| | | |
MICHIGAN PURDUE |
|
| 55 | 44 Final 13 |
|
|
| | |
|
| | | |
363 | MICHIGAN | -3.5 | -3 | 364 | PURDUE | 56 | 58 |
|
|
| | |
|
| | | |
|
|
All Games | 2-2 | -2 | 1-3 | 2-2 | 28.5 | 15.7 | 393.7 | (6.4) | 2.7 | 23.0 | 16.0 | 336.5 | (5) | 1.0 | Road Games | 0-2 | -2 | 0-2 | 1-1 | 10.0 | 3.5 | 284.0 | (4.7) | 4.5 | 27.0 | 20.5 | 335.0 | (5.9) | 1.5 | Last 3 Games | 2-1 | -1 | 1-2 | 1-2 | 33.3 | 18.7 | 435.3 | (6.9) | 2.7 | 17.0 | 11.0 | 305.0 | (4.4) | 1.0 | Grass Games | 0-1 | -1 | 0-1 | 0-1 | 6.0 | 0.0 | 299.0 | (4.5) | 6.0 | 13.0 | 10.0 | 239.0 | (4.8) | 2.0 |
|
| |
|
|
Offense (All Games) | 28.5 | 15.7 | 19.0 | 29:22 | 36-184 | (5.1) | 13-25 | 52.9% | 209 | (8.2) | 61-394 | (6.4) | (13.8) | Opponents Defensive Avg. | 21.4 | 11 | 18.8 | 30:03 | 36-145 | (4) | 18-30 | 60.3% | 208 | (6.8) | 67-353 | (5.3) | (16.5) | Offense Road Games | 10.0 | 3.5 | 15.0 | 30:56 | 35-115 | (3.3) | 12-26 | 46.2% | 169 | (6.5) | 61-284 | (4.7) | (28.4) | Defense (All Games) | 23.0 | 16.0 | 18.7 | 30:38 | 45-182 | (4) | 12-22 | 52.8% | 154 | (6.9) | 67-336 | (5) | (14.6) | Opponents Offensive Avg. | 29.4 | 18.5 | 20.4 | 30:57 | 44-211 | (4.7) | 14-25 | 56.8% | 181 | (7.4) | 69-391 | (5.7) | (13.3) | Defense Road Games | 27.0 | 20.5 | 17.0 | 29:03 | 36-163 | (4.5) | 11-20 | 55.0% | 172 | (8.6) | 56-335 | (5.9) | (12.4) |
|
|
| |
|
|
All Games | 3-1 | +1 | 3-1 | 2-1 | 42.5 | 29.0 | 463.5 | (5.8) | 2.5 | 20.7 | 9.0 | 353.2 | (4.9) | 3.0 | Home Games | 3-0 | +2 | 2-1 | 2-0 | 51.0 | 36.3 | 522.0 | (6.3) | 2.7 | 21.0 | 9.7 | 345.7 | (4.9) | 3.7 | Last 3 Games | 2-1 | 0 | 2-1 | 2-1 | 40.7 | 27.3 | 435.7 | (5.7) | 1.7 | 25.7 | 10.0 | 407.7 | (5.2) | 2.7 | Grass Games | 3-1 | +1 | 3-1 | 2-1 | 42.5 | 29.0 | 463.5 | (5.8) | 2.5 | 20.7 | 9.0 | 353.2 | (4.9) | 3.0 |
|
| |
|
|
Offense (All Games) | 42.5 | 29.0 | 23.7 | 31:34 | 41-201 | (4.9) | 25-38 | 67.1% | 262 | (6.9) | 79-463 | (5.8) | (10.9) | Opponents Defensive Avg. | 34.4 | 18.5 | 25.6 | 33:37 | 42-203 | (4.9) | 24-37 | 65.8% | 253 | (6.8) | 79-457 | (5.8) | (13.3) | Offense Home Games | 51.0 | 36.3 | 27.0 | 33:30 | 45-239 | (5.3) | 28-38 | 72.2% | 283 | (7.4) | 83-522 | (6.3) | (10.2) | Defense (All Games) | 20.7 | 9.0 | 18.7 | 28:26 | 32-105 | (3.3) | 23-39 | 57.6% | 248 | (6.3) | 71-353 | (4.9) | (17) | Opponents Offensive Avg. | 22.1 | 12 | 18.3 | 27:17 | 35-133 | (3.8) | 19-33 | 56.7% | 211 | (6.3) | 68-344 | (5.1) | (15.5) | Defense Home Games | 21.0 | 9.7 | 18.7 | 26:30 | 31-123 | (4) | 22-40 | 56.3% | 223 | (5.6) | 70-346 | (4.9) | (16.5) |
|
| Average power rating of opponents played: MICHIGAN 40.8, PURDUE 23.5 |
| | |
|
|
