|
|
TEXAS A&M ALABAMA |
|
| 118.5 | 49 Final 50 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| | |
601 | TEXAS A&M | 120 | 120 | 602 | ALABAMA | -6.5 | -7.5 |
|
|
| | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All Games | 12-4 | +1 | 5-4 | 1-7 | 65.4 | 31.3 | 45.1% | 34.6 | 59.9 | 27.6 | 40.6% | 31.2 | Road Games | 3-2 | -0.1 | 2-3 | 0-4 | 62.2 | 28.8 | 44.7% | 34.0 | 63.6 | 27.2 | 44.0% | 28.2 | Last 5 Games | 4-1 | 0 | 2-1 | 0-2 | 65.4 | 29.2 | 41.0% | 36.8 | 60.8 | 29.6 | 44.6% | 30.8 | Conference Games | 2-1 | 0 | 2-1 | 0-2 | 66.3 | 27.7 | 41.3% | 39.7 | 63.3 | 30.0 | 44.9% | 28.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
Team Stats (All Games) | 65.4 | 31.3 | 24-52 | 45.1% | 5-14 | 38.5% | 13-19 | 69.9% | 35 | 10 | 13 | 16 | 6 | 13 | 3 | vs opponents surrendering | 63.4 | 29.4 | 23-55 | 40.9% | 5-17 | 32.1% | 13-19 | 66.7% | 35 | 9 | 11 | 18 | 6 | 15 | 3 | Team Stats (Road Games) | 62.2 | 28.8 | 24-53 | 44.7% | 5-13 | 40.6% | 10-16 | 62.0% | 34 | 10 | 11 | 18 | 7 | 14 | 2 | Stats Against (All Games) | 59.9 | 27.6 | 22-53 | 40.6% | 6-19 | 31.8% | 10-15 | 70.9% | 31 | 9 | 13 | 17 | 6 | 13 | 4 | vs opponents averaging | 70.2 | 33.5 | 25-58 | 43.8% | 6-18 | 32.9% | 14-20 | 68.4% | 37 | 10 | 13 | 17 | 7 | 13 | 4 | Stats Against (Road Games) | 63.6 | 27.2 | 22-50 | 44.0% | 6-17 | 35.6% | 14-19 | 72.6% | 28 | 7 | 12 | 15 | 6 | 12 | 5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
All Games | 10-6 | -4 | 5-7 | 3-5 | 66.3 | 30.7 | 45.2% | 32.6 | 59.7 | 28.2 | 40.4% | 32.7 | Home Games | 6-3 | -5 | 1-4 | 2-1 | 66.9 | 30.3 | 43.6% | 32.8 | 57.7 | 26.6 | 39.0% | 35.2 | Last 5 Games | 3-2 | -2 | 2-3 | 2-1 | 65.2 | 28.8 | 46.4% | 32.0 | 58.0 | 26.6 | 40.5% | 31.4 | Conference Games | 2-1 | +1 | 1-2 | 2-0 | 70.3 | 30.0 | 46.7% | 30.7 | 64.0 | 30.0 | 47.1% | 30.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
Team Stats (All Games) | 66.3 | 30.7 | 24-53 | 45.2% | 6-17 | 35.6% | 13-18 | 70.9% | 33 | 9 | 12 | 17 | 8 | 13 | 5 | vs opponents surrendering | 65.8 | 30.4 | 24-56 | 42.3% | 6-18 | 34.1% | 12-18 | 67.8% | 34 | 9 | 13 | 18 | 7 | 14 | 4 | Team Stats (Home Games) | 66.9 | 30.3 | 24-54 | 43.6% | 6-18 | 32.7% | 14-19 | 72.2% | 33 | 9 | 13 | 16 | 9 | 11 | 6 | Stats Against (All Games) | 59.7 | 28.2 | 21-53 | 40.4% | 5-17 | 31.9% | 12-17 | 70.1% | 33 | 9 | 10 | 16 | 6 | 15 | 3 | vs opponents averaging | 68.7 | 32.6 | 24-57 | 42.7% | 6-18 | 33.0% | 14-20 | 69.2% | 37 | 11 | 13 | 17 | 7 | 14 | 4 | Stats Against (Home Games) | 57.7 | 26.6 | 21-54 | 39.0% | 6-17 | 31.8% | 10-15 | 67.9% | 35 | 10 | 9 | 15 | 4 | 16 | 3 |
|
|
Average power rating of opponents played: TEXAS A&M 72.2, ALABAMA 73.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
12/1/2012 | @ HOUSTON | 70-59 | W | -4.5 | W | 139.5 | U | 29-60 | 48.3% | 40 | 10 | 20-49 | 40.8% | 26 | 13 | 12/5/2012 | SF AUSTIN ST | 62-54 | W | | - | | - | 20-40 | 50.0% | 30 | 14 | 23-58 | 39.7% | 32 | 13 | 12/15/2012 | *OKLAHOMA | 54-64 | L | 3.5 | L | 130.5 | U | 20-50 | 40.0% | 35 | 19 | 21-54 | 38.9% | 31 | 11 | 12/18/2012 | TEXAS A&M CC | 66-54 | W | | - | | - | 27-51 | 52.9% | 35 | 15 | 19-58 | 32.8% | 34 | 10 | 12/22/2012 | SOUTHERN U | 51-53 | L | | - | | - | 22-46 | 47.8% | 27 | 13 | 20-53 | 37.7% | 31 | 12 | 12/29/2012 | ARMY | 61-55 | W | | - | | - | 19-56 | 33.9% | 42 | 12 | 22-55 | 40.0% | 36 | 16 | 1/3/2013 | HOUSTN BAPTIST | 67-59 | W | | - | | - | 24-50 | 48.0% | 23 | 9 | 23-47 | 48.9% | 33 | 23 | 1/9/2013 | ARKANSAS | 69-51 | W | -1.5 | W | 137.5 | U | 21-58 | 36.2% | 51 | 10 | 22-52 | 42.3% | 27 | 12 | 1/12/2013 | @ KENTUCKY | 83-71 | W | 15 | W | | - | 31-59 | 52.5% | 35 | 10 | 24-56 | 42.9% | 30 | 11 | 1/17/2013 | FLORIDA | 47-68 | L | 10.5 | L | 122 | U | 