| | | |
COLORADO WASHINGTON |
|
| 140.5 | 64 Final 47 |
|
|
| | |
|
| | | |
541 | COLORADO | Pick | -1.5 | 542 | WASHINGTON | 136.5 | 136.5 |
|
|
| | |
|
| | | |
|
|
All Games | 13-15 | -8.6 | 12-14 | 11-14 | 67.0 | 30.7 | 42.8% | 36.6 | 66.4 | 31.1 | 41.6% | 33.1 | Road Games | 2-10 | -8.3 | 3-8 | 4-6 | 61.5 | 25.7 | 39.2% | 35.2 | 70.1 | 32.3 | 44.3% | 34.0 | Last 5 Games | 2-3 | -1 | 2-3 | 3-2 | 64.6 | 25.6 | 39.4% | 37.4 | 73.2 | 34.2 | 44.5% | 34.2 | Conference Games | 6-10 | -5.2 | 7-8 | 8-8 | 65.9 | 28.4 | 41.2% | 36.3 | 70.6 | 31.1 | 43.4% | 35.2 |
|
| |
|
|
Team Stats (All Games) | 67.0 | 30.7 | 23-53 | 42.8% | 5-15 | 35.2% | 16-23 | 70.7% | 37 | 10 | 11 | 18 | 5 | 13 | 4 | vs opponents surrendering | 66 | 30.6 | 23-55 | 42.3% | 6-18 | 34.1% | 14-20 | 69.3% | 33 | 9 | 12 | 19 | 6 | 13 | 3 | Team Stats (Road Games) | 61.5 | 25.7 | 21-53 | 39.2% | 5-17 | 29.1% | 15-22 | 68.3% | 35 | 10 | 9 | 19 | 5 | 15 | 3 | Stats Against (All Games) | 66.4 | 31.1 | 23-55 | 41.6% | 7-20 | 34.6% | 13-19 | 69.7% | 33 | 9 | 12 | 20 | 7 | 12 | 4 | vs opponents averaging | 69.7 | 32.4 | 24-55 | 44.5% | 6-18 | 35.0% | 15-21 | 68.6% | 35 | 9 | 13 | 18 | 6 | 12 | 4 | Stats Against (Road Games) | 70.1 | 32.3 | 24-54 | 44.3% | 7-19 | 37.5% | 15-22 | 71.4% | 34 | 9 | 14 | 19 | 7 | 12 | 4 |
|
|
| |
|
|
All Games | 15-13 | -7.6 | 11-16 | 15-12 | 69.1 | 30.7 | 43.8% | 35.5 | 67.9 | 30.3 | 41.6% | 35.8 | Home Games | 7-6 | -9.2 | 4-9 | 7-6 | 71.2 | 31.2 | 45.1% | 36.4 | 66.7 | 30.1 | 39.7% | 36.3 | Last 5 Games | 1-4 | -2.8 | 1-4 | 4-1 | 67.6 | 27.4 | 38.0% | 29.2 | 81.2 | 37.4 | 52.4% | 40.0 | Conference Games | 4-12 | -16.2 | 5-11 | 11-5 | 67.8 | 28.4 | 43.2% | 31.3 | 74.9 | 33.7 | 47.8% | 34.9 |
|
| |
|
|
Team Stats (All Games) | 69.1 | 30.7 | 25-57 | 43.8% | 6-19 | 31.7% | 14-20 | 68.5% | 35 | 9 | 13 | 17 | 5 | 12 | 5 | vs opponents surrendering | 65.8 | 30.5 | 23-55 | 42.0% | 6-18 | 33.7% | 13-19 | 68.9% | 34 | 9 | 12 | 18 | 6 | 12 | 3 | Team Stats (Home Games) | 71.2 | 31.2 | 26-57 | 45.1% | 5-18 | 29.6% | 14-21 | 66.9% | 36 | 9 | 14 | 17 | 5 | 11 | 6 | Stats Against (All Games) | 67.9 | 30.3 | 25-59 | 41.6% | 6-17 | 33.9% | 13-19 | 68.9% | 36 | 10 | 12 | 18 | 6 | 11 | 3 | vs opponents averaging | 67.4 | 31.6 | 24-55 | 43.2% | 6-18 | 34.8% | 14-20 | 68.1% | 35 | 9 | 13 | 18 | 6 | 12 | 4 | Stats Against (Home Games) | 66.7 | 30.1 | 24-60 | 39.7% | 6-18 | 35.4% | 12-18 | 68.2% | 36 | 10 | 11 | 19 | 6 | 11 | 3 |
|
| Average power rating of opponents played: COLORADO 77.5, WASHINGTON 75.1 |
| | |
|
|
