|
|
VANDERBILT TEXAS A&M |
|
| 126.5 | 58 Final 69 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| | |
611 | VANDERBILT | 128 | 126.5 | 612 | TEXAS A&M | -5 | -5 |
|
|
| | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All Games | 11-9 | -4.2 | 8-9 | 8-5 | 70.4 | 32.3 | 47.4% | 35.0 | 63.7 | 28.3 | 40.1% | 32.1 | Road Games | 2-6 | -4.9 | 3-5 | 2-3 | 63.2 | 29.2 | 46.0% | 30.5 | 64.6 | 27.5 | 41.3% | 34.1 | Last 5 Games | 0-5 | -5.6 | 1-4 | 2-3 | 63.0 | 27.2 | 40.1% | 31.4 | 68.2 | 28.6 | 44.6% | 36.0 | Conference Games | 1-6 | -5.6 | 2-5 | 3-4 | 64.1 | 28.1 | 42.1% | 33.0 | 67.9 | 28.3 | 42.8% | 34.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
Team Stats (All Games) | 70.4 | 32.3 | 24-51 | 47.4% | 7-18 | 37.1% | 15-21 | 71.5% | 35 | 9 | 15 | 18 | 5 | 14 | 5 | vs opponents surrendering | 66 | 30.6 | 23-55 | 41.7% | 6-19 | 33.2% | 14-20 | 67.6% | 34 | 9 | 12 | 19 | 6 | 13 | 4 | Team Stats (Road Games) | 63.2 | 29.2 | 23-50 | 46.0% | 6-16 | 36.7% | 11-16 | 67.9% | 30 | 8 | 13 | 18 | 5 | 12 | 3 | Stats Against (All Games) | 63.7 | 28.3 | 22-56 | 40.1% | 6-18 | 33.6% | 13-20 | 66.1% | 32 | 11 | 11 | 19 | 6 | 12 | 3 | vs opponents averaging | 68 | 31.9 | 24-55 | 43.4% | 6-17 | 33.7% | 15-22 | 67.9% | 36 | 10 | 13 | 19 | 7 | 14 | 4 | Stats Against (Road Games) | 64.6 | 27.5 | 22-53 | 41.3% | 5-16 | 32.6% | 15-21 | 71.3% | 34 | 13 | 12 | 17 | 6 | 11 | 4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
All Games | 14-5 | +8 | 10-7 | 7-7 | 67.9 | 30.0 | 45.5% | 36.0 | 61.8 | 28.6 | 39.1% | 32.4 | Home Games | 9-1 | +6 | 5-3 | 3-2 | 73.8 | 32.7 | 47.3% | 37.9 | 61.9 | 27.2 | 37.3% | 33.8 | Last 5 Games | 5-0 | +6.2 | 4-1 | 3-2 | 68.2 | 28.4 | 45.8% | 36.4 | 61.2 | 29.8 | 38.0% | 31.2 | Conference Games | 5-2 | +5.2 | 5-2 | 4-3 | 64.1 | 27.7 | 41.6% | 38.1 | 63.0 | 28.7 | 37.1% | 35.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
Team Stats (All Games) | 67.9 | 30.0 | 25-54 | 45.5% | 5-15 | 34.0% | 14-21 | 64.7% | 36 | 9 | 14 | 18 | 6 | 12 | 3 | vs opponents surrendering | 64.6 | 30.2 | 23-54 | 41.8% | 6-18 | 33.1% | 13-20 | 67.3% | 34 | 9 | 12 | 19 | 6 | 14 | 3 | Team Stats (Home Games) | 73.8 | 32.7 | 26-56 | 47.3% | 6-15 | 36.4% | 15-24 | 62.6% | 38 | 9 | 16 | 18 | 6 | 11 | 4 | Stats Against (All Games) | 61.8 | 28.6 | 21-53 | 39.1% | 7-22 | 31.0% | 14-19 | 71.1% | 32 | 9 | 12 | 19 | 6 | 14 | 4 | vs opponents averaging | 68.4 | 31.8 | 24-54 | 43.9% | 6-18 | 34.2% | 15-22 | 68.6% | 35 | 9 | 13 | 19 | 7 | 13 | 4 | Stats Against (Home Games) | 61.9 | 27.2 | 20-54 | 37.3% | 8-24 | 33.1% | 13-19 | 71.0% | 34 | 9 | 12 | 20 | 5 | 14 | 4 |
|
|
Average power rating of opponents played: VANDERBILT 73.5, TEXAS A&M 76.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
12/13/2014 | PURDUE | 81-71 | W | 4 | W | 129 | O | 28-48 | 58.3% | 25 | 14 | 26-55 | 47.3% | 29 | 12 | 12/16/2014 | W CAROLINA | 99-79 | W | -10.5 | W | 135.5 | O | 26-47 | 55.3% | 34 | 18 | 30-57 | 52.6% | 18 | 14 | 12/20/2014 | @ GEORGIA TECH | 60-65 | L | 2.5 | L | | - | 21-45 | 46.7% | 30 | 13 | 26-67 | 38.8% | 39 | 7 | 12/22/2014 | PENNSYLVANIA | 79-50 | W | -13.5 | W | | - | 28-49 | 57.1% | 39 | 16 | 19-55 | 34.5% | 24 | 17 | 12/31/2014 | @ SAINT LOUIS | 70-55 | W | -4 | W | | - | 25-46 | 54.3% | 39 | 14 | 20-55 | 36.4% | 26 | 8 | 1/3/2015 | YALE | 79-74 | W | -5.5 | L | 123 | O | 23-56 | 41.1% | 39 | 12 | 27-67 | 40.3% | 39 | 17 | 1/6/2015 | AUBURN | 64-52 | W | -7.5 | W | 136 | U | 20-46 | 43.5% | 47 | 19 | 18-59 | 30.5% | 27 | 9 | 1/10/2015 | @ ARKANSAS | 70-82 | L | 10 | L | 144 | O | 26-50 | 52.0% | 27 | 22 | 28-59 | 47.5% | 33 | 11 | 1/14/2015 | GEORGIA | 67-70 | L | -2.5 | L | 128 | O | 23-56 | 41.1% | 36 | 11 | 22-45 | 48.9% | 27 | 11 | 1/17/2015 | @ MISSISSIPPI ST | 54-57 | L | -4 | L | 123.5 | U | 20-52 | 38.5% | 28 | 7 | 17-44 | 38.6% | 41 | 17 | 1/20/2015 | @ KENTUCKY | 57-65 | L | 