|
|
WISCONSIN PENN ST |
|
| 44 | 21 Final 24 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| | |
161 | WISCONSIN | 45 | 45 | 162 | PENN ST | -3 | -2 |
|
|
| | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All Games | 7-4 | -0.8 | 5-6 | 6-4 | 28.1 | 12.3 | 383.3 | (5.7) | 0.9 | 17.5 | 7.3 | 302.9 | (4.6) | 1.1 | Road Games | 2-2 | -1.4 | 3-1 | 3-1 | 33.5 | 15.2 | 438.0 | (6.3) | 1.0 | 17.0 | 6.7 | 335.0 | (4.8) | 1.5 | Last 3 Games | 1-2 | -2.4 | 1-2 | 1-2 | 29.7 | 12.7 | 385.0 | (5.4) | 0.3 | 17.0 | 8.0 | 269.0 | (4.1) | 1.3 | Grass Games | 1-0 | +1 | 1-0 | 1-0 | 38.0 | 17.0 | 645.0 | (8.3) | 1.0 | 14.0 | 7.0 | 252.0 | (4.3) | 1.0 | Conference Games | 4-3 | -0.4 | 5-2 | 5-2 | 31.9 | 13.7 | 423.6 | (6.1) | 0.7 | 17.4 | 7.7 | 289.7 | (4.5) | 1.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
Offense (All Games) | 28.1 | 12.3 | 19.1 | 32:58 | 45-218 | (4.8) | 13-22 | 58.6% | 166 | (7.6) | 67-383 | (5.7) | (13.6) | Opponents Defensive Avg. | 24.5 | 12.2 | 19.7 | 30:28 | 38-158 | (4.2) | 19-32 | 57.9% | 212 | (6.6) | 70-371 | (5.3) | (15.2) | Offense Road Games | 33.5 | 15.2 | 20.7 | 32:53 | 46-280 | (6.1) | 13-23 | 54.3% | 157 | (6.7) | 70-438 | (6.3) | (13.1) | Defense (All Games) | 17.5 | 7.3 | 15.8 | 26:57 | 32-107 | (3.4) | 19-34 | 55.0% | 196 | (5.8) | 66-303 | (4.6) | (17.3) | Opponents Offensive Avg. | 26.6 | 13.6 | 20 | 30:38 | 37-159 | (4.3) | 20-33 | 59.5% | 233 | (7.1) | 70-392 | (5.6) | (14.7) | Defense Road Games | 17.0 | 6.7 | 17.0 | 27:06 | 32-131 | (4.1) | 20-38 | 53.2% | 203 | (5.3) | 70-335 | (4.8) | (19.7) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
All Games | 7-4 | +1.9 | 8-2 | 6-5 | 29.5 | 16.8 | 422.5 | (5.5) | 1.2 | 18.9 | 4.7 | 355.6 | (4.9) | 1.9 | Home Games | 4-2 | +0.6 | 4-2 | 3-3 | 29.8 | 15.5 | 422.0 | (5.7) | 1.3 | 21.5 | 6.7 | 371.5 | (5) | 1.3 | Last 3 Games | 2-1 | +1 | 2-0 | 2-1 | 34.0 | 22.7 | 481.0 | (6.5) | 1.7 | 21.0 | 7.3 | 430.3 | (5.2) | 1.7 | Grass Games | 5-3 | +0.6 | 6-2 | 3-5 | 28.6 | 15.0 | 421.0 | (5.6) | 1.0 | 19.4 | 5.7 | 362.4 | (4.9) | 1.6 | Conference Games | 5-2 | +3.3 | 5-1 | 6-1 | 33.9 | 18.6 | 447.6 | (5.5) | 1.3 | 21.0 | 6.1 | 355.7 | (4.9) | 1.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
Offense (All Games) | 29.5 | 16.8 | 22.7 | 31:20 | 39-142 | (3.6) | 23-38 | 60.4% | 280 | (7.4) | 77-422 | (5.5) | (14.3) | Opponents Defensive Avg. | 26.8 | 13.5 | 20.2 | 30:52 | 38-167 | (4.3) | 19-32 | 59.0% | 222 | (6.9) | 70-389 | (5.5) | (14.5) | Offense Home Games | 29.8 | 15.5 | 22.8 | 31:04 | 35-120 | (3.4) | 25-39 | 63.2% | 302 | (7.7) | 74-422 | (5.7) | (14.1) | Defense (All Games) | 18.9 | 4.7 | 18.5 | 28:30 | 36-127 | (3.6) | 21-37 | 57.3% | 229 | (6.2) | 72-356 | (4.9) | (18.8) | Opponents Offensive Avg. | 27.4 | 14.1 | 20.6 | 30:06 | 42-190 | (4.6) | 18-30 | 60.1% | 200 | (6.7) | 71-390 | (5.5) | (14.2) | Defense Home Games | 21.5 | 6.7 | 19.3 | 28:37 | 40-152 | (3.8) | 20-34 | 57.8% | 219 | (6.5) | 74-371 | (5) | (17.3) |
|
|
Average power rating of opponents played: WISCONSIN 33.5, PENN ST 33.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
