|
|
ILLINOIS MARYLAND |
|
| 56.5 | 33 Final 63 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| | |
135 | ILLINOIS | 54.5 | 53.5 | 136 | MARYLAND | -15.5 | -17 |
|
|
| | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All Games | 3-4 | +1 | 3-4 | 3-4 | 24.7 | 13.0 | 372.1 | (5.5) | 1.4 | 34.0 | 17.6 | 510.4 | (6.7) | 2.1 | Road Games | 1-1 | +1 | 1-1 | 2-0 | 29.0 | 17.0 | 359.5 | (6) | 2.5 | 33.0 | 21.0 | 465.5 | (6.1) | 2.5 | Last 3 Games | 1-2 | 0 | 1-2 | 2-1 | 21.7 | 13.7 | 323.0 | (5.4) | 2.0 | 37.3 | 23.7 | 514.0 | (6.6) | 2.0 | Turf Games | 3-4 | +1 | 3-4 | 3-4 | 24.7 | 13.0 | 372.1 | (5.5) | 1.4 | 34.0 | 17.6 | 510.4 | (6.7) | 2.1 | Conference Games | 1-3 | 0 | 1-3 | 3-1 | 22.2 | 14.5 | 345.0 | (5.4) | 2.0 | 43.7 | 23.0 | 533.2 | (7) | 2.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
Offense (All Games) | 24.7 | 13.0 | 19.0 | 28:12 | 43-226 | (5.3) | 14-25 | 55.6% | 146 | (5.7) | 68-372 | (5.5) | (15.1) | Opponents Defensive Avg. | 27.6 | 13.1 | 21.4 | 31:53 | 41-194 | (4.7) | 18-31 | 58.3% | 215 | (6.9) | 73-409 | (5.6) | (14.8) | Offense Road Games | 29.0 | 17.0 | 15.0 | 25:35 | 39-270 | (6.8) | 9-20 | 47.5% | 89 | (4.5) | 59-359 | (6) | (12.4) | Defense (All Games) | 34.0 | 17.6 | 27.1 | 31:48 | 41-222 | (5.4) | 23-35 | 63.7% | 288 | (8.1) | 76-510 | (6.7) | (15) | Opponents Offensive Avg. | 28.4 | 13.6 | 21.3 | 29:07 | 36-187 | (5.1) | 20-34 | 59.3% | 240 | (7.1) | 70-427 | (6.1) | (15) | Defense Road Games | 33.0 | 21.0 | 28.0 | 34:24 | 42-238 | (5.7) | 21-34 | 61.8% | 227 | (6.7) | 76-465 | (6.1) | (14.1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
All Games | 4-3 | -6.5 | 4-3 | 3-4 | 27.1 | 13.3 | 329.9 | (5.8) | 1.0 | 23.3 | 13.9 | 315.6 | (4.5) | 2.1 | Home Games | 2-1 | -9 | 2-1 | 1-2 | 30.0 | 17.3 | 334.0 | (6.1) | 1.0 | 18.3 | 10.3 | 290.3 | (4.1) | 3.0 | Last 3 Games | 1-2 | -2 | 1-2 | 1-2 | 18.3 | 10.3 | 236.7 | (4.8) | 1.3 | 24.0 | 10.0 | 318.0 | (4.6) | 2.3 | Turf Games | 3-3 | -10 | 3-3 | 2-4 | 26.0 | 11.5 | 317.0 | (5.9) | 1.2 | 22.3 | 12.5 | 300.7 | (4.4) | 2.0 | Conference Games | 2-2 | -1 | 2-2 | 2-2 | 24.2 | 13.0 | 285.5 | (5.7) | 1.0 | 21.2 | 10.0 | 304.2 | (4.4) | 2.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
Offense (All Games) | 27.1 | 13.3 | 15.0 | 27:14 | 38-220 | (5.8) | 10-19 | 51.5% | 110 | (5.7) | 57-330 | (5.8) | (12.2) | Opponents Defensive Avg. | 26.2 | 13.7 | 19.2 | 29:51 | 38-172 | (4.5) | 17-30 | 56.4% | 184 | (6.2) | 68-356 | (5.3) | (13.6) | Offense Home Games | 30.0 | 17.3 | 14.0 | 27:19 | 36-246 | (6.8) | 9-18 | 49.1% | 88 | (4.8) | 54-334 | (6.1) | (11.1) | Defense (All Games) | 23.3 | 13.9 | 19.6 | 32:46 | 42-140 | (3.4) | 14-28 | 51.8% | 175 | (6.3) | 70-316 | (4.5) | (13.6) | Opponents Offensive Avg. | 28 | 15.7 | 20.4 | 31:05 | 38-151 | (4) | 19-32 | 59.0% | 224 | (7.1) | 70-376 | (5.4) | (13.4) | Defense Home Games | 18.3 | 10.3 | 19.3 | 32:41 | 46-143 | (3.1) | 11-26 | 41.6% | 147 | (5.7) | 71-290 | (4.1) | (15.8) |
|
|
Average power rating of opponents played: ILLINOIS 30.3, MARYLAND 35.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
