|
|
ILLINOIS NORTHWESTERN |
|
| 50 | 14 Final 50 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| | |
155 | ILLINOIS | 50.5 | 50 | 156 | NORTHWESTERN | -18.5 | -19.5 |
|
|
| | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All Games | 2-9 | -7.5 | 3-8 | 5-5 | 16.9 | 8.5 | 301.6 | (4.4) | 2.4 | 30.5 | 14.1 | 381.9 | (5.8) | 1.5 | Road Games | 0-4 | -2 | 0-4 | 3-1 | 12.5 | 5.0 | 230.0 | (3.6) | 2.0 | 43.2 | 20.7 | 507.7 | (7.5) | 1.7 | Last 3 Games | 0-3 | -2 | 1-2 | 1-2 | 14.0 | 4.0 | 259.7 | (3.8) | 2.0 | 29.7 | 13.3 | 424.7 | (6.1) | 0.7 | Grass Games | 0-1 | -1 | 0-1 | 1-0 | 14.0 | 7.0 | 332.0 | (4.5) | 3.0 | 45.0 | 28.0 | 510.0 | (7.6) | 2.0 | Conference Games | 0-7 | -5.9 | 1-6 | 3-4 | 11.4 | 4.7 | 276.4 | (4.1) | 2.1 | 33.0 | 15.1 | 414.9 | (6.1) | 0.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
Offense (All Games) | 16.9 | 8.5 | 16.8 | 30:54 | 38-128 | (3.4) | 19-31 | 62.8% | 174 | (5.7) | 68-302 | (4.4) | (17.8) | Opponents Defensive Avg. | 27.1 | 13 | 19.9 | 30:17 | 38-155 | (4.1) | 20-34 | 59.9% | 233 | (6.9) | 71-388 | (5.5) | (14.3) | Offense Road Games | 12.5 | 5.0 | 14.0 | 30:20 | 38-129 | (3.4) | 14-26 | 55.8% | 101 | (3.9) | 64-230 | (3.6) | (18.4) | Defense (All Games) | 30.5 | 14.1 | 18.7 | 29:06 | 41-181 | (4.4) | 15-25 | 62.1% | 201 | (8.1) | 65-382 | (5.8) | (12.5) | Opponents Offensive Avg. | 29.5 | 15.5 | 20.9 | 30:49 | 40-175 | (4.4) | 19-32 | 59.3% | 223 | (7) | 71-399 | (5.6) | (13.5) | Defense Road Games | 43.2 | 20.7 | 24.2 | 29:40 | 45-262 | (5.9) | 15-23 | 67.0% | 246 | (10.8) | 67-508 | (7.5) | (11.7) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
All Games | 8-3 | +5.6 | 10-1 | 4-6 | 29.8 | 15.2 | 393.0 | (5.4) | 0.9 | 23.5 | 7.7 | 398.4 | (5.3) | 1.9 | Home Games | 5-1 | +3.4 | 6-0 | 1-4 | 30.5 | 15.2 | 455.0 | (5.8) | 1.2 | 18.0 | 5.5 | 363.0 | (5.2) | 1.3 | Last 3 Games | 2-1 | +2.2 | 3-0 | 1-2 | 27.3 | 11.3 | 389.0 | (5.6) | 1.0 | 25.0 | 7.3 | 391.3 | (5.2) | 2.0 | Grass Games | 6-2 | +4.6 | 7-1 | 2-5 | 29.2 | 13.9 | 410.0 | (5.4) | 1.0 | 20.9 | 6.0 | 380.0 | (5.1) | 1.6 | Conference Games | 4-3 | +2.2 | 6-1 | 3-4 | 29.0 | 14.7 | 384.9 | (5.5) | 1.0 | 26.4 | 7.4 | 416.0 | (5.3) | 2.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
Offense (All Games) | 29.8 | 15.2 | 21.9 | 29:18 | 44-221 | (5) | 18-29 | 62.8% | 172 | (6) | 73-393 | (5.4) | (13.2) | Opponents Defensive Avg. | 24.4 | 13.3 | 19.5 | 30:26 | 40-174 | (4.3) | 17-30 | 58.5% | 193 | (6.5) | 70-367 | (5.2) | (15) | Offense Home Games | 30.5 | 15.2 | 24.8 | 31:21 | 51-281 | (5.5) | 17-28 | 62.5% | 174 | (6.2) | 79-455 | (5.8) | (14.9) | Defense (All Games) | 23.5 | 7.7 | 22.3 | 30:42 | 35-124 | (3.6) | 24-41 | 58.8% | 275 | (6.7) | 75-398 | (5.3) | (16.9) | Opponents Offensive Avg. | 24.7 | 12.3 | 20 | 30:40 | 37-147 | (4) | 19-33 | 57.8% | 234 | (7.1) | 70-380 | (5.5) | (15.4) | Defense Home Games | 18.0 | 5.5 | 19.5 | 28:39 | 32-110 | (3.5) | 22-38 | 58.0% | 253 | (6.7) | 69-363 | (5.2) | (20.2) |
|
|
Average power rating of opponents played: ILLINOIS 36.1, NORTHWESTERN 35.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
