| | | |
MIAMI MARYLAND |
|
| 123 | 71 Final 74 |
|
|
| | |
|
| | | |
783 | MIAMI | 122.5 | 123 | 784 | MARYLAND | -4.5 | -5 |
|
|
| | |
|
| | | |
|
|
All Games | 10-9 | -1.9 | 6-9 | 2-10 | 61.0 | 28.9 | 41.7% | 34.8 | 59.3 | 25.3 | 39.6% | 34.2 | Road Games | 6-3 | +6.6 | 5-3 | 0-7 | 57.9 | 26.7 | 43.3% | 32.9 | 54.1 | 22.9 | 38.0% | 30.6 | Last 5 Games | 2-3 | +1.6 | 2-3 | 1-4 | 54.0 | 26.2 | 39.4% | 30.0 | 58.6 | 25.6 | 38.4% | 37.4 | Conference Games | 2-5 | -2.1 | 3-4 | 1-6 | 53.4 | 26.1 | 38.9% | 32.4 | 57.6 | 25.1 | 37.4% | 37.0 |
|
| |
|
|
Team Stats (All Games) | 61.0 | 28.9 | 22-53 | 41.7% | 6-17 | 32.6% | 11-16 | 68.4% | 35 | 9 | 11 | 16 | 5 | 11 | 4 | vs opponents surrendering | 67.5 | 31.7 | 24-56 | 42.4% | 6-18 | 33.7% | 14-21 | 67.9% | 34 | 9 | 12 | 19 | 6 | 13 | 4 | Team Stats (Road Games) | 57.9 | 26.7 | 21-48 | 43.3% | 6-17 | 34.2% | 11-16 | 68.5% | 33 | 7 | 11 | 16 | 4 | 12 | 4 | Stats Against (All Games) | 59.3 | 25.3 | 21-53 | 39.6% | 7-20 | 33.8% | 10-16 | 65.1% | 34 | 9 | 11 | 16 | 5 | 11 | 3 | vs opponents averaging | 71.4 | 33.5 | 25-56 | 44.3% | 6-18 | 34.5% | 16-23 | 68.0% | 36 | 10 | 13 | 18 | 7 | 12 | 4 | Stats Against (Road Games) | 54.1 | 22.9 | 19-51 | 38.0% | 5-18 | 29.5% | 10-16 | 64.3% | 31 | 8 | 11 | 16 | 6 | 10 | 3 |
|
|
| |
|
|
All Games | 11-9 | -1.6 | 8-8 | 9-7 | 72.3 | 32.5 | 43.2% | 38.9 | 69.1 | 33.4 | 42.3% | 33.3 | Home Games | 7-3 | +2 | 3-3 | 3-3 | 76.7 | 34.5 | 46.1% | 39.1 | 68.1 | 33.2 | 41.5% | 31.8 | Last 5 Games | 1-4 | -3.2 | 1-4 | 3-2 | 65.8 | 28.6 | 37.4% | 37.6 | 75.6 | 34.8 | 48.3% | 35.8 | Conference Games | 3-4 | -1.2 | 3-4 | 4-3 | 70.6 | 32.6 | 41.3% | 35.9 | 74.1 | 34.1 | 46.8% | 34.7 |
|
| |
|
|
Team Stats (All Games) | 72.3 | 32.5 | 25-59 | 43.2% | 7-19 | 34.6% | 15-22 | 66.2% | 39 | 12 | 12 | 20 | 6 | 13 | 4 | vs opponents surrendering | 67.8 | 30.8 | 24-56 | 42.3% | 6-18 | 33.7% | 15-21 | 69.9% | 34 | 9 | 12 | 19 | 6 | 13 | 4 | Team Stats (Home Games) | 76.7 | 34.5 | 27-58 | 46.1% | 8-20 | 38.3% | 15-23 | 66.7% | 39 | 11 | 15 | 18 | 6 | 14 | 6 | Stats Against (All Games) | 69.1 | 33.4 | 23-55 | 42.3% | 7-18 | 36.6% | 16-23 | 69.5% | 33 | 8 | 12 | 19 | 6 | 13 | 3 | vs opponents averaging | 72.1 | 33.9 | 25-56 | 45.0% | 6-18 | 34.2% | 16-23 | 70.6% | 35 | 9 | 14 | 18 | 6 | 12 | 4 | Stats Against (Home Games) | 68.1 | 33.2 | 23-56 | 41.5% | 6-18 | 35.6% | 15-22 | 68.9% | 32 | 8 | 11 | 19 | 6 | 13 | 3 |
|
| Average power rating of opponents played: MIAMI 75.1, MARYLAND 75.2 |
| | |
|
|
12/19/2013 | @ SAVANNAH ST | 68-51 | W | | - | | - | 24-42 | 57.1% | 34 | 16 | 20-51 | 39.2% | 21 | 11 | 12/22/2013 | LASALLE | 71-58 | W | -3 | W | 122 | O | 28-59 | 47.5% | 40 | 7 | 23-60 | 38.3% | 35 | 10 | 12/30/2013 | LOYOLA-MD | 71-48 | W | | - | | - | 26-48 | 54.2% | 38 | 12 | 18-53 | 34.0% | 27 | 10 | 1/4/2014 | @ SYRACUSE | 44-49 | L | 13 | W | 123 | U | 17-40 | 42.5% | 27 | 15 | 17-47 | 36.2% | 29 | 7 | 1/8/2014 | @ N CAROLINA | 63-57 | W | 10 | W | 130 | U | 21-50 | 42.0% | 38 | 13 | 20-65 | 30.8% | 42 | 11 | 1/15/2014 | FLORIDA ST | 53-63 | L | -1 | L | 124 | U | 21-59 | 35.6% | 29 | 4 | 21-46 | 45.7% | 37 | 9 | 1/18/2014 | @ GEORGIA TECH | 56-42 | W | 1 | W | 121.5 | U | 20-43 | 46.5% | 31 | 11 | 13-44 | 29.5% | 27 | 13 | 1/22/2014 | DUKE | 46-67 | L | 4.5 | L | 129 | U | 17-48 | 35.4% | 28 | 11 | 24-56 | 42.9% | 42 | 9 | 1/25/2014 | SYRACUSE | 52-64 | L | 5.5 | L | 113 | O | 18-46 | 39.1% | 24 | 5 | 21-47 | 44.7% | 39 | 5 | 1/29/2014 | @ MARYLAND | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/1/2014 | NORFOLK ST | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/5/2014 | PITTSBURGH | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/8/2014 | NC STATE | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/10/2014 | @ FLORIDA ST | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/15/2014 | @ VIRGINIA TECH | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/19/2014 | NOTRE DAME | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
