.9 | 47.0% | 52.4 | Road Games | 2-17 | -15.1 | 8-10 | 11-8 | 94.7 | 50.1 | 44.0% | 49.1 | 105.3 | 52.1 | 47.5% | 53.5 | Last 5 Games | 0-5 | -5.2 | 1-4 | 1-4 | 83.6 | 45.6 | 40.8% | 49.6 | 94.6 | 46.4 | 46.9% | 50.6 |
|
| |
|
|
Team Stats (All Games) | 95.5 | 49.2 | 38-85 | 44.4% | 6-18 | 33.0% | 14-19 | 74.5% | 48 | 11 | 22 | 21 | 8 | 13 | 5 | vs opponents surrendering | 97.1 | 48.7 | 36-82 | 44.7% | 7-20 | 35.6% | 17-23 | 75.5% | 51 | 11 | 22 | 20 | 8 | 14 | 5 | Team Stats (Road Games) | 94.7 | 50.1 | 37-85 | 44.0% | 6-18 | 31.5% | 14-20 | 73.2% | 49 | 12 | 22 | 22 | 7 | 14 | 5 | Stats Against (All Games) | 100.2 | 50.9 | 39-82 | 47.0% | 7-17 | 39.5% | 17-22 | 74.8% | 52 | 12 | 22 | 18 | 7 | 14 | 5 | vs opponents averaging | 97.2 | 48.8 | 37-82 | 44.6% | 7-20 | 35.8% | 17-22 | 75.6% | 51 | 12 | 21 | 20 | 8 | 14 | 5 | Stats Against (Road Games) | 105.3 | 52.1 | 40-84 | 47.5% | 7-18 | 41.2% | 18-24 | 75.7% | 54 | 13 | 23 | 17 | 7 | 13 | 5 |
|
|
| |
|
|
All Games | 20-14 | -5.7 | 13-20 | 14-20 | 93.9 | 46.9 | 44.2% | 51.9 | 92.2 | 45.3 | 43.2% | 49.0 | Home Games | 10-9 | -14.1 | 4-15 | 6-13 | 92.3 | 46.0 | 43.1% | 52.6 | 90.5 | 45.3 | 42.7% | 49.4 | Last 5 Games | 4-1 | +3.7 | 3-1 | 4-1 | 102.8 | 54.0 | 48.3% | 51.8 | 96.0 | 46.0 | 44.6% | 44.8 |
|
| |
|
|
Team Stats (All Games) | 93.9 | 46.9 | 36-80 | 44.2% | 5-13 | 36.3% | 18-23 | 79.2% | 52 | 12 | 23 | 19 | 7 | 14 | 5 | vs opponents surrendering | 97.5 | 49 | 37-82 | 45.0% | 7-20 | 35.8% | 17-22 | 75.8% | 51 | 11 | 22 | 20 | 8 | 14 | 5 | Team Stats (Home Games) | 92.3 | 46.0 | 35-81 | 43.1% | 5-12 | 40.1% | 17-22 | 78.9% | 53 | 12 | 23 | 19 | 8 | 15 | 6 | Stats Against (All Games) | 92.2 | 45.3 | 35-81 | 43.2% | 6-17 | 34.5% | 16-22 | 75.5% | 49 | 12 | 18 | 20 | 8 | 14 | 5 | vs opponents averaging | 97 | 48.9 | 37-83 | 44.4% | 7-21 | 35.6% | 16-22 | 75.3% | 51 | 11 | 21 | 20 | 8 | 14 | 5 | Stats Against (Home Games) | 90.5 | 45.3 | 34-81 | 42.7% | 5-15 | 33.8% | 17-21 | 77.0% | 49 | 12 | 19 | 20 | 8 | 14 | 6 |
|
| Average power rating of opponents played: PHOENIX 94.8, CHICAGO 94.7 |
| | |
|
|
12/4/2012 | @ MEMPHIS | 98-108 | L | 10 | T | 196 | O | 38-82 | 46.3% | 39 | 16 | 40-85 | 47.1% | 63 | 19 | 12/6/2012 | DALLAS | 94-97 | L | -4 | L | 204.5 | U | 34-85 | 40.0% | 52 | 12 | 37-78 | 47.4% | 52 | 16 | 12/8/2012 | @ LA CLIPPERS | 99-117 | L | 10.5 | L | 200 | O | 36-78 | 46.2% | 47 | 20 | 48-93 | 51.6% | 52 | 11 | 12/9/2012 | ORLANDO | 90-98 | L | -4.5 | L | 198 | U | 36-78 | 46.2% | 36 | 12 | 40-77 | 51.9% | 53 | 18 | 12/12/2012 | MEMPHIS | 82-80 | W | 6.5 | W | 194 | U | 34-89 | 38.2% | 50 | 11 | 33-73 | 45.2% | 47 | 15 | 12/14/2012 | UTAH | 99-84 | W | 2 | W | 202.5 | U | 38-83 | 45.8% | 49 | 12 | 33-82 | 40.2% | 56 | 15 | 12/17/2012 | SACRAMENTO | 101-90 | W | -7 | W | 197 | U | 41-85 | 48.2% | 44 | 7 | 34-83 | 41.0% | 58 | 16 | 12/19/2012 | CHARLOTTE | 121-104 | W | -9 | W | 198.5 | O | 47-85 | 55.3% | 36 | 11 | 40-86 | 46.5% | 53 | 15 | 12/22/2012 | @ PORTLAND | 93-96 | L | 4.5 | W | 196 | U | 40-89 | 44.9% | 40 | 10 | 33-69 | 47.8% | 53 | 21 | 12/23/2012 | LA CLIPPERS | 77-103 | L | 6.5 | L | 195.5 | U | 29-80 | 36.2% | 50 | 14 | 38-71 | 53.5% | 55 | 16 | 12/26/2012 | NEW YORK | 97-99 | L | -2 | L | 195 | O | 38-83 | 45.8% | 50 | 13 | 40-88 | 45.5% | 50 | 11 | 12/28/2012 | @ INDIANA | 91-97 | L | 8 | W | 188.5 | U | 38-82 | 46.3% | 44 | 11 | 34-77 | 44.2% | 54 | 15 | 12/29/2012 | @ MINNESOTA | 107-111 | L | 8.5 | W | 194.5 | O | 45-97 | 46.4% | 55 | 4 | 45-89 | 50.6% | 60 | 10 | 12/31/2012 | @ OKLAHOMA CITY | 96-114 | L | 12.5 | L | 206.5 | O | 37-78 | 47.4% | 46 | 13 | 44-87 | 50.6% | 44 | 5 | 1/2/2013 | PHILADELPHIA | 95-89 | W | -4.5 | W | 195 | U | 39-85 | 45.9% | 51 | 13 | 37-84 | 44.0% | 50 | 16 | 1/4/2013 | UTAH | 80-87 | L | -1.5 | L | 198 | U | 34-75 | 45.3% | 48 | 20 | 40-89 | 44.9% | 48 | 10 | 1/6/2013 | MEMPHIS | 81-92 | L | 4.5 | L | 184.5 | U | 31-79 | 39.2% | 37 | 14 | 37-69 | 53.6% | 51 | 17 | 1/8/2013 | @ MILWAUKEE | 99-108 | L | 6 | L | 200.5 | O | 37-90 | 41.1% | 59 | 16 | 42-91 | 46.2% | 52 | 11 | 1/9/2013 | @ BOSTON | 79-87 | L | 8.5 | W | 191.5 | U | 33-84 | 39.3% | 55 | 16 | 37-81 | 45.7% | 49 | 13 | 1/11/2013 | @ BROOKLYN | 79-99 | L | 7.5 | L | 195 | U | 31-79 | 39.2% | 49 | 18 | 34-75 | 45.3% | 53 | 11 | 1/12/2013 | @ CHICAGO | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1/14/2013 | OKLAHOMA CITY | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1/17/2013 | MILWAUKEE | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1/23/2013 | @ SACRAMENTO | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1/24/2013 | LA CLIPPERS | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1/26/2013 | @ SAN ANTONIO | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1/27/2013 | @ DALLAS | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
| |
|
|
12/4/2012 | INDIANA | 76-80 | L | -4 | L | 180.5 | U | 28-73 | 38.4% | 53 | 19 | 29-80 | 36.2% | 54 | 12 | 12/5/2012 | @ CLEVELAND | 95-85 | W | -3 | W | 183 | U | 34-72 | 47.2% | 52 | 15 | 31-85 | 36.5% | 51 | 10 | 12/7/2012 | @ DETROIT | 108-104 | W | -2 | W | 181 | O | 43-82 | 52.4% | 48 | 8 | 36-70 | 51.4% | 36 | 8 | 12/8/2012 | NEW YORK | 93-85 | W | 2 | W | 188.5 | U | 34-78 | 43.6% | 54 | 19 | 27-84 | 32.1% | 52 | 15 | 12/11/2012 | LA CLIPPERS | 89-94 | L | 4 | L | 189 | U | 35-87 | 40.2% | 54 | 16 | 37-80 | 46.2% | 51 | 15 | 12/12/2012 | @ PHILADELPHIA | 96-89 | W | 2 | W | 180.5 | O | 34-78 | 43.6% | 46 | 11 | 41-91 | 45.1% | 56 | 13 | 12/15/2012 | BROOKLYN | 83-82 | W | -4.5 | L | 184 | U | 33-75 | 44.0% | 44 | 13 | 29-75 | 38.7% | 53 | 18 | 12/17/2012 | @ MEMPHIS | 71-80 | L | 6.5 | L | 178.5 | U | 28-75 | 37.3% | 48 | 16 | 30-80 | 37.5% | 61 | 18 | 12/18/2012 | BOSTON | 100-89 | W | -1.5 | W | 180.5 | O | 37-74 | 50.0% | 48 | 12 | 