|
|
TENNESSEE NC STATE |
|
| 130.5 | 72 Final 83 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| | |
723 | TENNESSEE | 133 | 133 | 724 | NC STATE | -5.5 | -5.5 |
|
|
| | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All Games | 4-3 | -0.4 | 1-5 | 2-5 | 65.9 | 28.6 | 44.1% | 33.9 | 66.9 | 33.4 | 41.8% | 34.9 | Road Games | 1-3 | -2.4 | 0-3 | 2-2 | 64.7 | 30.0 | 43.7% | 34.2 | 72.7 | 38.2 | 45.5% | 35.0 | Last 5 Games | 3-2 | +0.6 | 1-3 | 1-4 | 64.4 | 28.0 | 44.8% | 31.0 | 65.0 | 31.2 | 43.1% | 33.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
Team Stats (All Games) | 65.9 | 28.6 | 24-55 | 44.1% | 4-15 | 26.9% | 13-21 | 63.9% | 34 | 11 | 10 | 24 | 8 | 12 | 4 | vs opponents surrendering | 66.3 | 30.8 | 24-53 | 44.6% | 7-18 | 35.4% | 13-19 | 66.8% | 33 | 9 | 13 | 20 | 6 | 14 | 4 | Team Stats (Road Games) | 64.7 | 30.0 | 24-55 | 43.7% | 4-16 | 22.7% | 12-21 | 58.8% | 34 | 12 | 9 | 27 | 7 | 14 | 2 | Stats Against (All Games) | 66.9 | 33.4 | 20-49 | 41.8% | 8-22 | 37.5% | 18-26 | 67.6% | 35 | 11 | 13 | 20 | 6 | 15 | 2 | vs opponents averaging | 68.7 | 32.4 | 23-53 | 43.5% | 6-18 | 35.0% | 16-24 | 67.7% | 33 | 9 | 13 | 18 | 7 | 13 | 3 | Stats Against (Road Games) | 72.7 | 38.2 | 22-48 | 45.5% | 8-19 | 39.7% | 21-31 | 68.3% | 35 | 11 | 13 | 20 | 7 | 14 | 2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
All Games | 8-2 | -3 | 2-3 | 1-2 | 73.9 | 38.2 | 45.3% | 42.5 | 59.2 | 27.5 | 35.4% | 33.6 | Home Games | 8-1 | -2 | 2-3 | 1-1 | 75.3 | 38.7 | 45.3% | 43.8 | 58.4 | 26.6 | 35.0% | 33.2 | Last 5 Games | 3-2 | -5 | 1-2 | 1-1 | 67.8 | 35.4 | 47.1% | 38.2 | 58.0 | 27.0 | 35.6% | 34.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
Team Stats (All Games) | 73.9 | 38.2 | 26-57 | 45.3% | 6-17 | 35.5% | 16-24 | 67.8% | 42 | 11 | 12 | 18 | 4 | 11 | 7 | vs opponents surrendering | 65.6 | 31.4 | 23-54 | 41.9% | 6-19 | 32.8% | 14-21 | 68.3% | 34 | 8 | 11 | 19 | 6 | 14 | 4 | Team Stats (Home Games) | 75.3 | 38.7 | 26-58 | 45.3% | 6-17 | 34.8% | 17-24 | 68.2% | 44 | 11 | 12 | 18 | 4 | 11 | 7 | Stats Against (All Games) | 59.2 | 27.5 | 21-59 | 35.4% | 6-20 | 28.7% | 12-17 | 67.1% | 34 | 9 | 11 | 21 | 5 | 11 | 2 | vs opponents averaging | 69.7 | 33.6 | 24-55 | 43.9% | 7-19 | 34.9% | 14-22 | 67.2% | 36 | 9 | 13 | 19 | 7 | 13 | 3 | Stats Against (Home Games) | 58.4 | 26.6 | 21-59 | 35.0% | 6-20 | 28.0% | 11-17 | 66.9% | 33 | 8 | 10 | 22 | 5 | 11 | 2 |
|
|
Average power rating of opponents played: TENNESSEE 79.1, NC STATE 71.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
11/14/2014 | *VA COMMONWEALTH | 69-85 | L | 8 | L | 142.5 | O | 24-57 | 42.1% | 42 | 19 | 25-62 | 40.3% | 49 | 18 | 11/20/2014 | TEXAS SOUTHERN | 70-58 | W | -19 | L | 137.5 | U | 25-58 | 43.1% | 40 | 8 | 18-48 | 37.5% | 27 | 13 | 11/27/2014 | *SANTA CLARA | 64-57 | W | -7 | T | 132 | U | 23-51 | 45.1% | 34 | 12 | 15-37 | 40.5% | 25 | 13 | 11/28/2014 | *KANSAS | 67-82 | L | 8.5 | L | 129 | O | 24-54 | 44.4% | 22 | 10 | 24-49 | 49.0% | 44 | 16 | 11/30/2014 | *MARQUETTE | 59-67 | L | -2.5 | L | 131.5 | U | 26-60 | 43.3% | 39 | 15 | 23-43 | 53.5% | 22 | 9 | 12/6/2014 | KANSAS ST | 65-64 | W | -2 | L | 131 | U | 22-53 | 41.5% | 28 | 10 | 20-49 | 40.8% | 39 | 22 | 12/14/2014 | BUTLER | 67-55 | W | 1 | W | 123.5 | U | 25-50 | 50.0% | 32 | 7 | 18-54 | 33.3% | 38 | 14 | 12/17/2014 | @ NC STATE | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 12/19/2014 | TENNESSEE TECH | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 12/22/2014 | MERCER | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 12/27/2014 | TENNESSEE ST | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 12/31/2014 | E TENN ST | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1/7/2015 | @ MISSISSIPPI ST | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
