|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| | |
675 | UCF | 133.5 | 135 | 676 | SMU | -18.5 | -19 |
|
|
| | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All Games | 9-11 | -3.1 | 7-8 | 6-3 | 68.1 | 31.4 | 43.8% | 33.6 | 72.8 | 33.9 | 45.3% | 36.5 | Road Games | 1-5 | +0.2 | 3-3 | 3-1 | 71.5 | 32.7 | 43.3% | 34.0 | 82.5 | 36.7 | 48.0% | 40.8 | Last 5 Games | 1-4 | -1 | 2-3 | 3-2 | 70.0 | 28.2 | 42.3% | 32.4 | 81.6 | 36.4 | 48.1% | 39.8 | Conference Games | 2-7 | -0.8 | 6-3 | 6-3 | 69.1 | 28.4 | 42.2% | 34.8 | 77.3 | 35.1 | 46.3% | 38.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
Team Stats (All Games) | 68.1 | 31.4 | 24-54 | 43.8% | 7-19 | 37.3% | 13-21 | 65.5% | 34 | 8 | 12 | 16 | 5 | 13 | 4 | vs opponents surrendering | 64.9 | 30 | 23-54 | 42.0% | 6-19 | 33.1% | 13-20 | 68.0% | 34 | 9 | 12 | 18 | 6 | 13 | 4 | Team Stats (Road Games) | 71.5 | 32.7 | 25-58 | 43.3% | 7-17 | 39.6% | 14-21 | 68.5% | 34 | 8 | 10 | 19 | 5 | 13 | 4 | Stats Against (All Games) | 72.8 | 33.9 | 27-61 | 45.3% | 7-19 | 36.1% | 11-17 | 63.8% | 36 | 11 | 15 | 18 | 7 | 10 | 4 | vs opponents averaging | 67.1 | 31.8 | 24-55 | 42.7% | 6-19 | 33.0% | 14-20 | 69.6% | 35 | 9 | 13 | 18 | 6 | 13 | 4 | Stats Against (Road Games) | 82.5 | 36.7 | 30-63 | 48.0% | 7-19 | 36.8% | 15-25 | 61.5% | 41 | 13 | 18 | 18 | 7 | 10 | 6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
All Games | 17-4 | +3 | 9-8 | 8-8 | 69.9 | 32.9 | 48.6% | 37.4 | 58.9 | 26.6 | 37.6% | 29.1 | Home Games | 12-1 | +1.2 | 6-3 | 6-2 | 74.8 | 35.2 | 50.4% | 37.7 | 58.8 | 24.8 | 37.4% | 28.7 | Last 5 Games | 5-0 | +3 | 4-1 | 2-3 | 69.2 | 32.4 | 49.4% | 37.2 | 54.4 | 27.8 | 35.9% | 27.8 | Conference Games | 8-1 | +3.8 | 6-3 | 4-5 | 69.1 | 33.0 | 50.1% | 35.7 | 55.2 | 24.4 | 37.8% | 27.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
Team Stats (All Games) | 69.9 | 32.9 | 25-51 | 48.6% | 5-12 | 36.4% | 16-22 | 72.6% | 37 | 10 | 16 | 17 | 6 | 14 | 4 | vs opponents surrendering | 66 | 30.5 | 23-55 | 42.2% | 6-18 | 33.7% | 13-20 | 68.5% | 34 | 10 | 12 | 18 | 6 | 13 | 4 | Team Stats (Home Games) | 74.8 | 35.2 | 26-51 | 50.4% | 5-12 | 38.9% | 18-25 | 74.1% | 38 | 9 | 17 | 16 | 8 | 13 | 5 | Stats Against (All Games) | 58.9 | 26.6 | 20-54 | 37.6% | 8-24 | 31.2% | 11-17 | 63.9% | 29 | 8 | 13 | 18 | 7 | 13 | 3 | vs opponents averaging | 68.4 | 32.1 | 24-55 | 43.5% | 6-19 | 33.9% | 14-20 | 69.1% | 35 | 10 | 13 | 18 | 7 | 13 | 4 | Stats Against (Home Games) | 58.8 | 24.8 | 21-55 | 37.4% | 7-23 | 31.2% | 10-16 | 64.6% | 29 | 9 | 13 | 20 | 7 | 14 | 3 |
|
|
Average power rating of opponents played: UCF 71, SMU 71.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
12/13/2014 | FLA ATLANTIC | 41-54 | L | -2.5 | L | | - | 13-51 | 25.5% | 38 | 15 | 17-49 | 34.7% | 42 | 16 | 12/17/2014 | DETROIT | 75-70 | W | 3 | W | | - | 22-44 | 50.0% | 28 | 12 | 27-58 | 46.6% | 28 | 11 | 12/22/2014 | SE LOUISIANA | 70-65 | W | | - | | - | 27-65 | 41.5% | 39 | 9 | 26-65 | 40.0% | 46 | 14 | 12/31/2014 | TULSA | 54-56 | L | 7 | W | 133.5 | U | 19-49 | 38.8% | 37 | 16 | 24-63 | 38.1% | 33 | 4 | 1/4/2015 | @ TEMPLE | 78-84 | L | 15 | W | 127.5 | O | 30-66 | 45.5% | 39 | 11 | 31-68 | 45.6% | 44 | 8 | 1/6/2015 | @ HOUSTON | 79-78 | W | 7 | W | 139 | O | 29-62 | 46.8% | 48 | 17 | 24-64 | 37.5% | 37 | 10 | 1/11/2015 | SMU | 61-70 | L | 13 | W | 130 | O | 21-58 | 36.2% | 27 | 9 | 28-49 | 57.1% | 35 | 13 | 1/14/2015 | TULANE | 103-100 | W | 1.5 | W | 132.5 | O | 34-65 | 52.3% | 41 | 11 | 38-80 | 47.5% | 45 | 13 | 1/17/2015 | @ MEMPHIS | 79-99 | L | 13.5 | L | 134.5 | O | 26-57 | 