| | | |
| | |
|
| | | |
759 | USC | 137 | 140.5 | 760 | UCLA | -13 | -13 |
|
|
| | |
|
| | | |
|
|
All Games | 11-18 | -8.2 | 16-13 | 14-12 | 66.6 | 30.6 | 41.6% | 36.4 | 69.9 | 34.1 | 41.5% | 38.1 | Road Games | 3-10 | -1.2 | 9-4 | 6-5 | 62.2 | 29.2 | 39.8% | 36.2 | 70.3 | 36.8 | 42.5% | 38.3 | Last 5 Games | 2-3 | -0.5 | 3-2 | 2-3 | 64.0 | 27.0 | 40.2% | 36.8 | 66.2 | 32.6 | 36.9% | 41.6 | Conference Games | 3-14 | -8.5 | 9-8 | 9-8 | 65.5 | 29.2 | 40.9% | 34.4 | 72.5 | 35.5 | 43.4% | 38.9 |
|
| |
|
|
Team Stats (All Games) | 66.6 | 30.6 | 25-59 | 41.6% | 5-16 | 31.1% | 13-20 | 63.4% | 36 | 10 | 12 | 18 | 7 | 14 | 4 | vs opponents surrendering | 65.5 | 30.3 | 23-54 | 41.9% | 6-18 | 34.0% | 14-20 | 69.2% | 33 | 8 | 12 | 19 | 6 | 12 | 3 | Team Stats (Road Games) | 62.2 | 29.2 | 23-59 | 39.8% | 5-16 | 29.4% | 10-17 | 62.7% | 36 | 11 | 12 | 18 | 6 | 13 | 4 | Stats Against (All Games) | 69.9 | 34.1 | 25-60 | 41.5% | 7-21 | 31.9% | 13-19 | 70.8% | 38 | 11 | 13 | 18 | 7 | 14 | 4 | vs opponents averaging | 68.5 | 32 | 24-55 | 44.1% | 6-18 | 35.0% | 14-20 | 69.7% | 35 | 9 | 13 | 18 | 6 | 12 | 4 | Stats Against (Road Games) | 70.3 | 36.8 | 24-57 | 42.5% | 7-22 | 33.1% | 15-20 | 72.0% | 38 | 11 | 15 | 17 | 6 | 13 | 5 |
|
|
| |
|
|
All Games | 18-12 | +2 | 15-15 | 10-19 | 71.0 | 32.5 | 43.3% | 38.7 | 67.7 | 31.9 | 41.3% | 34.2 | Home Games | 15-1 | +8.8 | 11-5 | 8-7 | 80.4 | 37.7 | 48.2% | 39.8 | 66.2 | 30.7 | 40.6% | 31.6 | Last 5 Games | 3-2 | +1 | 4-1 | 1-4 | 69.0 | 34.6 | 48.5% | 32.8 | 64.2 | 32.6 | 39.9% | 31.0 | Conference Games | 10-7 | +4.1 | 11-6 | 4-13 | 67.5 | 30.8 | 43.5% | 36.4 | 65.4 | 31.0 | 42.0% | 32.6 |
|
| |
|
|
Team Stats (All Games) | 71.0 | 32.5 | 25-58 | 43.3% | 6-17 | 34.7% | 14-22 | 66.7% | 39 | 11 | 14 | 18 | 7 | 12 | 4 | vs opponents surrendering | 65.2 | 30.3 | 23-55 | 41.2% | 6-18 | 33.3% | 14-20 | 69.2% | 33 | 9 | 11 | 19 | 6 | 12 | 3 | Team Stats (Home Games) | 80.4 | 37.7 | 28-58 | 48.2% | 7-17 | 41.0% | 18-26 | 68.6% | 40 | 11 | 17 | 17 | 7 | 11 | 4 | Stats Against (All Games) | 67.7 | 31.9 | 23-57 | 41.3% | 8-22 | 34.9% | 13-18 | 70.7% | 34 | 8 | 14 | 18 | 6 | 12 | 3 | vs opponents averaging | 69.5 | 32.5 | 24-55 | 44.3% | 6-18 | 34.9% | 14-21 | 69.7% | 36 | 9 | 13 | 19 | 6 | 12 | 4 | Stats Against (Home Games) | 66.2 | 30.7 | 23-57 | 40.6% | 8-24 | 35.5% | 11-16 | 69.7% | 32 | 8 | 14 | 20 | 5 | 13 | 2 |
|
| Average power rating of opponents played: USC 77.2, UCLA 77.1 |
| | |
|
|
