|
|
CONNECTICUT CINCINNATI |
|
| 46 | 16 Final 41 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| | |
333 | CONNECTICUT | 45 | 46 | 334 | CINCINNATI | -16 | -14 |
|
|
| | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All Games | 0-5 | -17.2 | 1-4 | 3-2 | 16.4 | 11.2 | 290.4 | (4.3) | 2.0 | 28.6 | 14.2 | 348.2 | (5.1) | 2.0 | Road Games | 0-1 | -1.4 | 0-1 | 1-0 | 12.0 | 12.0 | 220.0 | (3.2) | 4.0 | 41.0 | 28.0 | 330.0 | (5.2) | 1.0 | Last 3 Games | 0-3 | -4.2 | 1-2 | 1-2 | 14.3 | 12.0 | 260.7 | (3.8) | 2.0 | 26.0 | 15.0 | 282.3 | (4.3) | 2.0 | Turf Games | 0-1 | -1.4 | 0-1 | 1-0 | 12.0 | 12.0 | 220.0 | (3.2) | 4.0 | 41.0 | 28.0 | 330.0 | (5.2) | 1.0 | Conference Games | 0-1 | -1.8 | 0-1 | 0-1 | 10.0 | 10.0 | 356.0 | (4.4) | 1.0 | 13.0 | 10.0 | 228.0 | (3.7) | 1.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
Offense (All Games) | 16.4 | 11.2 | 16.6 | 28:05 | 32-79 | (2.5) | 18-36 | 49.4% | 211 | (5.9) | 68-290 | (4.3) | (17.7) | Opponents Defensive Avg. | 23.9 | 13.1 | 18.5 | 28:13 | 35-125 | (3.6) | 18-32 | 55.6% | 222 | (6.9) | 67-347 | (5.2) | (14.5) | Offense Road Games | 12.0 | 12.0 | 14.0 | 29:39 | 39-27 | (0.7) | 12-29 | 41.4% | 193 | (6.7) | 68-220 | (3.2) | (18.3) | Defense (All Games) | 28.6 | 14.2 | 17.0 | 31:55 | 44-178 | (4.1) | 11-24 | 47.5% | 170 | (7.1) | 68-348 | (5.1) | (12.2) | Opponents Offensive Avg. | 29.7 | 15.3 | 18.1 | 32:45 | 42-167 | (4) | 15-26 | 55.7% | 205 | (7.9) | 68-372 | (5.5) | (12.5) | Defense Road Games | 41.0 | 28.0 | 15.0 | 30:21 | 43-153 | (3.6) | 10-21 | 47.6% | 177 | (8.4) | 64-330 | (5.2) | (8) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
All Games | 4-2 | -5.2 | 2-4 | 3-2 | 32.8 | 15.0 | 457.3 | (6.1) | 2.0 | 17.8 | 13.3 | 271.8 | (4.7) | 1.7 | Home Games | 3-0 | +2 | 2-1 | 2-0 | 48.7 | 25.7 | 523.0 | (7.2) | 1.3 | 12.0 | 12.0 | 260.3 | (4.6) | 2.3 | Last 3 Games | 2-1 | -3.2 | 0-3 | 1-2 | 24.0 | 11.3 | 398.0 | (5) | 2.7 | 15.3 | 14.3 | 234.7 | (4.5) | 1.7 | Turf Games | 4-1 | -1 | 2-3 | 3-1 | 35.4 | 16.8 | 478.8 | (6.3) | 1.6 | 16.2 | 11.4 | 278.0 | (4.8) | 1.8 | Conference Games | 1-1 | -3.2 | 0-2 | 1-1 | 29.0 | 17.0 | 412.5 | (5.6) | 2.5 | 23.0 | 21.5 | 308.5 | (5.6) | 1.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
Offense (All Games) | 32.8 | 15.0 | 24.0 | 32:06 | 42-201 | (4.8) | 23-33 | 69.2% | 257 | (7.8) | 75-457 | (6.1) | (13.9) | Opponents Defensive Avg. | 36 | 18.2 | 22.9 | 31:03 | 41-209 | (5.1) | 19-31 | 62.5% | 255 | (8.3) | 72-464 | (6.5) | (12.9) | Offense Home Games | 48.7 | 25.7 | 25.0 | 34:12 | 45-249 | (5.5) | 22-28 | 80.7% | 274 | (9.9) | 73-523 | (7.2) | (10.7) | Defense (All Games) | 17.8 | 13.3 | 14.0 | 27:53 | 32-112 | (3.5) | 15-26 | 57.1% | 160 | (6.2) | 58-272 | (4.7) | (15.2) | Opponents Offensive Avg. | 18.6 | 10.2 | 17.1 | 29:56 | 34-123 | (3.6) | 16-31 | 51.0% | 181 | (5.8) | 66-304 | (4.6) | (16.4) | Defense Home Games | 12.0 | 12.0 | 13.7 | 25:48 | 29-114 | (3.9) | 15-28 | 53.0% | 147 | (5.3) | 57-260 | (4.6) | (21.7) |
