| | | |
LSU MISSISSIPPI ST |
|
| 136.5 | 67 Final 73 |
|
|
| | |
|
| | | |
575 | LSU | -5 | -5 | 576 | MISSISSIPPI ST | 134 | 136.5 |
|
|
| | |
|
| | | |
|
|
All Games | 16-4 | +12.8 | 10-7 | 8-7 | 74.9 | 34.9 | 45.9% | 40.3 | 67.1 | 32.2 | 39.6% | 36.6 | Road Games | 6-3 | +8.9 | 6-3 | 5-1 | 71.9 | 32.1 | 44.0% | 39.8 | 68.4 | 32.7 | 40.0% | 36.1 | Last 5 Games | 4-1 | +6.6 | 4-1 | 2-2 | 72.2 | 33.6 | 45.1% | 38.0 | 66.4 | 31.0 | 38.2% | 38.8 | Conference Games | 5-2 | +6 | 4-2 | 4-2 | 73.6 | 34.3 | 43.8% | 39.1 | 70.0 | 31.1 | 39.0% | 40.4 |
|
| |
|
|
Team Stats (All Games) | 74.9 | 34.9 | 28-61 | 45.9% | 6-16 | 34.4% | 13-19 | 72.0% | 40 | 11 | 16 | 15 | 8 | 16 | 6 | vs opponents surrendering | 65.6 | 30.4 | 23-54 | 42.1% | 6-18 | 33.6% | 14-20 | 68.2% | 34 | 9 | 12 | 19 | 6 | 13 | 4 | Team Stats (Road Games) | 71.9 | 32.1 | 26-60 | 44.0% | 6-15 | 36.8% | 14-19 | 71.8% | 40 | 11 | 14 | 15 | 7 | 16 | 4 | Stats Against (All Games) | 67.1 | 32.2 | 25-63 | 39.6% | 6-18 | 31.6% | 11-17 | 66.2% | 37 | 12 | 12 | 17 | 9 | 15 | 3 | vs opponents averaging | 67.6 | 31.5 | 24-55 | 43.1% | 6-18 | 33.3% | 14-21 | 68.4% | 35 | 10 | 13 | 18 | 7 | 13 | 4 | Stats Against (Road Games) | 68.4 | 32.7 | 25-63 | 40.0% | 6-19 | 33.3% | 12-17 | 68.8% | 36 | 11 | 13 | 17 | 8 | 14 | 4 |
|
|
| |
|
|
All Games | 9-11 | -9.1 | 8-8 | 7-7 | 61.9 | 28.2 | 42.4% | 35.7 | 61.7 | 29.2 | 41.8% | 30.7 | Home Games | 7-4 | -6.9 | 4-4 | 3-4 | 62.6 | 30.2 | 42.4% | 35.9 | 59.7 | 30.1 | 41.1% | 29.5 | Last 5 Games | 2-3 | +0.8 | 4-1 | 4-1 | 68.8 | 28.0 | 41.7% | 39.4 | 70.0 | 27.8 | 42.7% | 31.6 | Conference Games | 2-5 | -0.2 | 4-3 | 5-2 | 62.6 | 26.0 | 40.2% | 36.1 | 69.0 | 29.1 | 43.2% | 33.3 |
|
| |
|
|
Team Stats (All Games) | 61.9 | 28.2 | 21-50 | 42.4% | 4-15 | 30.2% | 15-21 | 69.8% | 36 | 10 | 8 | 19 | 7 | 15 | 3 | vs opponents surrendering | 65.4 | 30.5 | 22-54 | 41.5% | 6-19 | 32.3% | 15-21 | 69.2% | 35 | 10 | 12 | 19 | 6 | 13 | 3 | Team Stats (Home Games) | 62.6 | 30.2 | 21-49 | 42.4% | 4-13 | 28.1% | 17-24 | 71.4% | 36 | 11 | 8 | 17 | 7 | 14 | 3 | Stats Against (All Games) | 61.7 | 29.2 | 22-52 | 41.8% | 7-20 | 33.8% | 12-19 | 61.7% | 31 | 8 | 11 | 18 | 7 | 12 | 3 | vs opponents averaging | 66.3 | 30.8 | 23-54 | 42.9% | 6-18 | 33.1% | 14-21 | 66.6% | 34 | 9 | 12 | 19 | 7 | 13 | 4 | Stats Against (Home Games) | 59.7 | 30.1 | 21-51 | 41.1% | 8-20 | 37.4% | 10-17 | 61.6% | 29 | 7 | 11 | 20 | 8 | 13 | 3 |
|
| Average power rating of opponents played: LSU 74.6, MISSISSIPPI ST 71.8 |
| | |
|
|
