|
|
W VIRGINIA BAYLOR |
|
| 143 | 66 Final 64 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| | |
517 | W VIRGINIA | 140.5 | 140.5 | 518 | BAYLOR | -5.5 | -5.5 |
|
|
| | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All Games | 11-9 | -2.6 | 8-7 | 8-7 | 78.8 | 38.1 | 45.3% | 36.5 | 71.1 | 33.7 | 43.3% | 35.3 | Road Games | 5-5 | +0.6 | 6-3 | 5-5 | 74.4 | 34.2 | 43.9% | 35.3 | 72.0 | 34.3 | 43.6% | 35.4 | Last 5 Games | 1-4 | -3.1 | 2-3 | 4-1 | 71.8 | 33.4 | 40.4% | 34.2 | 78.6 | 39.6 | 48.9% | 35.6 | Conference Games | 3-4 | -1.1 | 4-3 | 6-1 | 74.6 | 35.4 | 42.8% | 33.6 | 78.3 | 38.6 | 48.3% | 34.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
Team Stats (All Games) | 78.8 | 38.1 | 27-60 | 45.3% | 8-20 | 38.5% | 16-23 | 71.0% | 36 | 11 | 14 | 20 | 6 | 10 | 3 | vs opponents surrendering | 70 | 32.6 | 24-57 | 42.7% | 6-19 | 33.8% | 15-21 | 69.8% | 35 | 10 | 12 | 20 | 6 | 12 | 4 | Team Stats (Road Games) | 74.4 | 34.2 | 25-58 | 43.9% | 7-19 | 38.2% | 16-24 | 67.3% | 35 | 11 | 12 | 23 | 6 | 11 | 3 | Stats Against (All Games) | 71.1 | 33.7 | 25-57 | 43.3% | 7-20 | 34.4% | 15-23 | 66.9% | 35 | 10 | 12 | 20 | 5 | 13 | 4 | vs opponents averaging | 73.7 | 34.9 | 25-56 | 45.1% | 7-19 | 35.6% | 16-24 | 68.8% | 36 | 10 | 13 | 19 | 6 | 12 | 4 | Stats Against (Road Games) | 72.0 | 34.3 | 24-56 | 43.6% | 7-20 | 32.7% | 17-25 | 67.5% | 35 | 10 | 13 | 21 | 5 | 13 | 4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
All Games | 13-6 | -6 | 4-8 | 5-5 | 76.3 | 36.2 | 46.8% | 39.6 | 67.8 | 32.3 | 41.7% | 30.9 | Home Games | 9-2 | -4.7 | 2-3 | 1-3 | 79.2 | 38.1 | 47.4% | 41.3 | 63.8 | 28.6 | 38.5% | 31.9 | Last 5 Games | 1-4 | -8.8 | 1-3 | 3-2 | 70.4 | 33.0 | 39.4% | 38.2 | 72.4 | 32.0 | 47.3% | 33.4 | Conference Games | 1-5 | -9.8 | 1-4 | 4-2 | 70.7 | 33.8 | 39.9% | 38.5 | 74.8 | 33.3 | 48.8% | 33.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
Team Stats (All Games) | 76.3 | 36.2 | 26-56 | 46.8% | 7-18 | 38.9% | 17-26 | 65.9% | 40 | 12 | 15 | 18 | 5 | 13 | 6 | vs opponents surrendering | 73.4 | 34.9 | 25-57 | 44.1% | 7-19 | 34.9% | 16-24 | 68.5% | 35 | 10 | 13 | 20 | 6 | 13 | 4 | Team Stats (Home Games) | 79.2 | 38.1 | 26-55 | 47.4% | 6-17 | 38.3% | 20-30 | 67.6% | 41 | 12 | 17 | 17 | 5 | 12 | 6 | Stats Against (All Games) | 67.8 | 32.3 | 24-58 | 41.7% | 6-19 | 34.1% | 13-19 | 69.7% | 31 | 10 | 14 | 19 | 6 | 11 | 3 | vs opponents averaging | 75.3 | 35.8 | 26-58 | 45.0% | 6-19 | 33.3% | 17-24 | 70.7% | 36 | 10 | 13 | 20 | 6 | 13 | 4 | Stats Against (Home Games) | 63.8 | 28.6 | 23-59 | 38.5% | 6-19 | 29.9% | 13-19 | 67.5% | 32 | 11 | 14 | 21 | 4 | 11 | 3 |
|
|
Average power rating of opponents played: W VIRGINIA 73.7, BAYLOR 72.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
12/10/2013 | GONZAGA | 76-80 | L | 2 | L | 154 | O | 25-67 | 37.3% | 36 | 5 | 27-61 | 44.3% | 43 | 11 | 12/14/2013 | *MARSHALL | 74-64 | W | -9 | W | 159 | U | 25-50 | 50.0% | 38 | 16 | 25-60 | 41.7% | 35 | 15 | 12/22/2013 | PURDUE | 70-73 | L | -5 | L | 147.5 | U | 24-65 | 36.9% | 38 | 8 | 25-60 | 41.7% | 45 | 11 | 12/29/2013 | *WM & MARY | 82-45 | W | -10 | W | 147 | U | 30-61 | 49.2% | 47 | 9 | 14-55 | 25.5% | 31 | 12 | 1/4/2014 | @ TCU | 74-69 | W | -4 | W | 138 | O | 24-59 | 40.7% | 38 | 9 | 25-53 | 47.2% | 30 | 14 | 1/6/2014 | @ TEXAS TECH | 89-86 | W | -2.5 | W | 143 | O | 34-61 | 55.7% | 26 | 9 | 28-60 | 46.7% | 35 | 14 | 1/11/2014 | OKLAHOMA ST | 72-73 | L | 5.5 | W | 151.5 | U | 24-58 | 41.4% | 38 | 12 | 27-60 | 45.0% | 35 | 11 | 1/13/2014 | TEXAS | 69-80 | L | -5 | L | 145 | O | 26-69 | 37.7% | 30 | 6 | 29-55 | 52.7% | 49 | 18 | 1/18/2014 | @ KANSAS ST | 56-78 | L | 4 | L | 131.5 | O | 16-49 | 32.7% | 33 | 15 | 28-51 | 54.9% | 32 | 13 | 1/22/2014 | TEXAS TECH | 87-81 | W | -7 | L | 139.5 | O | 29-54 | 53.7% | 29 | 7 | 24-49 | 49.0% | 26 | 10 | 1/25/2014 | @ OKLAHOMA ST | 75-81 | L | 13.5 | W | 150 | O | 21-57 | 36.8% | 41 | 15 | 26-59 | 44.1% | 36 | 12 | 1/28/2014 | @ BAYLOR | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/1/2014 | KANSAS ST | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/5/2014 | OKLAHOMA | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/8/2014 | @ KANSAS | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/10/2014 | IOWA ST | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/15/2014 | @ TEXAS | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
