| | NBA : Teaser Line Matchup |
| |
MILWAUKEE CHICAGO |
|
| 190 | 104 Final 96 |
|
|
| | |
|
| | | |
715 | MILWAUKEE | +10 | Over 184 | 716 | CHICAGO | -2 | Under 192 |
|
|
| | |
|
| | | |
|
|
All Games | 17-16 | +0.8 | 16-16 | 15-18 | 96.3 | 49.3 | 43.3% | 51.9 | 97.3 | 48.2 | 44.4% | 53.3 | Road Games | 7-8 | +1.5 | 9-6 | 5-10 | 93.8 | 48.4 | 43.2% | 51.1 | 95.9 | 47.3 | 43.7% | 53.3 | Last 5 Games | 1-4 | -3.1 | 2-3 | 3-2 | 98.6 | 50.4 | 44.9% | 50.0 | 104.4 | 55.8 | 47.5% | 53.6 | Division Games | 5-4 | -1.4 | 5-4 | 2-7 | 91.9 | 48.1 | 43.2% | 49.2 | 92.9 | 47.7 | 42.4% | 57.3 |
|
| |
|
|
Team Stats (All Games) | 96.3 | 49.3 | 37-86 | 43.3% | 6-18 | 34.0% | 16-21 | 74.8% | 52 | 13 | 22 | 19 | 9 | 14 | 7 | vs opponents surrendering | 96.4 | 48.4 | 36-81 | 44.7% | 7-20 | 35.8% | 17-22 | 75.2% | 50 | 11 | 21 | 20 | 8 | 14 | 6 | Team Stats (Road Games) | 93.8 | 48.4 | 36-84 | 43.2% | 6-18 | 31.9% | 15-20 | 74.2% | 51 | 12 | 21 | 19 | 9 | 16 | 7 | Stats Against (All Games) | 97.3 | 48.2 | 37-83 | 44.4% | 6-17 | 33.3% | 18-23 | 77.7% | 53 | 13 | 22 | 20 | 8 | 16 | 4 | vs opponents averaging | 96.2 | 48.3 | 36-82 | 44.4% | 7-19 | 35.7% | 17-22 | 75.9% | 51 | 11 | 21 | 20 | 8 | 14 | 5 | Stats Against (Road Games) | 95.9 | 47.3 | 37-84 | 43.7% | 6-17 | 33.5% | 17-21 | 80.2% | 53 | 13 | 22 | 18 | 9 | 16 | 5 |
|
|
| |
|
|
All Games | 19-13 | -4.9 | 12-19 | 12-20 | 93.3 | 46.2 | 44.0% | 51.9 | 91.5 | 45.4 | 43.2% | 48.8 | Home Games | 10-8 | -11.6 | 4-14 | 5-13 | 92.1 | 45.4 | 43.2% | 52.4 | 89.8 | 45.0 | 42.5% | 49.1 | Last 5 Games | 4-1 | -2 | 2-2 | 2-3 | 95.6 | 48.6 | 43.6% | 53.2 | 88.6 | 46.0 | 43.6% | 49.6 | Division Games | 5-2 | +1.7 | 5-2 | 3-4 | 99.6 | 49.6 | 48.1% | 51.7 | 89.4 | 43.1 | 42.1% | 45.6 |
|
| |
|
|
Team Stats (All Games) | 93.3 | 46.2 | 35-80 | 44.0% | 5-13 | 36.0% | 18-22 | 79.8% | 52 | 12 | 23 | 19 | 7 | 14 | 5 | vs opponents surrendering | 97.6 | 49.1 | 37-82 | 45.0% | 7-20 | 36.0% | 17-22 | 75.9% | 51 | 11 | 22 | 20 | 8 | 14 | 5 | Team Stats (Home Games) | 92.1 | 45.4 | 35-81 | 43.2% | 5-13 | 40.1% | 17-22 | 79.4% | 52 | 12 | 23 | 19 | 7 | 15 | 6 | Stats Against (All Games) | 91.5 | 45.4 | 35-81 | 43.2% | 5-16 | 33.4% | 16-21 | 75.7% | 49 | 11 | 18 | 20 | 8 | 14 | 5 | vs opponents averaging | 97.1 | 48.9 | 37-82 | 44.5% | 7-20 | 35.6% | 16-22 | 75.5% | 51 | 11 | 21 | 20 | 8 | 14 | 5 | Stats Against (Home Games) | 89.8 | 45.0 | 34-80 | 42.5% | 5-15 | 32.8% | 17-21 | 77.0% | 49 | 12 | 19 | 20 | 8 | 14 | 6 |
|
| Average power rating of opponents played: MILWAUKEE 95.4, CHICAGO 94.7 |
| | |
|
|
