|
|
W MICHIGAN GEORGIA ST |
|
| 61 | 34 Final 15 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| | |
349 | W MICHIGAN | -6.5 | -7.5 | 350 | GEORGIA ST | 62.5 | 61 |
|
|
| | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All Games | 1-2 | -1 | 1-2 | 1-1 | 37.7 | 11.7 | 452.0 | (6.4) | 1.0 | 34.7 | 23.0 | 378.0 | (5.9) | 1.0 | Road Games | 0-1 | 0 | 0-1 | 0-1 | 3.0 | 0.0 | 208.0 | (2.8) | 1.0 | 49.0 | 35.0 | 451.0 | (8.5) | 0.0 | Last 3 Games | 1-2 | -1 | 1-2 | 1-1 | 37.7 | 11.7 | 452.0 | (6.4) | 1.0 | 34.7 | 23.0 | 378.0 | (5.9) | 1.0 | Turf Games | 1-2 | -1 | 1-2 | 1-1 | 37.7 | 11.7 | 452.0 | (6.4) | 1.0 | 34.7 | 23.0 | 378.0 | (5.9) | 1.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
Offense (All Games) | 37.7 | 11.7 | 24.0 | 31:17 | 36-202 | (5.6) | 19-34 | 56.3% | 250 | (7.3) | 71-452 | (6.4) | (12) | Opponents Defensive Avg. | 31.1 | 15 | 20.8 | 30:56 | 36-145 | (4) | 18-32 | 56.7% | 222 | (6.9) | 68-367 | (5.4) | (11.8) | Offense Road Games | 3.0 | 0.0 | 17.0 | 34:11 | 40-123 | (3.1) | 16-34 | 47.1% | 85 | (2.5) | 74-208 | (2.8) | (69.3) | Defense (All Games) | 34.7 | 23.0 | 17.0 | 28:43 | 45-252 | (5.6) | 9-19 | 49.1% | 126 | (6.6) | 64-378 | (5.9) | (10.9) | Opponents Offensive Avg. | 30.3 | 17.3 | 19.2 | 30:04 | 45-201 | (4.4) | 14-24 | 57.7% | 160 | (6.8) | 69-361 | (5.2) | (11.9) | Defense Road Games | 49.0 | 35.0 | 20.0 | 25:49 | 35-308 | (8.8) | 13-18 | 72.2% | 143 | (7.9) | 53-451 | (8.5) | (9.2) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
All Games | 1-2 | +1 | 1-2 | 1-1 | 17.7 | 10.3 | 325.3 | (4.7) | 1.0 | 40.0 | 24.0 | 534.0 | (7.9) | 1.3 | Home Games | 1-0 | +1 | 1-0 | 0-0 | 24.0 | 14.0 | 315.0 | (4.8) | 1.0 | 20.0 | 14.0 | 382.0 | (5.5) | 2.0 | Last 3 Games | 1-2 | +1 | 1-2 | 1-1 | 17.7 | 10.3 | 325.3 | (4.7) | 1.0 | 40.0 | 24.0 | 534.0 | (7.9) | 1.3 | Turf Games | 1-1 | +1 | 1-1 | 1-0 | 23.0 | 12.0 | 313.5 | (4.4) | 1.0 | 39.5 | 26.0 | 530.5 | (8) | 1.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
Offense (All Games) | 17.7 | 10.3 | 20.3 | 30:60 | 37-136 | (3.6) | 19-32 | 60.4% | 189 | (5.9) | 69-325 | (4.7) | (18.4) | Opponents Defensive Avg. | 17.8 | 9.1 | 19.4 | 31:05 | 40-143 | (3.6) | 18-27 | 65.4% | 170 | (6.2) | 67-313 | (4.7) | (17.6) | Offense Home Games | 24.0 | 14.0 | 21.0 | 27:23 | 38-128 | (3.4) | 20-28 | 71.4% | 187 | (6.7) | 66-315 | (4.8) | (13.1) | Defense (All Games) | 40.0 | 24.0 | 23.3 | 29:00 | 39-235 | (6) | 21-28 | 74.1% | 299 | (10.5) | 67-534 | (7.9) | (13.3) | Opponents Offensive Avg. | 33.7 | 22.1 | 22.6 | 29:55 | 39-201 | (5.2) | 21-30 | 69.9% | 283 | (9.4) | 69-484 | (7) | (14.3) | Defense Home Games | 20.0 | 14.0 | 19.0 | 32:37 | 51-181 | (3.5) | 12-19 | 63.2% | 201 | (10.6) | 70-382 | (5.5) | (19.1) |
|
|
Average power rating of opponents played: W MICHIGAN 29, GEORGIA ST 29.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
8/31/2018 | SYRACUSE | 42-55 | L | 4.5 | L | 65 | O | 28-242 | 19-36-379 | 2 | 62-334 | 11-28-226 | 1 | 9/8/2018 | @ MICHIGAN | 3-49 | L | 27.5 | L | 56 | U | 40-123 | 16-34-85 | 1 | 35-308 | 13-18-143 | 0 | 9/15/2018 | DELAWARE ST | 68-0 | W | -46.5 | W | | - | 41-241 | 23-33-286 | 0 | 38-115 | 4-11-8 | 2 | 9/22/2018 | @ GEORGIA ST | | | | | | | | | | | | | 9/29/2018 | @ MIAMI OHIO | | | | | | | | | | | | | 10/6/2018 | E MICHIGAN | | | | | | | | | | | | | 10/13/2018 | @ BOWLING GREEN | | | | | | | | | | | | | 10/20/2018 | @ C MICHIGAN | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
8/30/2018 | KENNESAW ST | 24-20 | W | -2.5 | W | | - | 38-128 | 20-28-187 | 1 | 51-181 | 12-19-201 | 2 | 9/8/2018 | @ NC STATE | 7-41 | L | 25 | L | 56 | U | 31-107 | 19-34-242 | 1 | 31-115 | 32-39-426 | 1 | 9/14/2018 | @ MEMPHIS | 22-59 | L | 29 | L | 63.5 | O | 43-173 | 19-34-139 | 1 | 35-410 | 19-27-269 | 1 | 9/22/2018 | W MICHIGAN | | | | | | | | | | | | | 9/29/2018 | LA MONROE | | | | | | | | | | | | | 10/4/2018 | @ TROY | | | | | | | | | | | | | 10/18/2018 | @ ARKANSAS ST | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
|
| W MICHIGAN: The Broncos have to replace their entire linebacking corps and two studs in the secondary, but there is still optimism coming from the team about the defense as a whole'even if its defensive line isn't exactly great, either. And if the unit can find a way to be average on that side of the ball then the team could contend in the conference. That's because the offense is going to be nearly impossible to stop, if healthy. Quarterback Jon Wassink should be in for a big year under center, and he'll be handing off to one of the best groups of rushers in the conference, including the slippery Jamauri Bogan. There's some value to be had in backing the Broncos as a bettor and hoping they figure it out defensively. | | GEORGIA ST: A 7-5 record in 2017 marked the best season in the Panthers' short history, and the future is bright for this young program. This year, however, they might take a small step back. Pint-sized wideout Penny Hart is a stud, but QB Conner Manning's exit means there should be some regression in the passing game. That's bad news, given that State loses its top two rushers from an attack that averaged a paltry 3.2 yards per carry. The defense loses some key guys, and the secondary in particular will rely on youngsters. Georgia State's recruiting has picked up in the last couple of years, so there is talent to pull from. |
|
|
|
|
Last Updated: 3/28/2024 6:27:51 AM EST. |
|
|