|
|
WAKE FOREST GEORGIA TECH |
|
|
| 62 Final 82 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| | |
569 | WAKE FOREST | | | 570 | GEORGIA TECH | -6 | -6 |
|
|
| | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All Games | 10-8 | +2.4 | 11-4 | 2-2 | 68.4 | 31.7 | 43.9% | 33.6 | 68.7 | 33.2 | 43.7% | 35.1 | Road Games | 2-6 | -3 | 6-2 | 1-2 | 66.0 | 30.2 | 40.3% | 36.1 | 72.5 | 36.0 | 45.3% | 32.5 | Last 5 Games | 3-2 | +3.6 | 4-1 | 0-1 | 65.0 | 32.0 | 40.3% | 36.0 | 66.8 | 33.4 | 43.6% | 38.0 | Conference Games | 3-3 | +3.6 | 5-1 | 0-2 | 64.5 | 31.7 | 40.4% | 37.2 | 69.0 | 34.7 | 44.1% | 37.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
Team Stats (All Games) | 68.4 | 31.7 | 23-53 | 43.9% | 5-15 | 36.5% | 16-24 | 67.1% | 34 | 9 | 11 | 18 | 7 | 14 | 4 | vs opponents surrendering | 65.6 | 30 | 23-56 | 41.9% | 6-18 | 33.0% | 13-19 | 68.7% | 34 | 10 | 12 | 18 | 6 | 14 | 3 | Team Stats (Road Games) | 66.0 | 30.2 | 22-55 | 40.3% | 5-13 | 40.4% | 16-24 | 68.0% | 36 | 11 | 10 | 19 | 6 | 15 | 2 | Stats Against (All Games) | 68.7 | 33.2 | 25-57 | 43.7% | 6-17 | 33.2% | 13-20 | 67.7% | 35 | 10 | 13 | 20 | 7 | 14 | 4 | vs opponents averaging | 69.4 | 32.1 | 25-55 | 44.4% | 6-18 | 34.7% | 14-20 | 69.9% | 35 | 9 | 13 | 17 | 7 | 13 | 4 | Stats Against (Road Games) | 72.5 | 36.0 | 25-56 | 45.3% | 8-20 | 38.9% | 14-19 | 72.1% | 32 | 8 | 15 | 21 | 6 | 12 | 4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
All Games | 10-7 | -5.8 | 6-9 | 4-3 | 64.8 | 31.8 | 41.4% | 38.8 | 59.4 | 27.7 | 37.7% | 35.8 | Home Games | 8-2 | -4.5 | 4-4 | 1-0 | 67.4 | 32.5 | 43.6% | 39.4 | 53.9 | 25.2 | 35.2% | 33.9 | Last 5 Games | 0-5 | -8.5 | 0-5 | 2-0 | 60.8 | 29.2 | 36.1% | 38.2 | 73.4 | 31.8 | 43.2% | 42.2 | Conference Games | 0-5 | -8.5 | 0-5 | 2-0 | 60.8 | 29.2 | 36.1% | 38.2 | 73.4 | 31.8 | 43.2% | 42.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
Team Stats (All Games) | 64.8 | 31.8 | 24-59 | 41.4% | 5-18 | 29.6% | 11-17 | 64.5% | 39 | 11 | 13 | 17 | 6 | 13 | 4 | vs opponents surrendering | 67.7 | 31.4 | 24-57 | 42.3% | 7-19 | 34.0% | 13-19 | 68.9% | 35 | 10 | 13 | 18 | 7 | 13 | 3 | Team Stats (Home Games) | 67.4 | 32.5 | 25-57 | 43.6% | 6-18 | 31.8% | 12-19 | 62.0% | 39 | 11 | 15 | 15 | 6 | 11 | 5 | Stats Against (All Games) | 59.4 | 27.7 | 21-55 | 37.7% | 6-19 | 31.2% | 12-18 | 64.8% | 36 | 9 | 12 | 16 | 6 | 14 | 4 | vs opponents averaging | 68.3 | 31.5 | 24-56 | 43.6% | 6-18 | 34.3% | 14-20 | 68.9% | 36 | 10 | 13 | 17 | 6 | 14 | 4 | Stats Against (Home Games) | 53.9 | 25.2 | 19-55 | 35.2% | 4-17 | 25.7% | 11-17 | 65.1% | 34 | 9 | 10 | 17 | 5 | 13 | 3 |
|
|
Average power rating of opponents played: WAKE FOREST 74.2, GEORGIA TECH 72.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
12/8/2012 | SETON HALL | 67-71 | L | 3 | L | | - | 23-52 | 44.2% | 23 | 18 | 28-57 | 49.1% | 44 | 23 | 12/18/2012 | FURMAN | 79-55 | W | -11.5 | W | | - | 28-52 | 53.8% | 36 | 10 | 19-52 | 36.5% | 27 | 13 | 12/22/2012 | @ UNC-GREENSBORO | 84-70 | W | 1 | W | | - | 27-51 | 52.9% | 32 | 16 | 25-59 | 42.4% | 30 | 16 | 1/2/2013 | XAVIER | 66-59 | W | 1.5 | W | | - | 21-49 | 42.9% | 32 | 17 | 21-49 | 42.9% | 36 | 20 | 1/5/2013 | @ DUKE | 62-80 | L | 23 | W | 142.5 | U | 23-56 | 41.1% | 43 | 19 | 29-63 | 46.0% | 35 | 6 | 1/9/2013 | VIRGINIA | 55-52 | W | 5 | W | | - | 18-44 | 40.9% | 24 | 12 | 20-55 | 36.4% | 40 | 17 | 1/12/2013 | BOSTON COLLEGE | 75-72 | W | -2 | W | | - | 29-57 | 50.9% | 31 | 12 | 20-48 | 41.7% | 32 | 17 | 1/15/2013 | @ CLEMSON | 44-60 | L | 7 | L | 127.5 | U | 15-61 | 24.6% | 42 | 11 | 22-49 | 44.9% | 36 | 11 | 1/19/2013 | @ VIRGINIA TECH | 65-66 | L | 3 | W | | - | 25-68 | 36.8% | 43 | 8 | 27-60 | 45.0% | 38 | 7 | 1/22/2013 | NC STATE | 86-84 | W | 8 | W | | - | 31-63 | 49.2% | 40 | 12 | 34-70 | 48.6% | 44 | 13 | 1/26/2013 | @ GEORGIA TECH | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1/30/2013 | DUKE | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/2/2013 | @ MARYLAND | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/5/2013 | @ N CAROLINA | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/9/2013 | FLORIDA ST | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/13/2013 | @ BOSTON COLLEGE | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/16/2013 | GEORGIA TECH | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
12/8/2012 | UNC-WILMINGTON | 73-66 | W | -14 | L | | - | 27-51 | 52.9% | 32 | 11 | 22-56 | 39.3% | 34 | 13 | 12/17/2012 | ALABAMA ST | 75-41 | W | | - | | - | 29-59 | 49.2% | 51 | 19 | 15-60 | 25.0% | 30 | 15 | 12/22/2012 | THE CITADEL | 73-41 | W | -22.5 | W | | - | 31-71 | 43.7% | 51 | 14 | 15-59 | 25.4% | 33 | 17 | 12/29/2012 | FORDHAM | 73-48 | W | -13.5 | W | | - | 29-58 | 50.0% | 38 | 8 | 16-57 | 28.1% | 38 | 14 | 1/2/2013 | UT-CHATTANOOGA | 74-58 | W | -16.5 | L | | - | 27-57 | 47.4% | 42 | 13 | 21-50 | 42.0% | 25 | 11 | 1/5/2013 | MIAMI | 49-62 | L | 2 | L | | - | 17-52 | 32.7% | 29 | 12 | 22-53 | 41.5% | 40 | 13 | 1/9/2013 | @ NC STATE | 70-83 | L | 9 | L | | - | 27-73 | 37.0% | 37 | 7 | 28-55 | 50.9% | 43 | 13 | 1/12/2013 | VIRGINIA TECH | 65-70 | L | -10 | L | | - | 22-61 | 36.1% | 32 | 9 | 24-58 | 41.4% | 43 | 12 | 1/17/2013 | @ DUKE | 57-73 | L | 14.5 | L | 128 | O | 22-58 | 37.9% | 43 | 21 | 26-65 | 40.0% | 40 | 13 | 1/23/2013 | @ N CAROLINA | 63-79 | L | 11 | L | 136.5 | O | 27-75 | 36.0% | 50 | 19 | 30-70 | 42.9% | 45 | 14 | 1/26/2013 | WAKE FOREST | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1/29/2013 | @ CLEMSON | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/3/2013 | VIRGINIA | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/5/2013 | FLORIDA ST | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/9/2013 | @ VIRGINIA TECH | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/14/2013 | CLEMSON | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/16/2013 | @ WAKE FOREST | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
|
| WAKE FOREST: After going 4-12 in the ACC last year, the Demon Deacons return both of their leading scorers from last year's campaign in C.J. Harris (16.7 PPG) and Travis McKie (16.1 PPG, 7.0 RPG). Cody Miller-McIntyre could be a valuable asset as a freshman point guard, while sophomore guard Chase Fischer (6.3 PPG) will be expected to fill a much larger role in his second season. | | GEORGIA TECH: Last year's leading scorer Glen Rice Jr.'also the team's lone double-digit scorer'is gone after getting kicked off the team late last year, but head coach Brian Gregory brings back a heady crew of veterans from a team that averaged a putrid 60.2 points per game last season. Mfon Udofia (9.9 PPG, 2.8 APG) will have a bigger burden on him, but the hope for this squad rests with its underclassmen. After seeing limited action last year, Julian Royal could emerge as a threat at forward, while 6-foot-8 power forward Robert Carter is one of the conference's top recruits. Swingman Marcus Hunt should also be able to find important minutes as a talented freshman on this squad that should be able to exceed low expectations following an abysmal 2011-2012 campaign (4-12 record in ACC). |
|
|
|
|
Last Updated: 3/29/2024 10:47:00 AM EST. |
|
|