1/15/2015 | @ ARIZONA | 54-68 | L | 16.5 | W | 125 | U | 21-49 | 42.9% | 26 | 10 | 23-55 | 41.8% | 41 | 8 | 1/17/2015 | @ ARIZONA ST | 72-78 | L | 6 | T | 124.5 | O | 26-56 | 46.4% | 33 | 13 | 26-47 | 55.3% | 28 | 14 | 1/22/2015 | WASHINGTON | 50-52 | L | -1 | L | 129 | U | 19-60 | 31.7% | 40 | 12 | 18-50 | 36.0% | 35 | 13 | 1/24/2015 | WASHINGTON ST | 90-58 | W | -8.5 | W | 134.5 | O | 34-62 | 54.8% | 44 | 11 | 24-62 | 38.7% | 28 | 12 | 1/29/2015 | @ USC | 98-94 | W | -3 | W | 133 | O | 30-65 | 46.2% | 43 | 20 | 31-73 | 42.5% | 41 | 17 | 1/31/2015 | @ UCLA | 59-72 | L | 6.5 | L | 133.5 | U | 20-55 | 36.4% | 33 | 15 | 25-52 | 48.1% | 36 | 11 | 2/7/2015 | UTAH | 51-79 | L | 6 | L | 123.5 | O | 14-47 | 29.8% | 28 | 9 | 26-45 | 57.8% | 36 | 10 | 2/12/2015 | CALIFORNIA | 61-68 | L | -7 | L | 130.5 | U | 22-60 | 36.7% | 43 | 12 | 23-55 | 41.8% | 34 | 10 | 2/15/2015 | STANFORD | 64-58 | W | 1.5 | W | 136.5 | U | 21-64 | 32.8% | 48 | 8 | 19-57 | 33.3% | 39 | 11 | 2/18/2015 | @ OREGON | 60-73 | L | 4.5 | L | 137.5 | U | 22-62 | 35.5% | 45 | 16 | 24-58 | 41.4% | 37 | 9 | 2/21/2015 | @ OREGON ST | 58-72 | L | 2.5 | L | 112 | O | 18-52 | 34.6% | 38 | 22 | 23-47 | 48.9% | 27 | 16 | 2/26/2015 | ARIZONA | 54-82 | L | 9.5 | L | 131.5 | O | 20-52 | 38.5% | 25 | 12 | 27-51 | 52.9% | 38 | 11 | 3/1/2015 | ARIZONA ST | 87-81 | W | -4 | W | 130 | O | 29-49 | 59.2% | 31 | 11 | 24-50 | 48.0% | 30 | 12 | 3/5/2015 | @ WASHINGTON | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 3/7/2015 | @ WASHINGTON ST | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
| |
|
|
1/15/2015 | OREGON ST | 56-43 | W | -7 | W | 123.5 | U | 18-43 | 41.9% | 31 | 13 | 15-47 | 31.9% | 30 | 15 | 1/18/2015 | OREGON | 85-77 | W | -5.5 | W | 142.5 | O | 30-59 | 50.8% | 43 | 11 | 30-72 | 41.7% | 34 | 6 | 1/22/2015 | @ COLORADO | 52-50 | W | 1 | W | 129 | U | 18-50 | 36.0% | 35 | 13 | 19-60 | 31.7% | 40 | 12 | 1/25/2015 | @ UTAH | 56-77 | L | 13 | L | 127.5 | O | 22-52 | 42.3% | 28 | 12 | 28-52 | 53.8% | 30 | 9 | 1/28/2015 | STANFORD | 74-84 | L | 2 | L | 140.5 | O | 27-56 | 48.2% | 30 | 13 | 28-53 | 52.8% | 31 | 9 | 2/1/2015 | CALIFORNIA | 88-90 | L | -6.5 | L | 133 | O | 33-62 | 53.2% | 22 | 7 | 36-60 | 60.0% | 38 | 14 | 2/4/2015 | @ OREGON | 74-78 | L | 6 | W | 150.5 | O | 30-53 | 56.6% | 24 | 9 | 31-58 | 53.4% | 30 | 11 | 2/8/2015 | @ OREGON ST | 50-64 | L | 4.5 | L | 123.5 | U | 15-42 | 35.7% | 32 | 22 | 23-45 | 51.1% | 24 | 16 | 2/13/2015 | ARIZONA | 62-86 | L | 11 | L | 146.5 | O | 19-54 | 35.2% | 30 | 12 | 31-59 | 52.5% | 37 | 8 | 2/15/2015 | ARIZONA ST | 68-78 | L | 2.5 | L | 142 | O | 22-58 | 37.9% | 26 | 7 | 28-57 | 49.1% | 44 | 11 | 2/22/2015 | @ WASHINGTON ST | 87-84 | W | 2.5 | W | 153 | O | 29-58 | 50.0% | 27 | 3 | 26-47 | 55.3% | 31 | 12 | 2/25/2015 | @ UCLA | 66-88 | L | 11 | L | 141 | O | 23-61 | 37.7% | 20 | 10 | 37-59 | 62.7% | 42 | 16 | 2/28/2015 | @ USC | 55-70 | L | 5 | L | 145.5 | U | 19-64 | 29.7% | 43 | 12 | 28-64 | 43.7% | 46 | 8 | 3/5/2015 | COLORADO | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 3/7/2015 | UTAH | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
| | | COLORADO: Tad Boyle has done a terrific job of taking the Buffaloes' program to another level in the Pac-12. The team lost Spence Dinwiddie to the NBA, but still brings back a lot of talent from a team that made the NCAA Tournament. C Josh Scott (14.1 PPG, 8.4 RPG, 1.1 BPG) is a highly-skilled post player who can score over both shoulders. He is not an elite athlete, but he knows how to play the game of basketball. Scott is also a solid passer from the block, kicking it out to teammates like PG Askia Booker (13.3 PPG, 3.7 RPG, 3.3 APG) and SG Xavier Johnson (12.0 PPG, 5.9 RPG, 36% threes). Booker is at his best when scoring off the bounce, while Johnson is better at finding the open spot on the perimeter. The Buffaloes are a deep and experienced team, but they will have to shoot better from behind the three-point arc (32% threes). | | WASHINGTON: The Huskies have had some struggles the past couple seasons, but have some potential to surprise people in the Pac-12. PG Nigel Williams-Goss (13.4 PPG, 4.4 RPG, 4.4 APG) is an ultra-talented floor leader that will have to become more of a scorer to help make up for the loss of C.J. Wilcox. At 6-foot-3, he has great size for the point, but will have to cut back on the turnovers. His partner in the backcourt is SG Andrew Andrews (12.3 PPG, 3.9 RPG, 2.6 APG), who is another combo guard who can go for 20 points on any given night. Both of these guys are very fast with the ball, and they put a lot of pressure on opposing defenses. The Huskies ranked 189th in the nation in rebounding, but teams can't crash the offensive glass because they have to get back to stop the fast break. For Washington to contend for an NCAA Tournament berth, PF Shawn Kemp Jr. (4.4 PPG, 1.8 RPG, 56% FG, 71% FT) must become more of a presence down low. If he is able to help the team rebound the ball, Washington could make a surprising run in the conference. |
| | |
| Last Updated: 4/20/2024 6:32:24 AM EST. |
|
|
| |
|