|
|
NORTHWESTERN MINNESOTA |
|
| 54 | 21 Final 13 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| | |
131 | NORTHWESTERN | -3.5 | -3.5 | 132 | MINNESOTA | 51 | 51 |
|
|
| | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All Games | 5-1 | +3.4 | 5-1 | 3-2 | 32.8 | 16.3 | 430.0 | (5.5) | 1.2 | 23.7 | 7.2 | 389.7 | (5.2) | 1.5 | Road Games | 1-1 | +0.1 | 1-1 | 2-0 | 35.0 | 17.5 | 292.0 | (4.4) | 1.0 | 40.0 | 11.5 | 519.5 | (5.4) | 2.0 | Last 3 Games | 2-1 | 0 | 2-1 | 2-0 | 36.7 | 20.7 | 453.0 | (6.1) | 1.3 | 25.0 | 3.3 | 369.3 | (5) | 1.0 | Conference Games | 1-1 | 0 | 1-1 | 2-0 | 36.0 | 17.0 | 475.5 | (6.2) | 2.0 | 34.0 | 5.0 | 434.0 | (5.2) | 1.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
Offense (All Games) | 32.8 | 16.3 | 25.0 | 30:30 | 47-232 | (4.9) | 21-31 | 66.1% | 198 | (6.3) | 78-430 | (5.5) | (13.1) | Opponents Defensive Avg. | 26.3 | 14.2 | 21 | 31:01 | 43-197 | (4.6) | 18-30 | 61.9% | 195 | (6.6) | 73-392 | (5.4) | (14.9) | Offense Road Games | 35.0 | 17.5 | 17.5 | 24:01 | 32-118 | (3.6) | 21-34 | 63.2% | 174 | (5.1) | 66-292 | (4.4) | (8.3) | Defense (All Games) | 23.7 | 7.2 | 21.8 | 29:30 | 31-104 | (3.4) | 26-44 | 60.0% | 286 | (6.5) | 75-390 | (5.2) | (16.5) | Opponents Offensive Avg. | 23.4 | 12.6 | 20.6 | 29:56 | 34-126 | (3.7) | 22-37 | 60.1% | 263 | (7.1) | 71-389 | (5.5) | (16.6) | Defense Road Games | 40.0 | 11.5 | 31.5 | 35:58 | 39-143 | (3.7) | 39-58 | 68.1% | 376 | (6.5) | 97-519 | (5.4) | (13) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
All Games | 4-1 | +3.4 | 3-2 | 1-3 | 26.4 | 13.0 | 384.6 | (5.6) | 1.8 | 19.6 | 9.4 | 320.8 | (4.7) | 2.0 | Home Games | 3-0 | +3.4 | 3-0 | 0-2 | 29.7 | 19.3 | 382.0 | (5.6) | 1.0 | 13.3 | 6.7 | 318.3 | (4.5) | 2.3 | Last 3 Games | 2-1 | +1.4 | 2-1 | 0-3 | 19.3 | 9.3 | 344.3 | (5.1) | 2.0 | 21.3 | 12.3 | 366.0 | (5.4) | 1.7 | Turf Games | 4-1 | +3.4 | 3-2 | 1-3 | 26.4 | 13.0 | 384.6 | (5.6) | 1.8 | 19.6 | 9.4 | 320.8 | (4.7) | 2.0 | Conference Games | 0-1 | -1 | 0-1 | 0-1 | 13.0 | 0.0 | 299.0 | (4.6) | 4.0 | 31.0 | 24.0 | 374.0 | (6.7) | 0.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
Offense (All Games) | 26.4 | 13.0 | 19.0 | 33:09 | 43-167 | (3.9) | 15-26 | 58.8% | 217 | (8.3) | 69-385 | (5.6) | (14.6) | Opponents Defensive Avg. | 29.5 | 17.5 | 19.3 | 31:45 | 40-167 | (4.2) | 17-28 | 61.8% | 216 | (7.8) | 68-383 | (5.6) | (13) | Offense Home Games | 29.7 | 19.3 | 19.3 | 33:33 | 45-175 | (3.9) | 13-23 | 58.8% | 207 | (9.1) | 68-382 | (5.6) | (12.9) | Defense (All Games) | 19.6 | 9.4 | 17.8 | 29:51 | 33-139 | (4.2) | 20-35 | 55.4% | 182 | (5.1) | 68-321 | (4.7) | (16.4) | Opponents Offensive Avg. | 21.8 | 11.9 | 20.6 | 30:44 | 35-136 | (3.8) | 22-38 | 59.0% | 240 | (6.3) | 73-375 | (5.1) | (17.2) | Defense Home Games | 13.3 | 6.7 | 18.7 | 26:27 | 34-118 | (3.4) | 21-37 | 57.7% | 200 | (5.4) | 71-318 | (4.5) | (23.9) |
|
|
Average power rating of opponents played: NORTHWESTERN 28.7, MINNESOTA 22.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