45.6% | 24 | 12 | 38-74 | 51.4% | 53 | 13 | 1/22/2015 | @ CONNECTICUT | 60-67 | L | 16.5 | W | 132.5 | U | 21-57 | 36.8% | 37 | 12 | 25-52 | 48.1% | 31 | 8 | 1/25/2015 | CINCINNATI | 46-56 | L | 9 | L | 127.5 | U | 17-52 | 32.7% | 31 | 12 | 19-47 | 40.4% | 33 | 9 | 1/28/2015 | TEMPLE | 62-86 | L | 7.5 | L | 133 | O | 21-50 | 42.0% | 29 | 16 | 33-65 | 50.8% | 37 | 8 | 1/31/2015 | @ SMU | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/7/2015 | @ E CAROLINA | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/11/2015 | S FLORIDA | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/15/2015 | HOUSTON | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/19/2015 | @ TULANE | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/22/2015 | MEMPHIS | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
12/17/2014 | IL-CHICAGO | 67-46 | W | -19 | W | 132 | U | 22-41 | 53.7% | 43 | 20 | 17-64 | 26.6% | 27 | 13 | 12/20/2014 | @ MICHIGAN | 62-51 | W | 1.5 | W | 128.5 | U | 23-50 | 46.0% | 44 | 20 | 17-54 | 31.5% | 27 | 14 | 12/29/2014 | MIDWESTERN TX | 70-61 | W | | - | | - | 23-60 | 38.3% | 47 | 19 | 22-64 | 34.4% | 38 | 18 | 12/31/2014 | S FLORIDA | 83-49 | W | -16.5 | W | 133.5 | U | 26-50 | 52.0% | 37 | 12 | 19-52 | 36.5% | 28 | 17 | 1/3/2015 | @ CINCINNATI | 50-56 | L | -1 | L | 117.5 | U | 21-49 | 42.9% | 25 | 17 | 19-41 | 46.3% | 30 | 18 | 1/8/2015 | MEMPHIS | 73-59 | W | -10 | W | 126.5 | O | 27-52 | 51.9% | 38 | 11 | 23-53 | 43.4% | 22 | 10 | 1/11/2015 | @ UCF | 70-61 | W | -13 | L | 130 | O | 28-49 | 57.1% | 35 | 13 | 21-58 | 36.2% | 27 | 9 | 1/14/2015 | @ TEMPLE | 60-55 | W | -3 | W | 126 | U | 22-46 | 47.8% | 33 | 16 | 20-49 | 40.8% | 23 | 12 | 1/17/2015 | E CAROLINA | 77-54 | W | -18 | W | 124 | O | 30-51 | 58.8% | 31 | 9 | 19-53 | 35.8% | 29 | 16 | 1/21/2015 | @ TULANE | 66-52 | W | -8.5 | W | 127.5 | U | 22-51 | 43.1% | 41 | 9 | 16-48 | 33.3% | 30 | 9 | 1/24/2015 | HOUSTON | 80-59 | W | -18.5 | W | 130 | O | 27-52 | 51.9% | 43 | 12 | 19-54 | 35.2% | 24 | 10 | 1/28/2015 | @ S FLORIDA | 63-52 | W | -11.5 | L | 125 | U | 23-51 | 45.1% | 38 | 12 | 18-52 | 34.6% | 33 | 13 | 1/31/2015 | UCF | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/5/2015 | CINCINNATI | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/7/2015 | @ TULSA | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/12/2015 | @ HOUSTON | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/14/2015 | CONNECTICUT | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/19/2015 | TEMPLE | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
|
| SMU: Expectations were high heading into the season as head coach Larry Brown thought he would have Emmanuel Mudiay leading the show, but Mudiay went overseas to play professionally. Despite the loss, the Mustangs are still a loaded team. PG Nic Moore (13.6 PPG, 4.9 APG, 1.5 SPG) is one of the more underrated point guards in the country. He is great on both ends of the court, and he can also knock down the long-range shot (44% threes). PF Markus Kennedy (12.4 PPG, 7.1 RPG, 1.6 APG) is the perfect big man for this team, as SMU is looking to push the pace and cause havoc on defense, but he will miss the first semester due to academic difficulties. The player to look out for is SG Keith Frazier (5.4 PPG, 40% threes). He had some struggles as a freshman, but he has the potential to be a 15-point scorer this season. If he reaches that level of scoring acumen, then the Mustangs will be a very difficult opponent in the NCAA Tournament. |
|
|
|
|
Last Updated: 4/20/2024 4:30:49 AM EST. |
|
|