| | | |
COLORADO UCLA |
|
| 133.5 | 59 Final 72 |
|
|
| | |
|
| | | |
697 | COLORADO | 132 | 134.5 | 698 | UCLA | -5.5 | -6.5 |
|
|
| | |
|
| | | |
|
|
All Games | 11-9 | -2.7 | 10-8 | 7-10 | 69.0 | 32.9 | 45.0% | 36.7 | 63.7 | 30.5 | 40.0% | 32.4 | Road Games | 2-7 | -5.3 | 3-5 | 3-4 | 62.3 | 28.0 | 40.6% | 34.1 | 69.3 | 32.0 | 43.8% | 34.2 | Last 5 Games | 2-3 | -0.1 | 3-1 | 3-2 | 72.8 | 32.2 | 44.5% | 37.2 | 70.0 | 30.4 | 42.5% | 34.6 | Conference Games | 4-4 | +0.8 | 5-2 | 4-4 | 70.1 | 31.6 | 44.7% | 36.2 | 68.1 | 29.6 | 41.1% | 35.7 |
|
| |
|
|
Team Stats (All Games) | 69.0 | 32.9 | 24-53 | 45.0% | 6-16 | 38.1% | 16-22 | 72.5% | 37 | 9 | 12 | 18 | 5 | 13 | 4 | vs opponents surrendering | 66.2 | 30.8 | 23-55 | 42.4% | 6-19 | 34.3% | 13-19 | 68.8% | 33 | 9 | 12 | 19 | 6 | 13 | 3 | Team Stats (Road Games) | 62.3 | 28.0 | 21-52 | 40.6% | 5-16 | 30.3% | 15-22 | 68.7% | 34 | 8 | 8 | 19 | 5 | 14 | 3 | Stats Against (All Games) | 63.7 | 30.5 | 23-57 | 40.0% | 7-21 | 32.7% | 11-17 | 66.8% | 32 | 9 | 12 | 19 | 7 | 12 | 3 | vs opponents averaging | 70 | 32.5 | 24-55 | 44.6% | 6-19 | 34.8% | 15-22 | 68.1% | 35 | 9 | 13 | 18 | 6 | 13 | 4 | Stats Against (Road Games) | 69.3 | 32.0 | 24-54 | 43.8% | 7-19 | 38.7% | 14-21 | 69.4% | 34 | 9 | 14 | 19 | 7 | 12 | 4 |
|
|
| |
|
|
All Games | 12-9 | -1.4 | 8-13 | 8-12 | 71.8 | 32.1 | 42.1% | 39.8 | 69.6 | 32.8 | 42.2% | 35.2 | Home Games | 10-1 | +4.8 | 7-4 | 6-4 | 82.5 | 38.0 | 47.2% | 40.5 | 67.8 | 31.4 | 41.3% | 33.9 | Last 5 Games | 3-2 | +1.6 | 3-2 | 1-4 | 68.8 | 30.0 | 43.7% | 34.6 | 65.4 | 32.4 | 48.6% | 28.8 | Conference Games | 4-4 | +0.6 | 4-4 | 2-6 | 65.6 | 28.0 | 40.3% | 36.6 | 67.6 | 32.4 | 45.2% | 33.6 |
|
| |
|
|
Team Stats (All Games) | 71.8 | 32.1 | 26-61 | 42.1% | 6-18 | 34.1% | 15-22 | 65.2% | 40 | 12 | 14 | 18 | 7 | 12 | 4 | vs opponents surrendering | 64.2 | 30.1 | 22-55 | 40.3% | 6-18 | 32.7% | 14-20 | 69.3% | 33 | 9 | 11 | 19 | 6 | 13 | 3 | Team Stats (Home Games) | 82.5 | 38.0 | 29-61 | 47.2% | 8-18 | 42.1% | 18-27 | 66.3% | 41 | 12 | 17 | 17 | 8 | 10 | 4 | Stats Against (All Games) | 69.6 | 32.8 | 24-57 | 42.2% | 8-22 | 35.5% | 13-19 | 71.4% | 35 | 8 | 14 | 19 | 6 | 13 | 4 | vs opponents averaging | 69.9 | 33.1 | 25-55 | 44.6% | 6-18 | 35.3% | 14-21 | 69.5% | 36 | 10 | 13 | 18 | 6 | 13 | 4 | Stats Against (Home Games) | 67.8 | 31.4 | 24-58 | 41.3% | 8-23 | 35.5% | 12-17 | 68.3% | 34 | 8 | 13 | 20 | 5 | 14 | 3 |
|
| Average power rating of opponents played: COLORADO 75.3, UCLA 75.9 |
| | |
|
|
