| | | |
SYRACUSE MISSOURI |
|
| 55 | 31 Final 27 |
|
|
| | |
|
| | | |
389 | SYRACUSE | 56 | 53.5 | 390 | MISSOURI | -5.5 | -5.5 |
|
|
| | |
|
| | | |
|
|
All Games | 5-5 | -0.5 | 4-6 | 6-3 | 28.3 | 12.5 | 469.8 | (6) | 1.7 | 26.1 | 13.6 | 379.7 | (5.6) | 1.3 | Road Games | 1-4 | -2.2 | 2-3 | 3-2 | 23.0 | 6.6 | 444.4 | (5.6) | 2.4 | 30.6 | 13.0 | 408.2 | (5.9) | 1.0 | Last 3 Games | 2-1 | +1.4 | 2-1 | 3-0 | 35.3 | 17.0 | 507.7 | (6.1) | 0.7 | 32.3 | 16.7 | 498.0 | (6.7) | 2.0 | Turf Games | 0-4 | -3.6 | 1-3 | 2-2 | 19.5 | 7.5 | 425.5 | (5.4) | 3.0 | 29.2 | 10.5 | 372.2 | (5.5) | 1.0 |
|
| |
|
|
Offense (All Games) | 28.3 | 12.5 | 25.1 | 29:22 | 41-169 | (4.2) | 24-38 | 63.2% | 301 | (7.9) | 79-470 | (6) | (16.6) | Opponents Defensive Avg. | 20.8 | 9.5 | 20 | 29:26 | 37-150 | (4) | 19-32 | 58.6% | 216 | (6.8) | 69-366 | (5.3) | (17.6) | Offense Road Games | 23.0 | 6.6 | 25.6 | 27:38 | 39-140 | (3.6) | 25-41 | 61.2% | 304 | (7.4) | 80-444 | (5.6) | (19.3) | Defense (All Games) | 26.1 | 13.6 | 19.4 | 30:37 | 36-149 | (4.2) | 20-31 | 62.2% | 231 | (7.3) | 67-380 | (5.6) | (14.5) | Opponents Offensive Avg. | 27.4 | 14.5 | 20.4 | 31:41 | 39-171 | (4.4) | 18-29 | 60.7% | 226 | (7.8) | 68-396 | (5.9) | (14.5) | Defense Road Games | 30.6 | 13.0 | 19.8 | 32:22 | 42-216 | (5.2) | 17-28 | 61.4% | 192 | (6.9) | 70-408 | (5.9) | (13.3) |
|
|
| |
|
|
All Games | 5-5 | -1.4 | 5-4 | 3-6 | 25.3 | 10.9 | 332.8 | (4.6) | 1.9 | 25.1 | 11.8 | 353.3 | (5.2) | 2.1 | Home Games | 3-3 | -2 | 2-3 | 2-3 | 27.3 | 14.2 | 323.0 | (4.4) | 1.8 | 23.7 | 11.0 | 313.5 | (4.8) | 2.7 | Last 3 Games | 2-1 | +1.6 | 3-0 | 1-2 | 30.3 | 10.3 | 354.0 | (4.4) | 3.0 | 24.0 | 10.3 | 346.7 | (5.1) | 1.7 | Turf Games | 3-3 | -2 | 2-3 | 2-3 | 27.3 | 14.2 | 323.0 | (4.4) | 1.8 | 23.7 | 11.0 | 313.5 | (4.8) | 2.7 |
|
| |
|
|
Offense (All Games) | 25.3 | 10.9 | 17.1 | 29:25 | 38-135 | (3.6) | 19-34 | 54.2% | 197 | (5.7) | 72-333 | (4.6) | (13.2) | Opponents Defensive Avg. | 25.2 | 13.5 | 18.9 | 30:18 | 38-147 | (3.9) | 18-31 | 58.7% | 209 | (6.7) | 69-357 | (5.2) | (14.1) | Offense Home Games | 27.3 | 14.2 | 16.7 | 29:18 | 38-138 | (3.6) | 18-34 | 52.2% | 185 | (5.4) | 73-323 | (4.4) | (11.8) | Defense (All Games) | 25.1 | 11.8 | 18.7 | 30:35 | 37-143 | (3.8) | 20-31 | 64.3% | 210 | (6.8) | 68-353 | (5.2) | (14.1) | Opponents Offensive Avg. | 29 | 15.3 | 19.7 | 29:28 | 38-159 | (4.2) | 18-29 | 61.2% | 221 | (7.6) | 67-380 | (5.7) | (13.1) | Defense Home Games | 23.7 | 11.0 | 16.3 | 30:42 | 38-139 | (3.6) | 17-27 | 60.6% | 174 | (6.3) | 66-313 | (4.8) | (13.2) |
|
| Average power rating of opponents played: SYRACUSE 35.8, MISSOURI 41.4 |
| | |
|
|