9/1/2018 | KENT ST | 31-24 | W | -18 | L | 56 | U | 49-279 | 13-24-190 | 1 | 43-183 | 28-41-270 | 2 | 9/8/2018 | W ILLINOIS | 34-14 | W | -8 | W | 51 | U | 47-238 | 14-23-138 | 0 | 21-66 | 26-42-295 | 3 | 9/15/2018 | S FLORIDA | 19-25 | L | 14 | W | 59 | U | 48-212 | 20-31-168 | 1 | 44-215 | 23-40-411 | 2 | 9/21/2018 | PENN ST | 24-63 | L | 27.5 | L | 59.5 | O | 45-245 | 18-31-166 | 2 | 51-387 | 13-20-204 | 2 | 10/6/2018 | @ RUTGERS | 38-17 | W | -4.5 | W | 51 | O | 43-330 | 10-19-89 | 0 | 30-119 | 29-46-267 | 3 | 10/13/2018 | PURDUE | 7-46 | L | 11 | L | 62 | U | 31-69 | 15-29-181 | 1 | 44-227 | 26-37-384 | 1 | 10/20/2018 | @ WISCONSIN | 20-49 | L | 24 | L | 53 | O | 36-210 | 9-21-90 | 5 | 54-357 | 13-22-188 | 2 | 10/27/2018 | @ MARYLAND | | | | | | | | | | | | | 11/3/2018 | MINNESOTA | | | | | | | | | | | | | 11/10/2018 | @ NEBRASKA | | | | | | | | | | | | | 11/17/2018 | IOWA | | | | | | | | | | | | | 11/24/2018 | @ NORTHWESTERN | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
9/1/2018 | *TEXAS | 34-29 | W | 12 | W | 54.5 | O | 46-143 | 21-34-264 | 0 | 36-142 | 21-39-263 | 3 | 9/8/2018 | @ BOWLING GREEN | 45-14 | W | -13 | W | 65.5 | U | 53-444 | 8-16-121 | 1 | 28-15 | 17-27-143 | 1 | 9/15/2018 | TEMPLE | 14-35 | L | -16 | L | 56 | U | 31-132 | 8-21-63 | 2 | 52-165 | 16-28-264 | 1 | 9/22/2018 | MINNESOTA | 42-13 | W | -2 | W | 46.5 | O | 37-315 | 10-14-117 | 0 | 40-94 | 14-32-169 | 3 | 10/6/2018 | @ MICHIGAN | 21-42 | L | 17.5 | L | 44.5 | O | 37-147 | 7-13-73 | 1 | 40-171 | 20-28-294 | 1 | 10/13/2018 | RUTGERS | 34-7 | W | -23.5 | W | 50.5 | U | 40-290 | 9-20-85 | 1 | 45-171 | 2-17-8 | 5 | 10/20/2018 | @ IOWA | 0-23 | L | 10 | L | 44.5 | U | 23-68 | 6-16-47 | 2 | 52-224 | 11-24-86 | 1 | 10/27/2018 | ILLINOIS | | | | | | | | | | | | | 11/3/2018 | MICHIGAN ST | | | | | | | | | | | | | 11/10/2018 | @ INDIANA | | | | | | | | | | | | | 11/17/2018 | OHIO ST | | | | | | | | | | | | | 11/24/2018 | @ PENN ST | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
|
| ILLINOIS: It's probably safe to say that head coach Lovie Smith is on the hot seat this season'the 2005 AP NFL Coach of the Year is a miserable 5-19 in his career with Illinois. This offense averaged a Power Five-worst 15.4 points per game last season and, in limited playing time last year, soon-to-be starting quarterback Cam Thomas completed just 42.4 percent of his passes for 375 yards, zero touchdowns and five interceptions. That's not promising, but the hope is that a new spread attack will bring out the best in him. On defense, the Illini return seven starters from a unit that couldn't stop anybody. It's likely that opposing offenses will be looking forward to playing them once again. ' | | MARYLAND: Maryland returns its entire offensive line from a year ago, and running backs Ty Johnson and Lorenzo Harrison III are more than capable of taking advantage of an experienced group up front. And redshirt freshman Kasim Hill is out to establish himself as one of the best dual-threat quarterbacks in the conference. On the other side of the ball, Maryland added some serious transfer talent. That should help a unit that also returns star LB Jesse Aniebonam, who suffered a serious ankle injury in Week 1 last season. The Terps are going to be a tougher team to beat this year, but asking them to compete with the national powers in the Big Ten East isn't realistic'especially given the turmoil that struck the program in August. |
|
|
|
|
Last Updated: 4/26/2024 1:21:18 AM EST. |
|
|