9/29/2012 | @ NEBRASKA | 27-30 | L | 11 | W | 52 | O | 41-56 | 15-28-239 | 1 | 46-259 | 17-29-181 | 2 | 10/6/2012 | ILLINOIS | 31-14 | W | -14.5 | W | 44.5 | O | 33-173 | 16-25-254 | 2 | 34-106 | 18-30-178 | 2 | 10/13/2012 | @ PURDUE | 38-14 | W | -1.5 | W | 49.5 | O | 57-467 | 12-21-178 | 1 | 28-128 | 11-31-124 | 1 | 10/20/2012 | MINNESOTA | 38-13 | W | -17 | W | 46.5 | O | 54-337 | 7-15-106 | 0 | 30-96 | 13-24-149 | 2 | 10/27/2012 | MICHIGAN ST | 13-16 | L | -5.5 | L | 41 | U | 37-19 | 14-22-171 | 0 | 28-61 | 24-39-216 | 1 | 11/10/2012 | @ INDIANA | 62-14 | W | -7.5 | W | 55.5 | O | 64-564 | 4-7-41 | 0 | 23-61 | 25-47-233 | 3 | 11/17/2012 | OHIO ST | 14-21 | L | -1 | L | 51.5 | U | 56-206 | 14-27-154 | 1 | 41-139 | 10-18-97 | 0 | 11/24/2012 | @ PENN ST | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
9/29/2012 | @ ILLINOIS | 35-7 | W | 3 | W | 41.5 | O | 52-173 | 18-30-211 | 0 | 22-74 | 29-47-292 | 3 | 10/6/2012 | NORTHWESTERN | 39-28 | W | -3 | W | 49 | O | 48-161 | 35-51-282 | 1 | 25-112 | 21-36-135 | 1 | 10/20/2012 | @ IOWA | 38-14 | W | 1.5 | W | 42 | O | 52-215 | 26-38-289 | 2 | 23-20 | 17-36-189 | 3 | 10/27/2012 | OHIO ST | 23-35 | L | 1 | L | 51.5 | O | 28-32 | 27-46-327 | 1 | 53-234 | 7-19-143 | 1 | 11/3/2012 | @ PURDUE | 34-9 | W | -3.5 | W | 49.5 | U | 38-185 | 22-37-321 | 0 | 26-87 | 33-62-288 | 1 | 11/10/2012 | @ NEBRASKA | 23-32 | L | 9 | T | 51 | O | 34-151 | 18-37-240 | 3 | 57-267 | 12-20-171 | 2 | 11/17/2012 | INDIANA | 45-22 | W | -16.5 | W | 56 | O | 44-151 | 22-32-395 | 2 | 26-24 | 33-59-454 | 2 | 11/24/2012 | WISCONSIN | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
|
| WISCONSIN: It appears Wisconsin has no interest in grooming its own QBs, as two years in a row the Badgers have landed big-name transfers. Danny O'Brien isn't Russell Wilson, but he did throw for 2,438 yards, 22 TD and just 8 INT at Maryland in 2010 before a major coaching change stunted his development last year (7 TD, 10 INT). With Heisman Trophy candidate RB Montee Ball (1,923 rush yds, 33 TD; 6 rec TD) keeping defenses honest, O'Brien should have a relatively easy time throwing to Jared Abbrederis (933 rec yds, 8 TD), the team's leading receiver from a year ago. Defense could be an issue for a unit that lost five starters, but the Badgers do return Chris Borland, who was one of the better linebackers in the nation last season. Head coach Bret Bielema usually does a solid job putting a quality defense on the field, so despite losing some key upperclassmen, there's reason not to believe the Badgers defensive unit will again be a force. | | PENN ST: After a year of distractions and tragedy at Penn State, new head coach Bill O'Brien is looking forward to a year in which the focus in Happy Valley is back on football. Last season, the Nittany Lions went back and forth between QBs Rob Bolden and Matt McGloin, neither of whom was impressive. The offensive line is also an issue, as the team needs to replace four starters. On the defensive side, the linebackers should be solid, but they will need to find fill-ins for all four starters they lost in the secondary. It's going to take a surprise at nearly every position for this Penn State team to resemble any of the better teams of the Joe Paterno era. |
|
|
Game Notes: |
|
Last Updated: 3/28/2024 9:44:39 PM EST. |
|
|