| | | |
NEBRASKA BAYLOR |
|
| 129.5 | 60 Final 74 |
|
|
| | |
|
NCAA Tournament - Second Round - AT&T Center - San Antonio, TX | | | | |
837 | NEBRASKA | 131.5 | 129.5 | 838 | BAYLOR | -3.5 | -3.5 |
|
|
| | |
|
| | | |
|
|
All Games | 19-12 | +7.8 | 20-10 | 10-17 | 67.0 | 31.1 | 42.7% | 33.4 | 64.9 | 29.9 | 42.0% | 34.9 | Road Games | 4-11 | -5 | 8-7 | 4-9 | 62.7 | 28.7 | 39.3% | 33.5 | 70.2 | 32.9 | 43.9% | 37.3 | Last 5 Games | 3-2 | +2.4 | 3-2 | 2-3 | 63.4 | 29.6 | 42.7% | 33.8 | 61.2 | 27.6 | 39.3% | 35.6 |
|
| |
|
|
Team Stats (All Games) | 67.0 | 31.1 | 22-53 | 42.7% | 6-18 | 33.9% | 16-22 | 71.9% | 33 | 7 | 10 | 20 | 7 | 11 | 3 | vs opponents surrendering | 66.2 | 31 | 23-55 | 41.8% | 6-18 | 32.5% | 14-20 | 69.9% | 34 | 9 | 11 | 19 | 6 | 12 | 4 | Team Stats (Road Games) | 62.7 | 28.7 | 22-56 | 39.3% | 6-19 | 31.8% | 13-18 | 71.2% | 33 | 8 | 9 | 22 | 6 | 11 | 3 | Stats Against (All Games) | 64.9 | 29.9 | 22-52 | 42.0% | 6-19 | 31.9% | 15-22 | 67.4% | 35 | 8 | 11 | 19 | 5 | 12 | 3 | vs opponents averaging | 69.9 | 33 | 24-55 | 43.9% | 6-18 | 34.1% | 15-22 | 70.8% | 36 | 9 | 13 | 18 | 6 | 12 | 4 | Stats Against (Road Games) | 70.2 | 32.9 | 23-53 | 43.9% | 6-18 | 32.2% | 17-25 | 70.2% | 37 | 9 | 13 | 16 | 5 | 11 | 4 |
|
|
| |
|
|
All Games | 24-11 | +2 | 14-14 | 14-12 | 75.2 | 35.1 | 45.6% | 38.7 | 68.4 | 32.7 | 42.4% | 31.8 | Road Games | 11-7 | +5.9 | 8-9 | 12-4 | 75.3 | 35.1 | 46.7% | 36.3 | 72.7 | 35.5 | 45.3% | 30.9 | Last 5 Games | 4-1 | +2.4 | 3-2 | 3-2 | 76.2 | 37.0 | 47.4% | 34.8 | 71.6 | 29.0 | 43.5% | 33.8 |
|
| |
|
|
Team Stats (All Games) | 75.2 | 35.1 | 26-56 | 45.6% | 8-19 | 39.0% | 17-25 | 67.2% | 39 | 13 | 15 | 17 | 5 | 12 | 6 | vs opponents surrendering | 72.3 | 33.8 | 25-57 | 43.4% | 7-19 | 34.5% | 16-23 | 69.6% | 35 | 10 | 13 | 20 | 6 | 13 | 4 | Team Stats (Road Games) | 75.3 | 35.1 | 26-56 | 46.7% | 8-20 | 41.9% | 14-21 | 66.7% | 36 | 12 | 14 | 18 | 5 | 12 | 5 | Stats Against (All Games) | 68.4 | 32.7 | 24-58 | 42.4% | 7-19 | 36.3% | 13-18 | 68.1% | 32 | 10 | 15 | 19 | 5 | 10 | 3 | vs opponents averaging | 74.4 | 35.2 | 26-58 | 44.5% | 6-19 | 34.3% | 17-24 | 70.9% | 36 | 10 | 13 | 19 | 6 | 12 | 4 | Stats Against (Road Games) | 72.7 | 35.5 | 26-57 | 45.3% | 8-20 | 40.4% | 13-19 | 70.6% | 31 | 10 | 15 | 17 | 6 | 10 | 3 |
|
| Average power rating of opponents played: NEBRASKA 79, BAYLOR 75 |
| | |
|
|
