| | | |
C MICHIGAN KANSAS |
|
| 44.5 | 10 Final 24 |
|
|
| | |
|
| | | |
321 | C MICHIGAN | 48 | 44.5 | 322 | KANSAS | -2.5 | -3.5 |
|
|
| | |
|
| | | |
|
|
All Games | 2-1 | +1.4 | 1-2 | 1-2 | 20.3 | 10.3 | 291.0 | (4.6) | 1.3 | 24.3 | 13.3 | 348.7 | (4.9) | 2.3 | Road Games | 1-0 | +1.4 | 1-0 | 1-0 | 38.0 | 21.0 | 333.0 | (5.6) | 1.0 | 17.0 | 7.0 | 326.0 | (3.9) | 3.0 | Last 3 Games | 2-1 | +1.4 | 1-2 | 1-2 | 20.3 | 10.3 | 291.0 | (4.6) | 1.3 | 24.3 | 13.3 | 348.7 | (4.9) | 2.3 | Turf Games | 1-1 | 0 | 0-2 | 0-2 | 11.5 | 5.0 | 270.0 | (4.2) | 1.5 | 28.0 | 16.5 | 360.0 | (5.5) | 2.0 |
|
| |
|
|
Offense (All Games) | 20.3 | 10.3 | 17.7 | 31:20 | 37-115 | (3.1) | 15-25 | 57.9% | 176 | (6.9) | 63-291 | (4.6) | (14.3) | Opponents Defensive Avg. | 22.8 | 9.8 | 20.9 | 34:31 | 42-144 | (3.5) | 17-30 | 58.2% | 196 | (6.6) | 71-341 | (4.8) | (14.9) | Offense Road Games | 38.0 | 21.0 | 19.0 | 30:29 | 43-161 | (3.7) | 11-16 | 68.7% | 172 | (10.7) | 59-333 | (5.6) | (8.8) | Defense (All Games) | 24.3 | 13.3 | 19.3 | 28:40 | 37-172 | (4.6) | 19-34 | 55.3% | 176 | (5.1) | 72-349 | (4.9) | (14.3) | Opponents Offensive Avg. | 24.7 | 14.7 | 18.8 | 26:29 | 34-151 | (4.4) | 19-33 | 58.0% | 179 | (5.4) | 67-330 | (4.9) | (13.3) | Defense Road Games | 17.0 | 7.0 | 19.0 | 29:31 | 34-122 | (3.6) | 24-49 | 49.0% | 204 | (4.2) | 83-326 | (3.9) | (19.2) |
|
|
| |
|
|
All Games | 1-1 | -1 | 0-2 | 0-1 | 18.5 | 13.5 | 377.0 | (5.1) | 1.0 | 34.5 | 10.0 | 466.0 | (6.9) | 1.5 | Home Games | 1-0 | 0 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 34.0 | 24.0 | 457.0 | (6.3) | 0.0 | 28.0 | 0.0 | 421.0 | (6.6) | 3.0 | Last 3 Games | 1-1 | -1 | 0-2 | 0-1 | 18.5 | 13.5 | 377.0 | (5.1) | 1.0 | 34.5 | 10.0 | 466.0 | (6.9) | 1.5 | Turf Games | 1-0 | 0 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 34.0 | 24.0 | 457.0 | (6.3) | 0.0 | 28.0 | 0.0 | 421.0 | (6.6) | 3.0 |
|
| |
|
|
Offense (All Games) | 18.5 | 13.5 | 18.5 | 31:16 | 48-231 | (4.8) | 12-26 | 45.3% | 145 | (5.5) | 74-377 | (5.1) | (20.4) | Opponents Defensive Avg. | 22.5 | 15.8 | 19 | 29:23 | 45-214 | (4.8) | 15-29 | 51.4% | 185 | (6.4) | 74-399 | (5.4) | (17.7) | Offense Home Games | 34.0 | 24.0 | 20.0 | 29:59 | 49-261 | (5.3) | 12-24 | 50.0% | 196 | (8.2) | 73-457 | (6.3) | (13.4) | Defense (All Games) | 34.5 | 10.0 | 18.5 | 28:42 | 36-227 | (6.3) | 16-31 | 52.4% | 238 | (7.6) | 67-466 | (6.9) | (13.5) | Opponents Offensive Avg. | 35.2 | 12 | 20.2 | 31:35 | 38-193 | (5.1) | 19-34 | 56.7% | 272 | (8) | 72-466 | (6.5) | (13.2) | Defense Home Games | 28.0 | 0.0 | 14.0 | 29:58 | 36-124 | (3.4) | 13-28 | 46.4% | 297 | (10.6) | 64-421 | (6.6) | (15) |
