| | | |
CLEVELAND CHICAGO |
|
| 186 | 92 Final 118 |
|
|
| | |
|
| | | |
707 | CLEVELAND | +300 | 708 | CHICAGO | -400 |
|
|
| | |
|
| | | |
|
|
All Games | 8-27 | -12 | 15-20 | 19-16 | 94.5 | 48.5 | 41.7% | 52.3 | 99.8 | 49.4 | 47.1% | 50.2 | Road Games | 5-15 | -2.4 | 12-8 | 12-8 | 94.9 | 49.6 | 42.2% | 50.8 | 99.6 | 51.1 | 47.9% | 49.5 | Last 5 Games | 1-4 | -3.6 | 2-3 | 4-1 | 99.6 | 54.4 | 43.2% | 50.2 | 103.6 | 54.0 | 46.0% | 51.8 | Division Games | 1-8 | -5.3 | 2-7 | 4-5 | 88.8 | 44.7 | 39.6% | 53.2 | 97.2 | 50.0 | 46.4% | 53.0 |
|
| |
|
|
Team Stats (All Games) | 94.5 | 48.5 | 35-85 | 41.7% | 8-22 | 35.3% | 16-22 | 74.2% | 52 | 13 | 19 | 22 | 8 | 14 | 3 | vs opponents surrendering | 96.8 | 48.7 | 37-82 | 44.5% | 7-20 | 35.4% | 17-22 | 75.7% | 51 | 11 | 21 | 20 | 8 | 14 | 5 | Team Stats (Road Games) | 94.9 | 49.6 | 35-84 | 42.2% | 8-22 | 35.3% | 16-22 | 74.0% | 51 | 13 | 18 | 23 | 9 | 14 | 3 | Stats Against (All Games) | 99.8 | 49.4 | 37-78 | 47.1% | 7-20 | 36.1% | 19-25 | 75.3% | 50 | 10 | 23 | 20 | 8 | 15 | 7 | vs opponents averaging | 96.4 | 48.7 | 36-82 | 44.3% | 7-20 | 35.2% | 17-22 | 75.2% | 51 | 11 | 22 | 20 | 8 | 14 | 5 | Stats Against (Road Games) | 99.6 | 51.1 | 37-77 | 47.9% | 7-19 | 36.2% | 19-25 | 76.2% | 50 | 10 | 23 | 20 | 8 | 15 | 7 |
|
|
| |
|
|
All Games | 18-13 | -5.9 | 11-19 | 11-20 | 92.5 | 46.0 | 43.7% | 51.8 | 91.5 | 45.3 | 43.2% | 49.2 | Home Games | 9-8 | -12.6 | 3-14 | 4-13 | 90.5 | 44.9 | 42.6% | 52.2 | 89.6 | 44.7 | 42.5% | 49.9 | Last 5 Games | 3-2 | -5.1 | 1-3 | 2-3 | 91.4 | 46.2 | 41.8% | 50.2 | 94.2 | 47.6 | 46.6% | 52.2 | Division Games | 4-2 | +0.7 | 4-2 | 2-4 | 96.5 | 49.0 | 47.2% | 51.2 | 89.0 | 42.0 | 42.1% | 47.2 |
|
| |
|
|
Team Stats (All Games) | 92.5 | 46.0 | 35-80 | 43.7% | 5-13 | 34.7% | 18-22 | 79.7% | 52 | 12 | 23 | 19 | 7 | 14 | 5 | vs opponents surrendering | 97.4 | 49 | 37-82 | 44.9% | 7-20 | 35.8% | 17-22 | 75.7% | 51 | 11 | 22 | 20 | 8 | 14 | 5 | Team Stats (Home Games) | 90.5 | 44.9 | 34-81 | 42.6% | 5-13 | 38.0% | 17-22 | 79.1% | 52 | 12 | 23 | 19 | 7 | 14 | 6 | Stats Against (All Games) | 91.5 | 45.3 | 35-81 | 43.2% | 5-17 | 32.9% | 16-21 | 75.5% | 49 | 11 | 18 | 20 | 8 | 14 | 5 | vs opponents averaging | 97 | 48.9 | 37-82 | 44.5% | 7-20 | 35.5% | 16-22 | 75.4% | 51 | 11 | 21 | 20 | 8 | 14 | 5 | Stats Against (Home Games) | 89.6 | 44.7 | 34-81 | 42.5% | 5-15 | 31.9% | 16-21 | 76.6% | 50 | 12 | 19 | 20 | 8 | 14 | 6 |
|
| Average power rating of opponents played: CLEVELAND 95.6, CHICAGO 95 |
| | |
|
|
11/30/2012 | @ ATLANTA | 113-111 | W | 8.5 | W | 189.5 | O | 41-85 | 48.2% | 56 | 18 | 38-78 | 48.7% | 38 | 12 | 12/1/2012 | PORTLAND | 117-118 | L | -1.5 | L | 192.5 | O | 43-99 | 43.4% | 63 | 16 | 46-94 | 48.9% | 49 | 14 | 12/3/2012 | @ DETROIT | 79-89 | L | 5 | L | 191.5 | U | 32-95 | 33.7% | 64 | 11 | 36-84 | 42.9% | 58 | 11 | 12/5/2012 | CHICAGO | 85-95 | L | 3 | L | 183 | U | 31-85 | 36.5% | 51 | 10 | 34-72 | 47.2% | 52 | 15 | 12/7/2012 | @ MINNESOTA | 73-91 | L | 8.5 | L | 191 | U | 30-87 | 34.5% | 49 | 18 | 30-70 | 42.9% | 59 | 21 | 12/8/2012 | DETROIT | 97-104 | L | 1 | L | 187 | O | 39-91 | 42.9% | 58 | 14 | 35-75 | 46.7% | 46 | 9 | 12/11/2012 | LA LAKERS | 100-94 | W | 6.5 | W | 206.5 | U | 37-84 | 44.0% | 54 | 12 | 31-75 | 41.3% | 63 | 18 | 12/12/2012 | @ INDIANA | 81-96 | L | 7.5 | L | 189 | U | 27-81 | 33.3% | 52 | 12 | 34-83 | 41.0% | 63 | 13 | 12/14/2012 | MILWAUKEE | 86-90 | L | 3 | L | 196 | U | 32-81 | 39.5% | 53 | 24 | 33-83 | 39.8% | 55 | 17 | 12/15/2012 | @ NEW YORK | 102-103 | L | 10 | W | 193.5 | O | 40-82 | 48.8% | 52 | 12 | 37-85 | 43.5% | 49 | 9 | 12/18/2012 | TORONTO | 99-113 | L | -5 | L | 189 | O | 36-70 | 51.4% | 42 | 15 | 39-75 | 52.0% | 42 | 14 | 12/19/2012 | @ BOSTON | 91-103 | L | 9 | L | 191 | O | 36-88 | 40.9% | 48 | 9 | 37-62 | 59.7% | 43 | 14 | 12/21/2012 | INDIANA | 89-99 | L | 4.5 | L | 187 | O | 32-80 | 40.0% | 47 | 16 | 39-80 | 48.7% | 57 | 17 | 12/22/2012 | @ MILWAUKEE | 94-82 | W | 8 | W | 197 | U | 38-88 | 43.2% | 58 | 12 | 31-79 | 39.2% | 50 | 14 | 12/26/2012 | @ WASHINGTON | 87-84 | W | 1 | W | 188.5 | U | 31-82 | 37.8% | 47 | 10 | 35-76 | 46.1% | 57 | 20 | 12/28/2012 | ATLANTA | 94-102 | L | 5.5 | L | 189.5 | O | 36-86 | 41.9% | 43 | 11 | 38-78 | 48.7% | 50 | 14 | 12/29/2012 | @ BROOKLYN | 100-103 | L | 8.5 | W | 190 | O | 38-82 | 46.3% | 47 | 18 | 35-75 | 46.7% | 51 | 12 | 1/2/2013 | SACRAMENTO | 94-97 | L | -3.5 | L | 200 | U | 34-87 | 39.1% | 60 | 13 | 38-88 | 43.2% | 51 | 10 | 1/4/2013 | @ CHARLOTTE | 106-104 | W | 1.5 | W | 196.5 | O | 39-78 | 50.0% | 47 | 13 | 37-82 | 45.1% | 51 | 14 | 1/5/2013 | HOUSTON | 104-112 | L | 6 | L | 213 | O | 36-91 | 39.6% | 54 | 13 | 37-79 | 46.8% | 56 | 17 | 1/7/2013 | @ CHICAGO | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1/9/2013 | ATLANTA | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1/11/2013 | @ DENVER | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1/13/2013 | @ LA LAKERS | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1/14/2013 | @ SACRAMENTO | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1/16/2013 | @ PORTLAND | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1/19/2013 | @ UTAH | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1/22/2013 | BOSTON | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
| |
|
|
11/28/2012 | DALLAS | 101-78 | W | -6 | W | 188.5 | U | 34-69 | 49.3% | 56 | 19 | 28-81 | 34.6% | 40 | 14 | 12/1/2012 | PHILADELPHIA | 93-88 | W | -6.5 | L | 182.5 | U | 38-81 | 46.9% | 59 | 13 | 36-82 | 43.9% | 43 | 11 | 12/4/2012 | INDIANA | 76-80 | L | -4 | L | 180.5 | U | 28-73 | 38.4% | 53 | 19 | 29-80 | 36.2% | 54 | 12 | 12/5/2012 | @ CLEVELAND | 95-85 | W | -3 | W | 183 | U | 34-72 | 47.2% | 52 | 15 | 31-85 | 36.5% | 51 | 10 | 12/7/2012 | @ DETROIT | 108-104 | W | -2 | W | 181 | O | 43-82 | 52.4% | 48 | 8 | 36-70 | 51.4% | 36 | 8 | 12/8/2012 | NEW YORK | 93-85 | W | 2 | W | 188.5 | U | 34-78 | 43.6% | 54 | 19 | 27-84 | 32.1% | 52 | 15 | 12/11/2012 | LA CLIPPERS | 89-94 | L | 4 | L | 189 | U | 35-87 | 40.2% | 54 | 16 | 37-80 | 46.2% | 51 | 15 | 12/12/2012 | @ PHILADELPHIA | 96-89 | W | 2 | W | 180.5 | O | 34-78 | 43.6% | 46 | 11 | 41-91 | 45.1% | 56 | 13 | 12/15/2012 | BROOKLYN | 83-82 | W | -4.5 | L | 184 | U | 33-75 | 44.0% | 44 | 13 | 29-75 | 38.7% | 53 | 18 | 12/17/2012 | @ MEMPHIS | 71-80 | L | 6.5 | L | 178.5 | U | 28-75 | 37.3% | 48 | 16 | 30-80 | 37.5% | 61 | 18 | 12/18/2012 | BOSTON | 100-89 | W | -1.5 | W | 180.5 | O | 37-74 | 50.0% | 48 | 12 | 35-81 | 43.2% | 43 | 9 | 12/21/2012 | @ NEW YORK | 110-106 | W | 6 | W | 188 | O | 37-83 | 44.6% | 62 | 16 | 38-91 | 41.8% | 45 | 10 | 12/22/2012 | @ ATLANTA | 75-92 | L | 4 | L | 184 | U | 32-76 | 42.1% | 38 | 15 | 38-77 | 49.4% | 48 | 16 | 12/25/2012 | HOUSTON | 97-120 | L | -5 | L | 197.5 | O | 37-83 | 44.6% | 40 | 11 | 46-82 | 56.1% | 49 | 10 | 12/29/2012 | WASHINGTON | 87-77 | W | -11 | L | 180.5 | U | 34-87 | 39.1% | 54 | 8 | 31-85 | 36.5% | 65 | 16 | 12/31/2012 | CHARLOTTE | 81-91 | L | -11.5 | L | 188.5 | U | 33-94 | 35.1% | 59 | 11 | 33-70 | 47.1% | 63 | 18 | 1/2/2013 | @ ORLANDO | 96-94 | W | -2 | T | 184 | O | 36-77 | 46.8% | 44 | 6 | 37-78 | 47.4% | 47 | 12 | 1/4/2013 | @ MIAMI | 96-89 | W | 7.5 | W | 189.5 | U | 36-80 | 45.0% | 54 | 15 | 30-65 | 46.2% | 37 | 12 | 1/7/2013 | CLEVELAND | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1/9/2013 | MILWAUKEE | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1/11/2013 | @ NEW YORK | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1/12/2013 | PHOENIX | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1/14/2013 | ATLANTA | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1/16/2013 | @ TORONTO | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1/18/2013 | @ BOSTON | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1/19/2013 | MEMPHIS | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1/21/2013 | LA LAKERS | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1/23/2013 | DETROIT | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
| | | CLEVELAND: GUARDS: KYRIE IRVING is the real deal, a heady playmaker and near-elite shooter. He should emerge as the NBA's next great point guard this season . . . Rookie DION WAITERS has a chance to step right into the starting lineup. He can get to the rim and generally makes good choices withthe ball. The only thing holding him back is defense after playing college ball in Syracuse's lazy zone . . . C.J. MILES will reportedly start at either the two or three spot, but he really needs to find the range on his shot again for him to stick in the starting lineup . . . Gunning combo guard DANIEL GIBSON is looking like he'll be their sixth man . . . The Cavs are still trying to figure out their second unit. JEREMY PARGO figures to be Irving's backup, but DONALD SLOAN is a better defender and could eventually pass him for this role, which doesn't mean many minutes unless Irving gets injured again. FORWARDS: TRISTAN THOMPSON is trying to add a perimeter shot to his repertoire. Don't count on him becoming David West, but he should improve offensively to go along with his rebounding and shot-blocking . . . ALONZO GEE returns as the starting small forward, excelling on the defensive end, but without a polished enough offensive game to earn 35 minutes per night . . . OMRI CASSPI was in and out of the rotation late in the year as he battled knee issues. It's getting close to make-or-break time for him . . . JON LEUER is a solid stretch four who has a real chance at a rotation spot . . . SAMARDO SAMUELS reportedly dropped some weight in his effort to find some minutes . . . LUKE WALTON is an unofficial member of the coaching staff . . . Undrafted rookie KEVIN JONES could make some noise with his work on the offensive boards . . . LUKE HARANGODY is more of a D-League talent. CENTERS: ANDERSON VAREJAO's wrist should be 100 percent, and Sideshow Anderson should be the same relentless, double-double threat he's always been . . . Rookie TYLER ZELLER is a 7-footer with some nice offensive skills -- he can knock down a jump shot in the half court, and run the floor. He'll struggle to defend in space, but made a living drawing charges at UNC, and should be able to play 20+ minutes as a rookie. | | CHICAGO: GUARDS: The best guess on DERRICK ROSE is a February return. But an ACL injury usually isn't 100 percent until the second full year back . . . With Rose out, KIRK HINRICH figures to play heavy minutes early. He's a defensive specialist who will pass and watch on offense . . . NATE ROBINSON could push Hinrich for minutes. He's the offensive half of that platoon, but Thibodeau almost always leans defense . . . RICHARD HAMILTON will carry a bigger offensive load while Rose is recovering. He's a shadow of his former self . . . MARCO BELINELLI is a nice addition. He's solid defensively, and he brings the long-range shooting Chicago lacks. Don't be surprised if he pushes Hamilton . . . Rookie MARQUIS TEAGUE will mostly sit and watch this year. FORWARDS: After avoiding wrist surgery, LUOL DENG should be Chicago's top scorer while Rose is out. He's the only one on this team who even has a chance to generate his own offense . . . CARLOS BOOZER continues to be a major disappointment. In the past it's been his atrocious defense, but now he's taken a step back offensively as well. He may score more with Rose out, but he'll continue to sit late in close games . . . TAJ GIBSON should be in for a bigger role. With Omer Asik gone, he's one of only two defensively capable bigs on this roster . . . VLADIMIR RADMANOVIC will try to replace some of the three-point shooting they lost when Kyle Korver left . . . JIMMY BUTLER has a puncher's chance at a rotation spot after a good summer. CENTERS: JOAKIM NOAH was still working his way back from that badly sprained ankle this summer. His durability is questionable, but the Bulls will have to lean on Noah for more minutes now that Omer Asik is gone . . . NAZR MOHAMMED steps into Asik's role as Noah's backup. But while Asik was an active defender, Mohammed is more of just a big body with six fouls to give. |
| | |
| Last Updated: 3/29/2024 1:57:11 AM EST. |
|
|
| |
|