|
|
|
|
|
|
PARADISE JAM - Round 2 - VI Sport & Fitness Center - St. Thomas, VI |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All Games | 2-1 | 0 | 1-1 | 0-1 | 64.7 | 29.3 | 39.6% | 40.3 | 60.3 | 29.3 | 35.0% | 39.7 | Road Games | 0-1 | -1 | 0-1 | 0-1 | 60.0 | 27.0 | 37.5% | 29.0 | 68.0 | 37.0 | 40.4% | 39.0 | Last 5 Games | 2-1 | 0 | 1-1 | 0-1 | 64.7 | 29.3 | 39.6% | 40.3 | 60.3 | 29.3 | 35.0% | 39.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
Team Stats (All Games) | 64.7 | 29.3 | 20-51 | 39.6% | 5-14 | 34.1% | 19-29 | 65.9% | 40 | 14 | 9 | 20 | 5 | 11 | 5 | vs opponents surrendering | 59.6 | 27.7 | 19-51 | 37.2% | 5-15 | 34.4% | 16-27 | 61.9% | 40 | 14 | 10 | 19 | 5 | 14 | 3 | Team Stats (Road Games) | 60.0 | 27.0 | 18-48 | 37.5% | 4-13 | 30.8% | 20-24 | 83.3% | 29 | 8 | 7 | 25 | 3 | 12 | 5 | Stats Against (All Games) | 60.3 | 29.3 | 21-61 | 35.0% | 6-21 | 26.6% | 12-21 | 57.1% | 40 | 15 | 11 | 22 | 5 | 9 | 3 | vs opponents averaging | 64.5 | 31.9 | 23-61 | 37.1% | 7-23 | 30.8% | 12-20 | 61.9% | 39 | 14 | 12 | 21 | 6 | 10 | 3 | Stats Against (Road Games) | 68.0 | 37.0 | 23-57 | 40.4% | 6-17 | 35.3% | 16-27 | 59.3% | 39 | 15 | 12 | 17 | 5 | 9 | 1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
All Games | 1-2 | -2.7 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 76.7 | 37.7 | 48.6% | 40.3 | 63.3 | 28.7 | 36.7% | 35.3 | Road Games | 0-1 | -2.7 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 70.0 | 36.0 | 49.1% | 34.0 | 72.0 | 34.0 | 37.3% | 40.0 | Last 5 Games | 1-2 | -2.7 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 76.7 | 37.7 | 48.6% | 40.3 | 63.3 | 28.7 | 36.7% | 35.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
Team Stats (All Games) | 76.7 | 37.7 | 28-58 | 48.6% | 5-17 | 27.5% | 16-26 | 60.8% | 40 | 11 | 13 | 17 | 4 | 10 | 7 | vs opponents surrendering | 71.9 | 34.5 | 27-57 | 46.7% | 5-18 | 30.4% | 13-20 | 65.4% | 39 | 11 | 12 | 17 | 6 | 14 | 5 | Team Stats (Road Games) | 70.0 | 36.0 | 28-57 | 49.1% | 4-13 | 30.8% | 10-14 | 71.4% | 34 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 2 | 8 | 7 | Stats Against (All Games) | 63.3 | 28.7 | 22-59 | 36.7% | 7-20 | 32.8% | 13-20 | 65.6% | 35 | 8 | 12 | 24 | 5 | 12 | 1 | vs opponents averaging | 66.4 | 31.2 | 24-60 | 39.9% | 7-21 | 33.0% | 12-19 | 63.1% | 35 | 9 | 12 | 20 | 7 | 13 | 2 | Stats Against (Road Games) | 72.0 | 34.0 | 25-67 | 37.3% | 11-31 | 35.5% | 11-16 | 68.7% | 40 | 11 | 18 | 16 | 4 | 7 | 0 |
|
|
Average power rating of opponents played: NEVADA 66, CLEMSON 66.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
11/15/2014 | CAL POLY-SLO | 65-49 | W | -2.5 | W | | - | 23-56 | 41.1% | 43 | 3 | 18-58 | 31.0% | 39 | 4 | 11/17/2014 | ADAMS ST | 69-64 | W | | - | | - | 20-50 | 40.0% | 49 | 18 | 23-68 | 33.8% | 41 | 14 | 11/21/2014 | *SETON HALL | 60-68 | L | 7 | L | 130.5 | U | 18-48 | 37.5% | 29 | 12 | 23-57 | 40.4% | 39 | 9 | 11/22/2014 | *CLEMSON | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 11/29/2014 | @ NEBRASKA-OMAHA | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 12/3/2014 | @ LONG BEACH ST | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 12/7/2014 | CALIFORNIA | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 12/13/2014 | CS-FULLERTON | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
11/14/2014 | FLORIDA A&M | 86-41 | W | | - | | - | 32-66 | 48.5% | 41 | 5 | 16-48 | 33.3% | 37 | 24 | 11/17/2014 | WINTHROP | 74-77 | L | | - | | - | 24-50 | 48.0% | 46 | 16 | 24-62 | 38.7% | 29 | 6 | 11/21/2014 | *GARDNER WEBB | 70-72 | L | -6.5 | L | | - | 28-57 | 49.1% | 34 | 8 | 25-67 | 37.3% | 40 | 7 | 11/22/2014 | *NEVADA | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 11/28/2014 | HIGH POINT | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 12/1/2014 | RUTGERS | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 12/7/2014 | ARKANSAS | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 12/14/2014 | AUBURN | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
|
| CLEMSON: The Tigers return four starters, but the one they don't have, K.J. McDaniels, was the star of the team with more than 17 points and seven boards per game. SG Damarcus Harrison (7.8 PPG, 2.7 RPG) is the leading scorer on the team, and should once again prove to be a key player for this team that won 23 games last season and nearly made the NCAA Tournament. The guy with the most scoring potential on the team is SG Jordan Roper (7.4 PPG in 19.2 MPG). He was a reserve on last season's team, but the junior has the potential to double his scoring this season. The Tigers were a tremendous defensive squad (58.4 PPG allowed, 2nd in ACC), and that helped them make a deep run in the NIT where they lost in the semifinals. Scoring once again may be difficult for Clemson, so the school will have to bring that same type of defensive effort on a nightly basis. |
|
|
|
|
Last Updated: 3/29/2024 4:33:16 AM EST. |
|
|