| | | |
STANFORD WASHINGTON ST |
|
| 153 | 88 Final 89 |
|
|
| | |
|
| | | |
665 | STANFORD | -8.5 | -9 | 666 | WASHINGTON ST | 150 | 152 |
|
|
| | |
|
| | | |
|
|
All Games | 15-5 | +4 | 11-8 | 12-8 | 74.8 | 35.6 | 45.2% | 36.6 | 65.7 | 30.6 | 42.0% | 32.0 | Road Games | 5-4 | +1 | 5-4 | 7-2 | 75.9 | 36.1 | 45.3% | 36.3 | 73.6 | 34.1 | 43.8% | 36.3 | Last 5 Games | 4-1 | +3 | 4-1 | 4-1 | 79.2 | 37.2 | 49.8% | 35.6 | 70.2 | 32.8 | 44.6% | 29.2 | Conference Games | 6-2 | +2.8 | 4-3 | 5-3 | 77.7 | 36.9 | 46.6% | 34.6 | 71.2 | 32.7 | 43.5% | 34.4 |
|
| |
|
|
Team Stats (All Games) | 74.8 | 35.6 | 26-58 | 45.2% | 7-17 | 41.7% | 15-22 | 70.6% | 37 | 10 | 13 | 19 | 6 | 10 | 3 | vs opponents surrendering | 66.7 | 31.1 | 23-56 | 42.0% | 6-18 | 34.0% | 14-20 | 69.6% | 34 | 9 | 12 | 19 | 6 | 12 | 3 | Team Stats (Road Games) | 75.9 | 36.1 | 28-62 | 45.3% | 8-19 | 44.4% | 11-16 | 69.7% | 36 | 10 | 12 | 21 | 5 | 11 | 3 | Stats Against (All Games) | 65.7 | 30.6 | 23-55 | 42.0% | 6-17 | 36.0% | 13-20 | 67.8% | 32 | 8 | 12 | 19 | 4 | 12 | 3 | vs opponents averaging | 69.5 | 31.9 | 24-55 | 44.2% | 6-18 | 35.3% | 14-21 | 69.5% | 35 | 9 | 13 | 18 | 6 | 13 | 4 | Stats Against (Road Games) | 73.6 | 34.1 | 25-58 | 43.8% | 6-18 | 35.2% | 17-24 | 69.1% | 36 | 10 | 14 | 17 | 5 | 11 | 4 |
|
|
| |
|
|
All Games | 9-11 | +4.1 | 8-11 | 11-3 | 70.5 | 32.8 | 42.5% | 33.9 | 75.5 | 35.5 | 46.5% | 35.5 | Home Games | 5-3 | -1.7 | 4-4 | 6-1 | 79.5 | 39.7 | 44.5% | 35.2 | 73.6 | 33.5 | 46.7% | 33.9 | Last 5 Games | 1-4 | -2.4 | 1-4 | 4-1 | 68.8 | 33.6 | 41.3% | 30.4 | 82.6 | 41.8 | 50.5% | 37.4 | Conference Games | 3-5 | +6 | 3-4 | 6-2 | 68.6 | 31.6 | 41.2% | 32.1 | 78.4 | 36.6 | 48.3% | 36.1 |
|
| |
|
|
Team Stats (All Games) | 70.5 | 32.8 | 24-56 | 42.5% | 7-21 | 34.0% | 16-22 | 72.6% | 34 | 8 | 15 | 18 | 4 | 12 | 4 | vs opponents surrendering | 64.6 | 29.8 | 22-54 | 41.0% | 6-18 | 34.2% | 14-20 | 69.1% | 33 | 9 | 12 | 18 | 6 | 12 | 3 | Team Stats (Home Games) | 79.5 | 39.7 | 26-59 | 44.5% | 9-26 | 35.6% | 18-22 | 80.7% | 35 | 9 | 17 | 18 | 6 | 12 | 3 | Stats Against (All Games) | 75.5 | 35.5 | 28-60 | 46.5% | 7-18 | 38.4% | 13-19 | 69.8% | 36 | 8 | 14 | 19 | 7 | 10 | 3 | vs opponents averaging | 68.6 | 32.2 | 24-54 | 44.7% | 6-18 | 36.2% | 14-20 | 68.9% | 35 | 9 | 13 | 18 | 6 | 12 | 4 | Stats Against (Home Games) | 73.6 | 33.5 | 27-58 | 46.7% | 6-16 | 39.2% | 13-20 | 66.2% | 34 | 7 | 10 | 19 | 7 | 12 | 2 |
|
| Average power rating of opponents played: STANFORD 76.9, WASHINGTON ST 73 |
| | |
|
|