12/13/2014 | SAM HOUSTON ST | 76-67 | W | -9 | T | 143 | P | 26-61 | 42.6% | 42 | 7 | 25-73 | 34.2% | 50 | 10 | 12/18/2014 | @ UAB | 79-70 | W | -6 | W | 141.5 | O | 28-61 | 45.9% | 34 | 10 | 29-65 | 44.6% | 36 | 14 | 12/22/2014 | COLL OF CHARLESTON | 71-47 | W | -12.5 | W | 133.5 | U | 22-46 | 47.8% | 43 | 21 | 18-64 | 28.1% | 34 | 17 | 12/29/2014 | SOUTHERN MISS | 87-67 | W | -17 | W | 134 | O | 35-71 | 49.3% | 46 | 13 | 23-57 | 40.4% | 28 | 15 | 1/3/2015 | SAVANNAH ST | 75-59 | W | -26 | L | 136.5 | U | 33-60 | 55.0% | 38 | 18 | 25-54 | 46.3% | 23 | 18 | 1/8/2015 | @ MISSOURI | 67-74 | L | -3 | L | 132 | O | 24-66 | 36.4% | 50 | 19 | 27-67 | 40.3% | 39 | 14 | 1/10/2015 | GEORGIA | 87-84 | W | -3 | T | 138 | O | 30-66 | 45.5% | 34 | 14 | 28-68 | 41.2% | 50 | 20 | 1/14/2015 | @ OLE MISS | 75-71 | W | 6 | W | 146 | P | 26-60 | 43.3% | 41 | 15 | 27-78 | 34.6% | 47 | 12 | 1/17/2015 | TEXAS A&M | 64-67 | L | -5 | L | 135.5 | U | 25-64 | 39.1% | 40 | 16 | 27-65 | 41.5% | 41 | 13 | 1/20/2015 | @ FLORIDA | 79-61 | W | 11 | W | 135 | O | 27-52 | 51.9% | 35 | 16 | 23-60 | 38.3% | 30 | 13 | 1/24/2015 | @ VANDERBILT | 79-75 | W | 2.5 | W | 140 | O | 30-64 | 46.9% | 42 | 19 | 27-63 | 42.9% | 36 | 16 | 1/28/2015 | S CAROLINA | 64-58 | W | -4.5 | W | 140.5 | U | 22-48 | 45.8% | 32 | 14 | 21-61 | 34.4% | 40 | 15 | 1/31/2015 | @ MISSISSIPPI ST | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/5/2015 | AUBURN | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/7/2015 | ALABAMA | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/10/2015 | KENTUCKY | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/14/2015 | @ TENNESSEE | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/17/2015 | @ TEXAS A&M | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/21/2015 | FLORIDA | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
| |
|
|
12/13/2014 | @ OREGON ST | 49-59 | L | 2.5 | L | 118 | U | 17-49 | 34.7% | 34 | 17 | 22-59 | 37.3% | 40 | 10 | 12/17/2014 | ARKANSAS ST | 55-69 | L | -12 | L | 123 | O | 21-65 | 32.3% | 33 | 9 | 24-46 | 52.2% | 39 | 14 | 12/20/2014 | *USC UPSTATE | 51-53 | L | | - | | - | 17-44 | 38.6% | 39 | 16 | 21-52 | 40.4% | 23 | 7 | 12/23/2014 | JACKSONVILLE | 70-47 | W | | - | | - | 25-44 | 56.8% | 35 | 21 | 18-49 | 36.7% | 18 | 17 | 12/30/2014 | MCNEESE ST | 47-66 | L | | - | | - | 18-43 | 41.9% | 21 | 10 | 26-50 | 52.0% | 30 | 8 | 1/2/2015 | FLORIDA ST | 62-55 | W | 2 | W | 126 | U | 24-52 | 46.2% | 28 | 12 | 19-43 | 44.2% | 30 | 19 | 1/7/2015 | TENNESSEE | 47-61 | L | 2 | L | 119.5 | U | 11-36 | 30.6% | 28 | 13 | 17-48 | 35.4% | 44 | 18 | 1/10/2015 | @ FLORIDA | 47-72 | L | 17 | L | 115 | O | 17-44 | 38.6% | 28 | 15 | 28-53 | 52.8% | 31 | 7 | 1/13/2015 | @ TEXAS A&M | 70-74 | L | 10 | W | 117 | O | 21-59 | 35.6% | 36 | 14 | 21-44 | 47.7% | 34 | 13 | 