| | | |
DUKE CONNECTICUT |
|
| 140 | 66 Final 56 |
|
|
| | |
|
at IZOD Center - East Rutherford, NJ | | | | |
517 | DUKE | -10.5 | -11 | 518 | CONNECTICUT | 140 | 140 |
|
|
| | |
|
| | | |
|
|
All Games | 9-0 | +3.7 | 6-3 | 4-3 | 87.6 | 42.1 | 53.7% | 38.3 | 60.7 | 26.7 | 40.3% | 29.3 | Road Games | 4-0 | +3.7 | 4-0 | 2-2 | 76.2 | 37.7 | 48.1% | 34.2 | 63.5 | 30.0 | 41.0% | 35.5 | Last 5 Games | 5-0 | +2.7 | 2-3 | 2-2 | 82.2 | 40.4 | 52.8% | 38.4 | 63.6 | 26.4 | 39.7% | 29.6 |
|
| |
|
|
Team Stats (All Games) | 87.6 | 42.1 | 32-59 | 53.7% | 8-21 | 38.2% | 16-24 | 67.7% | 38 | 12 | 18 | 16 | 9 | 10 | 4 | vs opponents surrendering | 65.2 | 30.4 | 23-56 | 41.9% | 6-18 | 33.0% | 13-19 | 66.9% | 34 | 9 | 12 | 19 | 6 | 13 | 3 | Team Stats (Road Games) | 76.2 | 37.7 | 26-54 | 48.1% | 7-18 | 40.5% | 17-25 | 67.7% | 34 | 9 | 14 | 16 | 7 | 9 | 3 | Stats Against (All Games) | 60.7 | 26.7 | 23-57 | 40.3% | 4-16 | 26.7% | 11-14 | 76.6% | 29 | 8 | 10 | 21 | 4 | 15 | 2 | vs opponents averaging | 69.1 | 32.7 | 24-56 | 43.6% | 6-19 | 34.0% | 14-21 | 69.9% | 36 | 9 | 13 | 18 | 6 | 13 | 3 | Stats Against (Road Games) | 63.5 | 30.0 | 24-58 | 41.0% | 4-17 | 26.9% | 11-14 | 75.9% | 35 | 10 | 9 | 22 | 4 | 12 | 2 |
|
|
| |
|
|
All Games | 4-3 | -4.8 | 1-4 | 2-2 | 68.3 | 32.3 | 45.0% | 36.3 | 62.4 | 33.9 | 40.1% | 32.1 | Road Games | 2-1 | +0.4 | 1-2 | 2-1 | 69.3 | 34.3 | 45.1% | 36.3 | 66.3 | 36.3 | 43.5% | 33.0 | Last 5 Games | 2-3 | -5.8 | 1-3 | 2-1 | 69.4 | 33.6 | 44.8% | 35.8 | 65.4 | 36.4 | 40.8% | 33.6 |
|
| |
|
|
Team Stats (All Games) | 68.3 | 32.3 | 25-55 | 45.0% | 5-16 | 29.5% | 14-20 | 72.1% | 36 | 7 | 12 | 16 | 5 | 13 | 4 | vs opponents surrendering | 65.2 | 30.6 | 23-54 | 42.2% | 6-17 | 33.4% | 14-20 | 67.5% | 36 | 9 | 12 | 19 | 6 | 14 | 4 | Team Stats (Road Games) | 69.3 | 34.3 | 25-55 | 45.1% | 5-16 | 31.2% | 15-23 | 65.2% | 36 | 7 | 10 | 20 | 5 | 13 | 5 | Stats Against (All Games) | 62.4 | 33.9 | 22-55 | 40.1% | 7-20 | 34.3% | 12-16 | 70.4% | 32 | 6 | 12 | 18 | 7 | 13 | 4 | vs opponents averaging | 68.2 | 32.3 | 24-57 | 41.4% | 7-21 | 33.0% | 14-20 | 68.3% | 36 | 10 | 13 | 19 | 7 | 13 | 4 | Stats Against (Road Games) | 66.3 | 36.3 | 23-54 | 43.5% | 5-15 | 34.8% | 14-21 | 67.2% | 33 | 7 | 11 | 21 | 7 | 13 | 3 |
|
| Average power rating of opponents played: DUKE 72.6, CONNECTICUT 72.4 |
| | |
|
|
11/14/2014 | PRESBYTERIAN | 113-44 | W | -39 | W | 147 | O | 42-69 | 60.9% | 46 | 9 | 18-52 | 34.6% | 21 | 17 | 11/15/2014 | FAIRFIELD | 109-59 | W | -32.5 | W | | - | 40-62 | 64.5% | 39 | 12 | 22-53 | 41.5% | 20 | 18 | 11/18/2014 | *MICHIGAN ST | 81-71 | W | -8 | W | 144 | O | 27-50 | 54.0% | 25 | 8 | 30-60 | 50.0% | 35 | 13 | 11/21/2014 | *TEMPLE | 74-54 | W | -17.5 | W | 148.5 | U | 25-64 | 39.1% | 43 | 9 | 22-59 | 37.3% | 40 | 17 | 11/22/2014 | *STANFORD | 70-59 | W | -10 | W | 146 | U | 22-56 | 39.3% | 41 | 10 | 22-61 | 36.1% | 40 | 12 | 11/26/2014 | FURMAN | 93-54 | W | -41 | L | 140 | O | 38-66 | 57.6% | 40 | 7 | 19-56 | 33.9% | 27 | 14 | 11/30/2014 | ARMY | 93-73 | W | -27.5 | L | | - | 31-60 | 51.7% | 43 | 10 | 26-57 | 45.6% | 25 | 14 | 12/3/2014 | @ WISCONSIN | 80-70 | W | 4.5 | W | 136 | O | 30-46 | 65.2% | 28 | 10 | 22-54 | 40.7% | 27 | 8 | 12/15/2014 | ELON | 75-62 | W | -32.5 | L | 150 | U | 29-56 | 51.8% | 40 | 17 | 25-59 | 42.4% | 29 | 19 | 12/18/2014 | *CONNECTICUT | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 12/29/2014 | TOLEDO | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 12/31/2014 | WOFFORD | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1/3/2015 | BOSTON COLLEGE | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1/7/2015 | @ WAKE FOREST | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
| |
|
|
