| | | |
GEORGIA OLE MISS |
|
| 134.5 | 76 Final 72 |
|
|
| | |
|
| | | |
779 | GEORGIA | 137 | 134.5 | 780 | OLE MISS | -4.5 | -5 |
|
|
| | |
|
| | | |
|
|
All Games | 17-9 | -0.9 | 14-9 | 11-11 | 68.9 | 32.3 | 44.0% | 37.7 | 64.7 | 30.5 | 39.3% | 33.7 | Road Games | 6-6 | +2.8 | 8-2 | 6-4 | 67.4 | 30.1 | 43.0% | 35.8 | 67.4 | 32.8 | 40.3% | 34.3 | Last 5 Games | 3-2 | -5 | 2-3 | 2-3 | 62.0 | 27.6 | 41.2% | 36.6 | 60.8 | 29.4 | 39.5% | 33.0 | Conference Games | 8-6 | -3.3 | 8-5 | 8-6 | 66.5 | 30.6 | 42.3% | 36.3 | 66.1 | 31.6 | 41.5% | 32.1 |
|
| |
|
|
Team Stats (All Games) | 68.9 | 32.3 | 23-52 | 44.0% | 6-16 | 34.0% | 18-26 | 68.5% | 38 | 9 | 12 | 18 | 6 | 13 | 5 | vs opponents surrendering | 64 | 29.7 | 22-54 | 41.3% | 6-19 | 32.7% | 13-19 | 68.2% | 33 | 9 | 12 | 19 | 6 | 13 | 4 | Team Stats (Road Games) | 67.4 | 30.1 | 22-51 | 43.0% | 5-16 | 33.0% | 18-25 | 70.2% | 36 | 8 | 12 | 20 | 6 | 12 | 4 | Stats Against (All Games) | 64.7 | 30.5 | 22-57 | 39.3% | 6-20 | 31.7% | 14-19 | 70.6% | 34 | 9 | 11 | 21 | 6 | 11 | 4 | vs opponents averaging | 68.5 | 32.1 | 24-55 | 44.0% | 6-18 | 34.0% | 14-21 | 69.2% | 36 | 10 | 13 | 18 | 6 | 13 | 4 | Stats Against (Road Games) | 67.4 | 32.8 | 23-56 | 40.3% | 7-20 | 34.2% | 15-22 | 69.4% | 34 | 9 | 13 | 20 | 6 | 11 | 4 |
|
|
| |
|
|
All Games | 19-8 | -2.8 | 16-10 | 11-10 | 73.0 | 33.9 | 43.3% | 37.2 | 66.3 | 31.3 | 39.8% | 34.6 | Home Games | 9-5 | -16 | 4-9 | 6-6 | 70.7 | 31.8 | 40.0% | 37.9 | 65.1 | 31.0 | 41.2% | 35.8 | Last 5 Games | 4-1 | +3.4 | 3-2 | 1-4 | 69.6 | 30.8 | 43.4% | 34.6 | 66.6 | 34.4 | 42.8% | 33.8 | Conference Games | 10-4 | +8.1 | 9-5 | 5-8 | 72.6 | 33.1 | 42.9% | 35.6 | 67.6 | 32.6 | 42.1% | 34.3 |
|
| |
|
|
Team Stats (All Games) | 73.0 | 33.9 | 25-58 | 43.3% | 7-19 | 34.6% | 17-21 | 78.3% | 37 | 10 | 13 | 19 | 7 | 11 | 4 | vs opponents surrendering | 64.7 | 30.2 | 22-54 | 41.4% | 6-19 | 33.1% | 14-20 | 69.2% | 34 | 9 | 12 | 19 | 6 | 13 | 3 | Team Stats (Home Games) | 70.7 | 31.8 | 24-59 | 40.0% | 6-21 | 31.4% | 17-22 | 76.9% | 38 | 10 | 14 | 17 | 7 | 11 | 4 | Stats Against (All Games) | 66.3 | 31.3 | 22-55 | 39.8% | 8-22 | 33.8% | 15-22 | 67.2% | 35 | 10 | 14 | 19 | 5 | 13 | 3 | vs opponents averaging | 68.4 | 32.3 | 24-55 | 43.3% | 6-18 | 33.6% | 15-21 | 68.4% | 36 | 10 | 13 | 18 | 7 | 13 | 4 | Stats Against (Home Games) | 65.1 | 31.0 | 22-54 | 41.2% | 8-21 | 36.4% | 13-19 | 65.6% | 36 | 8 | 15 | 19 | 5 | 14 | 3 |
|
| Average power rating of opponents played: GEORGIA 76.6, OLE MISS 76.8 |
| | |
|
|
