| | | |
INDIANA OHIO ST |
|
| 139.5 | 81 Final 68 |
|
|
| | |
|
| | | |
823 | INDIANA | Pick | 139 | 824 | OHIO ST | 139.5 | -1 |
|
|
| | |
|
| | | |
|
|
All Games | 20-3 | -7.5 | 11-10 | 8-9 | 83.3 | 42.1 | 50.1% | 39.7 | 61.6 | 28.1 | 38.0% | 29.8 | Road Games | 6-2 | -5.5 | 3-5 | 3-5 | 76.6 | 37.2 | 46.4% | 36.9 | 65.2 | 27.5 | 39.7% | 30.5 | Last 5 Games | 4-1 | 0 | 2-3 | 3-2 | 79.4 | 40.2 | 49.6% | 35.4 | 65.2 | 29.0 | 41.5% | 29.6 | Conference Games | 8-2 | -3 | 3-7 | 4-6 | 75.4 | 39.3 | 47.3% | 36.5 | 64.6 | 27.4 | 40.1% | 30.8 |
|
| |
|
|
Team Stats (All Games) | 83.3 | 42.1 | 28-56 | 50.1% | 8-18 | 42.6% | 20-27 | 74.6% | 40 | 11 | 16 | 17 | 8 | 13 | 4 | vs opponents surrendering | 64.8 | 29.5 | 23-54 | 41.9% | 6-18 | 33.2% | 13-19 | 68.7% | 34 | 9 | 12 | 18 | 7 | 14 | 3 | Team Stats (Road Games) | 76.6 | 37.2 | 25-53 | 46.4% | 7-16 | 45.2% | 20-27 | 74.4% | 37 | 10 | 14 | 18 | 7 | 12 | 3 | Stats Against (All Games) | 61.6 | 28.1 | 22-59 | 38.0% | 6-21 | 31.2% | 10-15 | 70.1% | 30 | 9 | 10 | 21 | 7 | 15 | 3 | vs opponents averaging | 67.8 | 31.8 | 24-56 | 43.0% | 6-19 | 33.8% | 13-20 | 68.4% | 36 | 10 | 13 | 17 | 7 | 13 | 4 | Stats Against (Road Games) | 65.2 | 27.5 | 23-58 | 39.7% | 7-20 | 34.8% | 12-16 | 76.0% | 30 | 9 | 11 | 21 | 6 | 14 | 4 |
|
|
| |
|
|
All Games | 17-5 | +0.2 | 12-8 | 7-12 | 71.9 | 35.2 | 46.2% | 36.6 | 58.1 | 25.8 | 38.3% | 32.2 | Home Games | 12-1 | +0.8 | 7-4 | 4-7 | 75.5 | 37.7 | 48.2% | 38.8 | 54.0 | 24.7 | 34.8% | 32.2 | Last 5 Games | 4-1 | +3 | 3-2 | 1-4 | 66.4 | 30.0 | 47.8% | 33.4 | 59.0 | 23.8 | 38.5% | 32.2 | Conference Games | 7-3 | +2.4 | 6-4 | 2-8 | 64.3 | 31.0 | 46.2% | 33.3 | 58.9 | 25.4 | 39.2% | 32.9 |
|
| |
|
|
Team Stats (All Games) | 71.9 | 35.2 | 26-56 | 46.2% | 7-17 | 37.7% | 13-19 | 69.6% | 37 | 10 | 14 | 16 | 7 | 11 | 5 | vs opponents surrendering | 63.7 | 29.4 | 23-54 | 41.7% | 6-18 | 32.6% | 13-18 | 68.0% | 34 | 9 | 12 | 17 | 6 | 13 | 3 | Team Stats (Home Games) | 75.5 | 37.7 | 27-57 | 48.2% | 7-19 | 39.3% | 13-20 | 67.2% | 39 | 10 | 16 | 16 | 7 | 12 | 5 | Stats Against (All Games) | 58.1 | 25.8 | 21-54 | 38.3% | 6-19 | 32.4% | 11-16 | 67.7% | 32 | 8 | 10 | 17 | 4 | 13 | 3 | vs opponents averaging | 66.8 | 31.2 | 24-55 | 43.4% | 6-18 | 34.0% | 13-19 | 69.0% | 35 | 9 | 12 | 17 | 6 | 13 | 4 | Stats Against (Home Games) | 54.0 | 24.7 | 19-54 | 34.8% | 6-20 | 29.5% | 11-16 | 65.4% | 32 | 8 | 9 | 18 | 4 | 15 | 2 |
|
| Average power rating of opponents played: INDIANA 73.9, OHIO ST 75.7 |
| | |
|
|
