|
|
KENTUCKY First Half Results TEXAS A&M |
|
| 60 | 30 Final 21 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| | |
605 | KENTUCKY | -3.5 | 606 | TEXAS A&M | 60 |
|
|
| | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All Games | 14-6 | -2 | 7-10 | 7-7 | 76.4 | 36.8 | 48.6% | 39.5 | 62.6 | 29.5 | 38.0% | 34.5 | Road Games | 4-4 | -0.6 | 3-5 | 4-4 | 68.0 | 33.5 | 46.3% | 37.9 | 66.5 | 31.5 | 38.3% | 38.7 | Last 5 Games | 4-1 | +1.4 | 2-3 | 2-2 | 73.4 | 35.2 | 48.9% | 41.0 | 64.2 | 29.8 | 37.5% | 34.0 | Conference Games | 5-2 | +2.4 | 2-5 | 2-3 | 71.1 | 34.6 | 47.5% | 38.9 | 66.0 | 29.9 | 38.8% | 35.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
Team Stats (All Games) | 76.4 | 36.8 | 28-57 | 48.6% | 6-16 | 35.6% | 15-23 | 64.3% | 39 | 11 | 15 | 16 | 7 | 13 | 8 | vs opponents surrendering | 65.4 | 30.5 | 23-55 | 41.9% | 6-18 | 32.5% | 13-19 | 68.2% | 34 | 10 | 13 | 18 | 7 | 14 | 4 | Team Stats (Road Games) | 68.0 | 33.5 | 25-54 | 46.3% | 6-15 | 36.9% | 12-21 | 60.0% | 38 | 9 | 13 | 18 | 5 | 13 | 8 | Stats Against (All Games) | 62.6 | 29.5 | 23-61 | 38.0% | 5-17 | 30.7% | 11-16 | 68.1% | 34 | 10 | 11 | 20 | 6 | 13 | 3 | vs opponents averaging | 68.6 | 31.5 | 24-56 | 43.9% | 6-18 | 34.3% | 13-20 | 66.8% | 36 | 10 | 14 | 18 | 7 | 14 | 4 | Stats Against (Road Games) | 66.5 | 31.5 | 25-65 | 38.3% | 5-17 | 27.8% | 12-17 | 68.3% | 39 | 12 | 12 | 18 | 7 | 9 | 4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
All Games | 13-7 | -3.4 | 7-6 | 1-9 | 62.8 | 29.7 | 44.8% | 34.0 | 58.7 | 27.0 | 40.7% | 30.6 | Home Games | 9-3 | -2.3 | 3-2 | 1-4 | 65.7 | 31.7 | 44.4% | 34.6 | 58.2 | 27.7 | 39.5% | 32.6 | Last 5 Games | 1-4 | -5.4 | 2-3 | 0-3 | 51.4 | 22.4 | 41.6% | 32.0 | 56.8 | 26.6 | 42.9% | 28.2 | Conference Games | 3-4 | -4.4 | 4-3 | 0-4 | 58.4 | 25.3 | 42.5% | 35.1 | 58.0 | 26.9 | 42.8% | 28.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
Team Stats (All Games) | 62.8 | 29.7 | 23-51 | 44.8% | 5-14 | 36.1% | 12-17 | 69.0% | 34 | 10 | 12 | 16 | 7 | 14 | 3 | vs opponents surrendering | 63.6 | 29.3 | 23-55 | 40.8% | 6-18 | 32.3% | 13-19 | 66.6% | 35 | 10 | 11 | 18 | 7 | 15 | 3 | Team Stats (Home Games) | 65.7 | 31.7 | 23-52 | 44.4% | 5-14 | 37.6% | 14-20 | 70.8% | 35 | 10 | 13 | 15 | 6 | 12 | 4 | Stats Against (All Games) | 58.7 | 27.0 | 21-52 | 40.7% | 6-19 | 32.5% | 10-15 | 69.0% | 31 | 9 | 12 | 17 | 7 | 14 | 4 | vs opponents averaging | 68.8 | 32.5 | 25-57 | 43.6% | 6-18 | 33.0% | 13-20 | 67.7% | 36 | 10 | 13 | 17 | 8 | 14 | 4 | Stats Against (Home Games) | 58.2 | 27.7 | 21-54 | 39.5% | 6-20 | 31.4% | 9-13 | 70.5% | 33 | 10 | 13 | 18 | 5 | 13 | 4 |
|
|
Average power rating of opponents played: KENTUCKY 74.8, TEXAS A&M 71.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
12/15/2012 | LIPSCOMB | 88-50 | W | | - | | - | 32-66 | 48.5% | 42 | 14 | 17-48 | 35.4% | 32 | 24 | 12/22/2012 | MARSHALL | 82-54 | W | -20 | W | 139 | U | 29-69 | 42.0% | 48 | 9 | 18-61 | 29.5% | 43 | 17 | 12/29/2012 | @ LOUISVILLE | 77-80 | L | 8 | W | 137.5 | O | 28-58 | 48.3% | 39 | 15 | 30-62 | 48.4% | 36 | 9 | 1/2/2013 | E MICHIGAN | 90-38 | W | -26.5 | W | 126.5 | O | 31-60 | 51.7% | 52 | 15 | 15-62 | 24.2% | 27 | 19 | 1/10/2013 | @ VANDERBILT | 60-58 | W | -12.5 | L | 128.5 | U | 24-53 | 45.3% | 37 | 16 | 23-70 | 32.9% | 42 | 13 | 1/12/2013 | TEXAS A&M | 71-83 | L | -15 | L | | - | 24-56 | 42.9% | 30 | 11 | 31-59 | 52.5% | 35 | 10 | 1/15/2013 | TENNESSEE | 75-65 | W | -13 | L | 135 | O | 25-51 | 49.0% | 34 | 13 | 25-54 | 46.3% | 30 | 13 | 1/19/2013 | @ AUBURN | 75-53 | W | -10 | W | 140 | U | 30-55 | 54.5% | 43 | 15 | 23-66 | 34.8% | 30 | 9 | 1/22/2013 | @ ALABAMA | 55-59 | L | -4 | L | 129.5 | U | 22-56 | 39.3% | 44 | 13 | 21-57 | 36.8% | 32 | 6 | 1/26/2013 | LSU | 75-70 | W | -15.5 | L | | - | 27-52 | 51.9% | 39 | 16 | 25-63 | 39.7% | 26 | 10 | 1/29/2013 | @ OLE MISS | 87-74 | W | 2.5 | W | 144 | O | 28-56 | 50.0% | 45 | 9 | 28-85 | 32.9% | 52 | 7 | 2/2/2013 | @ TEXAS A&M | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/5/2013 | S CAROLINA | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/9/2013 | AUBURN | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/12/2013 | @ FLORIDA | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/16/2013 | @ TENNESSEE | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/20/2013 | VANDERBILT | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/23/2013 | MISSOURI | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