17-50 | 34.0% | 33 | 16 | 25-50 | 50.0% | 28 | 11 | 1/19/2013 | @ ALABAMA | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1/23/2013 | @ LSU | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1/26/2013 | GEORGIA | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1/30/2013 | @ MISSISSIPPI ST | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/2/2013 | KENTUCKY | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/7/2013 | MISSOURI | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/9/2013 | @ GEORGIA | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
12/1/2012 | @ CINCINNATI | 56-58 | L | 7.5 | W | 130 | U | 25-57 | 43.9% | 37 | 16 | 23-59 | 39.0% | 32 | 11 | 12/5/2012 | DAYTON | 76-81 | L | -8.5 | L | | - | 20-54 | 37.0% | 28 | 8 | 26-53 | 49.1% | 37 | 14 | 12/15/2012 | @ VA COMMONWEALTH | 54-73 | L | 6.5 | L | 129 | U | 16-41 | 39.0% | 28 | 18 | 24-51 | 47.1% | 31 | 11 | 12/19/2012 | @ TEXAS TECH | 66-62 | W | -8.5 | L | | - | 23-45 | 51.1% | 33 | 20 | 22-58 | 37.9% | 28 | 14 | 12/22/2012 | MERCER | 59-66 | L | | - | | - | 21-53 | 39.6% | 33 | 9 | 22-54 | 40.7% | 35 | 11 | 12/30/2012 | TULANE | 50-53 | L | -8.5 | L | 123 | U | 19-48 | 39.6% | 30 | 13 | 18-50 | 36.0% | 34 | 13 | 1/5/2013 | OAKLAND | 65-45 | W | -10.5 | W | | - | 25-48 | 52.1% | 38 | 14 | 16-59 | 27.1% | 33 | 13 | 1/8/2013 | @ MISSOURI | 68-84 | L | 9.5 | L | 133 | O | 24-55 | 43.6% | 32 | 16 | 30-53 | 56.6% | 27 | 10 | 1/12/2013 | TENNESSEE | 68-65 | W | -6.5 | L | 120.5 | O | 23-54 | 42.6% | 25 | 7 | 26-55 | 47.3% | 40 | 16 | 1/16/2013 | @ MISSISSIPPI ST | 75-43 | W | -4 | W | | - | 31-58 | 53.4% | 35 | 12 | 16-45 | 35.6% | 23 | 21 | 1/19/2013 | TEXAS A&M | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1/22/2013 | KENTUCKY | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1/26/2013 | @ TENNESSEE | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1/31/2013 | ARKANSAS | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/2/2013 | @ VANDERBILT | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/6/2013 | @ AUBURN | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/9/2013 | LSU | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
|
| TEXAS A&M: Like Frank Haith at Missouri, this is Billy Kennedy's second year with his team and first in the SEC. But he will have a much more difficult job contending after going 14-18 last year and 4-14 in the Big 12. JUCO transfer Fabyon Harris will be tested as he makes a big leap to major conference competition while G Elston Turner (13.8 PPG, 3.6 RPG) and F Ray Turner (9.1 PPG, 5.5 RPG) will be reliable for a veteran presence and production. With two top backcourt recruits in J'Mychal Reese and Alex Caruso, this team has hope for the future, but they will need time to develop into true contenders. | | ALABAMA: The Crimson Tide made waves when they secured one of the nation's top recruits in 6-foot-7 Devonta Pollard who from the season's first game will be a threat on the open floor. Minutes won't be easy to come by on this team, however, with four starters returning. But Pollard's scoring presence will be critical on a team that will sorely miss JaMychal Green and Tony Mitchell's combined 27.1 PPG,14.4 RPG and 2.9 BPG from last season. The team still features Trevor Releford (12.0 PPG), however, who is not the best shooter (27% 3-pt FG). He is, however, a menace defensively with 2.0 SPG last year. He and senior Andrew Steele (6.6 PPG, 3.9 RPG, 2.7 APG) will form a solid backcourt, but the question is who will step up on the block. They possess two 7-footers in Carl Engstrom and Moussa Gueye, but neither has proven to be a force on the college level. |
|
|
|
|
Last Updated: 4/18/2024 11:51:00 PM EST. |
|
|