|
| Average power rating of opponents played: C MICHIGAN 17, KANSAS 20.5 |
| | |
|
|
8/28/2014 | UT-CHATTANOOGA | 20-16 | W | -10 | L | 53.5 | U | 46-150 | 15-26-173 | 1 | 29-106 | 13-24-150 | 4 | 9/6/2014 | @ PURDUE | 38-17 | W | 3 | W | 53 | O | 43-161 | 11-16-172 | 1 | 34-122 | 24-49-204 | 3 | 9/13/2014 | SYRACUSE | 3-40 | L | 5 | L | 50 | U | 23-34 | 18-34-183 | 2 | 49-289 | 20-30-175 | 0 | 9/20/2014 | @ KANSAS | | | | | | | | | | | | | 9/27/2014 | @ TOLEDO | | | | | | | | | | | | | 10/4/2014 | OHIO U | | | | | | | | | | | | | 10/11/2014 | @ N ILLINOIS | | | | | | | | | | | | | 10/18/2014 | BALL ST | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
| |
|
|
9/6/2014 | SE MISSOURI ST | 34-28 | W | -24 | L | | - | 49-261 | 12-24-196 | 0 | 36-124 | 13-28-297 | 3 | 9/13/2014 | @ DUKE | 3-41 | L | 12 | L | 56.5 | U | 47-202 | 12-29-95 | 2 | 36-331 | 20-35-180 | 0 | 9/20/2014 | C MICHIGAN | | | | | | | | | | | | | 9/27/2014 | TEXAS | | | | | | | | | | | | | 10/4/2014 | @ W VIRGINIA | | | | | | | | | | | | | 10/11/2014 | OKLAHOMA ST | | | | | | | | | | | | | 10/18/2014 | @ TEXAS TECH | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
| | | C MICHIGAN: The Chippewas return plenty for sophomore QB Cooper Rush (2,349 pass yds, 7.5 YPA, 15 TD, 15 INT), most notably WRs Titus Davis (1,109 rec yds, 18.2 avg, 8 TD) and Andrew Flory (377 rec yds). RB Saylor Lavallii (807 rush yds, 4.4 YPC, 5 TD) is a quite capable back and has a strong O-Line to create holes for him. On defense, the 4-2-5 scheme is anchored by LB Justin Cherocci (121 tackles, 4 sacks). DT Jabari Dean is back from a groin injury and should improve a mediocre front four. S Tony Annese (29 tackles, 2 INT, 2 TD) is the biggest playmaker in a solid Central Michigan secondary. | | KANSAS: Dual-threat sophomore QB Montell Cozart (3.6 YPA, 0 TD, 2 INT) won the starting job and has a true No. 1 receiver in Miami Ohio transfer WR Nick Harwell (3,166 rec yds, 23 TD in 3 years). The ground game could improve with RBs Brandon Bourbon (4.7 YPC, 4 TD) and Darrian Miller (4.8 YPC), but the O-Line is subpar. The defense's strength lies with CB Dexter McDonald (10 PD), S Isaiah Johnson (5 INT) and LB Ben Heeney (87 tackles, 3 INT). |
| | Game Notes: |
| Last Updated: 4/26/2024 3:37:48 AM EST. |
|
|
| |
|