|
|
DREXEL
MIAMI |
|
|
123.5
| 46
Final
66 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| CHARLESTON CLASSIC - Round 1 - TD Bank Arena - Charleston, SC |
|
|  | |
| 729 | DREXEL | 126 | 123.5 | | 730 | MIAMI | -10.5 | -10 |
|
|
|  | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| All Games | 0-2 | -1.6 | 0-2 | 0-1 | 48.5 | 27.0 | 31.5% | 34.5 | 58.5 | 28.5 | 38.8% | 40.5 | | Road Games | 0-1 | 0 | 0-1 | 0-1 | 48.0 | 29.0 | 29.1% | 34.0 | 65.0 | 33.0 | 42.3% | 43.0 | | Last 5 Games | 0-2 | -1.6 | 0-2 | 0-1 | 48.5 | 27.0 | 31.5% | 34.5 | 58.5 | 28.5 | 38.8% | 40.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
| Team Stats (All Games) | 48.5 | 27.0 | 17-54 | 31.5% | 5-20 | 24.4% | 9-12 | 76.0% | 34 | 5 | 7 | 21 | 4 | 13 | 4 | | vs opponents surrendering | 60.2 | 32.6 | 22-60 | 36.4% | 6-23 | 27.0% | 10-15 | 67.9% | 36 | 9 | 11 | 20 | 6 | 11 | 2 | | Team Stats (Road Games) | 48.0 | 29.0 | 16-55 | 29.1% | 7-29 | 24.1% | 9-14 | 64.3% | 34 | 6 | 7 | 23 | 5 | 12 | 5 | | Stats Against (All Games) | 58.5 | 28.5 | 20-51 | 38.8% | 2-12 | 20.8% | 16-23 | 69.6% | 40 | 9 | 8 | 16 | 8 | 13 | 3 | | vs opponents averaging | 63.9 | 27.6 | 22-54 | 41.8% | 4-15 | 24.0% | 16-22 | 70.2% | 40 | 10 | 11 | 16 | 7 | 13 | 5 | | Stats Against (Road Games) | 65.0 | 33.0 | 22-52 | 42.3% | 4-13 | 30.8% | 17-24 | 70.8% | 43 | 7 | 10 | 16 | 6 | 14 | 3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| All Games | 2-0 | +2.8 | 1-0 | 1-0 | 76.5 | 33.0 | 47.2% | 35.0 | 58.0 | 27.0 | 38.9% | 33.5 | | Road Games | 1-0 | +2.8 | 1-0 | 1-0 | 69.0 | 21.0 | 49.0% | 27.0 | 67.0 | 33.0 | 52.0% | 24.0 | | Last 5 Games | 2-0 | +2.8 | 1-0 | 1-0 | 76.5 | 33.0 | 47.2% | 35.0 | 58.0 | 27.0 | 38.9% | 33.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
| Team Stats (All Games) | 76.5 | 33.0 | 25-54 | 47.2% | 9-20 | 43.9% | 16-21 | 78.6% | 35 | 8 | 13 | 16 | 8 | 13 | 4 | | vs opponents surrendering | 60.8 | 26.1 | 21-54 | 38.8% | 6-21 | 30.8% | 13-18 | 72.2% | 32 | 7 | 10 | 15 | 5 | 14 | 4 | | Team Stats (Road Games) | 69.0 | 21.0 | 24-49 | 49.0% | 9-18 | 50.0% | 12-17 | 70.6% | 27 | 5 | 14 | 12 | 4 | 13 | 4 | | Stats Against (All Games) | 58.0 | 27.0 | 22-56 | 38.9% | 5-17 | 28.6% | 9-15 | 60.0% | 33 | 8 | 10 | 19 | 9 | 15 | 4 | | vs opponents averaging | 66.9 | 32.6 | 25-57 | 44.0% | 6-19 | 33.9% | 11-14 | 74.1% | 37 | 8 | 11 | 17 | 8 | 13 | 4 | | Stats Against (Road Games) | 67.0 | 33.0 | 26-50 | 52.0% | 8-17 | 47.1% | 7-9 | 77.8% | 24 | 4 | 15 | 17 | 8 | 13 | 5 |
|
|
| Average power rating of opponents played: DREXEL 78.5, MIAMI 74 |
|
|
|
|
|
| 11/14/2014 | @ COLORADO | 48-65 | L | 14 | L | 134 | U | 16-55 | 29.1% | 34 | 12 | 22-52 | 42.3% | 43 | 14 | | 11/17/2014 | ST JOSEPHS | 49-52 | L | -3 | L | | - | 18-53 | 34.0% | 35 | 14 | 18-51 | 35.3% | 38 | 13 | | 11/20/2014 | *MIAMI | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 11/30/2014 | SOUTHERN MISS | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 12/13/2014 | LASALLE | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 11/14/2014 | HOWARD | 84-49 | W | | - | | - | 27-59 | 45.8% | 43 | 13 | 18-63 | 28.6% | 43 | 17 | | 11/17/2014 | @ FLORIDA | 69-67 | W | 8 | W | 130 | O | 24-49 | 49.0% | 27 | 13 | 26-50 | 52.0% | 24 | 13 | | 11/20/2014 | *DREXEL | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 11/25/2014 | @ CHARLOTTE | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 11/28/2014 | S ALABAMA | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 12/2/2014 | ILLINOIS | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 12/6/2014 | WI-GREEN BAY | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 12/8/2014 | SAVANNAH ST | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
|
 | MIAMI: Miami is a team people do not know about yet, but the backcourt of transfers SG Sheldon McClellan and PG Angel Rodriguez has a chance to be one of the best in the ACC. McClellan was a very talented player at Texas two seasons ago, while Rodriguez was the starting point guard at Kansas State. Rodriguez does a great job of running the show for the offense, while McClellan is a superb athlete, who can be an elite perimeter defender. C Tonye Jeriki (4.2 PPG, 5.3 RPG, 0.9 BPG) is the lone returning starter on the team, but he is known more as a defensive player. For this team to make a run at the NCAA Tournament, it will need big performances from freshmen SG Ja'Quan Newton and James Palmer. |
|
|
|
|
| Last Updated: 4/19/2024 5:09:59 PM EST. |
|
|