12/18/2013 | NORTHWESTERN ST | 91-84 | W | | - | | - | 32-63 | 50.8% | 36 | 10 | 34-69 | 49.3% | 38 | 12 | 12/22/2013 | SOUTHERN U | 81-56 | W | | - | | - | 22-44 | 50.0% | 39 | 13 | 18-53 | 34.0% | 27 | 15 | 12/30/2013 | ORAL ROBERTS | 81-55 | W | | - | | - | 30-58 | 51.7% | 36 | 9 | 21-58 | 36.2% | 36 | 13 | 1/3/2014 | SAVANNAH ST | 80-50 | W | | - | | - | 27-51 | 52.9% | 41 | 9 | 21-63 | 33.3% | 31 | 11 | 1/7/2014 | @ IOWA ST | 72-87 | L | 7.5 | L | 147 | O | 28-66 | 42.4% | 40 | 19 | 34-62 | 54.8% | 31 | 10 | 1/11/2014 | TCU | 88-62 | W | -15 | W | 131.5 | O | 30-70 | 42.9% | 54 | 10 | 24-57 | 42.1% | 25 | 7 | 1/15/2014 | @ TEXAS TECH | 72-82 | L | -5 | L | 134 | O | 26-63 | 41.3% | 29 | 5 | 28-49 | 57.1% | 35 | 9 | 1/18/2014 | OKLAHOMA | 64-66 | L | -8 | L | 155 | U | 24-59 | 40.7% | 37 | 11 | 22-56 | 39.3% | 35 | 12 | 1/20/2014 | @ KANSAS | 68-78 | L | 10 | T | 144.5 | O | 23-59 | 39.0% | 31 | 16 | 23-40 | 57.5% | 29 | 16 | 1/25/2014 | TEXAS | 60-74 | L | -5 | L | 144 | U | 18-56 | 32.1% | 40 | 13 | 26-58 | 44.8% | 43 | 9 | 1/28/2014 | W VIRGINIA | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/1/2014 | @ OKLAHOMA ST | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/4/2014 | KANSAS | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/8/2014 | @ OKLAHOMA | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/12/2014 | @ TCU | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/15/2014 | KANSAS ST | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/17/2014 | OKLAHOMA ST | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
|
| W VIRGINIA: The Mountaineers finished below .500 for the first time in Bob Huggins' tenure as head coach with a team that didn't have one player average double-digit points. With troubled 6-foot-10 C Aaric Murray no longer with the program, the frontcourt will be extremely thin. Huggins hopes newcomer Jonathan Holton can post numbers like he did at Rhode Island (10.2 PPG, 8.1 RPG) before he was arrested and kicked off the team before salvaging his career at community college. The backcourt is in pretty good shape though with Eron Harris (9.8 PPG, 35% 3-pt FG) expected to improve in his second campaign alongside long-range shooter Terry Henderson (8.0 PPG, 40% 3-pt FG). Add in top recruit Devin Williams leading a strong freshman class, and the Mountaineers should regain their status as a quality basketball program very soon. | | BAYLOR: Baylor disappointed last season by failing to make the NCAA Tournament, but it still won the NIT and brings back some of the key pieces that yielded so much hope a year ago. Pierre Jackson, last season's leading scorer, is gone but he also dealt with consistency issues that brought the team down at times. This season's squad may be built off its strength in the post, where it returns two strong scorers in Cory Jefferson (13.3 PPG, 61% FG, 8.0 RPG) and Isaiah Austin (13.0 PPG, 8.3 RPG, 1.7 BPG). Jefferson will be a key senior leader while Austin was one of the nation's top recruits last season and has the potential to be the conference's best big man. Other key returners are sharp-shooting Brady Heslip (8.6 PPG, 39% 3-pt FG), who averaged 2.3 threes per game last season, and Gary Franklin (4.0 PPG), who should find more minutes in the backcourt as a senior. JUCO transfer Kenny Chery will likely take over the point, but he is not shy about putting up the rock. Adding to the potential of this squad are two high-upside recruits in SG Allerik Freeman and SF Ishmael Wainright, who both have the tools to become critical players. |
|
|
|
|
Last Updated: 4/24/2024 10:07:49 AM EST. |
|
|