12/15/2012 | *OKLAHOMA | 54-64 | L | 3.5 | L | 130.5 | U | 20-50 | 40.0% | 35 | 19 | 21-54 | 38.9% | 31 | 11 | 12/18/2012 | TEXAS A&M CC | 66-54 | W | | - | | - | 27-51 | 52.9% | 35 | 15 | 19-58 | 32.8% | 34 | 10 | 12/22/2012 | SOUTHERN U | 51-53 | L | | - | | - | 22-46 | 47.8% | 27 | 13 | 20-53 | 37.7% | 31 | 12 | 12/29/2012 | ARMY | 61-55 | W | | - | | - | 19-56 | 33.9% | 42 | 12 | 22-55 | 40.0% | 36 | 16 | 1/3/2013 | HOUSTN BAPTIST | 67-59 | W | | - | | - | 24-50 | 48.0% | 23 | 9 | 23-47 | 48.9% | 33 | 23 | 1/9/2013 | ARKANSAS | 69-51 | W | -1.5 | W | 137.5 | U | 21-58 | 36.2% | 51 | 10 | 22-52 | 42.3% | 27 | 12 | 1/12/2013 | @ KENTUCKY | 83-71 | W | 15 | W | | - | 31-59 | 52.5% | 35 | 10 | 24-56 | 42.9% | 30 | 11 | 1/17/2013 | FLORIDA | 47-68 | L | 10.5 | L | 122 | U | 17-50 | 34.0% | 33 | 16 | 25-50 | 50.0% | 28 | 11 | 1/19/2013 | @ ALABAMA | 49-50 | L | 8 | W | 118.5 | U | 20-42 | 47.6% | 27 | 15 | 18-41 | 43.9% | 25 | 16 | 1/23/2013 | @ LSU | 54-58 | L | 1 | L | | - | 20-44 | 45.5% | 38 | 24 | 24-63 | 38.1% | 32 | 11 | 1/26/2013 | GEORGIA | 52-59 | L | -7.5 | L | 113 | U | 17-49 | 34.7% | 31 | 11 | 19-44 | 43.2% | 32 | 12 | 1/30/2013 | @ MISSISSIPPI ST | 55-49 | W | -3.5 | W | | - | 25-53 | 47.2% | 31 | 22 | 16-40 | 40.0% | 24 | 24 | 2/2/2013 | KENTUCKY | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/7/2013 | MISSOURI | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/9/2013 | @ GEORGIA | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/13/2013 | OLE MISS | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/16/2013 | @ VANDERBILT | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/20/2013 | @ AUBURN | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/23/2013 | TENNESSEE | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
|
| KENTUCKY: Finally, John Calipari has a national championship. The question is, after sending seemingly his entire team to the NBA, can he repeat? If he can duplicate last year's formula of turning a top recruiting class into a cohesive unit, the answer will be yes. Six-foot-10 center Nerlens Noel highlights the class as the No. 1 recruit in the nation, and he will be on watch lists for defensive player of the year honors from day one with his shot-blocking prowess. The best scorers in the class, though, may be on the wing. At 6-foot-7, small forward Alex Poythress often looks unguardable, while 6-foot-5 shooting guard Archie Goodwin can score from anywhere on the floor with a deft 3-point shot and an ability to attack the lane. Seven-foot frosh Willie Cauley-Stein will join Noel in the frontcourt along with Kyle Wiltjer (5.0 PPG in 11.6 MPG, 43% 3-pt FG), who was a top recruit in the previous class but got lost behind last year's talent. If N.C. State transfer Ryan Harrow (9.3 PPG, 3.3 APG) can step up and effectively run the point in his sophomore season, this team will be near impossible to stop. | | TEXAS A&M: Like Frank Haith at Missouri, this is Billy Kennedy's second year with his team and first in the SEC. But he will have a much more difficult job contending after going 14-18 last year and 4-14 in the Big 12. JUCO transfer Fabyon Harris will be tested as he makes a big leap to major conference competition while G Elston Turner (13.8 PPG, 3.6 RPG) and F Ray Turner (9.1 PPG, 5.5 RPG) will be reliable for a veteran presence and production. With two top backcourt recruits in J'Mychal Reese and Alex Caruso, this team has hope for the future, but they will need time to develop into true contenders. |
|
|
|
|
Last Updated: 5/21/2024 2:10:33 PM EST. |
|
|