9/22/2012 | @ MINNESOTA | 10-17 | L | -3 | L | 54 | U | 33-122 | 21-31-228 | 4 | 41-106 | 16-30-231 | 0 | 10/5/2012 | PITTSBURGH | 14-13 | W | -2 | L | 59 | U | 33-120 | 19-31-185 | 1 | 37-27 | 25-33-319 | 1 | 10/13/2012 | @ RUTGERS | 15-23 | L | 6.5 | L | 50.5 | U | 32-62 | 25-42-356 | 4 | 36-85 | 14-23-152 | 0 | 10/19/2012 | CONNECTICUT | 40-10 | W | -5 | W | 43.5 | O | 53-251 | 14-20-251 | 0 | 18--6 | 23-41-296 | 2 | 10/27/2012 | @ S FLORIDA | 37-36 | W | 3 | W | 53.5 | O | 46-192 | 27-40-328 | 0 | 45-369 | 17-30-183 | 1 | 11/3/2012 | @ CINCINNATI | 24-35 | L | 4.5 | L | 56 | O | 41-193 | 23-47-286 | 2 | 53-263 | 16-27-207 | 3 | 11/10/2012 | LOUISVILLE | 45-26 | W | 0 | W | 59 | O | 52-278 | 15-23-246 | 0 | 17-48 | 36-50-424 | 2 | 11/17/2012 | @ MISSOURI | | | | | | | | | | | | | 11/23/2012 | @ TEMPLE | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
| |
|
|
9/22/2012 | @ S CAROLINA | 10-31 | L | 10 | L | 47.5 | U | 32-109 | 18-26-146 | 1 | 39-144 | 21-23-252 | 2 | 9/29/2012 | @ UCF | 21-16 | W | 2 | W | 48.5 | U | 29-89 | 19-30-257 | 1 | 35-128 | 29-45-267 | 1 | 10/6/2012 | VANDERBILT | 15-19 | L | -7 | L | 45 | U | 35-150 | 14-40-245 | 1 | 43-89 | 15-26-206 | 1 | 10/13/2012 | ALABAMA | 10-42 | L | 21 | L | 41 | O | 28-3 | 12-29-126 | 3 | 47-362 | 16-21-171 | 2 | 10/27/2012 | KENTUCKY | 33-10 | W | -14 | W | 48.5 | U | 47-186 | 16-27-87 | 3 | 34-101 | 10-22-78 | 3 | 11/3/2012 | @ FLORIDA | 7-14 | L | 17.5 | W | 41 | U | 35-99 | 24-51-236 | 4 | 33-170 | 12-23-106 | 1 | 11/10/2012 | @ TENNESSEE | 51-48 | W | 3.5 | W | 60.5 | O | 49-228 | 19-33-226 | 2 | 36-153 | 38-55-432 | 1 | 11/17/2012 | SYRACUSE | | | | | | | | | | | | | 11/24/2012 | @ TEXAS A&M | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
| | | SYRACUSE: Syracuse should be a good passing team in 2012 with Ryan Nassib (2,685 pass yds, 22 TD, 9 INT) returning under center. He'll get back his two best targets in leading receiver Alec Lemon (834 rec yds, 6 TD) and WR Marcus Sales, who missed all of 2011 after being arrested on drug-related charges, which have since been dropped. The rushing attack is an issue as there isn't a clear-cut No. 1 back between Jerome Smith, Prince-Tyson Gulley and Ashton Broyld. The offensive line is also suspect (90th in FBS in sacks allowed). On the defensive side, there is skepticism about the Orange's front four after losing their top pass rusher, Chandler Jones to the NFL. The secondary could also be an issue again (258 pass YPG allowed, 98th in nation), as Syracuse lacks talent at the defensive back positions.
| | MISSOURI: The Tigers are lucky to have most of their starters back at skill positions. Dual threat QB James Franklin (2,865 pass yds, 21 TD; 981 rush yds, 15 TD) gets back outstanding targets in WRs T.J Moe (649 rec yds, 4 TD) and Marcus Lucas (414 rec yds, 5 TD). RB Henry Josey (1,168 rush yds, 9 TD) is likely out for the year with a knee injury, but Kendial Lawrence (566 rush yds, 5 TD) is a capable replacement. This offense will be able to put up points in a hurry if the offensive line holds up. On the defensive side, the Tigers bring back an experienced secondary, but their top linemen, DE Brad Madison and DT Sheldon Richardson, both missed the spring with shoulder injuries. They'll need to get healthy and have big years for Missouri to be competitive in the SEC. |
| | Game Notes: |
| Last Updated: 3/28/2024 9:16:14 AM EST. |
|
|
| |
|