| | | |
IOWA ST
TEXAS TECH |
|
|
136
| 73
Final
78 |
|
|
| | |
|
| |  | |
| 581 | IOWA ST | -10 | -9 | | 582 | TEXAS TECH | 137 | 137 |
|
|
|  | |
|
| | | |
|
|
| All Games | 14-3 | +3.7 | 8-6 | 6-6 | 80.1 | 38.4 | 48.7% | 36.2 | 67.1 | 31.4 | 41.2% | 34.1 | | Road Games | 4-3 | -1.3 | 5-2 | 3-3 | 75.3 | 36.0 | 46.2% | 36.1 | 69.3 | 34.4 | 40.0% | 37.1 | | Last 5 Games | 4-1 | +3.7 | 3-2 | 3-2 | 74.6 | 33.4 | 47.2% | 35.6 | 71.8 | 34.0 | 41.0% | 38.0 | | Conference Games | 4-1 | +3.7 | 3-2 | 3-2 | 74.6 | 33.4 | 47.2% | 35.6 | 71.8 | 34.0 | 41.0% | 38.0 |
|
| |
|
|
| Team Stats (All Games) | 80.1 | 38.4 | 28-58 | 48.7% | 8-22 | 35.8% | 16-23 | 69.2% | 36 | 8 | 18 | 15 | 6 | 12 | 4 | | vs opponents surrendering | 66.5 | 31 | 23-54 | 42.7% | 6-19 | 33.7% | 14-20 | 68.1% | 34 | 9 | 13 | 19 | 6 | 14 | 3 | | Team Stats (Road Games) | 75.3 | 36.0 | 26-57 | 46.2% | 8-22 | 36.8% | 14-21 | 67.3% | 36 | 8 | 16 | 18 | 6 | 12 | 4 | | Stats Against (All Games) | 67.1 | 31.4 | 25-61 | 41.2% | 7-20 | 32.0% | 10-13 | 76.0% | 34 | 8 | 15 | 20 | 6 | 14 | 3 | | vs opponents averaging | 69.9 | 33 | 24-55 | 43.5% | 6-18 | 33.7% | 16-22 | 70.0% | 35 | 10 | 13 | 19 | 8 | 13 | 4 | | Stats Against (Road Games) | 69.3 | 34.4 | 25-62 | 40.0% | 6-20 | 30.9% | 13-17 | 75.4% | 37 | 10 | 13 | 19 | 6 | 12 | 3 |
|
|
| |
|
|
| All Games | 10-9 | -5.5 | 5-9 | 3-5 | 63.9 | 29.3 | 40.8% | 36.2 | 61.5 | 29.6 | 40.0% | 32.6 | | Home Games | 10-3 | +2 | 3-5 | 2-2 | 68.5 | 30.6 | 44.2% | 36.6 | 57.6 | 28.5 | 38.1% | 30.3 | | Last 5 Games | 0-5 | -3 | 1-4 | 2-3 | 51.4 | 22.6 | 31.7% | 34.0 | 69.4 | 31.2 | 46.3% | 36.0 | | Conference Games | 0-6 | -4 | 1-5 | 3-3 | 53.0 | 22.5 | 33.4% | 33.2 | 69.5 | 31.2 | 45.0% | 36.8 |
|
| |
|
|
| Team Stats (All Games) | 63.9 | 29.3 | 21-52 | 40.8% | 5-16 | 30.2% | 17-26 | 64.9% | 36 | 11 | 11 | 18 | 7 | 14 | 4 | | vs opponents surrendering | 65.5 | 30.4 | 23-54 | 42.1% | 6-18 | 33.2% | 14-21 | 67.7% | 35 | 10 | 12 | 19 | 7 | 14 | 4 | | Team Stats (Home Games) | 68.5 | 30.6 | 22-50 | 44.2% | 5-15 | 33.3% | 19-29 | 65.0% | 37 | 11 | 12 | 17 | 7 | 14 | 5 | | Stats Against (All Games) | 61.5 | 29.6 | 21-52 | 40.0% | 6-19 | 32.9% | 14-21 | 66.2% | 33 | 9 | 11 | 21 | 7 | 14 | 4 | | vs opponents averaging | 67.1 | 31.5 | 23-55 | 42.4% | 6-18 | 33.3% | 14-21 | 67.8% | 35 | 10 | 13 | 19 | 7 | 13 | 4 | | Stats Against (Home Games) | 57.6 | 28.5 | 20-52 | 38.1% | 6-19 | 30.6% | 12-19 | 63.6% | 30 | 9 | 9 | 23 | 7 | 15 | 3 |
|
| | Average power rating of opponents played: IOWA ST 75.4, TEXAS TECH 71.9 |
| | |
|
|
| 12/9/2014 | MISSOURI-KC | 73-56 | W | -26 | L | 152 | U | 26-56 | 46.4% | 38 | 14 | 22-53 | 41.5% | 25 | 16 | | 12/12/2014 | @ IOWA | 90-75 | W | 5.5 | W | 146.5 | O | 34-64 | 53.1% | 39 | 10 | 28-71 | 39.4% | 37 | 7 | | 12/14/2014 | SOUTHERN U | 88-78 | W | | - | | - | 28-53 | 52.8% | 37 | 13 | 29-66 | 43.9% | 28 | 11 | | 12/20/2014 | *DRAKE | 83-54 | W | -18.5 | W | | - | 32-59 | 54.2% | 36 | 12 | 19-49 | 38.8% | 29 | 18 | | 12/31/2014 | MISS VALLEY ST | 83-33 | W | | - | | - | 32-63 | 50.8% | 50 | 15 | 14-58 | 24.1% | 29 | 17 | | 1/3/2015 | *S CAROLINA | 60-64 | L | -6.5 | L | 146.5 | U | 20-57 | 35.1% | 34 | 13 | 23-50 | 46.0% | 42 | 20 | | 1/6/2015 | OKLAHOMA ST | 63-61 | W | -8 | L | 144.5 | U | 25-57 | 43.9% | 37 | 12 | 25-59 | 42.4% | 32 | 10 | | 1/10/2015 | @ W VIRGINIA | 74-72 | W | 4.5 | W | 150 | U | 25-50 | 50.0% | 40 | 18 | 22-68 | 32.4% | 38 | 9 | | 1/14/2015 | @ BAYLOR | 73-74 | L | 2 | W | 134.5 | O | 26-56 | 46.4% | 32 | 9 | 30-70 | 42.9% | 44 | 9 | | 1/17/2015 | KANSAS | 86-81 | W | -4.5 | W | 147 | O | 31-61 | 50.8% | 33 | 12 | 32-75 | 42.7% | 44 | 15 | | 1/20/2015 | KANSAS ST | 77-71 | W | -9.5 | L | 139.5 | O | 27-60 | 45.0% | 36 | 7 | 26-57 | 45.6% | 32 | 10 | | 1/24/2015 | @ TEXAS TECH | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1/26/2015 | TEXAS | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1/31/2015 | TCU | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/2/2015 | @ KANSAS | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/7/2015 | TEXAS TECH | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/9/2015 | @ OKLAHOMA | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/14/2015 | W VIRGINIA | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