1/17/2015 | VANDERBILT | 57-54 | W | 4 | W | 123.5 | U | 17-44 | 38.6% | 41 | 17 | 20-52 | 38.5% | 28 | 7 | 1/21/2015 | @ AUBURN | 78-71 | W | 7 | W | 129 | O | 26-56 | 46.4% | 44 | 17 | 25-62 | 40.3% | 33 | 12 | 1/24/2015 | GEORGIA | 66-72 | L | 5 | L | 125.5 | O | 22-65 | 33.8% | 42 | 9 | 23-47 | 48.9% | 32 | 11 | 1/28/2015 | @ OLE MISS | 73-79 | L | 12.5 | W | 138 | O | 30-54 | 55.6% | 34 | 16 | 22-55 | 40.0% | 31 | 6 | 1/31/2015 | LSU | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/3/2015 | @ TENNESSEE | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/7/2015 | @ ARKANSAS | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/10/2015 | ALABAMA | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/14/2015 | @ MISSOURI | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/19/2015 | OLE MISS | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/21/2015 | ARKANSAS | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
| | | LSU: To compete in the SEC this season, teams are going to need great frontcourts. Luckily for LSU, it has the size down low to compete with the two SEC powerhouses, Kentucky and Florida. Six-foot-8, 235-pound PF Jordan Mickey (12.7 PPG, 7.9 RPG, 53% FG) and 6-foot-10 C Jarrell Martin (10.3 PPG, 4.6 RPG, 47% FG) are two future pros. Mickey is also an exceptional defender, as he blocked 3.1 shots per game last season. The backcourt will dictate how good the Tigers could be this season, as freshman Jayne Patterson and JUCO transfer Josh Gray are the projected starters. The Tigers have flown under the radar the past few years, and have not entered a season with these kinds of expectations. If Mickey and Martin are able to both have the seasons they are capable of, LSU will be able to hang with most teams in the country. | | MISSISSIPPI ST: The Bulldogs bring back a lot of the starters from last season's team, but there still is a lot of work to do for this program to get back to respectability. Junior PG Craig Sword (13.7 PPG, 3.8 RPG, 2.8 APG) is a very intelligent player on the court, but he has to improve on his outside shooting (27% threes overall, 19% threes in SEC play). He does a nice job of scoring off the dribble, but if defenses had to respect him more from the perimeter, he would be even tougher to slow down. PF Gavin Ware (10.0 PPG, 7.2 RPG, 58% FG) is the team's best post player, and has reportedly improved upon his conditioning for the upcoming season. There is some young potential down low in freshmen PF Fallou Ndoye and SF Oliver Black, but Mississippi State is still a long ways from competing in the SEC. |
| | |
| Last Updated: 4/26/2024 10:28:41 PM EST. |
|
|
| |
|