11/14/2014 | JACKSON ST | 93-58 | W | | - | | - | 32-61 | 52.5% | 49 | 10 | 18-64 | 28.1% | 35 | 12 | 11/17/2014 | HOFSTRA | 76-64 | W | -12 | T | | - | 25-67 | 37.3% | 50 | 10 | 21-68 | 30.9% | 46 | 13 | 11/20/2014 | JACKSONVILLE | 79-43 | W | | - | | - | 28-66 | 42.4% | 57 | 15 | 13-56 | 23.2% | 27 | 13 | 11/23/2014 | S FLORIDA | 68-65 | W | -15 | L | 141.5 | U | 22-59 | 37.3% | 40 | 8 | 26-55 | 47.3% | 33 | 10 | 11/26/2014 | RICHMOND | 84-72 | W | -6 | W | | - | 29-58 | 50.0% | 38 | 10 | 28-58 | 48.3% | 24 | 11 | 11/28/2014 | BOISE ST | 60-54 | W | -7 | L | | - | 20-47 | 42.6% | 38 | 11 | 20-58 | 34.5% | 33 | 9 | 12/2/2014 | @ PURDUE | 61-66 | L | 5 | T | 139.5 | U | 22-49 | 44.9% | 31 | 9 | 22-56 | 39.3% | 37 | 10 | 12/6/2014 | WAKE FOREST | 78-65 | W | -9.5 | W | 135.5 | O | 26-47 | 55.3% | 39 | 15 | 22-57 | 38.6% | 31 | 11 | 12/12/2014 | CHARLESTON SO | 86-50 | W | | - | | - | 36-73 | 49.3% | 50 | 10 | 18-59 | 30.5% | 37 | 14 | 12/14/2014 | WOFFORD | 54-55 | L | -10.5 | L | | - | 19-45 | 42.2% | 33 | 11 | 21-59 | 35.6% | 33 | 4 | 12/17/2014 | TENNESSEE | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 12/20/2014 | *W VIRGINIA | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 12/23/2014 | LOUISIANA TECH | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 12/30/2014 | CINCINNATI | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1/3/2015 | PITTSBURGH | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1/7/2015 | @ VIRGINIA | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
|
| TENNESSEE: The Volunteers were so close to making it to the Elite Eight last year, losing by only two points to Michigan in the Sweet 16. But after losing four players that combined for 51.0 PPG, Tennessee is now in rebuilding mode with Donnie Tyndall as the new head coach. Tyndall does have a potential star in the making in swingman Josh Richardson (10.3 PPG, 2.9 RPG, 79% FT). Richardson averaged 19.3 PPG on 62% FG in three NCAA Tournament games, showing he is ready to become the No. 1 scoring threat on the team. This is a team with a lot of question marks, as freshmen like PF Tariq Owens and SF Willie Carmichael will be asked to provide the team with some scoring pop. The same goes for sophomore SG Robert Hubbs III (5.0 PPG) who shot a miserable 28% threes as a freshman before suffering a season-ending shoulder injury. Now fully healthy, the team will count on Hubbs to provide some much needed long-range shooting. | | NC STATE: NC State has to replace T.J. Warren, who averaged nearly 25 points last season. However, the Wolfpack have a transfer in SG Trevor Lacey, who averaged 9.3 PPG at Alabama two seasons ago. Lacey was a much-heralded recruit out of high school, and has the talent to help NC State fill the scoring void left by Warren. SG Ralston Turner (10.5 PPG, 37% threes) and PG Anthony "Cat" Barber (8.5 PPG, 3.5 APG) are two guys that sacrificed their numbers for Warren last season, and they are both versatile enough to increase their points significantly. The guards of NC State will be huge this season, as the team is lacking a true go-to post presence. |
|
|
|
|
Last Updated: 4/23/2024 11:10:05 AM EST. |
|
|