| |
|
|
| 12/10/2014 | FRESNO ST | 73-56 | W | -9.5 | W | | - | 25-52 | 48.1% | 32 | 15 | 21-52 | 40.4% | 26 | 17 | | 12/14/2014 | PRAIRIE VIEW A&M | 79-51 | W | | - | | - | 27-51 | 52.9% | 39 | 9 | 18-50 | 36.0% | 22 | 17 | | 12/17/2014 | S CAROLINA ST | 101-39 | W | | - | | - | 37-64 | 57.8% | 53 | 11 | 14-66 | 21.2% | 35 | 12 | | 12/19/2014 | ARK-PINE BLUFF | 72-51 | W | | - | | - | 23-48 | 47.9% | 37 | 15 | 15-48 | 31.2% | 25 | 16 | | 12/22/2014 | *LOYOLA-IL | 44-62 | L | -7 | L | | - | 17-50 | 34.0% | 29 | 9 | 17-45 | 37.8% | 39 | 14 | | 12/23/2014 | *HOUSTON | 69-82 | L | -6 | L | | - | 21-52 | 40.4% | 33 | 12 | 27-50 | 54.0% | 31 | 12 | | 12/29/2014 | N TEXAS | 60-45 | W | -12 | W | | - | 19-44 | 43.2% | 36 | 19 | 18-52 | 34.6% | 30 | 16 | | 1/3/2015 | TEXAS | 61-70 | L | 8 | L | 127 | O | 22-52 | 42.3% | 29 | 15 | 20-52 | 38.5% | 41 | 17 | | 1/5/2015 | W VIRGINIA | 67-78 | L | 6 | L | 134.5 | O | 19-46 | 41.3% | 35 | 22 | 30-63 | 47.6% | 35 | 8 | | 1/10/2015 | @ KANSAS | 54-86 | L | 15 | L | 133 | O | 18-55 | 32.7% | 34 | 15 | 32-61 | 52.5% | 43 | 11 | | 1/14/2015 | @ KANSAS ST | 51-58 | L | 9.5 | W | 124 | U | 19-56 | 33.9% | 38 | 13 | 17-44 | 38.6% | 30 | 11 | | 1/17/2015 | TCU | 42-62 | L | 2.5 | L | 125.5 | U | 11-48 | 22.9% | 31 | 12 | 19-42 | 45.2% | 36 | 11 | | 1/21/2015 | @ OKLAHOMA ST | 43-63 | L | 14 | L | 126.5 | U | 15-54 | 27.8% | 32 | 10 | 21-47 | 44.7% | 36 | 13 | | 1/24/2015 | IOWA ST | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1/28/2015 | @ OKLAHOMA | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1/31/2015 | @ W VIRGINIA | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/4/2015 | KANSAS ST | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/7/2015 | @ IOWA ST | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/10/2015 | KANSAS | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/14/2015 | @ TEXAS | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
| |  | IOWA ST: The Cyclones have continued to advance deeper in the NCAA Tournament under head coach Fred Hoiberg, and they reached the Sweet 16 last year before falling eventual champion UConn. PF Georges Niang (16.7 PPG, 4.5 RPG, 3.6 APG) is one of the most versatile players in college basketball. He will play the four-spot for Iowa State, but he will also bring the ball up the court, and even shoot it from the outside. He is coming off a broken foot suffered last season, but he is now fully healthy and capable of being the best player in the Big 12. PF Dustin Hogue (11.6 PPG, 8.4 RPG, 57% FG) does everything needed for the Cyclones, and is the leading returning rebounder in the Big 12. If he is able to expand his offensive game to the perimeter, then the Cyclones could have the most versatile frontcourt in the Big 12. Hoiberg has done a tremendous job of meshing returning veterans with incoming transfers, and he will look to do that once again. SG Bryce Dejean-Jones (UNLV) and PF Jameel McKay (Marquette) are two more transfers that will contribute immediately, but McKay is not eligible for the first nine games of the season. SG Naz Long (7.1 PPG, 40% threes) and heady PG Monte Morris (6.8 PPG, 3.7 APG and 2.6 RPG) will play a big role in how good the Cyclones can be this season. | | TEXAS TECH: The Red Raiders will look to their backcourt to get them back to the postseason for the first time since an NIT berth in 2010. Texas Tech was competitive in many games last season, as they defeated Baylor and Oklahoma State, while losing in the final minutes to Iowa State and Kansas. PG Robert Turner (9.3 PPG, 2.6 APG and 2.6 RPG) and SG Toddrick Gotcher (7.3 PPG, 2.9 RPG and 1.9 APG) are the only two starters back on the team, and they will be looked upon to take on the biggest chunks of the scoring load. But both players shot just 40% FG last season, and Tubby Smith will need to find somebody to rely on in a thin frontcourt. |
| | ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ PA SPORTSTICKER COLLEGE BASKETBALL PREVIEW (IOWA ST-TEXAS TECH) ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
*Iowa St.-Texas Tech Preview* =============================
By TAYLOR BECHTOLD STATS Writer
Iowa State (14-3) at Texas Tech (10-9), 4:00 p.m. EDT
Although his squad is off to the program's best conference start in 15 years, Iowa State coach Fred Hoiberg still has plenty of concerns heading into a matchup with last-place Texas Tech.
As they look to remain atop the Big 12, the ninth-ranked Cyclones hope to avoid another slow start Saturday as they try to keep a Red Raiders team that gave them fits last season winless in league play.
Iowa State has won four of its first five Big 12 contests for the first time since winning the regular season title in 1999-2000. Hoiberg's club, however, is looking to play with a greater sense of urgency early in games.
The Cyclones have averaged 35.4 points in the first half over their last five games compared to 41.2 in the final 20 minutes. They've also been tied or trailing at the break while losing two of their last three away from Hilton Coliseum.
"We do a lot of things to work on not getting off to a slow start," Hoiberg said. "All those little things to hopefully get off to a great start, and you have to on the road in this league or you're not going to win."
Iowa State trailed by five points early in the second half Tuesday before pulling out a 77-71 home win over Kansas State to move back into a first-place tie with 10-time defending champion Kansas.
Jameel McKay had a career high-tying 15 points off the bench, while Georges Niang added 14 points, six rebounds and four assists and Monte Morris hit a floater with 37 seconds left to seal the victory.
The Cyclones (14-3, 4-1) are scoring a conference-best 80.1 per game, though they've only reached that mark once in their last six - an 86-81 home win over the Jayhawks last Saturday.
With dates against No. 17 Texas, TCU and No. 11 Kansas coming after a trip to Lubbock, Iowa State has good reason not to look past a Texas Tech team that has dropped 12 of its last 13 conference games.
The Red Raiders rallied from a 15-point halftime deficit to tie things up in the most recent meeting in Lubbock on Jan. 4, 2014, before the Cyclones escaped with a 73-62 win. They also nearly pulled off the upset in Ames, falling 70-64 on Feb. 15.
"They played two great basketball games against us," Hoiberg said. "We were fortunate to walk away with both wins."
The Red Raiders (10-9, 0-6) hope to end their horrendous shooting slump as well as their six-game losing streak. They've totaled 85 points on a combined 25.5 percent shooting - including 7 for 32 from 3-point range - over their last two.
Keenan Evans had a season-high 18 points off the bench in Wednesday's 63-43 loss at Oklahoma State. The freshman guard was the only player to score more than six.
Devaugntah Williams, averaging a team-high 10.4 points, went scoreless on just three field-goal attempts in 16 minutes.
"(Evans) really did all the things we needed him to do, he just needed a little more help," coach Tubby Smith said.
Niang finished with 17 points in each of the two meetings with Texas Tech last season.
The Red Raiders have dropped their three games versus ranked opponents this season, including home losses to then-No. 11 Texas and then-No. 14 West Virginia earlier this month.
|
| | Last Updated: 4/19/2024 3:01:43 PM EST. |
|
|
| |
|