9/1/2012 | @ SYRACUSE | 42-41 | W | 2 | W | 53.5 | O | 40-124 | 22-32-213 | 1 | 30-126 | 44-65-470 | 3 | 9/8/2012 | VANDERBILT | 23-13 | W | 3 | W | 54.5 | U | 46-191 | 17-31-133 | 0 | 34-101 | 17-33-217 | 2 | 9/15/2012 | BOSTON COLLEGE | 22-13 | W | -4 | W | 55 | U | 60-293 | 30-40-267 | 2 | 21-25 | 24-44-291 | 1 | 9/22/2012 | S DAKOTA | 38-7 | W | -28.5 | W | | - | 53-277 | 12-15-131 | 0 | 23-51 | 17-33-189 | 1 | 9/29/2012 | INDIANA | 44-29 | W | -11.5 | W | 60.5 | O | 58-394 | 23-35-310 | 3 | 28-159 | 22-39-266 | 1 | 10/6/2012 | @ PENN ST | 28-39 | L | 3 | L | 49 | O | 25-112 | 21-36-135 | 1 | 48-161 | 35-51-282 | 1 | 10/13/2012 | @ MINNESOTA | | | | | | | | | | | | | 10/20/2012 | NEBRASKA | | | | | | | | | | | | | 10/27/2012 | IOWA | | | | | | | | | | | | | 11/10/2012 | @ MICHIGAN | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
8/30/2012 | @ UNLV | 30-27 | W | -9.5 | L | 52.5 | O | 46-209 | 17-30-269 | 2 | 37-159 | 16-35-116 | 3 | 9/8/2012 | NEW HAMPSHIRE | 44-7 | W | -12 | W | | - | 52-240 | 11-14-172 | 1 | 32-68 | 19-36-163 | 2 | 9/15/2012 | W MICHIGAN | 28-23 | W | -3 | W | 55.5 | U | 43-180 | 13-24-217 | 2 | 38-165 | 24-44-209 | 1 | 9/22/2012 | SYRACUSE | 17-10 | W | 3 | W | 54 | U | 41-106 | 16-30-231 | 0 | 33-122 | 21-31-228 | 4 | 9/29/2012 | @ IOWA | 13-31 | L | 6 | L | 46 | U | 32-102 | 20-33-197 | 4 | 25-182 | 18-31-192 | 0 | 10/13/2012 | NORTHWESTERN | | | | | | | | | | | | | 10/20/2012 | @ WISCONSIN | | | | | | | | | | | | | 10/27/2012 | PURDUE | | | | | | | | | | | | | 11/3/2012 | MICHIGAN | | | | | | | | | | | | | 11/10/2012 | @ ILLINOIS | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
|
| NORTHWESTERN: The Wildcats were second in the Big Ten last year with 470 total YPG, and they should be near the front of the pack again this year. QB Kain Colter was decent in his time starting last year (6 pass TD, 1 INT; 654 rush yds, 9 TD): he's another dual threat QB and whose running skills will team with sophomore RB Treyvon Green's (362 yds, 4 TD) to will tire out opposing defensive lines. Northwestern also should have solid play from its wide receivers this year. Defensively, the team is stacked with talent at linebacker, but has little depth at the other positions. It was a long 2011 season on the defensive side of the ball last year (408 YPG allowed), and if nobody is able to provide stability on the defensive line or in the secondary, it could be more of the same in 2012. | | MINNESOTA: The Golden Gophers had a difficult first year under head coach Jerry Kill, but things should go a lot smoother this time around. QB MarQueis Gray has all the tools to be an effective player in an offense that desperately needs him. Gray is a dual threat who will likely lead Minnesota in both passing and rushing in this coming season. The team lacks talent at both the RB and WR positions. Defensively, leading tackler Mike Rallis (83 tackles) returns, but outside of him, there isn't much to get excited about. This team had a lot of trouble stopping opponents last year (31.7 PPG allowed), so it's hard to be optimistic about the fact that they return six defensive starters. |
|
|
Game Notes: |
|
Last Updated: 4/23/2024 8:17:09 PM EST. |
|
|