|
|
MEMPHIS TULANE |
|
| 130.5 | 57 Final 55 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| | |
633 | MEMPHIS | -3 | -6 | 634 | TULANE | 131 | 130.5 |
|
|
| | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All Games | 11-7 | -10 | 8-7 | 6-8 | 68.3 | 32.6 | 44.9% | 38.5 | 62.0 | 26.4 | 38.4% | 32.6 | Road Games | 2-4 | -2 | 2-4 | 3-3 | 58.5 | 27.5 | 41.7% | 33.5 | 65.7 | 27.5 | 40.5% | 36.2 | Last 5 Games | 3-2 | 0 | 3-2 | 3-2 | 67.6 | 28.4 | 45.8% | 34.4 | 63.8 | 27.4 | 42.3% | 32.8 | Conference Games | 4-3 | -7.5 | 4-3 | 4-3 | 68.1 | 29.7 | 46.1% | 35.9 | 63.9 | 28.7 | 40.8% | 34.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
Team Stats (All Games) | 68.3 | 32.6 | 25-55 | 44.9% | 5-14 | 34.5% | 14-21 | 67.8% | 38 | 11 | 14 | 18 | 7 | 15 | 7 | vs opponents surrendering | 63.1 | 29.1 | 22-53 | 41.2% | 6-18 | 32.4% | 13-20 | 67.4% | 34 | 9 | 12 | 19 | 6 | 14 | 3 | Team Stats (Road Games) | 58.5 | 27.5 | 21-50 | 41.7% | 4-13 | 33.3% | 12-17 | 69.2% | 33 | 7 | 10 | 19 | 6 | 16 | 6 | Stats Against (All Games) | 62.0 | 26.4 | 21-56 | 38.4% | 4-17 | 26.6% | 15-21 | 70.6% | 33 | 10 | 11 | 18 | 8 | 13 | 3 | vs opponents averaging | 67.6 | 31.3 | 23-54 | 42.9% | 7-19 | 34.0% | 14-21 | 68.1% | 35 | 10 | 13 | 18 | 7 | 13 | 4 | Stats Against (Road Games) | 65.7 | 27.5 | 23-56 | 40.5% | 5-16 | 28.6% | 16-23 | 69.1% | 36 | 10 | 12 | 17 | 8 | 12 | 4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
All Games | 13-6 | +7.6 | 6-7 | 3-6 | 69.3 | 32.0 | 44.5% | 35.7 | 64.6 | 28.6 | 43.3% | 32.6 | Home Games | 9-3 | +0.2 | 1-5 | 0-3 | 67.5 | 32.6 | 44.7% | 35.7 | 59.7 | 26.5 | 40.0% | 33.3 | Last 5 Games | 2-3 | -1.2 | 1-4 | 1-4 | 66.4 | 30.0 | 39.7% | 36.0 | 69.8 | 29.2 | 42.6% | 38.0 | Conference Games | 4-3 | +5.4 | 3-4 | 2-5 | 67.6 | 30.6 | 42.2% | 34.4 | 67.7 | 28.7 | 43.3% | 35.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
Team Stats (All Games) | 69.3 | 32.0 | 24-55 | 44.5% | 6-19 | 34.2% | 14-21 | 67.1% | 36 | 10 | 12 | 18 | 7 | 14 | 2 | vs opponents surrendering | 67.7 | 31.7 | 24-56 | 43.1% | 6-19 | 32.5% | 13-20 | 67.1% | 36 | 10 | 13 | 18 | 7 | 13 | 4 | Team Stats (Home Games) | 67.5 | 32.6 | 23-52 | 44.7% | 6-18 | 31.8% | 15-22 | 67.3% | 36 | 10 | 12 | 18 | 7 | 15 | 3 | Stats Against (All Games) | 64.6 | 28.6 | 24-54 | 43.3% | 5-15 | 31.2% | 13-20 | 64.4% | 33 | 9 | 11 | 19 | 6 | 14 | 3 | vs opponents averaging | 65.1 | 30.6 | 23-55 | 42.1% | 5-17 | 32.2% | 13-20 | 66.9% | 35 | 10 | 12 | 18 | 7 | 14 | 4 | Stats Against (Home Games) | 59.7 | 26.5 | 22-55 | 40.0% | 4-14 | 27.9% | 11-18 | 65.4% | 33 | 9 | 10 | 20 | 6 | 15 | 2 |
|
|
Average power rating of opponents played: MEMPHIS 75.6, TULANE 68.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
12/6/2014 | BRADLEY | 73-45 | W | -9.5 | W | 128 | U | 21-49 | 42.9% | 38 | 8 | 13-48 | 27.1% | 33 | 20 | 12/13/2014 | OKLAHOMA ST | 55-73 | L | 2 | L | 131.5 | U | 20-57 | 35.1% | 41 | 23 | 20-42 | 47.6% | 28 | 17 | 12/15/2014 | NC CENTRAL | 81-47 | W | | - | | - | 30-58 | 51.7% | 47 | 14 | 14-47 | 29.8% | 23 | 15 | 12/17/2014 | USC UPSTATE | 83-73 | W | | - | | - | 29-57 | 50.9% | 37 | 19 | 29-67 | 43.3% | 30 | 13 | 12/20/2014 | ORAL ROBERTS | 78-63 | W | -9 | W | 134 | O | 26-61 | 42.6% | 48 | 14 | 22-65 | 33.8% | 34 | 11 | 12/23/2014 | W ILLINOIS | 78-51 | W | -18.5 | W | | - | 31-62 | 50.0% | 48 | 12 | 18-59 | 30.5% | 30 | 14 | 12/31/2014 | HOUSTON | 73-54 | W | -11.5 | W | 138 | U | 31-63 | 49.2% | 40 | 14 | 20-64 | 31.2% | 39 | 16 | 1/3/2015 | TULANE | 66-74 | L | -12 | L | 132 | O | 25-57 | 43.9% | 39 | 16 | 28-63 | 44.4% | 37 | 8 | 1/8/2015 | @ SMU | 59-73 | L | 10 | L | 126.5 | O | 23-53 | 43.4% | 22 | 10 | 27-52 | 51.9% | 38 | 11 | 1/11/2015 | @ HOUSTON | 62-44 | W | -5.5 | W | 137.5 | U | 23-53 | 43.4% | 35 | 13 | 16-48 | 33.3% | 31 | 18 | 1/15/2015 | CINCINNATI | 63-50 | W | 0 | W | 118 | U | 23-49 | 46.9% | 26 | 11 | 18-46 | 39.1% | 31 | 20 | 1/17/2015 | UCF | 99-79 | W | -13.5 | W | 134.5 | O | 38-74 | 51.4% | 53 | 13 | 26-57 | 45.6% | 24 | 12 | 1/21/2015 | @ TULSA | 55-73 | L | 4.5 | L | 127.5 | O | 20-48 | 41.7% | 36 | 17 | 25-62 | 40.3% | 40 | 6 | 1/24/2015 | @ TULANE | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1/28/2015 | E CAROLINA | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1/31/2015 | @ GONZAGA | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/4/2015 | JACKSONVILLE ST | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/7/2015 | TEMPLE | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/10/2015 | @ E CAROLINA | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/14/2015 | @ S FLORIDA | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
12/6/2014 | MISSISSIPPI ST | 59-54 | W | 2.5 | W | | - | 23-54 | 42.6% | 37 | 16 | 21-55 | 38.2% | 32 | 14 | 12/16/2014 | SAVANNAH ST | 75-67 | W | | - | | - | 25-42 | 59.5% | 37 | 19 | 27-61 | 44.3% | 29 | 13 | 12/19/2014 | JACKSON ST | 56-49 | W | | - | | - | 14-42 | 33.3% | 37 | 17 | 18-57 | 31.6% | 34 | 14 | 12/22/2014 | @ WASHINGTON | 57-66 | L | 14 | W | 134 | U | 19-60 | 31.7% | 36 | 14 | 25-48 | 52.1% | 33 | 18 | 12/28/2014 | *ST JOHNS | 57-82 | L | 11 | L | 126 | O | 22-58 | 37.9% | 34 | 17 | 31-61 | 50.8% | 38 | 11 | 12/31/2014 | @ E CAROLINA | 67-59 | W | 2 | W | 136 | U | 26-48 | 54.2% | 24 | 7 | 20-42 | 47.6% | 21 | 11 | 1/3/2015 | @ MEMPHIS | 74-66 | W | 12 | W | 132 | O | 28-63 | 44.4% | 37 | 8 | 25-57 | 43.9% | 39 | 16 | 1/7/2015 | TEMPLE | 56-64 | L | 3.5 | L | 131 | U | 22-59 | 37.3% | 37 | 14 | 21-61 | 34.4% | 45 | 9 | 1/11/2015 | S FLORIDA | 56-51 | W | -7.5 | L | 132 | U | 15-45 | 33.3% | 31 | 15 | 21-59 | 35.6% | 37 | 19 | 1/14/2015 | @ UCF | 100-103 | L | -1.5 | L | 132.5 | O | 38-80 | 47.5% | 45 | 13 | 34-65 | 52.3% | 41 | 11 | 1/17/2015 | @ HOUSTON | 68-65 | W | -1 | W | 134.5 | U | 23-55 | 41.8% | 37 | 11 | 23-48 | 47.9% | 26 | 8 | 1/21/2015 | SMU | 52-66 | L | 8.5 | L | 127.5 | U | 16-48 | 33.3% | 30 | 9 | 22-51 | 43.1% | 41 | 9 | 1/24/2015 | MEMPHIS | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1/27/2015 | TULSA | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1/31/2015 | @ TEMPLE | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/7/2015 | CONNECTICUT | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/14/2015 | @ CINCINNATI | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
|
| MEMPHIS: The Tigers had a very disappointing loss in an exhibition game to Christian Brothers, but this is still a team with a lot of talent. Junior PF Shaq Goodwin (11.5 PPG, 58% FG, 6.5 RPG, 1.8 APG) is very similar to past big men from Memphis, as a grind-it-out kind of player who does all the dirty work. SF Austin Nichols (9.3 PPG, 59% FG, 4.3 RPG, 1.2 BPG) is an athletic player who showed a lot of improvement during his freshman campaign. These two are the tone setters for the team, but there are question marks in the backcourt after losing some talented players like Joe Jackson, Michael Dixon Jr. and Geron Johnson. Redshirt PG Pookie Powell is a guy that is expected to fill in for the graduated Jackson. Powell is also a very fast player, who should allow the Tigers to play the style of offense that head coach Josh Pastner wants to run. |
|
|
|
|
Last Updated: 3/29/2024 9:56:44 AM EST. |
|
|