|
|
NC STATE GEORGIA TECH |
|
| 129 | 81 Final 80 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| | |
527 | NC STATE | Pick | -1 | 528 | GEORGIA TECH | 129 | 129 |
|
|
| | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All Games | 13-9 | -5.4 | 9-7 | 7-7 | 71.6 | 34.4 | 45.1% | 38.3 | 65.1 | 30.1 | 39.8% | 33.6 | Road Games | 1-4 | -2 | 2-1 | 1-4 | 62.6 | 34.4 | 44.4% | 31.4 | 67.6 | 33.0 | 42.5% | 34.0 | Last 5 Games | 1-4 | -5.6 | 2-2 | 2-3 | 69.2 | 31.8 | 41.1% | 37.4 | 71.6 | 30.8 | 44.8% | 35.6 | Conference Games | 4-5 | -0.4 | 6-2 | 4-5 | 70.0 | 31.7 | 44.7% | 36.2 | 67.7 | 29.7 | 41.4% | 35.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
Team Stats (All Games) | 71.6 | 34.4 | 25-56 | 45.1% | 6-17 | 36.9% | 15-21 | 67.8% | 38 | 10 | 11 | 18 | 4 | 11 | 6 | vs opponents surrendering | 64.1 | 29.8 | 22-54 | 41.6% | 6-18 | 33.1% | 13-19 | 68.9% | 33 | 9 | 11 | 19 | 6 | 13 | 3 | Team Stats (Road Games) | 62.6 | 34.4 | 23-52 | 44.4% | 7-16 | 41.8% | 10-17 | 58.8% | 31 | 9 | 10 | 19 | 3 | 13 | 3 | Stats Against (All Games) | 65.1 | 30.1 | 23-57 | 39.8% | 6-18 | 32.6% | 14-19 | 69.8% | 34 | 9 | 11 | 20 | 6 | 10 | 3 | vs opponents averaging | 70.1 | 33 | 25-55 | 44.5% | 6-18 | 34.5% | 14-21 | 68.5% | 36 | 10 | 13 | 18 | 7 | 12 | 4 | Stats Against (Road Games) | 67.6 | 33.0 | 23-54 | 42.5% | 7-18 | 36.3% | 15-21 | 74.0% | 34 | 10 | 13 | 17 | 6 | 11 | 3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
All Games | 10-10 | +1.2 | 9-9 | 8-5 | 63.8 | 30.4 | 41.4% | 38.2 | 62.9 | 27.4 | 42.8% | 29.9 | Home Games | 6-4 | 0 | 4-4 | 1-2 | 64.6 | 31.4 | 40.9% | 39.1 | 60.2 | 26.8 | 41.5% | 28.6 | Last 5 Games | 1-4 | -0.5 | 3-2 | 2-3 | 56.8 | 28.6 | 39.7% | 34.4 | 60.6 | 28.2 | 42.5% | 29.4 | Conference Games | 1-7 | -3.5 | 5-3 | 4-4 | 59.2 | 28.7 | 39.1% | 36.2 | 63.5 | 28.7 | 43.8% | 31.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
Team Stats (All Games) | 63.8 | 30.4 | 24-57 | 41.4% | 4-16 | 25.5% | 13-19 | 67.5% | 38 | 12 | 11 | 17 | 6 | 13 | 4 | vs opponents surrendering | 63.7 | 29.4 | 23-55 | 41.4% | 6-19 | 32.2% | 12-18 | 68.5% | 33 | 9 | 12 | 18 | 6 | 13 | 3 | Team Stats (Home Games) | 64.6 | 31.4 | 24-58 | 40.9% | 4-17 | 24.6% | 13-20 | 63.9% | 39 | 13 | 12 | 16 | 6 | 12 | 4 | Stats Against (All Games) | 62.9 | 27.4 | 22-52 | 42.8% | 5-18 | 30.3% | 13-18 | 70.0% | 30 | 6 | 12 | 18 | 6 | 12 | 3 | vs opponents averaging | 69.3 | 32.2 | 25-54 | 45.1% | 6-19 | 34.6% | 14-20 | 67.7% | 35 | 9 | 14 | 17 | 6 | 12 | 4 | Stats Against (Home Games) | 60.2 | 26.8 | 21-52 | 41.5% | 6-18 | 31.5% | 12-16 | 70.3% | 29 | 7 | 12 | 19 | 6 | 13 | 3 |
|
|
Average power rating of opponents played: NC STATE 77.8, GEORGIA TECH 75.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
12/12/2014 | CHARLESTON SO | 86-50 | W | | - | | - | 36-73 | 49.3% | 50 | 10 | 18-59 | 30.5% | 37 | 14 | 12/14/2014 | WOFFORD | 54-55 | L | -10.5 | L | | - | 19-45 | 42.2% | 33 | 11 | 21-59 | 35.6% | 33 | 4 | 12/17/2014 | TENNESSEE | 83-72 | W | -4.5 | W | 130.5 | O | 23-45 | 51.1% | 36 | 10 | 25-60 | 41.7% | 27 | 5 | 12/20/2014 | *W VIRGINIA | 69-83 | L | 2.5 | L | 139 | O | 20-36 | 55.6% | 26 | 23 | 31-58 | 53.4% | 28 | 14 | 12/23/2014 | LOUISIANA TECH | 73-65 | W | -5 | W | | - | 25-58 | 43.1% | 42 | 9 | 22-53 | 41.5% | 30 | 9 | 12/30/2014 | CINCINNATI | 60-76 | L | -5 | L | 121 | O | 22-48 | 45.8% | 26 | 13 | 28-52 | 53.8% | 31 | 9 | 1/3/2015 | PITTSBURGH | 68-50 | W | -4 | W | 130 | U | 27-52 | 51.9% | 34 | 10 | 18-55 | 32.7% | 30 | 7 | 1/7/2015 | @ VIRGINIA | 51-61 | L | 14 | W | 122 | U | 20-53 | 37.7% | 29 | 11 | 23-56 | 41.1% | 40 | 9 | 1/11/2015 | DUKE | 87-75 | W | 9 | W | 142.5 | O | 33-60 | 55.0% | 37 | 10 | 24-65 | 36.9% | 39 | 10 | 1/14/2015 | N CAROLINA | 79-81 | L | 4.5 | W | 143 | O | 28-66 | 42.4% | 37 | 10 | 30-54 | 55.6% | 33 | 13 | 1/17/2015 | @ FLORIDA ST | 72-63 | W | -1 | W | 138.5 | U | 27-61 | 44.3% | 38 | 14 | 19-51 | 37.3% | 34 | 12 | 1/22/2015 | @ MIAMI | 60-65 | L | 5 | T | 134.5 | U | 26-60 | 43.3% | 33 | 10 | 19-47 | 40.4% | 31 | 9 | 1/25/2015 | NOTRE DAME | 78-81 | L | 1.5 | L | 144 | O | 31-66 | 47.0% | 34 | 9 | 28-65 | 43.1% | 43 | 10 | 1/28/2015 | CLEMSON | 57-68 | L | -8 | L | 128 | U | 18-63 | 28.6% | 45 | 11 | 25-53 | 47.2% | 37 | 12 | 1/31/2015 | @ GEORGIA TECH | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/3/2015 | @ WAKE FOREST | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/11/2015 | VIRGINIA | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/14/2015 | @ LOUISVILLE | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/21/2015 | VIRGINIA TECH | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
12/15/2014 | APPALACHIAN ST | 70-57 | W | -17 | L | | - | 25-56 | 44.6% | 35 | 11 | 23-49 | 46.9% | 26 | 17 | 12/20/2014 | VANDERBILT | 65-60 | W | -2.5 | W | | - | 26-67 | 38.8% | 39 | 7 | 21-45 | 46.7% | 30 | 13 | 12/23/2014 | @ DAYTON | 61-75 | L | 5 | L | 128.5 | O | 25-63 | 39.7% | 39 | 14 | 21-46 | 45.7% | 27 | 6 | 12/30/2014 | CHARLOTTE | 67-66 | W | -5.5 | L | | - | 25-59 | 42.4% | 35 | 13 | 27-59 | 45.8% | 26 | 11 | 1/3/2015 | @ NOTRE DAME | 76-83 | L | 11.5 | W | 137.5 | O | 30-73 | 41.1% | 46 | 15 | 32-60 | 53.3% | 31 | 13 | 1/7/2015 | SYRACUSE | 45-46 | L | 4 | W | 125.5 | U | 15-57 | 26.3% | 43 | 14 | 18-52 | 34.6% | 33 | 12 | 1/10/2015 | @ WAKE FOREST | 69-76 | L | 3 | L | 132.5 | O | 28-61 | 45.9% | 29 | 12 | 25-51 | 49.0% | 41 | 17 | 1/14/2015 | NOTRE DAME | 59-62 | L | 4 | W | 135 | U | 21-51 | 41.2% | 33 | 9 | 20-46 | 43.5% | 26 | 9 | 1/17/2015 | @ PITTSBURGH | 65-70 | L | 6 | W | 121 | O | 21-53 | 39.6% | 39 | 15 | 24-55 | 43.6% | 29 | 6 | 1/22/2015 | @ VIRGINIA | 28-57 | L | 17 | L | 116.5 | U | 12-49 | 24.5% | 33 | 10 | 24-53 | 45.3% | 36 | 4 | 1/25/2015 | BOSTON COLLEGE | 62-64 | L | -4.5 | L | 121.5 | O | 21-55 | 38.2% | 35 | 13 | 23-50 | 46.0% | 27 | 12 | 1/28/2015 | @ MIAMI | 70-50 | W | 9.5 | W | 127 | U | 25-44 | 56.8% | 32 | 10 | 19-55 | 34.5% | 29 | 12 | 1/31/2015 | NC STATE | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/4/2015 | @ DUKE | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/7/2015 | WAKE FOREST | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/9/2015 | @ VIRGINIA TECH | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/14/2015 | FLORIDA ST | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/16/2015 | CLEMSON | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/21/2015 | @ N CAROLINA | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/23/2015 | LOUISVILLE | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
|
| NC STATE: NC State has to replace T.J. Warren, who averaged nearly 25 points last season. However, the Wolfpack have a transfer in SG Trevor Lacey, who averaged 9.3 PPG at Alabama two seasons ago. Lacey was a much-heralded recruit out of high school, and has the talent to help NC State fill the scoring void left by Warren. SG Ralston Turner (10.5 PPG, 37% threes) and PG Anthony "Cat" Barber (8.5 PPG, 3.5 APG) are two guys that sacrificed their numbers for Warren last season, and they are both versatile enough to increase their points significantly. The guards of NC State will be huge this season, as the team is lacking a true go-to post presence. | | GEORGIA TECH: Junior SF Marcus Georges-Hunt (11.7 PPG, 4.3 RPG, 2.1 APG) is the only returning starter from a team that really struggled last season. Freshman PG Travis Jorgenson (4.3 PPG, 2.5 APG) tore his ACL in the fourth game of the 2013-14 campaign, but is fully healed and will share point guard duties with South Florida transfer Josh Heath. The Yellow Jackets are going to have to get out in transition and get easy baskets, because the team will struggle to score in the half-court. SG Chris Bolden (5.4 PPG) is the second highest-scoring returnee, but he made just 29.8% FG last season. |
|
|
|
|
Last Updated: 4/19/2024 2:44:47 AM EST. |
|
|