11/30/2012 | @ MINNESOTA | 85-95 | L | 1.5 | L | 194.5 | U | 34-93 | 36.6% | 57 | 11 | 34-87 | 39.1% | 67 | 15 | 12/1/2012 | BOSTON | 91-88 | W | -3 | T | 196 | U | 36-79 | 45.6% | 49 | 14 | 34-82 | 41.5% | 50 | 16 | 12/3/2012 | @ NEW ORLEANS | 81-102 | L | -4 | L | 188.5 | U | 29-76 | 38.2% | 48 | 16 | 43-82 | 52.4% | 46 | 8 | 12/5/2012 | @ SAN ANTONIO | 99-110 | L | 9 | L | 202.5 | O | 35-84 | 41.7% | 45 | 11 | 40-85 | 47.1% | 58 | 17 | 12/7/2012 | CHARLOTTE | 108-93 | W | -7.5 | W | 197.5 | O | 38-94 | 40.4% | 66 | 10 | 36-81 | 44.4% | 55 | 11 | 12/9/2012 | @ BROOKLYN | 97-88 | W | 6 | W | 194 | U | 33-71 | 46.5% | 40 | 18 | 32-79 | 40.5% | 57 | 20 | 12/12/2012 | SACRAMENTO | 98-85 | W | -7.5 | W | 198 | U | 39-96 | 40.6% | 68 | 9 | 32-86 | 37.2% | 56 | 17 | 12/14/2012 | @ CLEVELAND | 90-86 | W | -3 | W | 196 | U | 33-83 | 39.8% | 55 | 17 | 32-81 | 39.5% | 53 | 24 | 12/15/2012 | LA CLIPPERS | 85-111 | L | 5 | L | 195 | O | 30-83 | 36.1% | 50 | 13 | 44-82 | 53.7% | 54 | 11 | 12/18/2012 | INDIANA | 98-93 | W | -2.5 | W | 185 | O | 37-86 | 43.0% | 52 | 15 | 32-80 | 40.0% | 60 | 20 | 12/19/2012 | @ MEMPHIS | 80-90 | L | 9 | L | 187.5 | U | 30-85 | 35.3% | 55 | 16 | 36-88 | 40.9% | 60 | 16 | 12/21/2012 | @ BOSTON | 99-94 | W | 5 | W | 191 | O | 36-83 | 43.4% | 72 | 21 | 36-94 | 38.3% | 50 | 14 | 12/22/2012 | CLEVELAND | 82-94 | L | -8 | L | 197 | U | 31-79 | 39.2% | 50 | 14 | 38-88 | 43.2% | 58 | 12 | 12/26/2012 | BROOKLYN | 108-93 | W | -5 | W | 187 | O | 40-84 | 47.6% | 52 | 18 | 34-88 | 38.6% | 50 | 15 | 12/29/2012 | MIAMI | 104-85 | W | 4 | W | 199.5 | U | 40-98 | 40.8% | 51 | 5 | 33-76 | 43.4% | 60 | 20 | 12/30/2012 | @ DETROIT | 94-96 | L | 2.5 | W | 191 | U | 36-77 | 46.8% | 37 | 12 | 39-82 | 47.6% | 55 | 16 | 1/2/2013 | SAN ANTONIO | 110-117 | L | 5.5 | L | 204 | O | 43-88 | 48.9% | 53 | 16 | 46-89 | 51.7% | 47 | 8 | 1/4/2013 | HOUSTON | 101-115 | L | 0 | L | 214 | O | 39-87 | 44.8% | 59 | 25 | 45-83 | 54.2% | 40 | 19 | 1/5/2013 | @ INDIANA | 80-95 | L | 4.5 | L | 187.5 | U | 31-82 | 37.8% | 49 | 13 | 40-92 | 43.5% | 67 | 12 | 1/8/2013 | PHOENIX | 108-99 | W | -6 | W | 200.5 | O | 42-91 | 46.2% | 52 | 11 | 37-90 | 41.1% | 59 | 16 | 1/9/2013 | @ CHICAGO | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1/11/2013 | DETROIT | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1/13/2013 | @ TORONTO | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1/15/2013 | @ LA LAKERS | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1/17/2013 | @ PHOENIX | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1/19/2013 | @ PORTLAND | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1/22/2013 | PHILADELPHIA | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1/25/2013 | @ CLEVELAND | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
| |
|
|
12/1/2012 | PHILADELPHIA | 93-88 | W | -6.5 | L | 182.5 | U | 38-81 | 46.9% | 59 | 13 | 36-82 | 43.9% | 43 | 11 | 12/4/2012 | INDIANA | 76-80 | L | -4 | L | 180.5 | U | 28-73 | 38.4% | 53 | 19 | 29-80 | 36.2% | 54 | 12 | 12/5/2012 | @ CLEVELAND | 95-85 | W | -3 | W | 183 | U | 34-72 | 47.2% | 52 | 15 | 31-85 | 36.5% | 51 | 10 | 12/7/2012 | @ DETROIT | 108-104 | W | -2 | W | 181 | O | 43-82 | 52.4% | 48 | 8 | 36-70 | 51.4% | 36 | 8 | 12/8/2012 | NEW YORK | 93-85 | W | 2 | W | 188.5 | U | 34-78 | 43.6% | 54 | 19 | 27-84 | 32.1% | 52 | 15 | 12/11/2012 | LA CLIPPERS | 89-94 | L | 4 | L | 189 | U | 35-87 | 40.2% | 54 | 16 | 37-80 | 46.2% | 51 | 15 | 12/12/2012 | @ PHILADELPHIA | 96-89 | W | 2 | W | 180.5 | O | 34-78 | 43.6% | 46 | 11 | 41-91 | 45.1% | 56 | 13 | 12/15/2012 | BROOKLYN | 83-82 | W | -4.5 | L | 184 | U | 33-75 | 44.0% | 44 | 13 | 29-75 | 38.7% | 53 | 18 | 12/17/2012 | @ MEMPHIS | 71-80 | L | 6.5 | L | 178.5 | U | 28-75 | 37.3% | 48 | 16 | 30-80 | 37.5% | 61 | 18 | 12/18/2012 | BOSTON | 100-89 | W | -1.5 | W | 180.5 | O | 37-74 | 50.0% | 48 | 12 | 35-81 | 43.2% | 43 | 9 | 12/21/2012 | @ NEW YORK | 110-106 | W | 6 | W | 188 | O | 37-83 | 44.6% | 62 | 16 | 38-91 | 41.8% | 45 | 10 | 12/22/2012 | @ ATLANTA | 75-92 | L | 4 | L | 184 | U | 32-76 | 42.1% | 38 | 15 | 38-77 | 49.4% | 48 | 16 | 12/25/2012 | HOUSTON | 97-120 | L | -5 | L | 197.5 | O | 37-83 | 44.6% | 40 | 11 | 46-82 | 56.1% | 49 | 10 | 12/29/2012 | WASHINGTON | 87-77 | W | -11 | L | 180.5 | U | 34-87 | 39.1% | 54 | 8 | 31-85 | 36.5% | 65 | 16 | 12/31/2012 | CHARLOTTE | 81-91 | L | -11.5 | L | 188.5 | U | 33-94 | 35.1% | 59 | 11 | 33-70 | 47.1% | 63 | 18 | 1/2/2013 | @ ORLANDO | 96-94 | W | -2 | T | 184 | O | 36-77 | 46.8% | 44 | 6 | 37-78 | 47.4% | 47 | 12 | 1/4/2013 | @ MIAMI | 96-89 | W | 7.5 | W | 189.5 | U | 36-80 | 45.0% | 54 | 15 | 30-65 | 46.2% | 37 | 12 | 1/7/2013 | CLEVELAND | 118-92 | W | -8 | W | 186 | O | 44-82 | 53.7% | 55 | 20 | 33-78 | 42.3% | 36 | 16 | 1/9/2013 | MILWAUKEE | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1/11/2013 | @ NEW YORK | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1/12/2013 | PHOENIX | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1/14/2013 | ATLANTA | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1/16/2013 | @ TORONTO | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1/18/2013 | @ BOSTON | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1/19/2013 | MEMPHIS | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1/21/2013 | LA LAKERS | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1/23/2013 | DETROIT | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1/25/2013 | GOLDEN STATE | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
| | | MILWAUKEE: GUARDS: BRANDON JENNINGS benefitted from the arrival of Monta Ellis last year. He has the offense and system to thrive, and now needs to prove he can be efficient enough to be a star . . . MONTA ELLIS played second fiddle to Jennings last year, and really struggled to shoot the ball. The Bucks now play the kind of tempo he likes, but he'll have to adjust to playing off the ball more often . . . BENO UDRIH won't see a ton of action off the bench considering Jennings and Ellis play so many minutes. If a starter gets hurt, he could step in and hit a lot of threes . . . Second-rounder DORON LAMB has some upside as a future sixth man, but figures to ride the bench this year once his torn elbow ligament heals. FORWARDS: ERSAN ILYASOVA should finally get some respect from Skiles after starring down the stretch last year . . . MIKE DUNLEAVY