|
|
NEW ORLEANS TEXAS A&M |
|
|
| 65 Final 87 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| | |
831 | NEW ORLEANS | | | 832 | TEXAS A&M | -26.5 | -25.5 |
|
|
| | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All Games | 1-1 | 0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 79.5 | 40.0 | 50.0% | 31.5 | 73.5 | 44.0 | 50.0% | 27.0 | Road Games | 0-1 | 0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 71.0 | 33.0 | 46.3% | 27.0 | 86.0 | 54.0 | 56.6% | 28.0 | Last 5 Games | 1-1 | 0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 79.5 | 40.0 | 50.0% | 31.5 | 73.5 | 44.0 | 50.0% | 27.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
Team Stats (All Games) | 79.5 | 40.0 | 24-48 | 50.0% | 5-12 | 40.0% | 26-42 | 62.4% | 31 | 10 | 13 | 23 | 7 | 15 | 4 | vs opponents surrendering | 72.2 | 35.7 | 24-55 | 43.6% | 5-14 | 32.6% | 20-36 | 54.9% | 33 | 11 | 12 | 23 | 9 | 15 | 4 | Team Stats (Road Games) | 71.0 | 33.0 | 19-41 | 46.3% | 5-9 | 55.6% | 28-37 | 75.7% | 27 | 8 | 12 | 23 | 2 | 13 | 3 | Stats Against (All Games) | 73.5 | 44.0 | 25-51 | 50.0% | 3-8 | 41.2% | 19-28 | 67.9% | 27 | 8 | 13 | 27 | 7 | 17 | 2 | vs opponents averaging | 72.3 | 39 | 26-54 | 47.0% | 4-10 | 37.9% | 17-27 | 65.2% | 34 | 9 | 13 | 26 | 7 | 19 | 4 | Stats Against (Road Games) | 86.0 | 54.0 | 30-53 | 56.6% | 6-11 | 54.5% | 20-30 | 66.7% | 28 | 11 | 19 | 24 | 5 | 8 | 4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
All Games | 3-1 | +1.8 | 3-1 | 1-3 | 71.2 | 30.5 | 44.7% | 42.7 | 56.0 | 25.2 | 35.9% | 29.5 | Home Games | 1-0 | +1 | 1-0 | 1-0 | 109.0 | 55.0 | 56.8% | 52.0 | 68.0 | 22.0 | 36.2% | 32.0 | Last 5 Games | 3-1 | +1.8 | 3-1 | 1-3 | 71.2 | 30.5 | 44.7% | 42.7 | 56.0 | 25.2 | 35.9% | 29.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
Team Stats (All Games) | 71.2 | 30.5 | 25-57 | 44.7% | 5-16 | 31.7% | 15-22 | 67.8% | 43 | 13 | 15 | 18 | 7 | 15 | 3 | vs opponents surrendering | 65.9 | 30.6 | 23-55 | 41.6% | 6-17 | 31.6% | 15-22 | 67.3% | 37 | 10 | 12 | 20 | 6 | 15 | 3 | Team Stats (Home Games) | 109.0 | 55.0 | 42-74 | 56.8% | 8-17 | 47.1% | 17-27 | 63.0% | 52 | 16 | 26 | 24 | 10 | 13 | 5 | Stats Against (All Games) | 56.0 | 25.2 | 19-52 | 35.9% | 5-22 | 21.6% | 14-19 | 70.5% | 29 | 7 | 10 | 19 | 7 | 17 | 4 | vs opponents averaging | 66.5 | 32.7 | 23-54 | 41.9% | 6-20 | 28.8% | 15-22 | 68.5% | 34 | 8 | 13 | 20 | 7 | 14 | 3 | Stats Against (Home Games) | 68.0 | 22.0 | 21-58 | 36.2% | 6-33 | 18.2% | 20-32 | 62.5% | 32 | 9 | 11 | 21 | 7 | 18 | 6 |
|
|
Average power rating of opponents played: NEW ORLEANS 57.5, TEXAS A&M 77.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
11/18/2014 | PENSACOLA CHRISTIAN | 88-61 | W | | - | | - | 29-55 | 52.7% | 36 | 18 | 21-49 | 42.9% | 26 | 27 | 11/20/2014 | @ TCU | 71-86 | L | | - | | - | 19-41 | 46.3% | 27 | 13 | 30-53 | 56.6% | 28 | 8 | 11/28/2014 | @ TEXAS A&M | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 11/30/2014 | @ DENVER | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 12/6/2014 | CROWLEYS RIDGE | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 12/13/2014 | @ SAN DIEGO | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 12/19/2014 | @ S ILLINOIS | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
11/14/2014 | NORTHWESTERN ST | 109-68 | W | -11.5 | W | 151 | O | 42-74 | 56.8% | 52 | 13 | 21-58 | 36.2% | 32 | 18 | 11/20/2014 | *DAYTON | 53-55 | L | -1 | L | 130.5 | U | 18-52 | 34.6% | 47 | 21 | 19-53 | 35.8% | 26 | 17 | 11/21/2014 | *COLL OF CHARLESTON | 59-50 | W | -8 | W | 118 | U | 18-49 | 36.7% | 36 | 13 | 18-49 | 36.7% | 31 | 17 | 11/23/2014 | *NEW MEXICO | 64-51 | W | -4 | W | 123.5 | U | 24-53 | 45.3% | 36 | 12 | 17-49 | 34.7% | 29 | 16 | 11/28/2014 | NEW ORLEANS | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 12/3/2014 | SAM HOUSTON ST | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 12/6/2014 | ARIZONA ST | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 12/9/2014 | @ BAYLOR | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 12/13/2014 | YOUNGSTOWN ST | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 12/20/2014 | *KANSAS ST | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
|
| TEXAS A&M: The Aggies have struggled since joining the SEC, and it may be tough for them to get things going this season. There are some quality players left on the team though, most notably PG Alex Caruso (9.0 PPG, 5.0 APG, 3.6 RPG) who is the returning assist leader in the conference. At 6-foot-5, he forces to defenses to have to collapse on him when he is driving, because he can finish very well at the basket. SG Jordan Green (6.9 PPG, 2.3 RPG, 1.6 APG) and PF Kourtney Roberson (9.8 PPG, 6.8 RPG, 59% FG) are two experienced players who are willing to do the dirty work for the team. Transfer F/G Jalen Jones (14 PPG and 7.7 RPG at SMU) is a player who is capable of leading this team in scoring. |
|
|
|
|
Last Updated: 5/13/2024 7:12:41 AM EST. |
|
|