11/14/2014 | BRYANT | 66-53 | W | | - | | - | 25-54 | 46.3% | 39 | 10 | 19-56 | 33.9% | 31 | 10 | 11/20/2014 | *COLL OF CHARLESTON | 65-57 | W | -12.5 | L | 125 | U | 21-47 | 44.7% | 36 | 13 | 20-46 | 43.5% | 26 | 13 | 11/21/2014 | *DAYTON | 75-64 | W | -4 | W | 127 | O | 25-55 | 45.5% | 33 | 8 | 22-54 | 40.7% | 38 | 14 | 11/23/2014 | *W VIRGINIA | 68-78 | L | -3.5 | L | 134.5 | O | 28-62 | 45.2% | 40 | 19 | 28-61 | 45.9% | 35 | 12 | 11/30/2014 | TEXAS | 54-55 | L | -1.5 | L | 128.5 | U | 17-56 | 30.4% | 36 | 8 | 17-46 | 37.0% | 35 | 13 | 12/5/2014 | YALE | 44-45 | L | -8.5 | L | | - | 19-43 | 44.2% | 25 | 13 | 18-55 | 32.7% | 36 | 11 | 12/14/2014 | COPPIN ST | 106-85 | W | | - | | - | 37-65 | 56.9% | 45 | 18 | 30-66 | 45.5% | 24 | 17 | 12/18/2014 | *DUKE | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 12/22/2014 | *COLUMBIA | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 12/28/2014 | C CONN ST | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 12/31/2014 | TEMPLE | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1/3/2015 | @ FLORIDA | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1/6/2015 | @ S FLORIDA | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1/10/2015 | CINCINNATI | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
| | | DUKE: Duke was ousted from the NCAA Tournament in the first round last year, but there is still plenty of talent in Durham. All of the talk begins with the freshman class including C Jahlil Okafor, PG Tyus Jones and SF Justise Winslow. Okafor is already one of the top centers in college basketball, and he will be a major contributor right away. His biggest strength is his offensive game, as he has a variety of moves on the block. Jones was one of the top point guards in the class, and should give the Blue Devils a talented playmaker. Winslow has a chance to earn major playing time early because of his defense, and he is terrific in the open floor. While the freshmen get a lot of hype, there is a lot of returning talent as well. PG Quinn Cook (11.6 PPG, 4.4 APG, 37% threes) has three years under his belt for the Blue Devils, giving the team a true leader at the point guard position. Look for Duke to play Cook and Jones together a lot, giving the team more opportunities to get out and run. SG Rasheed Sulaimon (9.9 PPG, 2.4 APG, 41% threes) had some sophomore struggles last season, but he is still capable of scoring 20 points on any given night. Maybe the most important player for Duke will be PF Amile Jefferson (6.5 PPG, 6.9 RPG). He shows flashes of being an all-conference player, but also has a tendency to disappear. Duke certainly has the talent to compete for an ACC title and national championship, but with so many freshmen, the Blue Devils will have to get big performances from the upperclassmen early in the season. | | CONNECTICUT: For the second time in four seasons, the UConn Huskies caught fire in March and ran all the way to an NCAA championship. While Shabazz Napier is no longer on the team, there are still plenty of pieces left from that team, including electric PG Ryan Boatright (12.1 PPG, 3.5 RPG, 3.4 APG). The 6-foot-0 combo guard has the quickness to blow by any defender in the country, and improved his outside shot greatly last season (38% threes). The team feeds off his non-stop energy and he will have a greater leadership role as the lone senior on the team. Boatright will once again be part of a backcourt that creates mismatches for opponents. NC State transfer SG Rodney Purvis is also a combo guard, but at 6-foot-4, he has the ability to post up on the low block. Both of these guys can be terrific defenders, so look for the Huskies to extend further up court and really pressure opponents. With C Amida Brimah (4.1 PPG, 3.0 RPG, 2.3 BPG) emerging as a legitimate shot blocker, it allows the Huskies to take risks and get into the passing lanes. This has a chance to be the best defensive team in the country, and top recruit, freshman swingman Daniel Hamilton, will be expected to score in double figures. |
| | |
| Last Updated: 4/26/2024 1:00:29 AM EST. |
|
|
| |
|