re-emerged as a legitimate three-point threat, though he doesn't do much else . . . DREW GOODEN's role should shrink with Ilyasova stepping up and Sam Dalembert coming in . . . LUC RICHARD MBAH a MOUTE is coming off knee surgery, but he's improving as a rebounder and can play both forward spots off the bench . . . Rookie JOHN HENSON is a defensive stud and does enough as a screener to get decent minutes early . . . TOBIAS HARRIS was a Summer League star, but he's too much of a 'tweener to thrive in the NBA . . . EKPE UDOH provides defense and rebounding off the bench . . . LARRY SANDERS has potential, but this frontcourt is too crowded for him to make an impact. CENTERS: SAM DALEMBERT fell in and out of favor in Houston, but he's exactly what the Bucksneed as a defensive presence in the paint. Milwaukee has numerous players who can man the five in spots (Ekpe Udoh, Drew Gooden), but Dalembert is by far their best defensive option and should see big minutes . . . JOEL PRZYBILLA signed on in August to provide back-end depth on the pine. | | CHICAGO: GUARDS: The best guess on DERRICK ROSE is a February return. But an ACL injury usually isn't 100 percent until the second full year back . . . With Rose out, KIRK HINRICH figures to play heavy minutes early. He's a defensive specialist who will pass and watch on offense . . . NATE ROBINSON could push Hinrich for minutes. He's the offensive half of that platoon, but Thibodeau almost always leans defense . . . RICHARD HAMILTON will carry a bigger offensive load while Rose is recovering. He's a shadow of his former self . . . MARCO BELINELLI is a nice addition. He's solid defensively, and he brings the long-range shooting Chicago lacks. Don't be surprised if he pushes Hamilton . . . Rookie MARQUIS TEAGUE will mostly sit and watch this year. FORWARDS: After avoiding wrist surgery, LUOL DENG should be Chicago's top scorer while Rose is out. He's the only one on this team who even has a chance to generate his own offense . . . CARLOS BOOZER continues to be a major disappointment. In the past it's been his atrocious defense, but now he's taken a step back offensively as well. He may score more with Rose out, but he'll continue to sit late in close games . . . TAJ GIBSON should be in for a bigger role. With Omer Asik gone, he's one of only two defensively capable bigs on this roster . . . VLADIMIR RADMANOVIC will try to replace some of the three-point shooting they lost when Kyle Korver left . . . JIMMY BUTLER has a puncher's chance at a rotation spot after a good summer. CENTERS: JOAKIM NOAH was still working his way back from that badly sprained ankle this summer. His durability is questionable, but the Bulls will have to lean on Noah for more minutes now that Omer Asik is gone . . . NAZR MOHAMMED steps into Asik's role as Noah's backup. But while Asik was an active defender, Mohammed is more of just a big body with six fouls to give. |
| | |
| Last Updated: 4/19/2024 7:24:13 AM EST. |
|
|
| |
|