| |
|
|
12/12/2013 | @ BOSTON COLLEGE | 88-80 | W | -1.5 | W | 144 | O | 32-58 | 55.2% | 29 | 11 | 25-51 | 49.0% | 28 | 9 | 12/14/2013 | FLA ATLANTIC | 66-62 | W | -18 | L | 142.5 | U | 25-63 | 39.7% | 40 | 9 | 22-56 | 39.3% | 33 | 13 | 12/21/2013 | BOSTON U | 77-83 | L | | - | | - | 28-58 | 48.3% | 42 | 17 | 25-59 | 42.4% | 34 | 12 | 12/29/2013 | TULSA | 85-74 | W | -10 | W | 144.5 | O | 26-60 | 43.3% | 43 | 10 | 26-67 | 38.8% | 34 | 10 | 12/31/2013 | NC CENTRAL | 70-56 | W | | - | | - | 22-49 | 44.9% | 43 | 16 | 18-55 | 32.7% | 28 | 7 | 1/4/2014 | GEORGIA TECH | 77-61 | W | -8.5 | W | 140 | U | 28-60 | 46.7% | 34 | 6 | 23-60 | 38.3% | 36 | 11 | 1/6/2014 | @ PITTSBURGH | 59-79 | L | 9 | L | 135.5 | O | 20-56 | 35.7% | 36 | 13 | 29-55 | 52.7% | 36 | 7 | 1/12/2014 | @ FLORIDA ST | 61-85 | L | 6.5 | L | 139.5 | O | 17-51 | 33.3% | 34 | 15 | 27-54 | 50.0% | 34 | 14 | 1/15/2014 | NOTRE DAME | 74-66 | W | -5.5 | W | 144 | U | 25-63 | 39.7% | 40 | 11 | 24-50 | 48.0% | 31 | 17 | 1/20/2014 | @ NC STATE | 56-65 | L | -2 | L | 142 | U | 22-70 | 31.4% | 50 | 12 | 23-57 | 40.4% | 41 | 8 | 1/25/2014 | PITTSBURGH | 79-83 | L | 3.5 | L | 135.5 | O | 26-54 | 48.1% | 28 | 17 | 25-49 | 51.0% | 37 | 16 | 1/29/2014 | MIAMI | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/1/2014 | @ VIRGINIA TECH | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/4/2014 | @ N CAROLINA | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/8/2014 | FLORIDA ST | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/10/2014 | @ VIRGINIA | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/15/2014 | @ DUKE | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/18/2014 | WAKE FOREST | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
| | | MIAMI: The Hurricanes were the surprise story of the ACC last season but lose almost all of last season's talent, mostly through graduation, while star PG Shane Larkin made the early leap to the NBA. Rion Brown (6.4 PPG) is the top talent, as the only returning player who averaged at least 2.0 PPG last season. Seven-footer Tonye Jekiri should be a defensive force, while DePaul transfer Donnavan Kirk (6.2 PPG, 3.9 RPG, 1.6 BPG) will get plenty of minutes at power forward. Head coach Jim Larranaga is good, but this will be a rebuilding year for the Hurricanes who have some respectable freshmen coming in, but nobody good enough to make them competitive in the tough ACC. Six-foot-1 volume shooter Deandre Burnett will probably log the most minutes among the incoming class. | | MARYLAND: This will be a new-look Maryland squad without center Alex Len, who took his talents to the NBA. Heading into the school's final year in the ACC, Dez Wells (13.1 PPG, 4.9 RPG, 3.0 APG) should lead the charge, even more so with Pe'Shon Howard transferring. The key for this team will be the development of two sophomores in Charles Mitchell (5.5 PPG, 5.4 RPG in 15.7 MPG) and Shaquille Cleare (3.7 PPG, 2.7 RPG in 12.0 MPG), who will be tasked with replacing Len in the paint. Cleare is a hefty 6-foot-9 center, who has the potential to be a load to deal with down low. Mitchell made the most of his limited time as a freshman, and also provides a hefty rebounding presence that could prove difficult for opponents to deal with. Sophomore Seth Allen (7.8 PPG, 2.3 APG) and freshman Roddy Peters will be tasked with running the point, which will allow junior Nick Faust (9.4 PPG, 3.7 RPG, 2.5 APG) to concentrate more on scoring from the two-guard spot. |
| | |
| Last Updated: 3/29/2024 11:27:49 AM EST. |
|
|
| |
|