1/14/2015 | UCLA | 66-83 | L | 5 | L | 143.5 | O | 24-58 | 41.4% | 20 | 12 | 35-62 | 56.5% | 41 | 14 | 1/22/2015 | @ OREGON | 67-75 | L | 10 | W | 149.5 | U | 25-67 | 37.3% | 37 | 13 | 21-58 | 36.2% | 45 | 15 | 1/24/2015 | @ OREGON ST | 55-59 | L | 8 | W | 121.5 | U | 17-50 | 34.0% | 36 | 10 | 20-51 | 39.2% | 32 | 6 | 1/29/2015 | COLORADO | 94-98 | L | 3 | L | 133 | O | 31-73 | 42.5% | 41 | 17 | 30-65 | 46.2% | 43 | 20 | 2/1/2015 | UTAH | 39-67 | L | 10.5 | L | 133 | U | 13-49 | 26.5% | 26 | 15 | 25-54 | 46.3% | 39 | 13 | 2/5/2015 | @ CALIFORNIA | 69-70 | L | 7.5 | W | 137 | O | 28-55 | 50.9% | 37 | 18 | 26-61 | 42.6% | 32 | 14 | 2/8/2015 | @ STANFORD | 62-70 | L | 14.5 | W | 148.5 | U | 25-64 | 39.1% | 35 | 16 | 22-60 | 36.7% | 50 | 17 | 2/11/2015 | OREGON | 75-80 | L | 3.5 | L | 148 | O | 31-66 | 47.0% | 29 | 11 | 34-59 | 57.6% | 34 | 14 | 2/14/2015 | OREGON ST | 68-55 | W | 2 | W | 117.5 | O | 23-51 | 45.1% | 38 | 23 | 19-58 | 32.8% | 32 | 16 | 2/19/2015 | @ ARIZONA | 57-87 | L | 23.5 | L | 138 | O | 18-57 | 31.6% | 34 | 16 | 31-65 | 47.7% | 50 | 15 | 2/22/2015 | @ ARIZONA ST | 59-64 | L | 12 | W | 143 | U | 25-55 | 45.5% | 33 | 15 | 19-58 | 32.8% | 39 | 11 | 2/25/2015 | WASHINGTON ST | 66-70 | L | -3 | L | 151 | U | 23-64 | 35.9% | 33 | 8 | 22-53 | 41.5% | 44 | 16 | 2/28/2015 | WASHINGTON | 70-55 | W | -5 | W | 145.5 | U | 28-64 | 43.7% | 46 | 8 | 19-64 | 29.7% | 43 | 12 | 3/4/2015 | @ UCLA | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
| |
|
|
1/14/2015 | @ USC | 83-66 | W | -5 | W | 143.5 | O | 35-62 | 56.5% | 41 | 14 | 24-58 | 41.4% | 20 | 12 | 1/22/2015 | @ OREGON ST | 55-66 | L | -1.5 | L | 124 | U | 19-62 | 30.6% | 35 | 12 | 22-43 | 51.2% | 32 | 16 | 1/24/2015 | @ OREGON | 64-82 | L | 2.5 | L | 147 | U | 25-61 | 41.0% | 28 | 7 | 33-53 | 62.3% | 31 | 10 | 1/29/2015 | UTAH | 69-59 | W | 5.5 | W | 132 | U | 24-52 | 46.2% | 29 | 6 | 23-47 | 48.9% | 27 | 14 | 1/31/2015 | COLORADO | 72-59 | W | -6.5 | W | 133.5 | U | 25-52 | 48.1% | 36 | 11 | 20-55 | 36.4% | 33 | 15 | 2/5/2015 | @ STANFORD | 69-67 | W | 7 | W | 144 | U | 24-64 | 37.5% | 40 | 9 | 24-57 | 42.1% | 41 | 11 | 2/7/2015 | @ CALIFORNIA | 62-64 | L | -4 | L | 137.5 | U | 25-54 | 46.3% | 44 | 12 | 23-61 | 37.7% | 33 | 5 | 2/11/2015 | OREGON ST | 75-59 | W | -9 | W | 119 | O | 22-46 | 47.8% | 41 | 14 | 20-52 | 38.5% | 23 | 7 | 2/14/2015 | OREGON | 72-63 | W | -6.5 | W | 145 | U | 24-48 | 50.0% | 38 | 13 | 22-56 | 39.3% | 24 | 6 | 2/18/2015 | @ ARIZONA ST | 66-68 | L | 3 | W | 138.5 | U | 25-57 | 43.9% | 27 | 8 | 23-50 | 