|
|
Average power rating of opponents played: CONNECTICUT 28.2, CINCINNATI 19.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
8/29/2013 | TOWSON | 18-33 | L | -16.5 | L | 47.5 | O | 27-81 | 16-28-206 | 2 | 50-201 | 13-20-192 | 1 | 9/14/2013 | MARYLAND | 21-32 | L | 4.5 | L | 47 | O | 33-34 | 29-46-349 | 2 | 43-224 | 15-28-277 | 3 | 9/21/2013 | MICHIGAN | 21-24 | L | 18.5 | W | 51 | U | 25-47 | 16-32-159 | 1 | 49-192 | 11-23-97 | 4 | 9/28/2013 | @ BUFFALO | 12-41 | L | -2.5 | L | 48.5 | O | 39-27 | 12-29-193 | 4 | 43-153 | 10-21-177 | 1 | 10/12/2013 | S FLORIDA | 10-13 | L | -3.5 | L | 40.5 | U | 37-207 | 15-43-149 | 1 | 34-122 | 8-28-106 | 1 | 10/19/2013 | @ CINCINNATI | | | | | | | | | | | | | 10/26/2013 | @ UCF | | | | | | | | | | | | | 11/8/2013 | LOUISVILLE | | | | | | | | | | | | | 11/16/2013 | @ SMU | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
8/31/2013 | PURDUE | 42-7 | W | -10.5 | W | 49 | P | 47-221 | 17-25-204 | 3 | 22-65 | 18-35-161 | 4 | 9/7/2013 | @ ILLINOIS | 17-45 | L | -7 | L | 56.5 | O | 32-148 | 23-42-308 | 1 | 39-210 | 26-37-312 | 0 | 9/14/2013 | NORTHWESTERN ST | 66-9 | W | -29.5 | W | 55.5 | O | 46-322 | 19-21-347 | 0 | 34-100 | 14-23-79 | 1 | 9/21/2013 | @ MIAMI OHIO | 14-0 | W | -24.5 | L | 55 | U | 52-198 | 23-37-171 | 3 | 29-7 | 7-16-80 | 2 | 10/5/2013 | @ S FLORIDA | 20-26 | L | -10.5 | L | 47 | U | 33-110 | 24-36-240 | 4 | 37-112 | 11-18-129 | 1 | 10/11/2013 | TEMPLE | 38-20 | W | -20 | L | 55 | O | 42-205 | 31-37-270 | 1 | 31-176 | 12-25-200 | 2 | 10/19/2013 | CONNECTICUT | | | | | | | | | | | | | 10/30/2013 | @ MEMPHIS | | | | | | | | | | | | | 11/9/2013 | SMU | | | | | | | | | | | | | 11/16/2013 | @ RUTGERS | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
|
| CONNECTICUT: The Huskies offense was awful (17.8 PPG, 4th-fewest in FBS) and really needs subpar QB Chandler Whitmer (9 TD, 16 INT) to improve in new OC T.J. Weist's hurry-up offense. Junior RB Lyle McCombs (860 rush yds, 3.5 YPC) had a down year due mostly to poor O-Line play. The staunch defense (310 YPG, 9th in FBS) lost a lot, but star MLB Yawin Smallwood (120 tackles, 15 TFL) returns, and DB Byron Jones (87 tackles) leads a strong secondary. | | CINCINNATI: The new coach prefers QB Brendon Kay (9.4 YPA, 10 TD, 2 INT) over QB Munchie Legaux (7.5 YPA, 13 TD, 9 INT) to run the offense. TE Travis Kelce (722 rec. yds, 8 TD) and WR Anthony McClung (539 rec. yds) are both solid. All five O-Line starters return for this quality ground attack (201 YPG, 30th in FBS). The nation's 14th-best scoring defense (18.5 PPG) is fast and athletic, led by LB Greg Blair (138 tackles), but the weak D-Line is concerning. |
|
|
Game Notes: |
|
Last Updated: 3/28/2024 11:06:13 AM EST. |
|
|