12/13/2014 | DENVER | 49-43 | W | -13.5 | L | 129.5 | U | 14-44 | 31.8% | 31 | 7 | 17-43 | 39.5% | 28 | 11 | 12/17/2014 | LOYOLA-MARYMOUNT | 67-58 | W | -17 | L | 132 | U | 22-53 | 41.5% | 30 | 8 | 24-51 | 47.1% | 31 | 17 | 12/20/2014 | @ BYU | 77-79 | L | 4.5 | W | 148 | O | 32-66 | 48.5% | 36 | 14 | 26-61 | 42.6% | 39 | 12 | 12/23/2014 | @ TEXAS | 74-71 | W | 10 | W | 130 | O | 29-67 | 43.3% | 32 | 6 | 25-56 | 44.6% | 36 | 11 | 12/29/2014 | ARK-PINE BLUFF | 74-39 | W | -24.5 | W | 129.5 | U | 25-49 | 51.0% | 33 | 14 | 13-41 | 31.7% | 21 | 25 | 1/2/2015 | WASHINGTON ST | 71-56 | W | -15 | T | 139.5 | U | 26-56 | 46.4% | 37 | 6 | 14-42 | 33.3% | 33 | 9 | 1/4/2015 | WASHINGTON | 68-60 | W | -5.5 | W | 131.5 | U | 23-59 | 39.0% | 38 | 9 | 21-55 | 38.2% | 37 | 19 | 1/8/2015 | @ UCLA | 81-86 | L | -1 | L | 131.5 | O | 26-71 | 36.6% | 42 | 9 | 27-62 | 43.5% | 51 | 10 | 1/11/2015 | @ USC | 78-76 | W | -6 | L | 132 | O | 30-65 | 46.2% | 30 | 14 | 26-53 | 49.1% | 32 | 14 | 1/14/2015 | @ CALIFORNIA | 69-59 | W | -2 | W | 133 | U | 25-52 | 48.1% | 34 | 8 | 22-62 | 35.5% | 41 | 9 | 1/17/2015 | CONNECTICUT | 72-59 | W | -5.5 | W | 124.5 | O | 24-59 | 40.7% | 48 | 13 | 23-55 | 41.8% | 24 | 12 | 1/22/2015 | ARIZONA | 82-89 | L | 3.5 | L | 130 | O | 25-50 | 50.0% | 29 | 14 | 30-54 | 55.6% | 25 | 10 | 1/24/2015 | ARIZONA ST | 89-70 | W | -6.5 | W | 136.5 | O | 31-53 | 58.5% | 36 | 8 | 27-62 | 43.5% | 26 | 9 | 1/28/2015 | @ WASHINGTON | 84-74 | W | -2 | W | 140.5 | O | 28-53 | 52.8% | 31 | 9 | 27-56 | 48.2% | 30 | 13 | 1/31/2015 | @ WASHINGTON ST | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/5/2015 | UCLA | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/8/2015 | USC | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/12/2015 | @ UTAH | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/15/2015 | @ COLORADO | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/21/2015 | CALIFORNIA | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
| |
|
|
12/13/2014 | @ SANTA CLARA | 67-76 | L | 4.5 | L | | - | 25-55 | 45.5% | 39 | 13 | 26-51 | 51.0% | 22 | 6 | 12/21/2014 | SAN JOSE ST | 82-53 | W | -22 | W | 124 | O | 31-67 | 46.3% | 45 | 10 | 20-60 | 33.3% | 33 | 14 | 12/28/2014 | CAL DAVIS | 90-83 | W | -4.5 | W | 143 | O | 31-57 | 54.4% | 34 | 19 | 33-59 | 55.9% | 23 | 13 | 1/2/2015 | @ STANFORD | 56-71 | L | 15 | T | 139.5 | U | 14-42 | 33.3% | 33 | 9 | 26-56 | 46.4% | 37 | 6 | 1/4/2015 | @ CALIFORNIA | 69-66 | W | 9.5 | W | 134.5 | O | 23-55 | 41.8% | 38 | 10 | 22-58 | 37.9% | 34 | 9 | 1/10/2015 | @ WASHINGTON | 80-77 | W | 11.5 | W | 137 | O | 28-61 | 45.9% | 34 | 10 | 32-65 | 49.2% | 31 | 9 | 1/15/2015 | OREGON | 108-99 | W | 3 | W | 147 | O | 33-56 | 58.9% | 35 | 12 | 38-77 | 49.4% | 36 | 9 | 1/17/2015 | OREGON ST | 47-62 | L | -2.5 | L | 132.5 | U | 14-48 | 29.2% | 22 | 10 | 21-43 | 48.8% | 37 | 10 | 1/21/2015 | @ UTAH | 64-86 | L | 18.5 | L | 136 | O | 21-46 | 45.7% | 35 | 17 | 29-60 | 48.3% | 30 | 4 | 1/24/2015 | @ COLORADO | 58-90 | L | 8.5 | L | 134.5 | O | 24-62 | 38.7% | 28 | 12 | 34-62 | 54.8% | 44 | 11 | 1/29/2015 | CALIFORNIA | 67-76 | L | -2.5 | L | 140 | O | 19-57 | 33.3% | 32 | 7 | 28-55 | 50.9% | 40 | 11 | 1/31/2015 | STANFORD | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/5/2015 | @ OREGON ST | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/8/2015 | @ OREGON | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/13/2015 | ARIZONA ST | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/15/2015 | ARIZONA | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/22/2015 | WASHINGTON | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
| | | STANFORD: The Cardinal made a surprising run to the Sweet 16 last season, defeating one of the country's most talented teams in Kansas. Leading the way for Stanford will be SG Chasson Randle (18.8 PPG, 3.6 RPG, 2.1 APG), a talented guard who was terrific in the NCAA Tournament last year. He is an improving shooter, making him a difficult matchup for the opposition. His attacking style is complemented perfectly on the perimeter by swingman Anthony Brown (12.3 PPG, 5.0 RPG, 45% threes), who shoot the basketball at a high percentage from anywhere on the court (48% FG, 79% FT). At 6-foot-6, he can get a shot off whenever he wants on the perimeter, while doing a solid job of moving without the ball. C Stefan Nastic (7.4 PPG, 2.8 RPG, 58% FG) did not put up huge numbers as a reserve last season, but now as the starting center, he could double both his points and rebounds. Joining him in the frontcourt is PF Reid Travis, a McDonald's All-American from Minnesota. He is a very physical player with a high motor, and should complement the skill set of Nastic nicely. | | WASHINGTON ST: The Cougars have a new coach in Ernie Kent, as the program is looking for anything to get things going back on the right track. If there is one positive, Washington State has one of the best players in the conference in SG DaVonte Lacy (19.4 PPG, 4.2 RPG, 39% threes). He is a complete scorer who can get to the rim, but can also catch fire from the outside as well. He was really the only scoring threat last season, and was able to put up those big numbers with defenses focusing on him. The other key WSU player is swingman Que Johnson (9.5 PPG, 2.4 RPG, 35% threes) who quietly had a solid season in the Pac-12 as a freshman. The weak spot on the team will be at the point, where Kent brought in three freshmen (Jackie Davis, Trevor Dunbar and Ny Redding) to compete with sophomore PG Ike Iroegbu (5.5 PPG, 1.5 APG in 18.1 MPG). Washington State also has to find some scoring from the frontcourt if it is going to be able to compete with the top teams in the conference. Forwards Dexter Kernich-Drew (6.3 PPG, 36% threes) and Junior Longrus (3.3 PPG, 3.5 RPG) need to make huge strides for the Cougars this season. |
| | |
| Last Updated: 4/26/2024 10:50:12 PM EST. |
|
|
| |
|