46.0% | 39 | 15 | 2/21/2015 | @ ARIZONA | 47-57 | L | 14 | W | 141 | U | 16-42 | 38.1% | 23 | 12 | 18-53 | 34.0% | 40 | 10 | 2/25/2015 | WASHINGTON | 88-66 | W | -11 | W | 141 | O | 37-59 | 62.7% | 42 | 16 | 23-61 | 37.7% | 20 | 10 | 3/1/2015 | WASHINGTON ST | 72-67 | W | -15 | L | 148 | U | 24-54 | 44.4% | 34 | 11 | 24-56 | 42.9% | 32 | 16 | 3/4/2015 | USC | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
| | | USC: Andy Enfield is in year two at USC, and the Trojans still have a long ways to go before they are competing for the Pac-12 title. The team lost three seniors, while also losing Byron Wesley, who transferred to Gonzaga. The team will rely heavily on swingman Katin Reinhardt, who transferred from UNLV. He averaged 10.1 PPG and 2.5 APG in his final season with the Rebels in 2012-13, shooting 89% FT and 35% threes, but his overall field-goal percentage was a subpar 36%. USC will also rely heavily on its incoming freshman class, as PG Jordan McLaughlin and SG Elijah Stewart will be asked to score immediately. The team is also excited about freshman swingman Malik Marquetti, and thinks that 6-foot-10 C Nikola Jovanovic (8.0 PPG, 4.4 RPG) will have a nice sophomore campaign. Look for the Trojans to push the pace on offense. | | UCLA: If you are talking about pure talent, the Bruins deserve to be higher on the list. However, this is as young of a team as there is in the conference, who will look to replace five key players that helped UCLA reach the Sweet 16 last season. The top incoming freshman is 6-foot-9 PF Kevin Looney, who is relentless on the glass. He should work well with C Tony Parker (6.9 PPG, 4.4 RPG, 0.6 BPG), who has to become a more imposing presence down low. He is skilled and agile for his size, but he has to be more aggressive in his junior campaign. SG Norman Powell (11.4 PPG, 2.8 RPG, 53% FG) leads a thin backcourt. Powell came off the bench last season, but will likely be the team's leading scorer, especially early as the freshmen class adjusts to college basketball. He must become a better shooter (29% from threes), as opposing defense are going to pack it in a bit and make the Bruins beat them from deep, but Powell played very well in the 2014 postseason with 14.0 PPG. He will be joined by PG Bryce Alford (8.0 PPG, 2.8 APG, 39% threes) who is the son of head coach Steve Alford, and has similarities to his father in his intelligence and long-range shooting. |
| | |
| Last Updated: 4/23/2024 6:07:09 PM EST. |
|
|
| |
|