1/30/2014 | INDIANA | 60-55 | W | -2 | W | 137.5 | U | 19-44 | 43.2% | 22 | 14 | 20-44 | 45.5% | 31 | 19 | 2/5/2014 | @ MICHIGAN | 50-79 | L | 13 | L | 135.5 | U | 19-54 | 35.2% | 26 | 11 | 26-52 | 50.0% | 35 | 13 | 2/8/2014 | @ NORTHWESTERN | 53-49 | W | 2 | W | 118 | U | 19-47 | 40.4% | 31 | 12 | 17-46 | 37.0% | 31 | 13 | 2/12/2014 | ILLINOIS | 67-58 | W | -3 | W | 127.5 | U | 19-43 | 44.2% | 28 | 10 | 18-49 | 36.7% | 36 | 14 | 2/16/2014 | @ MICHIGAN ST | 60-51 | W | 14 | W | 134.5 | U | 19-53 | 35.8% | 36 | 5 | 17-50 | 34.0% | 39 | 11 | 2/20/2014 | PENN ST | 80-67 | W | -5 | W | 134 | O | 19-43 | 44.2% | 39 | 13 | 22-63 | 34.9% | 37 | 6 | 2/23/2014 | PURDUE | 76-57 | W | -5.5 | W | 134 | U | 26-56 | 46.4% | 37 | 9 | 16-53 | 30.2% | 40 | 14 | 2/26/2014 | @ ILLINOIS | 49-60 | L | 3 | L | 125 | U | 20-45 | 44.4% | 28 | 15 | 19-51 | 37.3% | 34 | 9 | 3/1/2014 | NORTHWESTERN | 54-47 | W | -9.5 | L | 119 | U | 19-52 | 36.5% | 40 | 10 | 15-45 | 33.3% | 29 | 9 | 3/5/2014 | @ INDIANA | 70-60 | W | 6 | W | 132 | U | 25-55 | 45.5% | 36 | 9 | 22-60 | 36.7% | 37 | 10 | 3/9/2014 | WISCONSIN | 77-68 | W | 3 | W | 130 | O | 26-50 | 52.0% | 31 | 5 | 24-56 | 42.9% | 35 | 11 | 3/14/2014 | *OHIO ST | 67-71 | L | 5.5 | W | 124 | O | 22-60 | 36.7% | 34 | 11 | 25-55 | 45.5% | 43 | 15 | 3/21/2014 | *BAYLOR | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
| |
|
|
2/1/2014 | @ OKLAHOMA ST | 76-70 | W | 11 | W | 145.5 | O | 28-54 | 51.9% | 32 | 16 | 23-50 | 46.0% | 26 | 14 | 2/4/2014 | KANSAS | 52-69 | L | 4 | L | 143 | U | 16-55 | 29.1% | 31 | 11 | 25-54 | 46.3% | 45 | 13 | 2/8/2014 | @ OKLAHOMA | 72-88 | L | 5 | L | 153 | O | 25-59 | 42.4% | 30 | 8 | 30-56 | 53.6% | 35 | 8 | 2/12/2014 | @ TCU | 91-58 | W | -8.5 | W | 131 | O | 31-58 | 53.4% | 45 | 14 | 20-50 | 40.0% | 18 | 13 | 2/15/2014 | KANSAS ST | 87-73 | W | -4.5 | W | 132.5 | O | 30-70 | 42.9% | 54 | 17 | 28-73 | 38.4% | 40 | 13 | 2/17/2014 | OKLAHOMA ST | 70-64 | W | -5.5 | W | 143 | U | 23-61 | 37.7% | 51 | 14 | 22-59 | 37.3% | 36 | 12 | 2/22/2014 | @ W VIRGINIA | 88-75 | W | 3 | W | 145.5 | O | 32-59 | 54.2% | 34 | 4 | 22-55 | 40.0% | 31 | 4 | 2/26/2014 | @ TEXAS | 69-74 | L | 4 | L | 142 | O | 22-61 | 36.1% | 40 | 5 | 28-59 | 47.5% | 41 | 7 | 3/1/2014 | TEXAS TECH | 59-49 | W | -9 | W | 129 | U | 16-53 | 30.2% | 40 | 9 | 20-42 | 47.6% | 24 | 12 | 3/4/2014 | IOWA ST | 74-61 | W | -3 | W | 147.5 | U | 27-57 | 47.4% | 34 | 9 | 24-60 | 40.0% | 34 | 14 | 3/8/2014 | @ KANSAS ST | 76-74 | W | 3 | W | 131 | O | 24-48 | 50.0% | 26 | 10 | 24-56 | 42.9% | 33 | 