1/6/2015 | ARKANSAS | 75-79 | L | -3 | L | 137.5 | O | 25-55 | 45.5% | 40 | 17 | 31-60 | 51.7% | 25 | 9 | 1/10/2015 | @ LSU | 84-87 | L | 3 | T | 138 | O | 28-68 | 41.2% | 50 | 20 | 30-66 | 45.5% | 34 | 14 | 1/14/2015 | @ VANDERBILT | 70-67 | W | 2.5 | W | 128 | O | 22-45 | 48.9% | 27 | 11 | 23-56 | 41.1% | 36 | 11 | 1/17/2015 | FLORIDA | 73-61 | W | 2 | W | 125 | O | 23-41 | 56.1% | 26 | 16 | 24-48 | 50.0% | 26 | 19 | 1/20/2015 | OLE MISS | 69-64 | W | -4 | W | 141.5 | U | 22-53 | 41.5% | 35 | 10 | 24-60 | 40.0% | 38 | 14 | 1/24/2015 | @ MISSISSIPPI ST | 72-66 | W | -5 | W | 125.5 | O | 23-47 | 48.9% | 32 | 11 | 22-65 | 33.8% | 42 | 9 | 1/27/2015 | VANDERBILT | 70-62 | W | -5.5 | W | 133 | U | 19-43 | 44.2% | 37 | 16 | 21-58 | 36.2% | 27 | 7 | 1/31/2015 | @ S CAROLINA | 50-67 | L | 4 | L | 130 | U | 11-50 | 22.0% | 42 | 11 | 22-55 | 40.0% | 33 | 8 | 2/3/2015 | @ KENTUCKY | 58-69 | L | 18 | W | 123.5 | O | 19-46 | 41.3% | 36 | 16 | 25-55 | 45.5% | 24 | 7 | 2/7/2015 | TENNESSEE | 56-53 | W | -6 | L | 128.5 | U | 21-38 | 55.3% | 31 | 20 | 20-56 | 35.7% | 25 | 8 | 2/11/2015 | @ TEXAS A&M | 62-53 | W | 5 | W | 129 | U | 22-52 | 42.3% | 33 | 7 | 19-47 | 40.4% | 31 | 13 | 2/14/2015 | AUBURN | 68-69 | L | -11 | L | 138 | U | 23-61 | 37.7% | 39 | 10 | 22-49 | 44.9% | 33 | 12 | 2/17/2015 | S CAROLINA | 58-64 | L | -6.5 | L | 120 | O | 20-53 | 37.7% | 37 | 7 | 21-53 | 39.6% | 33 | 7 | 2/21/2015 | @ ALABAMA | 66-65 | W | 3.5 | W | 122 | O | 22-58 | 37.9% | 43 | 9 | 21-56 | 37.5% | 43 | 11 | 2/25/2015 | @ OLE MISS | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/28/2015 | MISSOURI | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 3/3/2015 | KENTUCKY | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 3/7/2015 | @ AUBURN | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
| |
|
|
1/6/2015 | @ KENTUCKY | 86-89 | L | 23 | W | 128.5 | O | 29-59 | 49.2% | 32 | 18 | 25-60 | 41.7% | 34 | 10 | 1/10/2015 | S CAROLINA | 65-49 | W | -3 | W | 138.5 | U | 20-49 | 40.8% | 33 | 10 | 18-49 | 36.7% | 32 | 15 | 1/14/2015 | LSU | 71-75 | L | -6 | L | 146 | P | 27-78 | 34.6% | 47 | 12 | 26-60 | 43.3% | 41 | 15 | 1/17/2015 | @ ARKANSAS | 96-82 | W | 9 | W | 154 | O | 31-55 | 56.4% | 33 | 11 | 22-53 | 41.5% | 27 | 12 | 1/20/2015 | @ GEORGIA | 64-69 | L | 4 | L | 141.5 | U | 24-60 | 40.0% | 38 | 14 | 22-53 | 41.5% | 35 | 10 | 1/24/2015 | FLORIDA | 72-71 | W | 1 | W | 135.5 | O | 25-56 | 44.6% | 30 | 9 | 22-46 | 47.8% | 29 | 13 | 1/28/2015 | MISSISSIPPI ST | 79-73 | W | -12.5 | L | 138 | O | 22-55 | 40.0% | 31 | 6 | 30-54 | 55.6% | 34 | 16 | 1/31/2015 | @ MISSOURI | 67-47 | W | -3.5 | W | 136 | U | 24-55 | 43.6% | 43 | 8 | 19-61 | 31.1% | 37 | 9 | 2/4/2015 | TEXAS