9/29/2012 | PENN ST | 7-35 | L | -3 | L | 41.5 | O | 22-74 | 29-47-292 | 3 | 52-173 | 18-30-211 | 0 | 10/6/2012 | @ WISCONSIN | 14-31 | L | 14.5 | L | 44.5 | O | 34-106 | 18-30-178 | 2 | 33-173 | 16-25-254 | 2 | 10/13/2012 | @ MICHIGAN | 0-45 | L | 24 | L | 48 | U | 37-105 | 7-16-29 | 2 | 51-353 | 9-15-174 | 1 | 10/27/2012 | INDIANA | 17-31 | L | -2.5 | L | 58.5 | U | 55-196 | 17-27-176 | 2 | 42-121 | 14-22-171 | 1 | 11/3/2012 | @ OHIO ST | 22-52 | L | 24.5 | L | 50.5 | O | 32-74 | 19-34-96 | 1 | 57-330 | 13-22-237 | 2 | 11/10/2012 | MINNESOTA | 3-17 | L | 2.5 | L | 45.5 | U | 35-101 | 15-25-175 | 2 | 50-231 | 9-15-78 | 0 | 11/17/2012 | PURDUE | 17-20 | L | 6.5 | W | 49 | U | 39-173 | 22-38-160 | 3 | 37-207 | 19-28-191 | 0 | 11/24/2012 | @ NORTHWESTERN | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
9/29/2012 | INDIANA | 44-29 | W | -11.5 | W | 60.5 | O | 58-394 | 23-35-310 | 3 | 28-159 | 22-39-266 | 1 | 10/6/2012 | @ PENN ST | 28-39 | L | 3 | L | 49 | O | 25-112 | 21-36-135 | 1 | 48-161 | 35-51-282 | 1 | 10/13/2012 | @ MINNESOTA | 21-13 | W | -3 | W | 54 | U | 34-208 | 11-17-67 | 0 | 42-158 | 16-30-169 | 3 | 10/20/2012 | NEBRASKA | 28-29 | L | 7 | W | 62.5 | U | 38-180 | 16-37-121 | 0 | 44-201 | 27-39-342 | 3 | 10/27/2012 | IOWA | 28-17 | W | -4 | W | 47 | U | 49-349 | 7-10-84 | 2 | 40-122 | 24-38-214 | 0 | 11/10/2012 | @ MICHIGAN | 31-38 | L | 8.5 | W | 51 | O | 58-248 | 14-21-183 | 1 | 32-133 | 16-30-286 | 2 | 11/17/2012 | @ MICHIGAN ST | 23-20 | W | 7 | W | 47 | U | 27-57 | 26-43-246 | 0 | 39-122 | 22-47-297 | 4 | 11/24/2012 | ILLINOIS | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
|
| ILLINOIS: The Illini offense started off hot last season before struggling down the stretch with six straight losses to close out its Big Ten slate. Tim Beckman replaced Ron Zook as head coach to make sure that wouldn't happen again. Illinois returns playmaking quarterback Nathan Scheelhaase (13 pass TD, 6 rush TD) while the running game should improve upon last season's pedestrian 172 rushing yards per game. The Illini will need a wide receiver to make up for the loss of first-round pick A.J. Jenkins, and that could be sophomore Spencer Harris, who provides a big target at 6-foot-3 and 195 pounds. Tim Banks, the new defensive coordinator, isn't likely to stir things up, as the Illini were sixth in the nation in sacks (3.15 per game), fourth in Tackles For Loss (7.9 per game) and third in pass defense (162 YPG). | | NORTHWESTERN: The Wildcats were second in the Big Ten last year with 470 total YPG, and they should be near the front of the pack again this year. QB Kain Colter was decent in his time starting last year (6 pass TD, 1 INT; 654 rush yds, 9 TD): he's another dual threat QB and whose running skills will team with sophomore RB Treyvon Green's (362 yds, 4 TD) to will tire out opposing defensive lines. Northwestern also should have solid play from its wide receivers this year. Defensively, the team is stacked with talent at linebacker, but has little depth at the other positions. It was a long 2011 season on the defensive side of the ball last year (408 YPG allowed), and if nobody is able to provide stability on the defensive line or in the secondary, it could be more of the same in 2012. |
|
|
Game Notes: |
|
Last Updated: 3/28/2024 6:18:15 AM EST. |
|
|