|
|
VIRGINIA TECH WAKE FOREST |
|
| 136.5 | 70 Final 73 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| | |
557 | VIRGINIA TECH | 136.5 | 136.5 | 558 | WAKE FOREST | -7.5 | -8 |
|
|
| | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All Games | 9-11 | -0.2 | 8-6 | 7-4 | 66.7 | 31.9 | 45.4% | 30.9 | 66.9 | 31.6 | 41.4% | 37.4 | Road Games | 1-6 | -2 | 4-3 | 4-3 | 61.7 | 31.0 | 41.8% | 28.0 | 73.0 | 35.7 | 46.4% | 38.0 | Last 5 Games | 1-4 | +0.8 | 4-1 | 3-2 | 58.6 | 25.8 | 38.6% | 27.8 | 69.6 | 33.8 | 44.4% | 42.0 | Conference Games | 1-6 | -1.2 | 5-2 | 5-2 | 62.0 | 28.1 | 39.1% | 27.9 | 71.7 | 37.7 | 44.6% | 42.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
Team Stats (All Games) | 66.7 | 31.9 | 24-53 | 45.4% | 7-18 | 38.9% | 11-18 | 60.7% | 31 | 8 | 12 | 18 | 5 | 13 | 4 | vs opponents surrendering | 65.5 | 30.3 | 23-54 | 42.2% | 6-19 | 32.5% | 13-20 | 68.4% | 34 | 9 | 12 | 19 | 6 | 13 | 3 | Team Stats (Road Games) | 61.7 | 31.0 | 22-54 | 41.8% | 8-20 | 38.3% | 9-16 | 58.7% | 28 | 7 | 11 | 19 | 6 | 14 | 2 | Stats Against (All Games) | 66.9 | 31.6 | 24-57 | 41.4% | 7-22 | 33.9% | 12-18 | 65.7% | 37 | 12 | 13 | 18 | 5 | 13 | 4 | vs opponents averaging | 68.8 | 32.4 | 24-55 | 43.8% | 6-18 | 33.1% | 14-21 | 68.5% | 36 | 10 | 13 | 18 | 7 | 13 | 4 | Stats Against (Road Games) | 73.0 | 35.7 | 26-56 | 46.4% | 8-20 | 37.6% | 14-20 | 67.6% | 38 | 11 | 14 | 16 | 7 | 15 | 4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
All Games | 9-12 | -3.6 | 9-6 | 8-4 | 70.8 | 34.0 | 42.2% | 40.2 | 70.0 | 31.1 | 44.2% | 33.3 | Home Games | 7-6 | -2.6 | 4-3 | 4-1 | 74.4 | 36.2 | 44.2% | 40.5 | 69.8 | 31.5 | 44.6% | 31.6 | Last 5 Games | 1-4 | -3 | 3-2 | 4-1 | 72.6 | 34.2 | 40.1% | 41.4 | 76.6 | 31.8 | 45.8% | 37.2 | Conference Games | 1-7 | -5 | 5-3 | 6-2 | 71.1 | 32.6 | 42.1% | 38.1 | 77.4 | 33.5 | 47.0% | 37.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
Team Stats (All Games) | 70.8 | 34.0 | 24-57 | 42.2% | 6-18 | 32.4% | 17-26 | 64.5% | 40 | 11 | 14 | 19 | 7 | 14 | 4 | vs opponents surrendering | 66.2 | 30.4 | 23-55 | 41.9% | 6-18 | 33.3% | 14-20 | 69.3% | 34 | 9 | 12 | 19 | 6 | 13 | 3 | Team Stats (Home Games) | 74.4 | 36.2 | 25-56 | 44.2% | 6-17 | 33.6% | 19-29 | 65.2% | 40 | 11 | 14 | 18 | 8 | 14 | 5 | Stats Against (All Games) | 70.0 | 31.1 | 25-57 | 44.2% | 6-20 | 31.1% | 14-21 | 64.9% | 33 | 8 | 13 | 20 | 9 | 13 | 5 | vs opponents averaging | 70.5 | 33.2 | 25-56 | 44.6% | 7-19 | 34.2% | 14-21 | 68.1% | 36 | 10 | 14 | 18 | 7 | 13 | 4 | Stats Against (Home Games) | 69.8 | 31.5 | 25-57 | 44.6% | 7-21 | 33.3% | 12-19 | 64.6% | 32 | 7 | 12 | 22 | 8 | 14 | 4 |
|
|
Average power rating of opponents played: VIRGINIA TECH 73.2, WAKE FOREST 76.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
12/14/2014 | ALABAMA A&M | 65-55 | W | | - | | - | 25-52 | 48.1% | 28 | 8 | 20-54 | 37.0% | 42 | 18 | 12/20/2014 | THE CITADEL | 64-61 | W | -13 | L | | - | 23-55 | 41.8% | 39 | 7 | 21-62 | 33.9% | 35 | 7 | 12/22/2014 | VMI | 87-74 | W | -9.5 | W | | - | 33-62 | 53.2% | 44 | 15 | 23-70 | 32.9% | 40 | 15 | 12/27/2014 | PRESBYTERIAN | 87-63 | W | | - | | - | 30-56 | 53.6% | 38 | 13 | 24-59 | 40.7% | 30 | 12 | 12/30/2014 | @ W VIRGINIA | 51-82 | L | 17 | L | 141.5 | U | 20-43 | 46.5% | 22 | 25 | 30-59 | 50.8% | 36 | 17 | 1/3/2015 | SYRACUSE | 66-68 | L | 9.5 | W | 131 | O | 22-56 | 39.3% | 34 | 11 | 23-59 | 39.0% | 42 | 8 | 1/6/2015 | @ FLORIDA ST | 75-86 | L | 9.5 | L | 131.5 | O | 24-58 | 41.4% | 22 | 6 | 27-52 | 51.9% | 42 | 14 | 1/13/2015 | @ LOUISVILLE | 63-78 | L | 22 | W | 134.5 | O | 22-60 | 36.7% | 33 | 8 | 31-65 | 47.7% | 40 | 7 | 1/18/2015 | @ N CAROLINA | 53-68 | L | 22 | W | 147 | U | 19-53 | 35.8% | 22 | 14 | 26-59 | 44.1% | 49 | 17 | 1/22/2015 | NOTRE DAME | 60-85 | L | 10.5 | L | 137 | O | 24-62 | 38.7% | 29 | 9 | 29-59 | 49.2% | 43 | 6 | 1/25/2015 | VIRGINIA | 47-50 | L | 16.5 | W | 122 | U | 19-42 | 45.2% | 21 | 14 | 17-49 | 34.7% | 33 | 13 | 1/27/2015 | PITTSBURGH | 70-67 | W | 5 | W | 129.5 | O | 23-60 | 38.3% | 34 | 9 | 27-61 | 44.3% | 45 | 11 | 1/31/2015 | @ WAKE FOREST | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/3/2015 | @ SYRACUSE | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/7/2015 | FLORIDA ST | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/9/2015 | GEORGIA TECH | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/14/2015 | @ CLEMSON | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/18/2015 | @ MIAMI | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/21/2015 | @ NC STATE | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
12/14/2014 | SAMFORD | 86-68 | W | -18 | T | | - | 30-61 | 49.2% | 42 | 13 | 26-55 | 47.3% | 26 | 18 | 12/20/2014 | *FLORIDA | 50-63 | L | 14 | W | 125 | U | 17-46 | 37.0% | 36 | 24 | 21-51 | 41.2% | 31 | 15 | 12/22/2014 | BUCKNELL | 60-53 | W | | - | | - | 17-47 | 36.2% | 41 | 13 | 14-49 | 28.6% | 35 | 16 | 12/28/2014 | @ RICHMOND | 65-63 | W | 6 | W | 123 | O | 25-58 | 43.1% | 37 | 13 | 27-58 | 46.6% | 33 | 10 | 12/31/2014 | PRINCETON | 80-66 | W | -4.5 | W | | - | 26-61 | 42.6% | 45 | 10 | 26-57 | 45.6% | 27 | 8 | 1/4/2015 | LOUISVILLE | 76-85 | L | 12.5 | W | 130 | O | 28-53 | 52.8% | 36 | 12 | 31-62 | 50.0% | 35 | 7 | 1/7/2015 | DUKE | 65-73 | L | 15 | W | 145 | U | 28-61 | 45.9% | 31 | 11 | 26-59 | 44.1% | 39 | 14 | 1/10/2015 | GEORGIA TECH | 76-69 | W | -3 | W | 132.5 | O | 25-51 | 49.0% | 41 | 17 | 28-61 | 45.9% | 29 | 12 | 1/13/2015 | @ SYRACUSE | 83-86 | L | 9.5 | W | 133.5 | O | 30-62 | 48.4% | 43 | 13 | 30-72 | 41.7% | 39 | 8 | 1/21/2015 | N CAROLINA | 71-87 | L | 8 | L | 147.5 | O | 24-60 | 40.0% | 34 | 14 | 35-58 | 60.3% | 36 | 12 | 1/24/2015 | @ CLEMSON | 57-59 | L | 5 | W | 127 | U | 19-61 | 31.1% | 45 | 10 | 20-57 | 35.1% | 43 | 7 | 1/28/2015 | @ FLORIDA ST | 76-82 | L | 4.5 | L | 139 | O | 24-70 | 34.3% | 44 | 10 | 27-58 | 46.6% | 39 | 11 | 1/31/2015 | VIRGINIA TECH | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/3/2015 | NC STATE | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/7/2015 | @ GEORGIA TECH | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/11/2015 | MIAMI | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/14/2015 | @ VIRGINIA | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/17/2015 | @ NOTRE DAME | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
|
| VIRGINIA TECH: The biggest positive for this the Hokies is that they now have Buzz Williams as their new head coach. The former Marquette head man has shown throughout the years how to get the best out of his teams. SG Adam Smith (11.0 PPG, 2.3 RPG, 2.1 APG) battled calf and leg injuries last season, but he showed his potential when he scored 27 points against then-No. 1 Michigan State last season. The 6-foot-1 Smith does not have great size, but he is fearless when driving the ball, and does a great job at the foul line (82% FT). PG Devin Wilson (9.2 PPG, 4.8 APG, 3.2 RPG) is also another talented player, who as a freshman averaged 35.0 MPG. Virginia Tech is thin up front, but PF Shane Henry averaged a double-double on the JUCO level last season. | | WAKE FOREST: One advantage for the Demon Deacons is that they have their top two scorers back from last season's team. PG Codi Miller-McIntyre (12.6 PPG, 4.2 APG, 3.0 RPG) and C Devin Thomas (11.1 PPG, 7.5 RPG) are a very good inside-outside duo, allowing Wake Forest to play many different styles of games. For Miller-McIntyre, he must improve on his shooting from the outside, as he knocked down only 20% from the three-point line. Thomas is relentless on the glass, and he will have to continue to do that against some of the top ACC post players. This is a team that will really look for those two to score, with redshirt freshman SF Greg McClinton hopefully being the third leading scorer on the team led by new head coach Danny Manning. |
|
|
|
|
Last Updated: 3/29/2024 7:31:52 AM EST. |
|
|