9/1/2012 | *ALABAMA | 14-41 | L | 13 | L | 48.5 | O | 29-69 | 11-27-200 | 3 | 42-232 | 11-21-199 | 1 | 9/8/2012 | AIR FORCE | 31-25 | W | -21.5 | L | 58.5 | U | 31-214 | 14-25-208 | 1 | 71-290 | 10-19-127 | 0 | 9/15/2012 | MASSACHUSETTS | 63-13 | W | -44.5 | W | 53.5 | O | 43-294 | 16-25-291 | 1 | 36-112 | 15-30-147 | 1 | 9/22/2012 | @ NOTRE DAME | 6-13 | L | 6 | L | 49 | U | 41-161 | 13-25-138 | 6 | 31-94 | 11-19-145 | 2 | 10/6/2012 | @ PURDUE | | | | | | | | | | | | | 10/13/2012 | ILLINOIS | | | | | | | | | | | | | 10/20/2012 | MICHIGAN ST | | | | | | | | | | | | | 10/27/2012 | @ NEBRASKA | | | | | | | | | | | | | 11/3/2012 | @ MINNESOTA | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
| |
|
|
9/1/2012 | E KENTUCKY | 48-6 | W | -19.5 | W | | - | 40-175 | 37-47-372 | 5 | 31-105 | 8-22-85 | 4 | 9/8/2012 | @ NOTRE DAME | 17-20 | L | 14 | W | 53.5 | U | 30-90 | 19-37-198 | 2 | 36-52 | 24-39-324 | 1 | 9/15/2012 | E MICHIGAN | 54-16 | W | -23.5 | W | 49.5 | O | 42-392 | 19-31-184 | 2 | 38-169 | 14-29-144 | 3 | 9/29/2012 | MARSHALL | 51-41 | W | -17 | L | 61.5 | O | 53-149 | 27-37-294 | 1 | 23-95 | 45-68-439 | 4 | 10/6/2012 | MICHIGAN | | | | | | | | | | | | | 10/13/2012 | WISCONSIN | | | | | | | | | | | | | 10/20/2012 | @ OHIO ST | | | | | | | | | | | | | 10/27/2012 | @ MINNESOTA | | | | | | | | | | | | | 11/3/2012 | PENN ST | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
| | | MICHIGAN: This could be the season for the Wolverines to return to the Rose Bowl. The offensive line is losing two starters, but luckily Michigan will not have to replace the untied shoes of senior QB Denard Robinson (2,173 pass yds, 20 TD; 1,176 rush yds, 16 TD). Not only is the Heisman Trophy candidate back, but so is his top running back, senior Fitzgerald Toussaint (1,041 rush yds, 9 TD). If a wide receiver can emerge and be at least almost as productive as Junior Hemingway was last year, the Wolverines offense could be one of the most explosive in the country. Defensively, three starters in the secondary return along with what should be one of the best defensive lines in the Big Ten. | | PURDUE: Purdue is yet another Big Ten team with a quarterback controversy. QB Robert Marve (633 pass yds, 4 TD, 5 INT) will return to take snaps away from another talented QB in Caleb TerBush (1,905 pass yds, 13 TD, 6 INT). Fortunately for Purdue, both of these quarterbacks are very capable. If they can sure up an iffy offensive line, their solid corps of running backs and receivers could make the Boilermakers one of the tougher offenses to stop. On the other side of the ball, Kawann Short (6.5 sacks, 54 tackles, 17 TFL) is trying to solidify himself as the best defensive end in college football. In the secondary, the team is losing some players, but also returns some nice talent at cornerback. |
| | Game Notes: |
| Last Updated: 4/26/2024 10:52:02 AM EST. |
|
|
| |
|