12/13/2014 | N COLORADO | 93-68 | W | -12 | W | 134 | O | 31-49 | 63.3% | 35 | 11 | 24-61 | 39.3% | 24 | 8 | 12/22/2014 | *DEPAUL | 82-68 | W | -9 | W | 143.5 | O | 24-53 | 45.3% | 36 | 12 | 21-63 | 33.3% | 40 | 18 | 12/23/2014 | *GEORGE WASHINGTON | 50-53 | L | 1 | L | 126 | U | 19-52 | 36.5% | 33 | 14 | 17-44 | 38.6% | 32 | 12 | 12/25/2014 | @ HAWAII | 66-69 | L | -4.5 | L | 135 | P | 20-48 | 41.7% | 41 | 16 | 27-60 | 45.0% | 29 | 9 | 1/2/2015 | UCLA | 62-56 | W | -4 | W | 133.5 | U | 18-48 | 37.5% | 41 | 18 | 22-70 | 31.4% | 41 | 13 | 1/4/2015 | USC | 86-65 | W | -11 | W | 128.5 | O | 32-58 | 55.2% | 33 | 10 | 28-64 | 43.7% | 35 | 13 | 1/7/2015 | @ UTAH | 49-74 | L | 10.5 | L | 123.5 | U | 17-43 | 39.5% | 30 | 18 | 26-61 | 42.6% | 37 | 8 | 1/15/2015 | @ ARIZONA | 54-68 | L | 16.5 | W | 125 | U | 21-49 | 42.9% | 26 | 10 | 23-55 | 41.8% | 41 | 8 | 1/17/2015 | @ ARIZONA ST | 72-78 | L | 6 | T | 124.5 | O | 26-56 | 46.4% | 33 | 13 | 26-47 | 55.3% | 28 | 14 | 1/22/2015 | WASHINGTON | 50-52 | L | -1 | L | 129 | U | 19-60 | 31.7% | 40 | 12 | 18-50 | 36.0% | 35 | 13 | 1/24/2015 | WASHINGTON ST | 90-58 | W | -8.5 | W | 134.5 | O | 34-62 | 54.8% | 44 | 11 | 24-62 | 38.7% | 28 | 12 | 1/29/2015 | @ USC | 98-94 | W | -3 | W | 133 | O | 30-65 | 46.2% | 43 | 20 | 31-73 | 42.5% | 41 | 17 | 1/31/2015 | @ UCLA | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/7/2015 | UTAH | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/12/2015 | CALIFORNIA | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/15/2015 | STANFORD | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/18/2015 | @ OREGON | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/21/2015 | @ OREGON ST | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
| |
|
|
12/13/2014 | GONZAGA | 74-87 | L | 7.5 | L | 147.5 | O | 25-60 | 41.7% | 30 | 12 | 31-53 | 58.5% | 34 | 13 | 12/20/2014 | *KENTUCKY | 44-83 | L | 16 | L | 136 | U | 19-71 | 26.8% | 42 | 15 | 32-64 | 50.0% | 47 | 12 | 12/28/2014 | @ ALABAMA | 50-56 | L | 4.5 | L | 144 | U | 16-52 | 30.8% | 40 | 18 | 17-51 | 33.3% | 39 | 12 | 1/2/2015 | @ COLORADO | 56-62 | L | 4 | L | 133.5 | U | 22-70 | 31.4% | 41 | 13 | 18-48 | 37.5% | 41 | 18 | 1/4/2015 | @ UTAH | 39-71 | L | 12 | L | 135 | U | 15-52 | 28.8% | 28 | 11 | 24-51 | 47.1% | 42 | 10 | 1/8/2015 | STANFORD | 86-81 | W | 1 | W | 131.5 | O | 27-62 | 43.5% | 51 | 10 | 26-71 | 36.6% | 42 | 9 | 1/11/2015 | CALIFORNIA | 73-54 | W | -6.5 | W | 135 | U | 29-65 | 44.6% | 40 | 6 | 21-52 | 40.4% | 34 | 16 | 1/14/2015 | @ USC | 83-66 | W | -5 | W | 143.5 | O | 35-62 | 56.5% | 41 | 14 | 24-58 | 41.4% | 20 | 12 | 1/22/2015 | @ OREGON ST | 55-66 | L | -1.5 | L | 124 | U | 19-62 | 30.6% | 35 | 12 | 22-43 | 51.2% | 32 | 16 | 1/24/2015 | @ OREGON | 64-82 | L | 2.5 | L | 147 | U | 25-61 | 41.0% | 28 | 7 | 33-53 | 62.3% | 31 | 10 | 1/29/2015 | UTAH | 69-59 | W | 5.5 | W | 132 | U | 24-52 | 46.2% | 29 | 6 | 23-47 | 48.9% | 27 | 14 | 1/31/2015 | COLORADO | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/5/2015 | @ STANFORD | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/7/2015 | @ CALIFORNIA | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/11/2015 | OREGON ST | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/14/2015 | OREGON | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/18/2015 | @ ARIZONA ST | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/21/2015 | @ ARIZONA | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
| | | COLORADO: Tad Boyle has done a terrific job of taking the Buffaloes' program to another level in the Pac-12. The team lost Spence Dinwiddie to the NBA, but still brings back a lot of talent from a team that made the NCAA Tournament. C Josh Scott (14.1 PPG, 8.4 RPG, 1.1 BPG) is a highly-skilled post player who can score over both shoulders. He is not an elite athlete, but he knows how to play the game of basketball. Scott is also a solid passer from the block, kicking it out to teammates like PG Askia Booker (13.3 PPG, 3.7 RPG, 3.3 APG) and SG Xavier Johnson (12.0 PPG, 5.9 RPG, 36% threes). Booker is at his best when scoring off the bounce, while Johnson is better at finding the open spot on the perimeter. The Buffaloes are a deep and experienced team, but they will have to shoot better from behind the three-point arc (32% threes). | | UCLA: If you are talking about pure talent, the Bruins deserve to be higher on the list. However, this is as young of a team as there is in the conference, who will look to replace five key players that helped UCLA reach the Sweet 16 last season. The top incoming freshman is 6-foot-9 PF Kevin Looney, who is relentless on the glass. He should work well with C Tony Parker (6.9 PPG, 4.4 RPG, 0.6 BPG), who has to become a more imposing presence down low. He is skilled and agile for his size, but he has to be more aggressive in his junior campaign. SG Norman Powell (11.4 PPG, 2.8 RPG, 53% FG) leads a thin backcourt. Powell came off the bench last season, but will likely be the team's leading scorer, especially early as the freshmen class adjusts to college basketball. He must become a better shooter (29% from threes), as opposing defense are going to pack it in a bit and make the Bruins beat them from deep, but Powell played very well in the 2014 postseason with 14.0 PPG. He will be joined by PG Bryce Alford (8.0 PPG, 2.8 APG, 39% threes) who is the son of head coach Steve Alford, and has similarities to his father in his intelligence and long-range shooting. |
| | |
| Last Updated: 4/19/2024 11:25:19 PM EST. |
|
|
| |
|