12/28/2012 | JACKSONVILLE | 93-59 | W | -36 | L | 152 | P | 29-57 | 50.9% | 41 | 15 | 22-56 | 39.3% | 28 | 20 | 12/31/2012 | @ IOWA | 69-65 | W | -7 | L | 152.5 | U | 26-65 | 40.0% | 46 | 15 | 21-63 | 33.3% | 39 | 12 | 1/7/2013 | @ PENN ST | 74-51 | W | -16.5 | W | 138.5 | U | 22-42 | 52.4% | 33 | 17 | 19-60 | 31.7% | 35 | 19 | 1/12/2013 | MINNESOTA | 88-81 | W | -8 | L | 145.5 | O | 27-53 | 50.9% | 36 | 15 | 29-66 | 43.9% | 34 | 17 | 1/15/2013 | WISCONSIN | 59-64 | L | -10.5 | L | 133 | U | 20-54 | 37.0% | 37 | 11 | 23-51 | 45.1% | 28 | 8 | 1/20/2013 | @ NORTHWESTERN | 67-59 | W | -12.5 | L | 137.5 | U | 20-42 | 47.6% | 36 | 6 | 20-49 | 40.8% | 24 | 6 | 1/23/2013 | PENN ST | 72-49 | W | -24.5 | L | 138.5 | U | 20-44 | 45.5% | 39 | 18 | 17-51 | 33.3% | 32 | 18 | 1/27/2013 | MICHIGAN ST | 75-70 | W | -10 | L | 135.5 | O | 27-53 | 50.9% | 31 | 16 | 27-60 | 45.0% | 32 | 19 | 1/30/2013 | @ PURDUE | 97-60 | W | -7.5 | W | 136.5 | O | 33-67 | 49.3% | 39 | 8 | 22-55 | 40.0% | 29 | 18 | 2/2/2013 | MICHIGAN | 81-73 | W | -5.5 | W | 145 | O | 26-50 | 52.0% | 38 | 16 | 30-70 | 42.9% | 29 | 8 | 2/7/2013 | @ ILLINOIS | 72-74 | L | -7 | L | 149.5 | U | 25-50 | 50.0% | 30 | 14 | 26-58 | 44.8% | 26 | 10 | 2/10/2013 | @ OHIO ST | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/13/2013 | NEBRASKA | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/16/2013 | PURDUE | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/19/2013 | @ MICHIGAN ST | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/26/2013 | @ MINNESOTA | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 3/2/2013 | IOWA | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 3/5/2013 | OHIO ST | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
| |
|
|
12/22/2012 | KANSAS | 66-74 | L | -5.5 | L | 140.5 | U | 20-65 | 30.8% | 37 | 13 | 25-49 | 51.0% | 41 | 19 | 12/29/2012 | CHICAGO ST | 87-44 | W | -36.5 | W | 144 | U | 33-58 | 56.9% | 48 | 10 | 13-49 | 26.5% | 22 | 14 | 1/2/2013 | NEBRASKA | 70-44 | W | -21 | W | 129.5 | U | 29-59 | 49.2% | 43 | 9 | 17-56 | 30.4% | 32 | 14 | 1/5/2013 | @ ILLINOIS | 55-74 | L | -3 | L | 143 | U | 20-60 | 33.3% | 30 | 16 | 28-58 | 48.3% | 40 | 18 | 1/8/2013 | @ PURDUE | 74-64 | W | -8 | W | 134.5 | O | 31-55 | 56.4% | 38 | 13 | 26-67 | 38.8% | 32 | 6 | 1/13/2013 | MICHIGAN | 56-53 | W | -1.5 | W | 137.5 | U | 22-50 | 44.0% | 30 | 12 | 18-47 | 38.3% | 30 | 13 | 1/19/2013 | @ MICHIGAN ST | 56-59 | L | 1 | L | 132.5 | U | 19-47 | 40.4% | 25 | 14 | 22-50 | 44.0% | 34 | 13 | 1/22/2013 | IOWA | 72-63 | W | -10 | L | 137.5 | U | 27-52 | 51.9% | 34 | 17 | 22-62 | 35.5% | 40 | 14 | 1/26/2013 | @ PENN ST | 65-51 | W | -12.5 | W | 127.5 | U | 21-48 | 43.7% | 38 | 8 | 17-47 | 36.2% | 25 | 4 | 1/29/2013 | WISCONSIN | 58-49 | W | -6 | W | 119 | U | 23-45 | 51.1% | 32 | 10 | 19-52 | 36.5% | 26 | 9 | 2/2/2013 | @ NEBRASKA | 63-56 | W | -12.5 | L | 123 | U | 18-46 | 39.1% | 33 | 11 | 23-62 | 37.1% | 38 | 10 | 2/5/2013 | @ MICHIGAN | 74-76 | L | 7 | W | 131.5 | O | 30-58 | 51.7% | 30 | 11 | 28-60 | 46.7% | 32 | 11 | 2/10/2013 | INDIANA | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/14/2013 | NORTHWESTERN | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/17/2013 | @ WISCONSIN | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/20/2013 | MINNESOTA | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/24/2013 | MICHIGAN ST | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/28/2013 | @ NORTHWESTERN | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 3/5/2013 | @ INDIANA | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
| | | INDIANA: Say hello to the preseason No. 1 team in the nation. Tom Crean took a huge leap with last year's team, winning 15 more games than the previous season. And with four returning starters and the team's five leading scorers coming back, another giant leap is in the works. Cody Zeller (15.6 PPG, 6.6 RPG) was phenomenal in his freshman campaign, making 62.3% of his field goals and averaging more than a block and steal per game. He's joined in the frontcourt by Christian Watford (12.6 PPG, 5.8 RPG), while Jordan Hulls (11.7 PPG, 3.3 APG) and Victor Oladipo (10.8 PPG, 5.3 RPG 1.4 SPG) form a dangerous backcourt tandem. What makes this squad so threatening though is that Crean adds an elite crew of reinforcements. After missing all of last season with injuries, Maurice Creek is back and, when healthy, he might be the best pure scorer on the team'when he was healthy in his freshman year in 2009-2010, he averaged 16.4 PPG. And with top recruits Yogi Ferrell, Jeremy Hollowell and Hanner Mosquera-Perea, this is a team with both significant talent and depth. | | OHIO ST: Ohio State will be very different looking this year, without Jared Sullinger and William Buford, but Thad Matta's Buckeyes should still be able to hang with the best of the best in the nation. Deshaun Thomas (15.9 PPG, 5.4 RPG) is a threat both on the perimeter and in the post from the forward position and he should benefit from more opportunities. Point guard Aaron Craft (8.8 PPG, 4.6 APG, 2.5 SPG) may be the best pure point guard in the Big Ten, and there's no doubt he should be able to improve now as an upperclassman. The Buckeyes missed out on a number of top recruits, but this veteran-led squad should still be dangerous, especially if Lenzelle Smith Jr. (6.8 PPG, 4.6 RPG) takes the necessary steps forward in his junior campaign. |
| | Follow Rusty Miller on Twitter: http://www.twitter.com/rustymillerap
|
| Last Updated: 4/23/2024 4:45:57 PM EST. |
|
|
| |
|