35-81 | 43.2% | 43 | 9 | 12/21/2012 | @ NEW YORK | 110-106 | W | 6 | W | 188 | O | 37-83 | 44.6% | 62 | 16 | 38-91 | 41.8% | 45 | 10 | 12/22/2012 | @ ATLANTA | 75-92 | L | 4 | L | 184 | U | 32-76 | 42.1% | 38 | 15 | 38-77 | 49.4% | 48 | 16 | 12/25/2012 | HOUSTON | 97-120 | L | -5 | L | 197.5 | O | 37-83 | 44.6% | 40 | 11 | 46-82 | 56.1% | 49 | 10 | 12/29/2012 | WASHINGTON | 87-77 | W | -11 | L | 180.5 | U | 34-87 | 39.1% | 54 | 8 | 31-85 | 36.5% | 65 | 16 | 12/31/2012 | CHARLOTTE | 81-91 | L | -11.5 | L | 188.5 | U | 33-94 | 35.1% | 59 | 11 | 33-70 | 47.1% | 63 | 18 | 1/2/2013 | @ ORLANDO | 96-94 | W | -2 | T | 184 | O | 36-77 | 46.8% | 44 | 6 | 37-78 | 47.4% | 47 | 12 | 1/4/2013 | @ MIAMI | 96-89 | W | 7.5 | W | 189.5 | U | 36-80 | 45.0% | 54 | 15 | 30-65 | 46.2% | 37 | 12 | 1/7/2013 | CLEVELAND | 118-92 | W | -8 | W | 186 | O | 44-82 | 53.7% | 55 | 20 | 33-78 | 42.3% | 36 | 16 | 1/9/2013 | MILWAUKEE | 96-104 | L | -6 | L | 190 | O | 39-95 | 41.1% | 57 | 15 | 39-84 | 46.4% | 55 | 16 | 1/11/2013 | @ NEW YORK | 108-101 | W | 4.5 | W | 193.5 | O | 39-68 | 57.4% | 49 | 18 | 37-90 | 41.1% | 49 | 12 | 1/12/2013 | PHOENIX | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1/14/2013 | ATLANTA | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1/16/2013 | @ TORONTO | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1/18/2013 | @ BOSTON | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1/19/2013 | MEMPHIS | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1/21/2013 | LA LAKERS | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1/23/2013 | DETROIT | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1/25/2013 | GOLDEN STATE | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1/26/2013 | @ WASHINGTON | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1/28/2013 | CHARLOTTE | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
| | | PHOENIX: GUARDS: With Steve Nash gone, GORAN DRAGIC takes over at the point. He was a monster as a starter in Houston late last year, and he's familiar with Phoenix's system from his time there as Nash's backup . . . SHANNON BROWN is one of the league's better sixth men and could end up seeing close to starter minutes this year. Once just a raw athlete, he's made major strides as a shooter and ball-handler . . . KENDALL MARSHALL was a bit of a product of an absurdly talented supporting cast in college at UNC. He's got work to do to become an NBA-caliber starter, but he'll be capable enough as a backup point guard as a rookie . . . SEBASTIAN TELFAIR still can't hit an open jump shot, but will factor into the backcourt rotation. FORWARDS: LUIS SCOLA steps in as the starting four. While he's in his 30's and an underwhelming athlete, he's crafty and relentless . . . JARED DUDLEY will continue to be their main catch-and-shoot threat on the wing. It might take a while to develop an on-court chemistry