11 | 3/12/2014 | *TCU | 76-68 | W | -16 | L | 130 | O | 31-57 | 54.4% | 39 | 13 | 24-53 | 45.3% | 22 | 9 | 3/13/2014 | *OKLAHOMA | 78-73 | W | 1 | W | 153.5 | U | 24-48 | 50.0% | 36 | 11 | 28-66 | 42.4% | 34 | 9 | 3/14/2014 | *TEXAS | 86-69 | W | -1.5 | W | 138.5 | O | 25-58 | 43.1% | 45 | 7 | 31-78 | 39.7% | 42 | 6 | 3/15/2014 | *IOWA ST | 65-74 | L | 3 | L | 150 | U | 23-57 | 40.4% | 28 | 8 | 24-48 | 50.0% | 38 | 12 | 3/21/2014 | *NEBRASKA | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
| | | NEBRASKA: Head coach Tim Miles is one of the most likeable coaches in college basketball, and despite the record last season, the Cornhuskers are improving. SG Shavon Shields (8.6 PPG, 5.1 RPG, 36% 3-pt FG) continued to make great strides throughout the season, playing his best basketball late in the season, scoring a career-high 29 points in a victory over Penn State. SG Ray Gallegos (12.5 PPG, 3.1 RPG) is the only other returning player that averaged at least six points per game. With many newcomers this season, things will be tough in Lincoln again. However, the folks need to be patient with Miles, because he will have Nebraska playing much better basketball. | | BAYLOR: Baylor disappointed last season by failing to make the NCAA Tournament, but it still won the NIT and brings back some of the key pieces that yielded so much hope a year ago. Pierre Jackson, last season's leading scorer, is gone but he also dealt with consistency issues that brought the team down at times. This season's squad may be built off its strength in the post, where it returns two strong scorers in Cory Jefferson (13.3 PPG, 61% FG, 8.0 RPG) and Isaiah Austin (13.0 PPG, 8.3 RPG, 1.7 BPG). Jefferson will be a key senior leader while Austin was one of the nation's top recruits last season and has the potential to be the conference's best big man. Other key returners are sharp-shooting Brady Heslip (8.6 PPG, 39% 3-pt FG), who averaged 2.3 threes per game last season, and Gary Franklin (4.0 PPG), who should find more minutes in the backcourt as a senior. JUCO transfer Kenny Chery will likely take over the point, but he is not shy about putting up the rock. Adding to the potential of this squad are two high-upside recruits in SG Allerik Freeman and SF Ishmael Wainright, who both have the tools to become critical players. |
| | Follow Paul J. Weber on Twitter: www.twitter.com/pauljweber
|
| Last Updated: 3/29/2024 10:26:00 AM EST. |
|
|
| |
|