A&M | 69-59 | W | -5.5 | W | 136 | U | 24-62 | 38.7% | 39 | 8 | 22-57 | 38.6% | 42 | 16 | 2/7/2015 | @ AUBURN | 86-79 | W | -5 | W | 149 | O | 26-45 | 57.8% | 34 | 13 | 23-57 | 40.4% | 30 | 8 | 2/12/2015 | @ FLORIDA | 62-61 | W | 5 | W | 134 | U | 23-54 | 42.6% | 36 | 9 | 23-61 | 37.7% | 36 | 8 | 2/14/2015 | ARKANSAS | 70-71 | L | -2.5 | L | 156.5 | U | 25-66 | 37.9% | 45 | 10 | 28-59 | 47.5% | 31 | 11 | 2/19/2015 | @ MISSISSIPPI ST | 71-65 | W | -5.5 | W | 138 | U | 26-60 | 43.3% | 30 | 6 | 22-48 | 45.8% | 35 | 13 | 2/21/2015 | TENNESSEE | 59-57 | W | -8 | L | 134.5 | U | 21-54 | 38.9% | 28 | 6 | 22-51 | 43.1% | 37 | 13 | 2/25/2015 | GEORGIA | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/28/2015 | @ LSU | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 3/3/2015 | @ ALABAMA | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 3/7/2015 | VANDERBILT | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
| | | GEORGIA: Georgia had a solid 2013-14 campaign with 20 wins, and expects even more this season with its top five scorers all coming back. Unlike the schools ahead of the Bulldogs in the projected SEC standings, they are going to rely heavily on the play of the backcourt. PG Charles Mann (13.9 PPG, 4.2 RPG, 2.9 APG) and SG Kenny Gaines (13.0 PPG, 2.5 RPG, 38% threes) are two guards that are effective in different ways. Mann is at his best slashing to the rim, but he must limit the turnovers (3.4 TOPG). PF Marcus Thornton (8.3 PPG, 6.1 RPG) is heading into his senior year, and he took a giant step as a junior with a team-high 45 blocks (1.3 BPG). The Bulldogs didn't make the NCAA Tournament because of a slow start, but they finished second in the SEC with a 12-6 record. They will have to have a stronger non-conference performance, but the Bulldogs should contend for a tournament berth. | | OLE MISS: Leading scorer Marshall Henderson is no longer a part of this program, but that may not be a bad thing for this school. Leading the way for the Rebels is PG Jarvis Summers (17.3 PPG, 3.8 APG, 2.4 RPG), who gives the team a calming presence on the floor. He can also hit from outside, knocking down 42% of his three-point tries last season. C Aaron Jones (6.0 PPG, 6.6 RPG, 2.1 BPG) is a terrific defensive player, but he will need to become more of a scoring presence on the other end of the court. Transfers will play a big role for Ole Miss, especially in the scoring department. Guards Stefan Moody and Terence Smith have the ability to come off the bench and ignite the team on offense. |
| | |
| Last Updated: 4/19/2024 1:25:03 AM EST. |
|
|
| |
|