with Dragic . . . MICHAEL BEASLEY has a chance to grab a starting spot. He rarely has his head on straight, but he can score . . . CHANNING FRYE, the sharp-shooting 7-footer, will likely miss the 2012-13 season due to an enlarged heart, but this condition is expected to completely heal . . . WESLEY JOHNSON gets a fresh start. He needs to start knocking down shots to land a rotation spot . . . MARKIEFF MORRIS showed flashes as a rookie, but has to make better decisions on the offensive end. He'll be a key on the second unit . . . Well-traveled P.J. TUCKER earned himself a roster spot with an impressive Summer League. CENTERS: MARCIN GORTAT had a great year-and-a-half alongside Steve Nash, and he'll have to prove he can create in the low post a little more. But he's a skilled big man who should pair nicely with Luis Scola as a scorer and passer in the post . . . Injury-riddled JERMAINE O'NEAL is still a strong low-post defender and shot-blocker. | | CHICAGO: GUARDS: The best guess on DERRICK ROSE is a February return. But an ACL injury usually isn't 100 percent until the second full year back . . . With Rose out, KIRK HINRICH figures to play heavy minutes early. He's a defensive specialist who will pass and watch on offense . . . NATE ROBINSON could push Hinrich for minutes. He's the offensive half of that platoon, but Thibodeau almost always leans defense . . . RICHARD HAMILTON will carry a bigger offensive load while Rose is recovering. He's a shadow of his former self . . . MARCO BELINELLI is a nice addition. He's solid defensively, and he brings the long-range shooting Chicago lacks. Don't be surprised if he pushes Hamilton . . . Rookie MARQUIS TEAGUE will mostly sit and watch this year. FORWARDS: After avoiding wrist surgery, LUOL DENG should be Chicago's top scorer while Rose is out. He's the only one on this team who even has a chance to generate his own offense . . . CARLOS BOOZER continues to be a major disappointment. In the past it's been his atrocious defense, but now he's taken a step back offensively as well. He may score more with Rose out, but he'll continue to sit late in close games . . . TAJ GIBSON should be in for a bigger role. With Omer Asik gone, he's one of only two defensively capable bigs on this roster . . . VLADIMIR RADMANOVIC will try to replace some of the three-point shooting they lost when Kyle Korver left . . . JIMMY BUTLER has a puncher's chance at a rotation spot after a good summer. CENTERS: JOAKIM NOAH was still working his way back from that badly sprained ankle this summer. His durability is questionable, but the Bulls will have to lean on Noah for more minutes now that Omer Asik is gone . . . NAZR MOHAMMED steps into Asik's role as Noah's backup. But while Asik was an active defender, Mohammed is more of just a big body with six fouls to give. |
| | |
| Last Updated: 3/29/2024 7:41:05 AM EST. |
|
|
| |
|