21.5 | W | 127 | U | 22-53 | 41.5% | 30 | 16 | 20-46 | 43.5% | 33 | 13 | 1/24/2015 | LSU | 75-79 | L | -2.5 | L | 140 | O | 27-63 | 42.9% | 36 | 16 | 30-64 | 46.9% | 42 | 19 | 1/27/2015 | @ GEORGIA | 62-70 | L | 5.5 | L | 133 | U | 21-58 | 36.2% | 27 | 7 | 19-43 | 44.2% | 37 | 16 | 1/31/2015 | @ TEXAS A&M | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/3/2015 | FLORIDA | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/7/2015 | S CAROLINA | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/11/2015 | TENNESSEE | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/14/2015 | @ ALABAMA | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/18/2015 | @ FLORIDA | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/21/2015 | MISSOURI | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
12/13/2014 | YOUNGSTOWN ST | 81-63 | W | -13 | W | | - | 31-51 | 60.8% | 35 | 12 | 25-61 | 41.0% | 28 | 10 | 12/20/2014 | *KANSAS ST | 64-71 | L | 4 | L | 128.5 | O | 25-51 | 49.0% | 25 | 6 | 24-39 | 61.5% | 24 | 12 | 12/30/2014 | MERCER | 65-50 | W | -12 | W | 121 | U | 23-50 | 46.0% | 36 | 8 | 19-46 | 41.3% | 25 | 11 | 1/3/2015 | HARTFORD | 58-49 | W | | - | | - | 19-50 | 38.0% | 41 | 13 | 16-57 | 28.1% | 35 | 14 | 1/6/2015 | @ ALABAMA | 44-65 | L | 5.5 | L | 126 | U | 16-52 | 30.8% | 33 | 14 | 21-47 | 44.7% | 36 | 8 | 1/10/2015 | KENTUCKY | 64-70 | L | 14.5 | W | 119 | O | 23-69 | 33.3% | 52 | 12 | 18-64 | 28.1% | 53 | 12 | 1/13/2015 | MISSISSIPPI ST | 74-70 | W | -10 | L | 117 | O | 21-44 | 47.7% | 34 | 13 | 21-59 | 35.6% | 36 | 14 | 1/17/2015 | @ LSU | 67-64 | W | 5 | W | 135.5 | U | 27-65 | 41.5% | 41 | 13 | 25-64 | 39.1% | 40 | 16 | 1/21/2015 | MISSOURI | 62-50 | W | -9 | W | 125.5 | U | 20-47 | 42.6% | 37 | 12 | 20-47 | 42.6% | 24 | 14 | 1/24/2015 | @ TENNESSEE | 67-61 | W | 3.5 | W | 121 | O | 25-52 | 48.1% | 34 | 9 | 20-52 | 38.5% | 27 | 9 | 1/27/2015 | @ AUBURN | 71-61 | W | -2.5 | W | 129 | O | 28-56 | 50.0% | 36 | 8 | 15-44 | 34.1% | 29 | 10 | 1/31/2015 | VANDERBILT | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/4/2015 | @ OLE MISS | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/7/2015 | @ MISSOURI | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/11/2015 | GEORGIA | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/14/2015 | FLORIDA | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/17/2015 | LSU | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/21/2015 | @ S CAROLINA | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
|
| VANDERBILT: The Commodores had a great recruiting class, showing their program is taking the right steps to move up the standings in the conference. Everything for the team will start with sophomore C Damian Jones (11.3 PPG, 5.7 RPG, 1.4 BPG), who showed last season that he is ready to be the leader on the team. While it may still take a little while for this team to start producing a lot of wins, PG Shelton Mitchell, SG Riley LaChance and SF Matthew Fisher-Davis are among the projected freshmen starters who could be the cornerstone of this program in the next few seasons. | | TEXAS A&M: The Aggies have struggled since joining the SEC, and it may be tough for them to get things going this season. There are some quality players left on the team though, most notably PG Alex Caruso (9.0 PPG, 5.0 APG, 3.6 RPG) who is the returning assist leader in the conference. At 6-foot-5, he forces to defenses to have to collapse on him when he is driving, because he can finish very well at the basket. SG Jordan Green (6.9 PPG, 2.3 RPG, 1.6 APG) and PF Kourtney Roberson (9.8 PPG, 6.8 RPG, 59% FG) are two experienced players who are willing to do the dirty work for the team. Transfer F/G Jalen Jones (14 PPG and 7.7 RPG at SMU) is a player who is capable of leading this team in scoring. |
|
|
|
|
Last Updated: 5/19/2024 12:02:26 PM EST. |
|
|